It's not in the images any more. As aleasto pointed out, we're
actually being sent to Discover to install it, and matching on
*that* screen, which isn't what we intend.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
Per the upstream issue, this change was intentional (as a 'least
worst' option), so we shouldn't mark the needle as workaround.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
Add a link to the issue report for blivet-gui using an odd icon
for btrfs volumes, now I finally filed it.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
For a while, it seems like the test was often hitting a message
where the field we match on isn't actually visible because a lot
of other fields are shown first. So, add a variant needle that
matches on a different field, the message ID.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
https://github.com/storaged-project/udisks/issues/1102 - udisks2
seems to have a bug where it leaves filesystems mounted at a
"temporary" mount point after creating them. We need to work
around this when it happens or else we'll frequently get test
failures.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
These hit low-90% matches when run on the F38 respins for some
reason, just add another variant...
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
In https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1938847 , we wound up
doing an LVM thinp install when we meant to do a regular LVM
install, because LVM was already highlighted (for some reason)
in the scheme list, and the "LVM" needle is narrow enough that
it matched on the start of "LVM Thin Provisioning".
To avoid this, we make the match area in the existing needle
wider so it can't match on "LVM Thin Provisioning", and add an
alternate needle for LVM when it's highlighted.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
I don't know exactly why this sometimes shows up highlighted and
sometimes unhighlighted, but hey, it's not wrong either way, so
we just handle it.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
We never hit this path without a system menu button any more,
due to changes in KDE over time. It hasn't been hit for two years.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
Now both GNOME and KDE do offline updates on all supported
releases, we never see an 'update done' screen any more. This
branch is left over from when the KDE offline update branch was
still conditional on release number.
If we ever implement this test on a desktop that doesn't do
offline updates, we can put this back easily enough.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
There's no need to do all this 'check whether it's selected and
click it if not' stuff (for three different mount points). Just
always click it. If it's already selected, clicking it again
doesn't hurt (one of these stanzas even clicks it *even if it's
selected*!)
If we need to cover both cases, we just need two needles with
the same tag, we don't need separate code paths. In each case,
though, we actually haven't matched one of the needles for ages
(the most recent was part_boot_selected, but now we're using
GPT by default, we won't hit that any more as it'll be the BIOS
boot partition that's selected by default), so delete the needles
we aren't matching any more. If we *do* hit any case where we
need to handle the 'other' state, we can just add the alternative
needle with the same tag.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
This has not been hit for a year (on stg; three years on prod).
I *think* it would only be hit if we ran the test on an Everything
image, but as the test is now specifically associated with the
Server install DVD, that doesn't seem likely to happen.
If we somehow *do* hit ext4 pre-selected again, this can still
be handled simply by adding an alternate
anaconda_blivet_part_fs_ext4 needle which matches on ext4 already
being selected; that avoids the need to keep an alternate code
path around.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
This branch is very fragile, because the test won't fail if we
miss the match on the security needle. So in practice, we are
never going to notice when the needle goes stale, and we'll just
wind up never triggering this branch and always going down the
other path. That's the current situation: the security_install
needle last matched more than a year ago at least. Let's just
admit the truth here and drop the branch entirely.
Also update the cockpit_updates_restart_ignore needle. This is
in a similar case - we don't really notice when it goes stale,
as the test completes, it just takes a bit longer - but since
this one is quite easy to find, let's just update it instead of
dropping it.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
This was resolved upstream and we're no longer hitting this bug
in tests on F38, Rawhide or even F37 respins, so we should no
longer need this workaround.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
It looks like neither of these has been a problem for some time.
The notification needle has not matched for a year. The akonadi
needle doesn't exist any more - it was cleaned up in the 2021
needle cleanup, meaning it hadn't matched for weeks in 2021. I
checked the last several months of KDE app start/stop tests and
don't see any case where there was a stray notification that we
missed. So I think we can just ditch this whole mechanism for
now; if we have problems with these notifications again in future
we can put it back.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
The last one of these was deleted during the last needle cleanup,
but we do actually still occasionally hit the dialog, e.g. in
https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1837435/modules/kontakt/steps/3
so let's add an updated version of the needle.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
I think the shade of grey on the background changed. We'll
probably need more needle updates for the compose tests (the
desktop_login test and different languages), but this covers the
update tests.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
In today's Rawhide, for some reason, after we delete the first
file, the second file we want to delete is highlighted.
Previously the other file in the directory was highlighted. No
biggie, just handle both cases.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
There's a difference in the Info page and we get every font
twice on Silverblue because they're present in two locations.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
