Fix rtmutex/futex self-deadlock NULL deref in remove_waiter() ahead of RHEL; bump to 211.30.4
This commit is contained in:
parent
3df1ed4e4b
commit
4f6054905f
86
1418-rtmutex-use-waiter-task-in-remove-waiter.patch
Normal file
86
1418-rtmutex-use-waiter-task-in-remove-waiter.patch
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
|
||||
From 3bfdc63936dd4773109b7b8c280c0f3b5ae7d349 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
|
||||
From: Keenan Dong <keenanat2000@gmail.com>
|
||||
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2026 16:46:00 +0800
|
||||
Subject: [PATCH] rtmutex: Use waiter::task instead of current in
|
||||
remove_waiter()
|
||||
|
||||
remove_waiter() is used by the slowlock paths, but it is also used for
|
||||
proxy-lock rollback in rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock() when invoked from
|
||||
futex_requeue().
|
||||
|
||||
In the latter case waiter::task is not current, but remove_waiter()
|
||||
operates on current for the dequeue operation. That results in several
|
||||
problems:
|
||||
|
||||
1) the rbtree dequeue happens without waiter::task::pi_lock being held
|
||||
|
||||
2) the waiter task's pi_blocked_on state is not cleared, which leaves a
|
||||
dangling pointer primed for UAF around.
|
||||
|
||||
3) rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain() operates on the wrong top priority waiter
|
||||
task
|
||||
|
||||
Use waiter::task instead of current in all related operations in
|
||||
remove_waiter() to cure those problems.
|
||||
|
||||
[ tglx: Fixup rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(), add a comment and amend the
|
||||
changelog ]
|
||||
|
||||
Fixes: 8161239a8bcc ("rtmutex: Simplify PI algorithm and make highest prio task get lock")
|
||||
Reported-by: Yuan Tan <yuantan098@gmail.com>
|
||||
Reported-by: Yifan Wu <yifanwucs@gmail.com>
|
||||
Reported-by: Juefei Pu <tomapufckgml@gmail.com>
|
||||
Reported-by: Xin Liu <bird@lzu.edu.cn>
|
||||
Signed-off-by: Keenan Dong <keenanat2000@gmail.com>
|
||||
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
|
||||
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
|
||||
|
||||
(cherry picked from commit 3bfdc63936dd4773109b7b8c280c0f3b5ae7d349)
|
||||
[AlmaLinux: adapted to a10 (6.12); context/line offsets only. scoped_guard(raw_spinlock, ...) is available in this tree (include/linux/cleanup.h + DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1 raw_spinlock in include/linux/spinlock.h), so the upstream form is used verbatim.]
|
||||
---
|
||||
kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 13 ++++++++-----
|
||||
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
|
||||
|
||||
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
|
||||
index 4a8df18..e6f305d 100644
|
||||
--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
|
||||
+++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
|
||||
@@ -1534,20 +1534,23 @@ static bool rtmutex_spin_on_owner(struct rt_mutex_base *lock,
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Must be called with lock->wait_lock held and interrupts disabled. It must
|
||||
* have just failed to try_to_take_rt_mutex().
|
||||
+ *
|
||||
+ * When invoked from rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock() waiter::task != current !
