The ISO or HDD image won't be attached to the post-upgrade
tests, and these are not tests of the image anyway, they're
tests of the compose.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
With the new 2G max EFI system partition size, we were trying to
stuff 12G of Fedora into a 10G disk. That wasn't going to work.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
I don't think we need an alternative needle for ppc - the
current 'boot_inactive' needle should work fine on ppc. Let's
just always use that.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
As of yesterday's Rawhide, the modular repos are not installed by
default, so of course all the modular tests fail. So, install
the repos before running the tests.
This isn't conditionalized on release version as I don't think
we ever run this test on anything other than Rawhide and
Branched.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
Drop the e2fsprogs scratch build workaround we were using for
https://github.com/fedora-silverblue/issue-tracker/issues/470 -
with the new 'use a custom ref and rebase to the official ref'
thing I implemented for update ostree tests, it shouldn't be
necessary any longer.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
This checks we actually deployed the 'fedora-openqa' ref as we
intended to (if not, the rebase test probably won't work
properly or won't test what we want it to).
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
We have had several problems where rebasing from one release to
another just doesn't work, and we have to work around it somehow.
Sometimes it's difficult or impossible to do. All we want to do
here is check the rebase mechanism itself; we don't actually want
to assert that you can rebase to any specific other release.
For update tests, we should be able to use a non-standard ref
name for the ostree we build, embed into the installer image,
and install. That should mean we can then rebase to the standard
ref name for the same release, which should be much safer than
trying to rebase to a different release. We can't do this for
the compose tests, but at least for update tests I'm hoping this
makes things more robust.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
I think this is new behaviour in rpm 4.19, or else we would have
run into this before when testing an s390utils update. But it's
easy enough to handle.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
It's not in the images any more. As aleasto pointed out, we're
actually being sent to Discover to install it, and matching on
*that* screen, which isn't what we intend.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
Per the upstream issue, this change was intentional (as a 'least
worst' option), so we shouldn't mark the needle as workaround.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
Add a link to the issue report for blivet-gui using an odd icon
for btrfs volumes, now I finally filed it.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
F36 is now EOL, and from F37 onwards, grub is the bootloader in
any situation where it actually matters to do_bootloader (which
is only when we're editing parameters). We do still use syslinux
in the PXE tests on x86_64 BIOS, but we don't edit the parameters
in that case.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
For a while, it seems like the test was often hitting a message
where the field we match on isn't actually visible because a lot
of other fields are shown first. So, add a variant needle that
matches on a different field, the message ID.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
https://github.com/storaged-project/udisks/issues/1102 - udisks2
seems to have a bug where it leaves filesystems mounted at a
"temporary" mount point after creating them. We need to work
around this when it happens or else we'll frequently get test
failures.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
util-linux-user subpackage was removed but comps wasn't updated.
I've fixed comps now, but that won't "kick in" until after the
next Rawhide compose; we need to workaround the issue until then.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
These hit low-90% matches when run on the F38 respins for some
reason, just add another variant...
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
If install errors out, currently we still wait like an hour for
an "install_done" screen that will never come, before we give
up. Since we have a needle for the "unknown error has occurred"
screen, we may as well use it here - if we see that screen, we
can just die immediately. This may go stale if we forget to
update the needle, but it's only one line, so meh.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
In https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1938847 , we wound up
doing an LVM thinp install when we meant to do a regular LVM
install, because LVM was already highlighted (for some reason)
in the scheme list, and the "LVM" needle is narrow enough that
it matched on the start of "LVM Thin Provisioning".
To avoid this, we make the match area in the existing needle
wider so it can't match on "LVM Thin Provisioning", and add an
alternate needle for LVM when it's highlighted.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
I don't know exactly why this sometimes shows up highlighted and
sometimes unhighlighted, but hey, it's not wrong either way, so
we just handle it.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
