RHEL 9.0.0 Alpha bootstrap
The content of this branch was automatically imported from Fedora ELN with the following as its source: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mesa#88d3441dff2920e10f8bc5f43a78975cdbc43adf
This commit is contained in:
Petr Šabata
parent
3c91dc5095
commit
933da17fae
8
.gitignore
vendored
8
.gitignore
vendored
@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
|
|||||||
|
*.jx
|
||||||
|
*.src.rpm
|
||||||
|
.build*
|
||||||
|
/mesa-*.tar.bz2
|
||||||
|
/mesa-*.tar.xz
|
||||||
|
x86_64/
|
||||||
|
results_mesa/
|
||||||
|
mesa-*/
|
||||||
117
Mesa-MLAA-License-Clarification-Email.txt
Normal file
117
Mesa-MLAA-License-Clarification-Email.txt
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Subject: RE: Question about Mesa MLAA license
|
||||||
|
From: Jorge Jimenez <iryoku@gmail.com>
|
||||||
|
Date: 01/08/2013 12:50 PM
|
||||||
|
To: Tom Callaway <tcallawa@redhat.com>
|
||||||
|
CC: "jorge@iryoku.com" <jorge@iryoku.com>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Yes to both questions.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Thanks,
|
||||||
|
Jorge
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
From: Tom Callaway <tcallawa@redhat.com>
|
||||||
|
Sent: January 8, 2013 6:49 PM
|
||||||
|
To: Jorge Jimenez <iryoku@gmail.com>
|
||||||
|
CC: jorge@iryoku.com
|
||||||
|
Subject: Re: Question about Mesa MLAA license
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
On 01/08/2013 12:39 PM, Jorge Jimenez wrote:
|
||||||
|
> Hi Tom,
|
||||||
|
>
|
||||||
|
> What we meant with that is that we made an exception for clause 2.
|
||||||
|
> Instead of clause 2, in the case of the Mesa project, you have to name
|
||||||
|
> the technique Jimenez's MLAA in the config options of Mesa. We did that
|
||||||
|
> just to allow them to solve license issues. This exception should be for
|
||||||
|
> the Mesa project, and any project using Mesa, like Fedora.
|
||||||
|
>
|
||||||
|
> We want to widespread usage of our MLAA, so we want to avoid any kind of
|
||||||
|
> license complications. Hope current one is good for Fedora, if not
|
||||||
|
> please tell, and we'll see what we can do!
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Okay, a few more questions:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* If Fedora decides to simply reproduce the quoted statement:
|
||||||
|
"Uses Jimenez's MLAA. Copyright (C) 2010 by Jorge Jimenez, Belen Masia,
|
||||||
|
Jose I. Echevarria, Fernando Navarro and Diego Gutierrez."
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Specifically, if this is done as part of documentation included with
|
||||||
|
Mesa, is that sufficient to meet clause 2 even if the Mesa config option
|
||||||
|
is not set as described in your exception?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Currently, the Mesa config option for MLAA says: "Morphological
|
||||||
|
anti-aliasing based on Jimenez\' MLAA. 0 to disable, 8 for default
|
||||||
|
quality". Is this in compliance with your exception?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Thanks again,
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
~tom
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
==
|
||||||
|
Fedora Project
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Subject: RE: Question about Mesa MLAA license
|
||||||
|
From: Jorge Jimenez <iryoku@gmail.com>
|
||||||
|
Date: 01/08/2013 12:39 PM
|
||||||
|
To: "jorge@iryoku.com" <jorge@iryoku.com>, Tom Callaway <tcallawa@redhat.com>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Hi Tom,
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
What we meant with that is that we made an exception for clause 2.
|
||||||
|
Instead of clause 2, in the case of the Mesa project, you have to name
|
||||||
|
the technique Jimenez's MLAA in the config options of Mesa. We did that
|
||||||
|
just to allow them to solve license issues. This exception should be for
|
||||||
|
the Mesa project, and any project using Mesa, like Fedora.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
We want to widespread usage of our MLAA, so we want to avoid any kind of
|
||||||
|
license complications. Hope current one is good for Fedora, if not
|
||||||
|
please tell, and we'll see what we can do!
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Cheers,
|
||||||
|
Jorge
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
From: Tom Callaway <tcallawa@redhat.com>
|
||||||
|
Sent: January 8, 2013 6:30 PM
|
||||||
|
To: jorge@iryoku.com
|
||||||
|
Subject: Question about Mesa MLAA license
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Jorge,
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Thanks for all of your fantastic graphics work! I have been auditing
|
||||||
|
Fedora (a popular distribution of Linux) for license compliance and I
|
||||||
|
came across your MLAA code in Mesa.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The license says:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the following
|
||||||
|
statement:
|
||||||
|
*
|
||||||
|
* "Uses Jimenez's MLAA. Copyright (C) 2010 by Jorge Jimenez, Belen Masia,
|
||||||
|
* Jose I. Echevarria, Fernando Navarro and Diego Gutierrez."
|
||||||
|
*
|
||||||
|
* Only for use in the Mesa project, this point 2 is filled by naming the
|
||||||
|
* technique Jimenez's MLAA in the Mesa config options.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
That wording is unclear. When you say "Only for use in the Mesa
|
||||||
|
project...", it seems like you could either be saying:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- This code may only be used as part of Mesa.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
OR
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- In Mesa, you can comply with clause 2 by simply selecting "Jimenez's
|
||||||
|
MLAA" in the Mesa config options.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
*****
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
If the first item is true, then we may have to remove the MLAA code from
|
||||||
|
Fedora's copy of Mesa. However, looking at the license on your SMAA
|
||||||
|
code, I do not believe it to be the case. Please let me know either way!
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Thanks in advance,
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Tom Callaway
|
||||||
|
Fedora Legal
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
==
|
||||||
|
Fedora Project
|
||||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user