mdadm/0022-mdadm-super1-restore-commit-45a87c2f31335-to-fix-clu.patch
Xiao Ni cdf21d08ef Update to latest upstream
After updating to latest upstream, bug2163711 can be fixed.
We don't use rhel only udev rule anymore and we use the
udev rules from upstream. So we don't need to modify our
rhel only udev rule again.

Resolves: bz#2163711

Signed-off-by: Xiao Ni <xni@redhat.com>
2023-01-30 16:08:49 +08:00

111 lines
3.9 KiB
Diff

From 63902857b98c37c8ac4b837bb01d006b327a4532 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Heming Zhao <heming.zhao@suse.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2022 00:10:40 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 22/83] mdadm/super1: restore commit 45a87c2f31335 to fix
clustered slot issue
Commit 9d67f6496c71 ("mdadm:check the nodes when operate clustered
array") modified assignment logic for st->nodes in write_bitmap1(),
which introduced bitmap slot issue:
load_super1 didn't set up supertype.nodes, which made spare disk only
have one slot info. Then it triggered kernel md_bitmap_load_sb to get
wrong bitmap slot data.
For fixing this issue, there are two methods:
1> revert the related code of commit 9d67f6496c71. and restore the code
from former commit 45a87c2f31335 ("super1: add more checks for
NodeNumUpdate option").
st->nodes value would be 0 & 1 under current code logic. i.e.
When adding a spare disk, there is no place to init st->nodes, and
the value is ZERO.
2> keep 9d67f6496c71, add additional ->nodes handling in load_super1(),
let load_super1 to set st->nodes when bitmap is BITMAP_MAJOR_CLUSTERED.
Under current mdadm code logic, load_super1 will be called many
times, any new code in load_super1 will cost mdadm running more time.
And more reason is I prefer as much as possible to limit clustered
code spreading in every corner.
So I used method <1> to fix this issue.
How to trigger:
dd if=/dev/zero bs=1M count=1 oflag=direct of=/dev/sda
dd if=/dev/zero bs=1M count=1 oflag=direct of=/dev/sdb
dd if=/dev/zero bs=1M count=1 oflag=direct of=/dev/sdc
mdadm -C /dev/md0 -b clustered -e 1.2 -n 2 -l mirror /dev/sda /dev/sdb
mdadm -a /dev/md0 /dev/sdc
mdadm /dev/md0 --fail /dev/sda
mdadm /dev/md0 --remove /dev/sda
mdadm -Ss
mdadm -A /dev/md0 /dev/sdb /dev/sdc
the output of current "mdadm -X /dev/sdc":
(there should be (by default) 4 slot info for correct output)
```
Filename : /dev/sdc
Magic : 6d746962
Version : 5
UUID : a74642f8:a6b1fba8:58e1f8db:cfe7b082
Events : 29
Events Cleared : 0
State : OK
Chunksize : 64 MB
Daemon : 5s flush period
Write Mode : Normal
Sync Size : 306176 (299.00 MiB 313.52 MB)
Bitmap : 5 bits (chunks), 5 dirty (100.0%)
```
And mdadm later operations will trigger kernel output error message:
(triggered by "mdadm -A /dev/md0 /dev/sdb /dev/sdc")
```
kernel: md0: invalid bitmap file superblock: bad magic
kernel: md_bitmap_copy_from_slot can't get bitmap from slot 1
kernel: md-cluster: Could not gather bitmaps from slot 1
kernel: md0: invalid bitmap file superblock: bad magic
kernel: md_bitmap_copy_from_slot can't get bitmap from slot 2
kernel: md-cluster: Could not gather bitmaps from slot 2
kernel: md0: invalid bitmap file superblock: bad magic
kernel: md_bitmap_copy_from_slot can't get bitmap from slot 3
kernel: md-cluster: Could not gather bitmaps from slot 3
kernel: md-cluster: failed to gather all resyn infos
kernel: md0: detected capacity change from 0 to 612352
```
Acked-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Heming Zhao <heming.zhao@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Jes Sorensen <jsorensen@fb.com>
---
super1.c | 12 +++++++++++-
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/super1.c b/super1.c
index e3e2f954..3a0c69fd 100644
--- a/super1.c
+++ b/super1.c
@@ -2674,7 +2674,17 @@ static int write_bitmap1(struct supertype *st, int fd, enum bitmap_update update
}
if (bms->version == BITMAP_MAJOR_CLUSTERED) {
- if (__cpu_to_le32(st->nodes) < bms->nodes) {
+ if (st->nodes == 1) {
+ /* the parameter for nodes is not valid */
+ pr_err("Warning: cluster-md at least needs two nodes\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ } else if (st->nodes == 0) {
+ /*
+ * parameter "--nodes" is not specified, (eg, add a disk to
+ * clustered raid)
+ */
+ break;
+ } else if (__cpu_to_le32(st->nodes) < bms->nodes) {
/*
* Since the nodes num is not increased, no
* need to check the space enough or not,
--
2.38.1