This seems to be needed to prevent openQA trying to run x86_64
jobs on ppc64 workers (which, uh, doesn't go very well). openQA
is kinda supposed to not do this, but it seems like that got
broken somewhere along the line:
https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/20812
Summary:
As we're getting the Workstation dvd-ostree (OStree installer
image) built for Rawhide now, let's try testing it.
Test Plan:
Run the tests on a Rawhide compose that works and
has the image (e.g. 20170615.n.0). Check that new tests work
as expected and old tests are not adversely affected. A
corresponding diff for fedora_openqa will be coming to take
care of scheduling. Note that the tests will often soft fail
for now; this is intentional due to RHBZ#1193590, the bash
prompt for root is incorrect on ostree installs, so I have
added a needle that matches the incorrect prompt but which is
flagged as a workaround needle (so causing the test result to
be a soft fail).
Reviewers: jsedlak, jskladan
Reviewed By: jsedlak
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qa.fedoraproject.org/D1211
Summary:
This just adds the FreeIPA web UI and password change
test modules to the FreeIPA upgrade test (client end). It's
useful to check out these features too. We don't need to
separate these into separate jobs, as we're not trying to
fill out different matrix checkboxes here, we just want to
know whether everything works.
Test Plan:
Run the test, see that the modules work properly.
I was actually expecting this to fail given the issues with
the upgrade on the server end, but it seems to pass.
Reviewers: jsedlak, jskladan
Reviewed By: jsedlak
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qa.fedoraproject.org/D1207
Summary:
This adds an upgrade variant of the FreeIPA tests, with only
the simplest client enrolment (sssd) for now. The server test
starts from the N-1 release and deploys the domain controller
role. The client test similarly starts from the N-1 release
and, when the server is deployed, enrols as a domain client.
Then the server upgrades itself, while the client waits (as the
server is its name server). Then the client upgrades itself,
while the server does some self-checks. The server then waits
for the client to do its checks before decommissioning itself,
as usual. So, summary: *deployment* of both server and client
occurs on N-1, then both are upgraded, then the actual *checks*
occur on N.
In my testing, this all more or less works, except the role
decommission step fails. This failure seems to be a genuine one
so far as I can tell; I intend to file a bug for it soon.
Test Plan:
Run the new tests, check they work. Run the existing
FreeIPA tests (both the compose and the update variants), check
they both behave the same.
Reviewers: jsedlak, jskladan
Reviewed By: jsedlak
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qa.fedoraproject.org/D1204
Summary:
This adds a new test suite, run for Workstation and KDE live
images, which does not create a user during install. It then
expects initial-setup (KDE) or gnome-initial-setup (Workstation)
to appear after install, creates a user, and proceeds with
normal boot.
Note the ARM image test already covers the initial-setup text
mode, and the ARM minimal image is the only case where that
actually matters (it's not included in Server).
Test Plan:
Run the new tests, check they work. Run all old
tests, check the changes didn't break them.
Reviewers: jsedlak, jskladan
Reviewed By: jsedlak
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qa.fedoraproject.org/D1185
Summary:
For some reason, we have `USER_LOGIN` set to 'false' for the KDE
package set install test. I really don't know / remember why
that would be; I'd think we should create a user and log in as
that user to make sure it works properly when installing KDE
from the traditional installer. It's not strictly part of the
package set test, true, but still, seems worth doing.
Also, when `USER_LOGIN` is set to 'false' and the installer runs,
we create a user called 'false'. This doesn't seem like what we
wanted, so let's not do that. I dunno if there are any other
cases besides the KDE one that this commit changes, but still.
Test Plan:
Run the full test suite and look for weirdness, check
KDE package set test works as intended (now creates a user called
'test' and logs in as that user).
Reviewers: jsedlak, jskladan
Reviewed By: jsedlak
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qa.fedoraproject.org/D1182
Explicitly specify the ahci0.0 bus for the HDD in install_sata.
This is needed to work if we are using CDMODEL=ide-cd (which we
need at present to work around a bug with SCSI CDs), and is a
good idea anyway to ensure the drive is actually connected to
the SATA bus (I dunno if it was before or not).
