Commit Graph

7 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Michal Schorm
0422db7c11 Split the testsuite into two sub-packages
Small sub-package 'mysql-test' will remain architecture dependent
and will continue to carry all architecture dependent parts of the testsuite.

New huge sub-package 'mysql-test-data' will hold all of the
achitecture independent data and will be built as 'noarch'.

This will save over 1GB of redundant data per each package build.
2024-08-15 13:03:33 +02:00
Michal Schorm
121323a08d Rebase to 8.4.2 2024-08-07 23:48:31 +02:00
Michal Schorm
d8f302a634 Bump version for rebuild 2024-07-24 10:25:59 +02:00
Michal Schorm
b41c2f81e8 Make 'mysql8.4' the distribution default 2024-07-24 08:06:35 +02:00
Michal Schorm
77ed2ab2e2 Remove the un-approved license 'Artistic-1.0-Perl' from the license field
Two reasons:

1) This license is included due to the Perl module 'Expect'. However I wasn't able to actually
   locate it's sources in the MySQL source tarball. I believe it's a remnant of a code that was
   removed in the past.
   I've asked the MySQL upstream to verify my claim and either disprove it or fix the LICENSE
   file in wihch they mention it.

   For this reason I believe the 'GPL-1.0-or-later' also does not apply, so I'm removing it too.
   I'll put the 'GPL-1.0-or-later' should upstream disprove my findings.

2) As per clarification on the Fedora License mailing list:
   https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/LBAZXYBAA4YHJ2GEWEP5S7QXVOB76MUR/
  "
  If your package is licensed under a known choice of two licenses and
  one is a "good" license and one is a "bad" license, then the License:
  field must reflect the "good" license only. This is highly uncommon in
  Fedora packages apart from the case of Perl modules dual licensed
  under the GPL and the Artistic License 1.0. In that case you must pick
  the appropriate identifier for the GPL side (which in Perl modules
  will typically map to SPDX "GPL-1.0-or-later"). You are encouraged to
  include a comment memorializing this, for example:
  \# Upstream project is dual licensed GPL | Artistic 1.0
  "
2024-07-22 13:34:45 +02:00
Michal Schorm
6f668c197a Remove usage of OpenSSL Engine
After discussion with change owner, I've prepared the correct solution.

There is a difference between Fedora and CentOS Stream 10 / RHEL 10:
- in CentOS Stream 10 / RHEL 10, the change is self-contained by the
  'openssl-devel' package itself, which now defines OPENSSL_NO_ENGINE
  in the headers so new application builds don't use engine at all
- in Fedora, the headers containing the OPENSSL_NO_ENGINE definition
  are put into a separate sub-package 'openssl-devel-engine', instead
  of being put into the 'openssl-devel'
2024-07-22 13:34:39 +02:00
Michal Schorm
1e143dc511 Rename the SPECfile to match the version of the package 2024-07-19 14:04:58 +02:00