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static void __sched remove_waiter(struct rt_mutex_base *lock,
|
||||
struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter)
|
||||
{
|
||||
bool is_top_waiter = (waiter == rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock));
|
||||
struct task_struct *owner = rt_mutex_owner(lock);
|
||||
+ struct task_struct *waiter_task = waiter->task;
|
||||
struct rt_mutex_base *next_lock;
|
||||
|
||||
lockdep_assert_held(&lock->wait_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
- raw_spin_lock(¤t->pi_lock);
|
||||
- rt_mutex_dequeue(lock, waiter);
|
||||
- current->pi_blocked_on = NULL;
|
||||
- raw_spin_unlock(¤t->pi_lock);
|
||||
+ scoped_guard(raw_spinlock, &waiter_task->pi_lock) {
|
||||
+ rt_mutex_dequeue(lock, waiter);
|
||||
+ waiter_task->pi_blocked_on = NULL;
|
||||
+ }
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Only update priority if the waiter was the highest priority
|
||||
@@ -1583,7 +1586,7 @@ static void __sched remove_waiter(struct rt_mutex_base *lock,
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&lock->wait_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(owner, RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK, lock,
|
||||
- next_lock, NULL, current);
|
||||
+ next_lock, NULL, waiter_task);
|
||||
|
||||
raw_spin_lock_irq(&lock->wait_lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
--
|
||||
2.50.1
|
||||
70
1420-rtmutex-skip-remove-waiter-when-not-enqueued.patch
Normal file
70
1420-rtmutex-skip-remove-waiter-when-not-enqueued.patch
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
|
||||
From 40a25d59e85b3c8709ac2424d44f65610467871e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
|
||||
From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
|
||||
Date: Thu, 7 May 2026 04:29:13 -0700
|
||||
Subject: [PATCH] locking/rtmutex: Skip remove_waiter() when waiter is not
|
||||
enqueued
|
||||
|
||||
syzbot triggered the following splat in remove_waiter() via
|
||||
FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE_PI:
|
||||
|
||||
KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000a88-0x0000000000000a8f]
|
||||
class_raw_spinlock_constructor
|
||||
remove_waiter+0x159/0x1200 kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:1561
|
||||
rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock+0x103/0x120
|
||||
futex_requeue+0x10e4/0x20d0
|
||||
__x64_sys_futex+0x34f/0x4d0
|
||||
|
||||
task_blocks_on_rt_mutex() does not arm the waiter upon deadlock detection,
|
||||
leaving waiter->task nil, where 3bfdc63936dd ("rtmutex: Use waiter::task instead
|
||||
of current in remove_waiter()") made this fatal.
|
||||
|
||||
Furthermore, rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock() should not be calling into remove_waiter()
|
||||
upon a successfully grabbing the rtmutex. 1a1fb985f2e2 ("futex: Handle early deadlock
|
||||
return correctly"), moved the remove_waiter() out of __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock()
|
||||
(where 'ret' was only ever 0 or < 0) into the wrapper. Tighten this check to
|
||||
account for try_to_take_rt_mutex().
|
||||
|
||||
Fixes: 3bfdc63936dd ("rtmutex: Use waiter::task instead of current in remove_waiter()")
|
||||
Reported-by: syzbot+78147abe6c524f183ee9@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
|
||||
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
|
||||
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
|
||||
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
|
||||
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/69f114ac.050a0220.ac8b.0003.GAE@google.com/
|
||||
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260507112913.1019537-1-dave@stgolabs.net
|
||||
|
||||
(cherry picked from commit 40a25d59e85b3c8709ac2424d44f65610467871e)
|
||||
[AlmaLinux: adapted to a10 (6.12); context/line offsets only. Both hunks apply: remove_waiter() in kernel/locking/rtmutex.c (depends on waiter_task local from 3bfdc63936dd) and rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock() in kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c. In this tree __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock() returns 1 on try_to_take_rt_mutex() success, so the ret<0 tightening is required to avoid calling remove_waiter() on lock acquisition.]
