Powerful light-weight programming language
As far as I can tell there should not be any effect visible outside of RPM database and fedora-review tool. This change is needed to make lua-libs package + *other* Lua packages compliant with packaging guidelines. Formerly the lua-libs package put a library /usr/lib64/lua/5.3 directory but did not own the directory itself. This is being flagged by fedora-review as non-compliance. This problem affected other Lua packages which put library into /usr/lib64/lua/5.3 as well. These other libraries were always flagged by fedora-review as non-compliant because the library package did not Require a package which owns /usr/lib64/lua/5.3. (The build system autogenerates depedency on lua-libs which did not own the directory.) |
||
---|---|---|
tests | ||
.gitignore | ||
lua-5.2.2-configure-compat-module.patch | ||
lua-5.2.2-configure-linux.patch | ||
lua-5.2.2-idsize.patch | ||
lua-5.2.2-luac-shared-link-fix.patch | ||
lua-5.2.3-autotoolize.patch | ||
lua-5.3.0-autotoolize.patch | ||
lua-5.3.0-configure-compat-module.patch | ||
lua-5.3.0-idsize.patch | ||
lua-5.3.4-bug1.patch | ||
lua-5.3.4-bug4.patch | ||
lua-5.3.4-bug5.patch | ||
lua-5.3.4-bug6.patch | ||
lua.spec | ||
luaconf.h | ||
macros.lua | ||
mit.txt | ||
sources |