rpms/java-11-openjdk
7
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Activity

Workaround GCC 10-based build failure on s390x

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Severin Gehwolf 2020-02-14 16:43:27 +01:00
parent 720e2c1e92
commit 542fe92d09
1 changed files with 5 additions and 0 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

5
java-11-openjdk.spec
View File

@ -1362,11 +1362,16 @@ export ARCH_DATA_MODEL=64
export CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -mieee"
%endif
GCC_10_WORKAROUND_S390x="-fno-tree-coalesce-vars -fno-tree-copy-prop -fno-tree-dce -fno-tree-dominator-opts -fno-tree-dse -fno-tree-forwprop -fno-tree-fre -fno-tree-loop-distribute-patterns -fno-tree-loop-distribution -fno-tree-loop-vectorize -fno-tree-partial-pre -fno-tree-phiprop -fno-tree-pre -fno-tree-pta -fno-tree-scev-cprop -fno-tree-sink -fno-tree-slp-vectorize -fno-tree-slsr -fno-tree-sra -fno-tree-switch-conversion -fno-tree-tail-merge -fno-tree-ter -fno-tree-vrp -fno-unit-at-a-time -fno-unswitch-loops -fno-vect-cost-model -fno-version-loops-for-strides"
# We use ourcppflags because the OpenJDK build seems to
# pass EXTRA_CFLAGS to the HotSpot C++ compiler...
# Explicitly set the C++ standard as the default has changed on GCC >= 6
EXTRA_CFLAGS="%ourcppflags -std=gnu++98 -Wno-error -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks -fno-lifetime-dse -fcommon"
EXTRA_CPP_FLAGS="%ourcppflags -std=gnu++98 -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks -fno-lifetime-dse -fcommon"
%ifarch s390x
EXTRA_CFLAGS="$EXTRA_CFLAGS $GCC_10_WORKAROUND_S390x"
EXTRA_CPP_FLAGS="$EXTRA_CPP_FLAGS $GCC_10_WORKAROUND_S390x"
%endif
%ifarch %{power64} ppc
# fix rpmlint warnings