Summary:
This adds an entirely new workflow for testing distribution
updates. The `ADVISORY` variable is introduced: when set,
`main.pm` will load an early post-install test that sets up
a repository containing the packages from the specified update,
runs `dnf -y update`, and reboots. A new templates file is
added, `templates-updates`, which adds two new flavors called
`updates-server` and `updates-workstation`, each containing
job templates for appropriate post-install tests. Scheduler is
expected to post `ADVISORY=(update ID) HDD_1=(base image)
FLAVOR=updates-(server|workstation)`, where (base image) is one
of the stable release base disk images produced by `createhdds`
and usually used for upgrade testing. This will result in the
appropriate job templates being loaded.
We rejig postinstall test loading and static network config a
bit so that this works for both the 'compose' and 'updates' test
flows: we have to ensure we bring up networking for the tap
tests before we try and install the updates, but still allow
later adjustment of the configuration. We take advantage of the
openQA feature that was added a few months back to run the same
module multiple times, so the `_advisory_update` module can
reboot after installing the updates and the modules that take
care of bootloader, encryption and login get run again. This
looks slightly wacky in the web UI, though - it doesn't show the
later runs of each module.
We also use the recently added feature to specify `+HDD_1` in
the test suites which use a disk image uploaded by an earlier
post-install test, so the test suite value will take priority
over the value POSTed by the scheduler for those tests, and we
will use the uploaded disk image (and not the clean base image
POSTed by the scheduler) for those tests.
My intent here is to enhance the scheduler, adding a consumer
which listens out for critpath updates, and runs this test flow
for each one, then reports the results to ResultsDB where Bodhi
could query and display them. We could also add a list of other
packages to have one or both sets of update tests run on it, I
guess.
Test Plan:
Try a post something like:
HDD_1=disk_f25_server_3_x86_64.img DISTRI=fedora VERSION=25
FLAVOR=updates-server ARCH=x86_64 BUILD=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c
ADVISORY=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c CURRREL=25 PREVREL=24
Pick an appropriate `ADVISORY` (ideally, one containing some
packages which might actually be involved in the tests), and
matching `FLAVOR` and `HDD_1`. The appropriate tests should run,
a repo with the update packages should be created and enabled
(and dnf update run), and the tests should work properly. Also
test a regular compose run to make sure I didn't break anything.
Reviewers: jskladan, jsedlak
Reviewed By: jsedlak
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qa.fedoraproject.org/D1143
The rule for test priorities is pretty simple. Ranges of
priority values map to the 'Milestone' by which the test must
be passing, per the release criteria. The priority for each
openQA test is the *highest* priority for any wiki test case /
criterion it covers.
0-20: critical smoke tests (higher than Alpha priority)
20-29: Alpha priority
30-39: Beta priority
40-49: Final priority
50+: Optional priority
Note that tests for non-release-blocking arches or images must
always be over 50; I've simply added 50 to the values for all
i386 tests in this change. Other than that, I just corrected a
few values which had got out of whack or were originally set
wrong.
Summary:
This adds a new test, memory_check, which just does a default
package set install with `inst.debug` parameter then uploads
the memory usage file (`/tmp/memory.dat`) at the end. We can
have check-compose use the data to analyze changes in memory
usage over time.
Test Plan:
Fire off the Workstation network install image tests
and make sure the memory usage test runs and works on all three
machines. This is live on staging already.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel_but_actually_jsedlak_who_uses_stupid_nicknames
Reviewed By: garretraziel_but_actually_jsedlak_who_uses_stupid_nicknames
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qa.fedoraproject.org/D1082
Summary:
Include some basic testing of Japanese input, and split the
input testing (including Russian) into a separate module, since
it's not really part of 'login' testing.
Test Plan:
Run the test, and the Russian and French tests too to
make sure they didn't break. Tested on staging. Note the Japanese
test soft fails, intentionally, at present, as I discovered a bug
while working on it:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=776189
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D1072
Using 'host' is, for some reason, causing the problem where non-
minimal installs fail to boot. No idea why, but switching the
CPU model to Nehalem solves it.
Summary:
The non-English tests so far did not test that graphical login
worked as expected, which is a fairly large hole. With this
change, they should do a Workstation install and test login to
both GNOME and the console works as expected. KDE is not yet
tested.
