Adam Williamson 818c2d5d8f Handle rpm -q commands failing if we didn't download anything ... I think this is new behaviour in rpm 4.19, or else we would have run into this before when testing an s390utils update. But it's easy enough to handle. Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>		2023-05-31 10:26:45 -07:00
..
anaconda.pm	Drop a no-op workaround (needle hasn't existed since 2021)	2023-05-04 09:57:14 -07:00
anacondatest.pm	Add a perltidy check and apply it to the entire codebase	2022-07-28 14:38:38 -07:00
bugzilla.pm	Add a perltidy check and apply it to the entire codebase	2022-07-28 14:38:38 -07:00
cockpit.pm	Clean up minimal browser environment setup	2023-03-02 13:51:08 -08:00
disks.pm	disks: also authenticate when unmounting	2023-05-18 15:45:57 -07:00
fedoradistribution.pm	Update serial console handling for upstream changes	2023-05-02 12:24:26 -07:00
freeipa.pm	Add a needle cleanup script, enhance the needle check script	2023-05-04 09:57:15 -07:00
installedtest.pm	_post_fail_hook: only do advisory package checks when appropriate	2022-12-14 08:47:46 -08:00
modularity.pm	Add a perltidy check and apply it to the entire codebase	2022-07-28 14:38:38 -07:00
packagetest.pm	Use pandoc-common instead of python3-kickstart for package tests	2023-03-18 09:44:02 -07:00
tapnet.pm	tapnet: don't double-declare @forwards	2022-05-26 14:49:57 -07:00
utils.pm	Handle rpm -q commands failing if we didn't download anything	2023-05-31 10:26:45 -07:00