rpms/bind9.16
7
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Activity

Specific recursive query patterns may lead to an out-of-memory condition

Browse Source 
6319.	[security]	Query patterns that continuously triggered cache
			database maintenance could exhaust all available memory
			on the host running named. (CVE-2023-6516) [GL #4383]

Resolves: RHEL-25381
; Resolves: CVE-2023-6516
This commit is contained in:
Petr Menšík 2024-02-12 21:01:15 +01:00
parent 3fb3b2d2bd
commit 2c1332b473
2 changed files with 287 additions and 0 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

283
bind-9.16-CVE-2023-6516.patch Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,283 @@
From 6e08fef24d7ba491228a4083ea0f0e33253a1043 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Petr Mensik <pemensik@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2024 20:48:57 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Specific recursive query patterns may lead to an
out-of-memory condition
6319. [security] Query patterns that continuously triggered cache
database maintenance could exhaust all available memory
on the host running named. (CVE-2023-6516) [GL #4383]
Resolves: CVE-2023-6516
---
lib/dns/include/dns/rbt.h | 6 ++
lib/dns/mapapi | 2 +-
lib/dns/rbt.c | 1 +
lib/dns/rbtdb.c | 149 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
4 files changed, 107 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/dns/include/dns/rbt.h b/lib/dns/include/dns/rbt.h
index b67e602..69655b0 100644
--- a/lib/dns/include/dns/rbt.h
+++ b/lib/dns/include/dns/rbt.h
@@ -164,6 +164,12 @@ struct dns_rbtnode {
uint16_t locknum; /* note that this is not in the bitfield */
isc_refcount_t references;
/*@}*/
+
+ /*%
+ * This linked list is used to store nodes from which tree pruning can
+ * be started.
+ */
+ ISC_LINK(dns_rbtnode_t) prunelink;
};
typedef isc_result_t (*dns_rbtfindcallback_t)(dns_rbtnode_t *node,
diff --git a/lib/dns/mapapi b/lib/dns/mapapi
index 1b502d3..a46e190 100644
--- a/lib/dns/mapapi
+++ b/lib/dns/mapapi
@@ -13,4 +13,4 @@
# Whenever releasing a new major release of BIND9, set this value
# back to 1.0 when releasing the first alpha. Map files are *never*
# compatible across major releases.
-MAPAPI=3.0
+MAPAPI=4.0
diff --git a/lib/dns/rbt.c b/lib/dns/rbt.c
index 7f2c2d2..a220368 100644
--- a/lib/dns/rbt.c
+++ b/lib/dns/rbt.c
@@ -2283,6 +2283,7 @@ create_node(isc_mem_t *mctx, const dns_name_t *name, dns_rbtnode_t **nodep) {
HASHVAL(node) = 0;
ISC_LINK_INIT(node, deadlink);
+ ISC_LINK_INIT(node, prunelink);
LOCKNUM(node) = 0;
WILD(node) = 0;
diff --git a/lib/dns/rbtdb.c b/lib/dns/rbtdb.c
index 75f97f5..2707507 100644
--- a/lib/dns/rbtdb.c
+++ b/lib/dns/rbtdb.c
@@ -515,6 +515,10 @@ struct dns_rbtdb {
*/
rbtnodelist_t *deadnodes;
+ /* List of nodes from which recursive tree pruning can be started from.
+ * Locked by tree_lock. */
+ rbtnodelist_t prunenodes;
+
/*
* Heaps. These are used for TTL based expiry in a cache,
* or for zone resigning in a zone DB. hmctx is the memory
@@ -1060,6 +1064,7 @@ free_rbtdb(dns_rbtdb_t *rbtdb, bool log, isc_event_t *event) {
unsigned int i;
isc_result_t result;
char buf[DNS_NAME_FORMATSIZE];
+ dns_rbtnode_t *node = NULL;
dns_rbt_t **treep;
isc_time_t start;
dns_dbonupdatelistener_t *listener, *listener_next;
@@ -1086,8 +1091,6 @@ free_rbtdb(dns_rbtdb_t *rbtdb, bool log, isc_event_t *event) {
* the overhead of unlinking all nodes here should be negligible.
*/
for (i = 0; i < rbtdb->node_lock_count; i++) {
- dns_rbtnode_t *node;
-
node = ISC_LIST_HEAD(rbtdb->deadnodes[i]);
while (node != NULL) {
ISC_LIST_UNLINK(rbtdb->deadnodes[i], node, deadlink);
@@ -1095,6 +1098,12 @@ free_rbtdb(dns_rbtdb_t *rbtdb, bool log, isc_event_t *event) {
}
}
+ node = ISC_LIST_HEAD(rbtdb->prunenodes);
+ while (node != NULL) {
+ ISC_LIST_UNLINK(rbtdb->prunenodes, node, prunelink);
+ node = ISC_LIST_HEAD(rbtdb->prunenodes);
+ }
+
if (event == NULL) {
rbtdb->quantum = (rbtdb->task != NULL) ? 100 : 0;
}
@@ -1934,19 +1943,32 @@ is_leaf(dns_rbtnode_t *node) {
node->left == NULL && node->right == NULL);
}
+/*%
+ * The tree lock must be held when this function is called as it reads and
+ * updates rbtdb->prunenodes.
+ */
static inline void
send_to_prune_tree(dns_rbtdb_t *rbtdb, dns_rbtnode_t *node,
isc_rwlocktype_t locktype) {
- isc_event_t *ev;
- dns_db_t *db;
+ bool pruning_queued = (ISC_LIST_HEAD(rbtdb->prunenodes) != NULL);
+
+ INSIST(locktype == isc_rwlocktype_write);
- ev = isc_event_allocate(rbtdb->common.mctx, NULL, DNS_EVENT_RBTPRUNE,
- prune_tree, node, sizeof(isc_event_t));
new_reference(rbtdb, node, locktype);
- db = NULL;
- attach((dns_db_t *)rbtdb, &db);
- ev->ev_sender = db;
- isc_task_send(rbtdb->task, &ev);
+ INSIST(!ISC_LINK_LINKED(node, prunelink));
+ ISC_LIST_APPEND(rbtdb->prunenodes, node, prunelink);
+
+ if (!pruning_queued) {
+ isc_event_t *ev = NULL;
+ dns_db_t *db = NULL;
+
