I updated my vim spec file plugin which improves %changelog generation
and didn't notice that my 'spec_chglog_format' config (which included a
trailing '-') caused a duplicate '-'.
Many years ago, the GPG signature file was included in the source list¹.
A compromise at kernel.org caused the tarballs to move to googlecode.com
for a number of releases and the signatures were not provided in an
easily downloaded format². When the source location was moved back to
kernel.org, the signature file had already been removed from the spec
file and was not re-added³.
There is an effort underway to make GPG signature verification a
requirement when upstream provides signatures⁴. Regardless of whether
this becomes a requirement in the packaging guidelines, verification of
upstream signatures makes good sense. It also makes the process easier
for git package maintainers, who are (or should be ;) doing this
manually for each upstream git release.
While adding the signatures to the source list, all non-upstream source
files were moved to Source10 and above. This should make it easier to
add new upstream source files in the future, avoiding the need for
tedious (and error-prone) renumbering of existing sources.
Remove the unused entry for Patch14 also.
¹ ea3f253 Include gpg signature for tarball in SRPM (2011-08-26)
² c57f383 Update to 1.7.9.1 (2012-02-15)
³ b741f45 Change source URLs, as googlecode doesn't have up-to-date
tarballs (2014-06-10)
⁴ https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/610https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts:GPGSignatureshttps://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/2TBK4LLNRH73QJQSXWFPCQYHGTSJ3C7P/
Using https URL's for source files provides a little more security for
those downloading the code. Packagers, of course, should be verifying
the GPG signature files before pushing new releases to Fedora's source
cache¹.
While we're changing the source URL's, we might as well use the smaller
tar.xz files which upstream provides. (This requires minor adjustments
to the unpacking of prebuilt html and man tarballs; tar on el5 does not
know how to automatically filter via xz.)
¹ Replace .xz with .sign for the signatures, which are made against the
uncompressed tarballs.
Workaround missing git subtree documentation in prebuilt docs, dropping
a redundant listing of Documentation/docbook-xsl.css,
Only add git-cvsserver binary once if the core dir matches the
bin dir as it does on el5.
Signed-off-by: Konrad Scherer <Konrad.Scherer@windriver.com>
Using pkg-config for the bash-completion path isn't an option on older
EL systems. To allow rebuilding of current git on those systems, the
bash-completion pkg-config bits are conditionalized similar to other
areas where Fedora and older EL differ.
An updated file package fixes the issues that caused the git-svn script
to not be properly parsed for perl requirements. This was fixed as part
of #1051598.
Rather than maintaining the same list if 3 different places, use a
single exclude_re variable for the files we want to exclude from the
main package file list.
Upstream took great care to make use of YAML::Any optional¹. It's fine
to pull it in on Fedora and EL >= 6, but it's not available for EL-5 so
we'll just filter it from the requirements.
¹ git-svn: use YAML format for mergeinfo cache when possible
https://github.com/git/git/commit/68f532f4b
When building packages, we install to DESTDIR but we don't want this to
end up hard-coded in the scripts.
This needs discussed upstream to find a proper solution.
