69 lines
2.7 KiB
Diff
69 lines
2.7 KiB
Diff
|
From fcf20a7c75d01009701fd960247ff76914280e1a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
|
||
|
From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
||
|
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2025 22:13:57 +0100
|
||
|
Subject: [PATCH 12/22] block: Fix crash on block_resize on inactive node
|
||
|
|
||
|
RH-Author: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
||
|
RH-MergeRequest: 340: QMP command for block device reactivation after migration
|
||
|
RH-Jira: RHEL-54670
|
||
|
RH-Acked-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
|
||
|
RH-Acked-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
|
||
|
RH-Commit: [12/22] 9edc182c7ac587b0eaea836203b77d94b4d9bd80 (kmwolf/centos-qemu-kvm)
|
||
|
|
||
|
In order for block_resize to fail gracefully on an inactive node instead
|
||
|
of crashing with an assertion failure in bdrv_co_write_req_prepare()
|
||
|
(called from bdrv_co_truncate()), we need to check for inactive nodes
|
||
|
also when they are attached as a root node and make sure that
|
||
|
BLK_PERM_RESIZE isn't among the permissions allowed for inactive nodes.
|
||
|
To this effect, don't enumerate the permissions that are incompatible
|
||
|
with inactive nodes any more, but allow only BLK_PERM_CONSISTENT_READ
|
||
|
for them.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
||
|
Acked-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
|
||
|
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
|
||
|
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
|
||
|
Message-ID: <20250204211407.381505-7-kwolf@redhat.com>
|
||
|
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
||
|
(cherry picked from commit 8c2c72a33581987af8d8c484d03af3cd69b9e10a)
|
||
|
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
|
||
|
---
|
||
|
block.c | 7 +++++++
|
||
|
block/block-backend.c | 2 +-
|
||
|
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
|
||
|
|
||
|
diff --git a/block.c b/block.c
|
||
|
index 41e72e6965..bedd54deaa 100644
|
||
|
--- a/block.c
|
||
|
+++ b/block.c
|
||
|
@@ -3077,6 +3077,13 @@ bdrv_attach_child_common(BlockDriverState *child_bs,
|
||
|
assert(child_class->get_parent_desc);
|
||
|
GLOBAL_STATE_CODE();
|
||
|
|
||
|
+ if (bdrv_is_inactive(child_bs) && (perm & ~BLK_PERM_CONSISTENT_READ)) {
|
||
|
+ g_autofree char *perm_names = bdrv_perm_names(perm);
|
||
|
+ error_setg(errp, "Permission '%s' unavailable on inactive node",
|
||
|
+ perm_names);
|
||
|
+ return NULL;
|
||
|
+ }
|
||
|
+
|
||
|
new_child = g_new(BdrvChild, 1);
|
||
|
*new_child = (BdrvChild) {
|
||
|
.bs = NULL,
|
||
|
diff --git a/block/block-backend.c b/block/block-backend.c
|
||
|
index db6f9b92a3..356db1b703 100644
|
||
|
--- a/block/block-backend.c
|
||
|
+++ b/block/block-backend.c
|
||
|
@@ -253,7 +253,7 @@ static bool blk_can_inactivate(BlockBackend *blk)
|
||
|
* guest. For block job BBs that satisfy this, we can just allow
|
||
|
* it. This is the case for mirror job source, which is required
|
||
|
* by libvirt non-shared block migration. */
|
||
|
- if (!(blk->perm & (BLK_PERM_WRITE | BLK_PERM_WRITE_UNCHANGED))) {
|
||
|
+ if (!(blk->perm & ~BLK_PERM_CONSISTENT_READ)) {
|
||
|
return true;
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
--
|
||
|
2.39.3
|
||
|
|