As part of this we tweak the implementation of keyboard layout
switching in graphical environments to use a generic function
in main_common which can handle both anaconda and desktops
(just GNOME at present, but should extend easily to any desktop
with a known switcher key and a visible layout indicator),
replacing the anacondatest class method. I kinda don't like that
the test has to specifically tell the function when it's in
anaconda, but I don't think I want to start experimenting with
a global 'test phase' openQA variable or anything like that at
present.
Fixes T842.
Test Plan:
Run the French and Russian install tests and check
they work as expected. Also run an English Workstation install
if you like, and make sure that didn't break. This change is
live on staging ATM, seems to work fine.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Maniphest Tasks: T842
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D1071
Summary:
I've been wanting to do this for a while; I think it'll let us
check for some significant changes between composes. This should
cause runs of a few test cases to collect and upload info on:
* installed packages
* free memory
* disk space
* active services
* 1 minute of CPU usage info (via top)
immediately after install and initial login. In some cases this
will be useful / interesting simply to look at directly, but
we can also have check-compose analyze the data and include
significant changes in its reports.
Test Plan:
Run affected tests, make sure the data collection
works.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D1046
Summary:
GNOME's update notification criteria are pretty braindead: it
fires the update check timer once on login then once every hour
thereafter, but only actually checks for and notifies of updates
once a day if it's after 6am(?!?!?!). So we have to do a bunch
of fiddling around to ensure we reliably get a notification.
Move the clock to 6am if it's earlier than that, and reset the
'last update check' timer to 48 hours ago, then log in to GNOME
after that.
Note: I thought this still wasn't fully reliable, but I've looked
into all the recent failures of either test on staging and
there's only one which was really 'no update notification came
up', and the logs clearly indicate PK did run an update check,
so I don't think that was a test bug (I think something went
wrong with the update check). The other failures are all 'GNOME
did something wacky', plus one case where the needle didn't quite
match because I think the match area is slightly too tall; I'll
fix that in a second.
Test Plan:
Run the tests on both KDE and GNOME and check they
work properly now (assuming nothing unrelated breaks, like KDE
crashing...)
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D1039
These keep failing because they don't work right. I have it
partially fixed on a branch but not fully fixed yet, and it's
been this way for a few weeks already, so let's disable the
tests for now until I can actually complete the fix.
Goes along with the commit to openqa_fedora_tools that makes
flavor generation go through fedfind's `correct_image` helper,
which changes the 'type' of ostree installer images from 'boot'
to 'dvd-ostree'. See https://pagure.io/pungi/issue/417 for
more background on this. Committing without review as it's an
urgent issue we have to fix right away.
Summary:
I started out wanting to fix an issue I noticed today where
graphical upgrade tests were failing because they didn't wait
for the graphical login screen properly; the test was sitting
at the 'full Fedora logo' state of plymouth for a long time,
so the current boot_to_login_screen's wait_still_screen was
triggered by it and the function wound up failing on the
assert_screen, because it was still some time before the real
login screen appeared.
So I tweaked the boot_to_login_screen implementation to work
slightly differently (look for a login screen match, *then* -
if we're dealing with a graphical login - wait_still_screen
to defeat the 'old GPU buffer showing login screen' problem
and assert the login screen again). But while working on it,
I figured we really should consolidate all the various places
that handle the bootloader -> login, we were doing it quite
differently in all sorts of different places. And as part of
that, I converted the base tests to use POSTINSTALL (and thus
go through the shared _wait_login tests) instead of handling
boot themselves. As part of *that*, I tweaked main.pm to not
require all POSTINSTALL tests have the _postinstall suffix on
their names, as it really doesn't make sense, and renamed the
tests.
Test Plan: Run all tests, see if they work.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D1015
Summary:
this more or less covers desktop_error_checks and desktop_
update_notification, though it can't really distinguish
between them easily. All we know is that if both the live and
postinstall versions of this test pass, both of those tests
pass. Any fails will have to be investigated manually.
Test Plan:
Run the tests for both KDE and Workstation, see
what happens. Workstation will fail for F25 and Rawhide at
present, due to SELinux/abrt notifications.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D1004
Summary:
Very similar to the CLI update test, but using the desktops'
update applications. This is based off the CLI update test
branch as it uses the shared functions that branch introduced.
