import mesa-19.1.0-0.5.rc5.el8

.gitignore

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+SOURCES/mesa-19.1.0-rc5.tar.xz

.mesa.metadata

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+83a8cc4a4e450d65e9ce7eb5d46dbbdca574bca2 SOURCES/mesa-19.1.0-rc5.tar.xz

SOURCES/Makefile

@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+VERSION ?= 19.1.0-rc5
+SANITIZE ?= 1
+
+DIRNAME = mesa-${VERSION}
+
+all: archive
+
+clean:
+	rm -rf $(DIRNAME)/
+	rm -f mesa-${VERSION}.tar.xz
+
+clone: clean
+	curl -O https://mesa.freedesktop.org/archive/mesa-${VERSION}.tar.xz
+	tar xf mesa-${VERSION}.tar.xz
+
+sanitize: clone vl_mpeg12_decoder.c vl_decoder.c
+ifdef SANITIZE
+	cat < vl_mpeg12_decoder.c > $(DIRNAME)/src/gallium/auxiliary/vl/vl_mpeg12_decoder.c
+	cat < vl_decoder.c > $(DIRNAME)/src/gallium/auxiliary/vl/vl_decoder.c
+endif
+
+archive: clone sanitize
+	tar caf ${DIRNAME}.tar.xz ${DIRNAME}

SOURCES/Mesa-MLAA-License-Clarification-Email.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
+
+Subject: RE: Question about Mesa MLAA license
+From: Jorge Jimenez <iryoku@gmail.com>
+Date: 01/08/2013 12:50 PM
+To: Tom Callaway <tcallawa@redhat.com>
+CC: "jorge@iryoku.com" <jorge@iryoku.com>
+
+Yes to both questions.
+ 
+Thanks,
+Jorge
+ 
+From: Tom Callaway <tcallawa@redhat.com>
+Sent: January 8, 2013 6:49 PM
+To: Jorge Jimenez <iryoku@gmail.com>
+CC: jorge@iryoku.com
+Subject: Re: Question about Mesa MLAA license
+ 
+On 01/08/2013 12:39 PM, Jorge Jimenez wrote:
+> Hi Tom,
+>
+> What we meant with that is that we made an exception for clause 2.
+> Instead of clause 2, in the case of the Mesa project, you have to name
+> the technique Jimenez's MLAA in the config options of Mesa. We did that
+> just to allow them to solve license issues. This exception should be for
+> the Mesa project, and any project using Mesa, like Fedora.
+>
+> We want to widespread usage of our MLAA, so we want to avoid any kind of
+> license complications. Hope current one is good for Fedora, if not
+> please tell, and we'll see what we can do!
+
+Okay, a few more questions:
+
+* If Fedora decides to simply reproduce the quoted statement:
+"Uses Jimenez's MLAA. Copyright (C) 2010 by Jorge Jimenez, Belen Masia,
+Jose I. Echevarria, Fernando Navarro and Diego Gutierrez."
+
+Specifically, if this is done as part of documentation included with
+Mesa, is that sufficient to meet clause 2 even if the Mesa config option
+is not set as described in your exception?
+
+* Currently, the Mesa config option for MLAA says: "Morphological
+anti-aliasing based on Jimenez\' MLAA. 0 to disable, 8 for default
+quality". Is this in compliance with your exception?
+
+Thanks again,
+
+~tom
+
+==
+Fedora Project
+
+Subject: RE: Question about Mesa MLAA license
+From: Jorge Jimenez <iryoku@gmail.com>
+Date: 01/08/2013 12:39 PM
+To: "jorge@iryoku.com" <jorge@iryoku.com>, Tom Callaway <tcallawa@redhat.com>
+
+Hi Tom,
+ 
+What we meant with that is that we made an exception for clause 2. 
+Instead of clause 2, in the case of the Mesa project, you have to name 
+the technique Jimenez's MLAA in the config options of Mesa. We did that 
+just to allow them to solve license issues. This exception should be for 
+the Mesa project, and any project using Mesa, like Fedora.
+ 
+We want to widespread usage of our MLAA, so we want to avoid any kind of 
+license complications. Hope current one is good for Fedora, if not 
+please tell, and we'll see what we can do!
+ 
+Cheers,
+Jorge
+ 
+From: Tom Callaway <tcallawa@redhat.com>
+Sent: January 8, 2013 6:30 PM
+To: jorge@iryoku.com
+Subject: Question about Mesa MLAA license
+ 
+Jorge,
+
+Thanks for all of your fantastic graphics work! I have been auditing
+Fedora (a popular distribution of Linux) for license compliance and I
+came across your MLAA code in Mesa.
+
+The license says:
+
+ *    2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the following
+statement:
+ *
+ *       "Uses Jimenez's MLAA. Copyright (C) 2010 by Jorge Jimenez, Belen Masia,
+ *        Jose I. Echevarria, Fernando Navarro and Diego Gutierrez."
+ *
+ *       Only for use in the Mesa project, this point 2 is filled by naming the
+ *       technique Jimenez's MLAA in the Mesa config options.
+
+That wording is unclear. When you say "Only for use in the Mesa
+project...", it seems like you could either be saying:
+
+- This code may only be used as part of Mesa.
+
+OR
+
+- In Mesa, you can comply with clause 2 by simply selecting "Jimenez's
+MLAA" in the Mesa config options.
+
+*****
+
+If the first item is true, then we may have to remove the MLAA code from
+Fedora's copy of Mesa. However, looking at the license on your SMAA
+code, I do not believe it to be the case. Please let me know either way!
+
+Thanks in advance,
+
+Tom Callaway
+Fedora Legal
+
+==
+Fedora Project

SOURCES/glesv2.pc

@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+prefix=/usr
+libdir=${prefix}/lib64
+includedir=${prefix}/include
+
+Name: glesv2
+Description: Mesa OpenGL ES 2.0 library
+Version: 19.1.0
+Libs: -L${libdir} -lGLESv2
+Libs.private: -lpthread -pthread -lm -ldl
+Cflags: -I${includedir}

SOURCES/vl_decoder.c

@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+#include "vl_decoder.h"
+bool
+vl_profile_supported(struct pipe_screen *screen, enum pipe_video_profile profile,
+                     enum pipe_video_entrypoint entrypoint)
+{
+   return false;
+}
+
+int
+vl_level_supported(struct pipe_screen *screen, enum pipe_video_profile profile)
+{
+   return 0;
+}
+
+struct pipe_video_codec *
+vl_create_decoder(struct pipe_context *pipe,
+                  const struct pipe_video_codec *templat)
+{
+   return NULL;
+}

SOURCES/vl_mpeg12_decoder.c

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+#include "vl_mpeg12_decoder.h"
+struct pipe_video_codec *
+vl_create_mpeg12_decoder(struct pipe_context *context,
+                         const struct pipe_video_codec *templat)
+{
+    return NULL;
+}