Remove the un-approved license 'Artistic-1.0-Perl' from the license field
Two reasons: 1) This license is included due to the Perl module 'Expect'. However I wasn't able to actually locate it's sources in the MySQL source tarball. I believe it's a remnant of a code that was removed in the past. I've asked the MySQL upstream to verify my claim and either disprove it or fix the LICENSE file in wihch they mention it. For this reason I believe the 'GPL-1.0-or-later' also does not apply, so I'm removing it too. I'll put the 'GPL-1.0-or-later' should upstream disprove my findings. 2) As per clarification on the Fedora License mailing list: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/LBAZXYBAA4YHJ2GEWEP5S7QXVOB76MUR/ " If your package is licensed under a known choice of two licenses and one is a "good" license and one is a "bad" license, then the License: field must reflect the "good" license only. This is highly uncommon in Fedora packages apart from the case of Perl modules dual licensed under the GPL and the Artistic License 1.0. In that case you must pick the appropriate identifier for the GPL side (which in Perl modules will typically map to SPDX "GPL-1.0-or-later"). You are encouraged to include a comment memorializing this, for example: \# Upstream project is dual licensed GPL | Artistic 1.0 "
This commit is contained in:
parent
6f668c197a
commit
77ed2ab2e2
@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ URL: http://www.mysql.com
|
||||
|
||||
# Exceptions allow client libraries to be linked with most open source SW,
|
||||
# not only GPL code. See README.mysql-license
|
||||
License: GPL-2.0-or-later AND LGPL-2.1-only AND BSL-1.0 AND GPL-1.0-or-later OR Artistic-1.0-Perl AND BSD-2-Clause
|
||||
License: GPL-2.0-or-later AND LGPL-2.1-only AND BSL-1.0 AND BSD-2-Clause
|
||||
|
||||
Source0: https://cdn.mysql.com/Downloads/MySQL-8.4/mysql-%{version}.tar.gz
|
||||
Source2: mysql_config_multilib.sh
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user