qemu-kvm/kvm-block-Fix-crash-on-block_resize-on-inactive-node.patch
Miroslav Rezanina a583c50c4e * Mon Feb 17 2025 Miroslav Rezanina <mrezanin@redhat.com> - 9.1.0-15
- kvm-migration-Add-helper-to-get-target-runstate.patch [RHEL-54670]
- kvm-qmp-cont-Only-activate-disks-if-migration-completed.patch [RHEL-54670]
- kvm-migration-block-Make-late-block-active-the-default.patch [RHEL-54670]
- kvm-migration-block-Apply-late-block-active-behavior-to-.patch [RHEL-54670]
- kvm-migration-block-Fix-possible-race-with-block_inactiv.patch [RHEL-54670]
- kvm-migration-block-Rewrite-disk-activation.patch [RHEL-54670]
- kvm-block-Add-active-field-to-BlockDeviceInfo.patch [RHEL-54670]
- kvm-block-Allow-inactivating-already-inactive-nodes.patch [RHEL-54670]
- kvm-block-Inactivate-external-snapshot-overlays-when-nec.patch [RHEL-54670]
- kvm-migration-block-active-Remove-global-active-flag.patch [RHEL-54670]
- kvm-block-Don-t-attach-inactive-child-to-active-node.patch [RHEL-54670]
- kvm-block-Fix-crash-on-block_resize-on-inactive-node.patch [RHEL-54670]
- kvm-block-Add-option-to-create-inactive-nodes.patch [RHEL-54670]
- kvm-block-Add-blockdev-set-active-QMP-command.patch [RHEL-54670]
- kvm-block-Support-inactive-nodes-in-blk_insert_bs.patch [RHEL-54670]
- kvm-block-export-Don-t-ignore-image-activation-error-in-.patch [RHEL-54670]
- kvm-block-Drain-nodes-before-inactivating-them.patch [RHEL-54670]
- kvm-block-export-Add-option-to-allow-export-of-inactive-.patch [RHEL-54670]
- kvm-nbd-server-Support-inactive-nodes.patch [RHEL-54670]
- kvm-iotests-Add-filter_qtest.patch [RHEL-54670]
- kvm-iotests-Add-qsd-migrate-case.patch [RHEL-54670]
- kvm-iotests-Add-NBD-based-tests-for-inactive-nodes.patch [RHEL-54670]
- Resolves: RHEL-54670
  (Provide QMP command for block device reactivation after migration [rhel-10.0])
2025-02-17 03:54:53 -05:00

69 lines
2.7 KiB
Diff

From fcf20a7c75d01009701fd960247ff76914280e1a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2025 22:13:57 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 12/22] block: Fix crash on block_resize on inactive node
RH-Author: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
RH-MergeRequest: 340: QMP command for block device reactivation after migration
RH-Jira: RHEL-54670
RH-Acked-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
RH-Acked-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
RH-Commit: [12/22] 9edc182c7ac587b0eaea836203b77d94b4d9bd80 (kmwolf/centos-qemu-kvm)
In order for block_resize to fail gracefully on an inactive node instead
of crashing with an assertion failure in bdrv_co_write_req_prepare()
(called from bdrv_co_truncate()), we need to check for inactive nodes
also when they are attached as a root node and make sure that
BLK_PERM_RESIZE isn't among the permissions allowed for inactive nodes.
To this effect, don't enumerate the permissions that are incompatible
with inactive nodes any more, but allow only BLK_PERM_CONSISTENT_READ
for them.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20250204211407.381505-7-kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
(cherry picked from commit 8c2c72a33581987af8d8c484d03af3cd69b9e10a)
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
---
block.c | 7 +++++++
block/block-backend.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/block.c b/block.c
index 41e72e6965..bedd54deaa 100644
--- a/block.c
+++ b/block.c
@@ -3077,6 +3077,13 @@ bdrv_attach_child_common(BlockDriverState *child_bs,
assert(child_class->get_parent_desc);
GLOBAL_STATE_CODE();
+ if (bdrv_is_inactive(child_bs) && (perm & ~BLK_PERM_CONSISTENT_READ)) {
+ g_autofree char *perm_names = bdrv_perm_names(perm);
+ error_setg(errp, "Permission '%s' unavailable on inactive node",
+ perm_names);
+ return NULL;
+ }
+
new_child = g_new(BdrvChild, 1);
*new_child = (BdrvChild) {
.bs = NULL,
diff --git a/block/block-backend.c b/block/block-backend.c
index db6f9b92a3..356db1b703 100644
--- a/block/block-backend.c
+++ b/block/block-backend.c
@@ -253,7 +253,7 @@ static bool blk_can_inactivate(BlockBackend *blk)
* guest. For block job BBs that satisfy this, we can just allow
* it. This is the case for mirror job source, which is required
* by libvirt non-shared block migration. */
- if (!(blk->perm & (BLK_PERM_WRITE | BLK_PERM_WRITE_UNCHANGED))) {
+ if (!(blk->perm & ~BLK_PERM_CONSISTENT_READ)) {
return true;
}
--
2.39.3