We do not use the fake update packages, as they don't really
do anything useful for these tests; for dnf they can help us
distinguish between issues with the dnf mechanism and issues
with the repos, but we can't really tell that in the graphical
case. So we only use the python3-kickstart package here.
Test Plan:
Run the test on both KDE and GNOME and ensure it
performs as intended. I've been testing it on staging, so you
can see it there.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D1010
Summary:
this uses a couple of test repos with fake packages to test the
basic dnf mechanisms are working, then messes around with the
python3-kickstart package a bit to try and test the default repo
configuration is working, keys are in place and so on. We use
python3-kickstart because we should be able to rely on the copy
of that package in the 'stable' repo being installable (or else
the compose would have failed), but it shouldn't be vital to
the operation of the system.
Test Plan: Run the test, see if it works.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D1006
Summary:
Pretty straightforward tests which deploy the database
server role and exercise it a bit.
Test Plan: Run the tests, check they work properly.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D991
Summary:
we have a long-standing problem with all the tests that hit
the repositories. The tests are triggered as soon as a compose
completes. At this point in time, the compose is not synced to
the mirrors, where the default 'fedora' repo definition looks;
the sync happens after the compose completes, and there is also
a metadata sync step that must happen after *that* before any
operation that uses the 'fedora' repository definition will
actually use the packages from the new compose. Thus all net
install tests and tests that installed packages have been
effectively testing the previous compose, not the current one.
We have some thoughts about how to fix this 'properly' (such
that the openQA tests wouldn't have to do anything special,
but their 'fedora' repository would somehow reflect the compose
under test), but none of them is in place right now or likely
to happen in the short term, so in the mean time this should
deal with most of the issues. With this change, everything but
the default_install tests for the netinst images should use
the compose-under-test's Everything tree instead of the 'fedora'
repository, and thus should install and test the correct
packages.
This relies on a corresponding change to openqa_fedora_tools
to set the LOCATION openQA setting (which is simply the base
location of the compose under test).
Test Plan:
Do a full test run, check (as far as you can) tests run sensibly
and use appropriate repositories.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D989
This adds possiblity to specify more than one test in ENTRYPOINT
variable - test names should be separated with spaces and loading is done
as with POSTINSTALL.
Add _console_shutdown test to ARM image deployment.
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D973
Summary:
This goes with D968, which bumped the version of the disk_ks
image, so templates has to stay in sync.
Test Plan:
As per D968 (you'll need this diff as well or else
the tests will try to use the wrong disk image).
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D969
Summary:
pretty simple stuff here. The distinction between 'firefox' and
'browser' is that the 'browser' needles I expect would also be
correct for other default browsers, while the 'firefox' needles
are specific to Firefox. We need '-kde' variants of some Firefox
needles where interface text is included, because the font is
Cantarell in GNOME but whatever the default 'sans' font is in
KDE - I suppose we should really use -thatfontsname rather than
-kde, but I can't think what it's called...
I couldn't do the 'log in to FAS' bit of the test since we don't
really have a sane way to provide a password while not exposing
it to the public.
Test Plan:
Run the test, check it works - for both KDE and
Workstation.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D938
Summary:
again, added as a non-fatal module for realmd_join_cockpit as
it's convenient to do it here. Also abstract a couple of ipa
bits into a new exporter package in the style of SUSE's
mm_network, rather than using ill-fitting class inheritance as
we have before - we should probably convert our existing class
based stuff to work this way.
Also a few minor tweaks and clean-ups of the other tests:
The path in console_login() where we detect login of a regular
user when we want root or vice versa and log out was actually
broken because it would 'wait' for the result of the 'exit'
command, which obviously doesn't work (as it relies on running
another command afterwards, and we're no longer at a shell).
This commit no longer actually uses that path, but I spotted
the bug with an earlier version of this which did, and we may
as well keep the fix.
/var/log/lastlog is an apparently-extremely-large sparse file.
A couple of times it seemed to cause tar to run very slowly
while creating the /var/log archive for upload on failure. It's
no use for diagnosing bugs, so we may as well exclude it from
the archive.
