Reasoning:
1. pandoc is not in critpath so will not itself be tested
2. pandoc is widely used and actively maintained
3. package is noarch
4. package has minimal deps
Hopefully this will work for everything. For some reason, the
"use python3-blivet for pykickstart tests" fails mysteriously
sometimes, see e.g.
https://openqa.stg.fedoraproject.org/tests/2672282
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
See e.g. https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1829593
sometimes we see the app UI briefly before the access prompt
appears. Handle that case by waiting a few seconds and doing
the match again.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
Somehow, the dummy package being python3-kickstart causes the
graphical update tests (only) to fail for pykickstart updates
(that's the source package of python3-kickstart). The CLI and
Cockpit update tests are fine with this and pass.
To workaround this, use python3-blivet as the dummy package for
the graphical update tests when testing an update that contains
python3-kickstart. I've updated the test repo to contain both
dummy packages.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
So...there's an ffmpeg update:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-a5e10b188a
which went stable. It includes new sonames of all the ffmpeg
libs. It also pulls in a thing called oneVPL, which has a bug
that breaks ostree composes.
There's a big kf5 update:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-b086a98f78
which contains kf5-kfilemetadata, which is built against ffmpeg.
Neal made sure that update's build of it was built against the
new ffmpeg and submitted both for stable at once - but the tests
on the kf5 update failed because they weren't run against the
new ffmpeg as it wasn't yet stable, and the kf5 update was
ejected from the push because of the failed tests.
So now we have the ffmpeg update stable but not the
kf5-kfilemetadata rebuild for it, which will break KDE stuff,
and the oneVPL issue means ostree composes will all fail.
This adds the ffmpeg update as a workaround so we can re-run the
tests for the kf5 update and get them to pass so we can push it
stable. It also adds the oneVPL update as a workaround so ostree
compose tests don't start failing.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
...for the GNOME icon theme change. This needle isn't hit very
often so it didn't get updated with the others.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
They've dropped the IRC section from this page. We don't really
need three match areas, just the two is sufficient to identify
it.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
This test hasn't run for a long time due to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2151607 , now we got
it working again, almost all the needles need updating.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
This reverts commit 2fecb70468.
Sadly, clicking on the right menu entry...doesn't work. Let's
try going back to the old way, but add an 'enter' press once
the entry we want is selected.
Move the xauth disablement and the disabling of studies into
_setup_browser, instead of repeating it in a couple of other
places (but *not* doing it in the zezere test, where we should
be doing it). Drop some explicit package installs that should
no longer be needed as Firefox and/or X.org now depend on those
things. Install the current default fonts (Noto), not the old
ones (DejaVu).
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
There's a weird issue with the rpmostree_rebase test for this
update:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-f6afa6f9e5#comment-2919613
it doesn't reproduce locally (I can type fine after doing the
same things the test does up to the rollback) and I can't think
of any possible cause, and I don't want to hold the update up.
So we're just gonna work around it and hope this doesn't start
happening to all F38 update tests after this goes stable. If it
does, we'll have to do the workaround for all of them.
The workaround is just to rollback and reboot 'blindly', instead
of checking the rollback command works. The drawback is that if
the rollback command fails we'll wait 7.5 minutes before giving
up on it, and it'll be a bit less clear exactly what happened.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
If the cursor is visible in the middle of the screen, this would
not match. So move the match area a bit
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
Just using a scratch build for now as my fix hasn't been reviewed
and may have dumb mistakes in it, but it does seem to fix the
openQA test at least.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
Plasma 5.27.1 is going all the way back to F36 (in
FEDORA-2023-d7dcc38129), so we'll have a welcome tour on both
desktops we actually test on, on all supported releases. So we
can just drop the desktop conditional entirely here now.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
A different way to address the same problem as 56936df7 . Let's
just *remove* the repo management packages after we're done
creating the repos. dnf will automatically remove the unused
dependencies too. This fixes the python-cryptography case at
least - I tested.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
There's this awkward path for the live image install tests on
updates. We run the 'are the correct versions of all the packages
installed' check on these tests to ensure the right versions
actually made it onto the live image. So we don't run
`dnf -y update` at the end of repo_setup_updates on that path,
because if we did that, even if the packages on the live image
were old, we'd update them there and hide the problem.
However, this causes a bit of an ordering issue, because in
order to set up the advisory repo, we need to install a few
packages. What if the update under test includes one of those
packages, or a dependency that wasn't already installed? In
that case, we wind up with the older stable version of the
package (because obviously we can't install the newer version
from the advisory repo *before we've set up the advisory repo*),
don't update it later, and so the 'correct version' check at
the end of the test fails. See:
https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1778707 for a case of
this happening with a python-cryptography update.
Up till now I was trying to handle this by just updating the
specific packages we install, but that doesn't account for
*dependencies* of them. I looked down the path of trying to
generate a list of all those dependencies and update all of
them but it looks a bit mad. So instead let's try this. On that
specific path, we'll generate the "all installed packages" list
*before* we run repo_setup, so it just doesn't include anything
that gets installed during repo_setup. The implementation is a
bit icky but not too horrible.
We *could* just *always* generate the all installed packages
list earlier, but then that would mean we *wouldn't* catch dep
issues in this kind of package on the other test paths, whereas
currently we do. I don't want to lose that.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
5.27.1 is going to F37, and adds it. In the short term this
will waste a minute and a half and cause soft fails on all other
F37 updates until the update that adds this goes stable, but
I don't really feel like working around this, let's just live
with it till the update goes stable.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
OK, neither 'input' nor 'keyboard' actually gives us the Keyboard
pane, they both give results for uninstalled apps from Software
:(. 'hotkey' (which is one of the keywords in the .desktop file)
does seem to work, for now at least, let's try that.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
Contacts now has two burger menus, which is awkward. We need
specific needles to identify each, we can't rely on the generic
needle any more as it won't always open the right menu. We also
need to still work with the old UI for the flatpak.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
This is to handle a temporary condition where the screen isn't
present on the KDE base disk images for F38 or F39 yet, so they
only see it on the second boot on update tests, but don't handle
it because we marked it as already 'done'.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
