Use ps_process_pattern to read state. Access to get attributes of target boinc_t domain is included with ps_process_pattern.
Use ps_process_pattern to read state. Access to get attributes of target cobblerd_t domain is included with ps_process_pattern.
Use ps_process_pattern to read state. Permission to get attributes of target exim_t domain is included with ps_process_pattern.
Use ps_process_pattern to read state. Access to get attributes of target plymouthd_t domain is included with ps_process_pattern.
Use ps_process_pattern to read state. Access to get attributes of target pportreserve_t domain is included with ps_process_pattern.
Use ps_process_pattern to read state. Access to get attributes of target postfix domains is included with ps_process_pattern.
Use ps_process_pattern to read state. Permission to get attributes of target qpidd_t domain is included with ps_process_pattern.
Signed-off-by: Dominick Grift <domg472@gmail.com>
My previous version had a minor bug in admin_role where it was using cobblerd_var_log_t, and cobblerd_var_lib_t instead of cobbler_var_log_t, and cobbler_var_lib_t.
Whilst i was at it, i decided the implement a cobbler_etc_t for cobbler content in /etc. This because you cannot admin a cobbler environment witouth having access to cobbler config files and i dont want to give cobbler_admin access to manage etc_t.
As a consequence if this i also removed the files_read_etc_files(cobblerd_t), as i think that cobbler only needed it to read its own files in /etc. However this is not confirmed, and it may need read access to etc_t afteral.
Also i would like to underscore my reason for using public_content_rw_t. One of the reasons is that i do not want to give cobbler access to manage httpd_sys_content_rw_t. In general i do not want to depend on apache module at all.
Signed-off-by: Dominick Grift <domg472@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris PeBenito <pebenito@gentoo.org>
