Summary:
This adds a couple of new exporter modules, renames main_common
to utils (this is a better name: openSUSE's main_common is
functions used in main.pm, utils is what they call their module
full of miscellaneous commonly-used functions), and moves a
bunch of utility functions that were previously needlessly
implemented as instance methods in base classes into the
exporter modules. That means we can get rid of all the annoying
$self-> syntax for calling them.
We get rid of `fedorabase` entirely, as it's no longer useful
for anything. Other base classes keep the 'standard' methods
(like `post_fail_hook`) and methods which actually need to be
methods (like `root_console`, whose behaviour is different in
anacondatest and installedtest).
Test Plan:
Do a full test suite run and check everything lines
up. There should be no functional differences from before at all,
this is just a re-org.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel_but_actually_jsedlak_who_uses_stupid_nicknames
Reviewed By: garretraziel_but_actually_jsedlak_who_uses_stupid_nicknames
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qa.fedoraproject.org/D1080
Summary:
we have a long-standing problem with all the tests that hit
the repositories. The tests are triggered as soon as a compose
completes. At this point in time, the compose is not synced to
the mirrors, where the default 'fedora' repo definition looks;
the sync happens after the compose completes, and there is also
a metadata sync step that must happen after *that* before any
operation that uses the 'fedora' repository definition will
actually use the packages from the new compose. Thus all net
install tests and tests that installed packages have been
effectively testing the previous compose, not the current one.
We have some thoughts about how to fix this 'properly' (such
that the openQA tests wouldn't have to do anything special,
but their 'fedora' repository would somehow reflect the compose
under test), but none of them is in place right now or likely
to happen in the short term, so in the mean time this should
deal with most of the issues. With this change, everything but
the default_install tests for the netinst images should use
the compose-under-test's Everything tree instead of the 'fedora'
repository, and thus should install and test the correct
packages.
This relies on a corresponding change to openqa_fedora_tools
to set the LOCATION openQA setting (which is simply the base
location of the compose under test).
Test Plan:
Do a full test run, check (as far as you can) tests run sensibly
and use appropriate repositories.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D989
Summary: Pretty simple!
Test Plan:
Check the upgrade tests work the same as before the
change.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D979
in the recent commit to always use nogpgcheck I inadvertently
broke the upgrade tests, by dropping the `--releasever` from
the `dnf system-upgrade download` command. So fix that.
Summary:
Except when running on the pre-upgrade release in the upgrade
tests (where GPG check should always be OK).
Currently we always need to use --nogpgcheck on Rawhide, and we
must also use it on Branched prior to the Bodhi activation
point. At present we don't really have any simple way to know
when the Bodhi activation point has kicked in. We could assume
that it's safe to do GPG checking for 'candidate' (not nightly)
composes, but even that isn't 100% safe and isn't really the
*right* thing to do. So I think for now it's best to just always
use --nogpgcheck , until we come up with a decent way to check
for Bodhi enablement, or releng figures things out so we can
rely on packages being signed in Rawhide and in Branched before
Bodhi enablement.
Test Plan:
Check the tests all still run, make sure I didn't
miss any dnf calls.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D964
Summary:
This requires us to handle decryption each time we reboot in
the upgrade process, so factor that little block out into the
base class so we don't have to keep pasting it. It's also a
bit tricky to integrate into the 'catch a boot loop' code we
have to deal with #1349721, but I think this should work. There
is a matching openqa_fedora_tools diff to generate the disk
image.
Test Plan:
Run the tests, check that they work, run the other
upgrade and encrypted install tests and check they still work
properly too.
Reviewers: garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D922
Summary:
try to catch a boot loop after `dnf system-upgrade reboot`, if
we do, set the test to soft_fail and pass enforcing=0 to work
around it.
Test Plan:
Run the upgrade_foo tests and see that they now soft
fail instead of hard failing (unless there are any other issues).
Run the upgrade_2_foo tests and make sure they still pass (i.e.
we don't erroneously soft fail them).