+ attach((dns_db_t *)rbtdb, &db);
+
+ ev = isc_event_allocate(rbtdb->common.mctx, NULL,
+ DNS_EVENT_RBTPRUNE, prune_tree, db,
+ sizeof(isc_event_t));
+ isc_task_send(rbtdb->task, &ev);
+ }
}
/*%
@@ -2220,17 +2242,26 @@ restore_locks:
}
/*
- * Prune the tree by recursively cleaning-up single leaves. In the worst
- * case, the number of iteration is the number of tree levels, which is at
- * most the maximum number of domain name labels, i.e, 127. In practice, this
- * should be much smaller (only a few times), and even the worst case would be
- * acceptable for a single event.
+ * Prune the tree by recursively cleaning up single leaves. Go through all
+ * nodes stored in the rbtdb->prunenodes list; for each of them, in the worst
+ * case, it will be necessary to traverse a number of tree levels equal to the
+ * maximum legal number of domain name labels (127); in practice, the number of
+ * tree levels to traverse will virtually always be much smaller (a few levels
+ * at most). While holding the tree lock throughout this entire operation is
+ * less than ideal, so is splitting the latter up by queueing a separate
+ * prune_tree() run for each node to start pruning from (as queueing requires
+ * allocating memory and can therefore potentially be exploited to exhaust
+ * available memory). Also note that actually freeing up the memory used by
+ * RBTDB nodes (which is what this function does) is essential to keeping cache
+ * memory use in check, so since the tree lock needs to be acquired anyway,
+ * freeing as many nodes as possible before the tree lock gets released is
+ * prudent.
*/
static void
prune_tree(isc_task_t *task, isc_event_t *event) {
- dns_rbtdb_t *rbtdb = event->ev_sender;
- dns_rbtnode_t *node = event->ev_arg;
- dns_rbtnode_t *parent;
+ dns_rbtdb_t *rbtdb = (dns_rbtdb_t *)event->ev_arg;
+ dns_rbtnode_t *node = NULL;
+ dns_rbtnode_t *parent = NULL;
unsigned int locknum;
UNUSED(task);
@@ -2238,44 +2269,60 @@ prune_tree(isc_task_t *task, isc_event_t *event) {
isc_event_free(&event);
RWLOCK(&rbtdb->tree_lock, isc_rwlocktype_write);
- locknum = node->locknum;
- NODE_LOCK(&rbtdb->node_locks[locknum].lock, isc_rwlocktype_write);
- do {
- parent = node->parent;
- decrement_reference(rbtdb, node, 0, isc_rwlocktype_write,
- isc_rwlocktype_write, true);
- if (parent != NULL && parent->down == NULL) {
- /*
- * node was the only down child of the parent and has
- * just been removed. We'll then need to examine the
- * parent. Keep the lock if possible; otherwise,
- * release the old lock and acquire one for the parent.
- */
- if (parent->locknum != locknum) {
- NODE_UNLOCK(&rbtdb->node_locks[locknum].lock,
- isc_rwlocktype_write);
- locknum = parent->locknum;
- NODE_LOCK(&rbtdb->node_locks[locknum].lock,
- isc_rwlocktype_write);
+ while ((node = ISC_LIST_HEAD(rbtdb->prunenodes)) != NULL) {
+ locknum = node->locknum;
+ NODE_LOCK(&rbtdb->node_locks[locknum].lock,
+ isc_rwlocktype_write);
+ do {
+ if (ISC_LINK_LINKED(node, prunelink)) {
+ ISC_LIST_UNLINK(rbtdb->prunenodes, node,
+ prunelink);
}
- /*
- * We need to gain a reference to the node before
- * decrementing it in the next iteration.
- */
- if (ISC_LINK_LINKED(parent, deadlink)) {
- ISC_LIST_UNLINK(rbtdb->deadnodes[locknum],
+ parent = node->parent;
+ decrement_reference(rbtdb, node, 0,
+ isc_rwlocktype_write,
+ isc_rwlocktype_write, true);
+
+ if (parent != NULL && parent->down == NULL) {
+ /*
+ * node was the only down child of the parent
+ * and has just been removed. We'll then need
+ * to examine the parent. Keep the lock if
+ * possible; otherwise, release the old lock and
+ * acquire one for the parent.
+ */
+ if (parent->locknum != locknum) {
+ NODE_UNLOCK(
+ &rbtdb->node_locks[locknum].lock,
+ isc_rwlocktype_write);
+ locknum = parent->locknum;
+ NODE_LOCK(
+ &rbtdb->node_locks[locknum].lock,
+ isc_rwlocktype_write);
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * We need to gain a reference to the node
+ * before decrementing it in the next iteration.
+ */
+ if (ISC_LINK_LINKED(parent, deadlink)) {
+ ISC_LIST_UNLINK(
+ rbtdb->deadnodes[locknum],
parent, deadlink);
+ }
+ new_reference(rbtdb, parent,
+ isc_rwlocktype_write);
+ } else {
+ parent = NULL;
}
- new_reference(rbtdb, parent, isc_rwlocktype_write);
- } else {
- parent = NULL;
- }
- node = parent;
- } while (node != NULL);
- NODE_UNLOCK(&rbtdb->node_locks[locknum].lock, isc_rwlocktype_write);
+ node = parent;
+ } while (node != NULL);
+ NODE_UNLOCK(&rbtdb->node_locks[locknum].lock,
+ isc_rwlocktype_write);
+ }
RWUNLOCK(&rbtdb->tree_lock, isc_rwlocktype_write);
detach((dns_db_t **)&rbtdb);
@@ -8726,6 +8773,8 @@ dns_rbtdb_create(isc_mem_t *mctx, const dns_name_t *origin, dns_dbtype_t type,
ISC_LIST_INIT(rbtdb->deadnodes[i]);
}
+ ISC_LIST_INIT(rbtdb->prunenodes);
+
rbtdb->active = rbtdb->node_lock_count;
for (i = 0; i < (int)(rbtdb->node_lock_count); i++) {
--
2.43.0