|
||||
---
|
||||
kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 3 +++
|
||||
kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c | 2 +-
|
||||
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
|
||||
|
||||
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
|
||||
index e6f305d..15111dc 100644
|
||||
--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
|
||||
+++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
|
||||
@@ -1547,6 +1547,9 @@ static void __sched remove_waiter(struct rt_mutex_base *lock,
|
||||
|
||||
lockdep_assert_held(&lock->wait_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
+ if (!waiter_task) /* never enqueued */
|
||||
+ return;
|
||||
+
|
||||
scoped_guard(raw_spinlock, &waiter_task->pi_lock) {
|
||||
rt_mutex_dequeue(lock, waiter);
|
||||
waiter_task->pi_blocked_on = NULL;
|
||||
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c
|
||||
index 6614ccd..341a540 100644
|
||||
--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c
|
||||
+++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c
|
||||
@@ -347,7 +347,7 @@ int __sched rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock,
|
||||
|
||||
raw_spin_lock_irq(&lock->wait_lock);
|
||||
ret = __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(lock, waiter, task, &wake_q);
|
||||
- if (unlikely(ret))
|
||||
+ if (unlikely(ret < 0))
|
||||
remove_waiter(lock, waiter);
|
||||
preempt_disable();
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&lock->wait_lock);
|
||||
--
|
||||
2.50.1
|
||||
14
kernel.spec
14
kernel.spec
@ -176,13 +176,13 @@ Summary: The Linux kernel
|
||||
%define specrpmversion 6.12.0
|
||||
%define specversion 6.12.0
|
||||
%define patchversion 6.12
|
||||
%define pkgrelease 211.30.3
|
||||
%define pkgrelease 211.30.4
|
||||
%define kversion 6
|
||||
%define tarfile_release 6.12.0-211.7.1.el10_2
|
||||
# This is needed to do merge window version magic
|
||||
%define patchlevel 12
|
||||
# This allows pkg_release to have configurable %%{?dist} tag
|
||||
%define specrelease 211.30.3%{?buildid}%{?dist}
|
||||
%define specrelease 211.30.4%{?buildid}%{?dist}
|
||||
# This defines the kabi tarball version
|
||||
%define kabiversion 6.12.0-211.7.1.el10_2
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1452,6 +1452,8 @@ Patch1414: 1414-fs-smb-client-fix-out-of-bounds-read-in-cifs-sanitize-prepa.patc
|
||||
Patch1415: 1415-kvm-x86-fix-shadow-paging-use-after-free-due-to-unexpected-gfn.patch
|
||||
Patch1416: 1416-kvm-x86-fix-shadow-paging-use-after-free-due-to-unexpected-role.patch
|
||||
Patch1417: 1417-eventpoll-fix-ep-remove-struct-eventpoll-struct-file-uaf.patch
|
||||
Patch1418: 1418-rtmutex-use-waiter-task-in-remove-waiter.patch
|
||||
Patch1420: 1420-rtmutex-skip-remove-waiter-when-not-enqueued.patch
|
||||
# END OF PATCH DEFINITIONS
|
||||
|
||||
%description
|
||||
@ -2626,6 +2628,8 @@ ApplyPatch 1414-fs-smb-client-fix-out-of-bounds-read-in-cifs-sanitize-prepa.patc
|
||||
ApplyPatch 1415-kvm-x86-fix-shadow-paging-use-after-free-due-to-unexpected-gfn.patch
|
||||
ApplyPatch 1416-kvm-x86-fix-shadow-paging-use-after-free-due-to-unexpected-role.patch
|
||||
ApplyPatch 1417-eventpoll-fix-ep-remove-struct-eventpoll-struct-file-uaf.patch
|
||||
ApplyPatch 1418-rtmutex-use-waiter-task-in-remove-waiter.patch
|
||||
ApplyPatch 1420-rtmutex-skip-remove-waiter-when-not-enqueued.patch
|
||||
# END OF PATCH APPLICATIONS
|
||||
|
||||
# Any further pre-build tree manipulations happen here.
|
||||
@ -5130,6 +5134,12 @@ fi\
|
||||
#
|
||||
#
|
||||
%changelog
|
||||
* Tue Jul 08 2026 Andrew Lukoshko <alukoshko@almalinux.org> - 6.12.0-211.30.4
|
||||
- Fix rtmutex self-deadlock NULL pointer dereference in remove_waiter() ahead of
|
||||
RHEL, upstream 3bfdc63936dd + 40a25d59e85b (1418, 1420); the futex_requeue guard
|
||||
74e144274af3 was dropped, reverted upstream by 39def6d250d3 (the NULL deref is
|
||||
fully handled by 40a25d59e85b)
|
||||
|
||||
* Mon Jul 06 2026 Andrew Lukoshko <alukoshko@almalinux.org> - 6.12.0-211.30.3
|
||||
- Fix CVE-2026-46242: eventpoll ep_remove struct eventpoll / struct file
|
||||
use-after-free, adapted from upstream a6dc643c6931 ahead of RHEL (1417)
|
||||
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user