Reviewers: garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D912
Summary:
I really just want to add the desktop_terminal test, but I think
this refactor is in order now. It splits up loading of the
various test phases (much as SUSE do it) and allows us to run
the post-install tests without the install tests, for e.g. I
tweaked things to allow the upgrade tests to use the existing
_wait_login tests for final login and combine the two upgrade
postinstall tests into one simple one.
This comes with a bit of a behaviour change to make graphical
wait login behave the same as console wait login: it will log
in unless USER_LOGIN is set to 'false'. Previously it only
logged in if both USER_LOGIN and USER_PASSWORD were set, which
I don't think ever happened in a graphical test, so we never
actually did a graphical login. The intent here is we should do
a login on the default_install tests. That's going a bit beyond
the test case, but it seems like a reasonable thing to test. We
can set USER_LOGIN to false if we don't want to do it.
Test Plan:
Do a full test run, make sure the new tests work and
no old tests break.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D839
With the arrival of Pungi 4, the scheduler is no longer using
fedfind-provided BUILD and FLAVOR values, but ones derived from
Pungi properties. BUILD is now simply the Pungi compose_id.
FLAVOR is produced by joining the Pungi variant, type, and
format with '-' characters as the separators.
Pungi, unfortunately, does not treat 'Rawhide' as a release, it
synthesizes a release number for Rawhide composes and places
that in the compose ID. To cope with that, for now, the
scheduler will set RAWHIDE to '1' if the compose is a Rawhide
one. As we have to adapt all places where we parse the release
in any case, this commit consolidates them into a fedorabase
subroutine.
For the one place where we also used to parse the 'milestone'
from fedfind, there is a placeholder get_milestone subroutine
which currently returns an empty string, as I don't yet have a
good handle on how to draw the kinds of distinctions fedfind
mapped to 'milestone' from Pungi metadata.
Summary:
Instead of sitting there waiting 6000 seconds twice, when DNF
explicitly tells us it failed, just die.
This is why we haven't been getting proper compose check reports
lately; the upgrade tests are failing, waiting 6000 seconds to
time out, then being cloned and tried again, waiting another 6000
seconds. This is just barely going beyond check-compose's 8 hour
wait limit, as it's some time before the upgrade tests even get
started (they're low in the priority list). We're still going to
have that problem if the tests fail any other way, but this at
least catches that case.
Test Plan:
Run the upgrade tests and see that they fail quicker
(assuming the dependency problems they're dying on aren't fixed).
Maybe also do a 22-23 upgrade test and check it still succeeds
properly.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D650
Summary:
Updating the stable release prior to doing the update can take
a long time if the image hasn't been updated for a while, and
the upgrade download process itself can take a long time. If
the screen blanks out in either case, either the following
needle match may fail (if we're waiting for a needle) or 'still
screen' may be detected early (if we're waiting for a still
screen), so let's disable screen blanking to avoid it.
Test Plan: Run the upgrade tests and see if they work.
Reviewers: garretraziel, jskladan
Reviewed By: jskladan
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D628
Summary:
This is a first cut which more or less works for now. Issues:
1) We're not really testing the BUILD, here. All the test does
is try and upgrade to the specified VERSION - so it'll be using
the latest 'stable' for the given VERSION at the time the test
runs. This isn't really that terrible, but especially for TC/RC
validation, we might want to make things a bit more elaborate
and set up the repo for the actual BUILD (and disable the main
repos).
2) We'd actually need --nogpgcheck for non-Rawhide, at one
specific point in the release cycle - after Branching but
before Bodhi activation (which is when we can be sure all
packages are signed). This won't matter until 24 branches, and
maybe releng will have it fixed by then...if not, I'll tweak
it.
3) We don't really test that the upgrade actually *happened*
for desktop, at the moment - the only thing in the old test
that really checked that was where we checked for the fedup
boot menu entry, but that has no analog in dnf. What we should
probably do is check that GUI login works, then switch to a
console and check /etc/fedora-release just as the minimal test
does.
Test Plan:
Run the tests. Note that creating the desktop disk
image doesn't work ATM, so I can't verify the desktop test
works, but the minimal one seems to (with D565). There'll be
a matching diff for openqa_fedora_tools to update the test
case names there.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: jskladan, garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D567
