this avoids comparing against files on disk (and the huge diff the
test runner produces in case of failure). Instead we look for a
200 HTTP response with large enough size and some well known
strings inside the response data.
Because you cannot share data between test methods these have to all be
in one big function. This adds one series to test the failed compose
results, and a 2nd function to test for the successful compose.
This adds returning the commit id from read_commit, and a new function
read_recipe_and_id() that returns the commit id and the recipe in a
tuple.
If the commit is passed in, it is used as is. If no commit is passed in
it finds the most recent commit for the file on the selected branch and
returns that.
Missing recipes now raise a RecipeError with an informative message.
eg. "No commits for missing-recipe.toml on the master branch."
Passing ?branch=<branch-name> will use the specified branch instead of
master.
The new branch will not exist until a /recipes/new?branch=new-branch
POST is made. At that time the branch will be created based on the
current master branch and the new commit will be added to it.
- Fix `projects_depsolve()` to not consider a successful empty response
(rc == 0) as an error.
- Fix recipe_from_dict() to default modules and packages to empty lists
instead of `None`, to avoid a Python-ism in the API for consumers and
stay compatible to the bdcs API.
Fixes#290
Recipe should have its version bumped based on the version from the
previous commit, and not be bumped on the first commit. Fix the code and
the tests.