4
bind9.16.spec
View File

@ -132,6 +132,7 @@ Patch189: bind-9.16-CVE-2023-3341.patch
Patch194: bind-9.16-CVE-2023-4408.patch
Patch195: bind-9.16-CVE-2023-5517.patch
Patch196: bind-9.16-CVE-2023-5679.patch
Patch197: bind-9.16-CVE-2023-6516.patch
%{?systemd_ordering}
Requires: coreutils
@ -448,6 +449,7 @@ in HTML and PDF format.
%patch194 -p1 -b .CVE-2023-4408
%patch195 -p1 -b .CVE-2023-5517
%patch196 -p1 -b .CVE-2023-5679
%patch197 -p1 -b .CVE-2023-6516
%if %{with PKCS11}
%patch135 -p1 -b .config-pkcs11
@ -1172,6 +1174,8 @@ fi;
- Prevent assertion failure when nxdomain-redirect is used with
RFC 1918 reverse zones (CVE-2023-5517)
- Prevent assertion failure if DNS64 and serve-stale is used (CVE-2023-5679)
- Specific recursive query patterns may lead to an out-of-memory
condition (CVE-2023-6516)
* Wed Sep 20 2023 Petr Menšík <pemensik@redhat.com> - 32:9.16.23-0.16
- Limit the amount of recursion possible in control channel (CVE-2023-3341)