From 542fe92d09b15a8bebc22b612708073b40277365 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Severin Gehwolf Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 16:43:27 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Workaround GCC 10-based build failure on s390x --- java-11-openjdk.spec | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/java-11-openjdk.spec b/java-11-openjdk.spec index 80b4cf7..82ecc54 100644 --- a/java-11-openjdk.spec +++ b/java-11-openjdk.spec @@ -1362,11 +1362,16 @@ export ARCH_DATA_MODEL=64 export CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -mieee" %endif +GCC_10_WORKAROUND_S390x="-fno-tree-coalesce-vars -fno-tree-copy-prop -fno-tree-dce -fno-tree-dominator-opts -fno-tree-dse -fno-tree-forwprop -fno-tree-fre -fno-tree-loop-distribute-patterns -fno-tree-loop-distribution -fno-tree-loop-vectorize -fno-tree-partial-pre -fno-tree-phiprop -fno-tree-pre -fno-tree-pta -fno-tree-scev-cprop -fno-tree-sink -fno-tree-slp-vectorize -fno-tree-slsr -fno-tree-sra -fno-tree-switch-conversion -fno-tree-tail-merge -fno-tree-ter -fno-tree-vrp -fno-unit-at-a-time -fno-unswitch-loops -fno-vect-cost-model -fno-version-loops-for-strides" # We use ourcppflags because the OpenJDK build seems to # pass EXTRA_CFLAGS to the HotSpot C++ compiler... # Explicitly set the C++ standard as the default has changed on GCC >= 6 EXTRA_CFLAGS="%ourcppflags -std=gnu++98 -Wno-error -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks -fno-lifetime-dse -fcommon" EXTRA_CPP_FLAGS="%ourcppflags -std=gnu++98 -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks -fno-lifetime-dse -fcommon" +%ifarch s390x +EXTRA_CFLAGS="$EXTRA_CFLAGS $GCC_10_WORKAROUND_S390x" +EXTRA_CPP_FLAGS="$EXTRA_CPP_FLAGS $GCC_10_WORKAROUND_S390x" +%endif %ifarch %{power64} ppc # fix rpmlint warnings