I caught cockpit webUI login failing one time when testing the
test, so threw in a wait_still_screen before starting to type
the URL, as we have for the FreeIPA webUI.
I also caught a timing issue with the openQA webUI policy add
step; the test flips from the Users screen to the HBAC screen
then clicks the 'add' button, but there's actually an identical
'add' button on *both* screens, so it could wind up trying to
click the one on the Users screen instead, if the web UI took
a few milliseconds to switch. So we throw in a needle match to
make sure we're actually on the HBAC screen before clicking the
button.
We make the freeipa_webui test a 'milestone' so that if the
new test fails, restoring to the last-known-good milestone
doesn't take so long; it actually seems like openQA can get
confused and try to cancel the test if restoring the milestone
takes a *really* long time, and wind up with a zombie qemu
process, which isn't good. This seems to avoid that happening.
Test Plan:
In the simple case, just run all the FreeIPA-related
tests on Fedora 24 (as Rawhide is broken) and make sure they all
work properly. To get a bit more advanced you can throw in an
`assert_script_run 'false'` in either of the non-fatal tests to
break it and make sure things go properly when that happens (the
last milestone should be restored - which should be right after
freeipa_webui, sitting at tty1 - and run properly; things are
set up so each test starts with root logged in on tty1).
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D935
Summary:
we can test this quite easily by placing the standard openQA
updates image in the NFS repo used for the NFS repo install
tests. We just have to copy the contents of the ISO (instead of
directly exporting the ISO loop mount as an NFS share) so we
can add this extra file.
At first I planned to combine this with the NFS repo variation
test, but when you use a remote stage2 like this it changes repo
setup such that the packaging.log line we look for to verify
the remote repo was used does not show up, and there's enough
fuzziness in how anaconda-dracut fudges inst.repo and
inst.stage2 that it's probably a good idea to test them
separately anyhow.
Test Plan:
Run the new test and the other NFS tests, make sure
this one works and the others don't break.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D929
Summary:
This requires us to handle decryption each time we reboot in
the upgrade process, so factor that little block out into the
base class so we don't have to keep pasting it. It's also a
bit tricky to integrate into the 'catch a boot loop' code we
have to deal with #1349721, but I think this should work. There
is a matching openqa_fedora_tools diff to generate the disk
image.
Test Plan:
Run the tests, check that they work, run the other
upgrade and encrypted install tests and check they still work
properly too.
Reviewers: garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D922
Summary:
goes with the openqa_fedora_tools commit to switch from virt-
builder to virt-install. That bumps all the imgvers, so we must
update templates correspondingly.
Test Plan: As per D917.
Reviewers: garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D918
Summary:
as a new, non-fatal test step in the cockpit enrolment test,
because it kinda fits in there; we have an enrolled system with
a web browser *right there*. This will require making the wiki
reporting stuff slightly cleverer so we can say 'report a pass
for this wiki test instance if this test step passed', but that
should be possible. Making this non-fatal means the rest of the
cockpit enrolment test will go ahead even if the freeipa web UI
fails.
The 'check if we can log in' stuff is identical to freeipa_
client_postinstall except with different user names, so we could
potentially factor that out somehow, but I couldn't think of a
super clean way to do it so for now it's just copied.
Note this diff is on top of the freeipa-realmd branch which
is for D894, it's not on top of develop.
Test Plan:
Run the modified test and see if it works. No other
tests are modified, so they should be OK.
Reviewers: garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D895
Summary:
This is a pretty straightforward IPA joining test. Since I
figured out how to set up a DHCP server for support_server,
let's do the same for the domain controller so we can simplify
these enrolment tests a bit.
We also extend the timeout on installing haveged on the server
a bit (2 minutes is a bit low when it hits a slow metadata
download), and drop an unnecessary clone_host_file from the
cockpit join test (it was only there for testing and the next
operation immediately overwrites it).
Test Plan:
Do a full server DVD test run, check the new test
works and none of the others broke.
Reviewers: garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D894
Summary:
Set up the support server to provide DHCP/DNS functionality and
an NFS server, providing a kickstart. Add a kickstart test just
like the other root-user-crypted-net kickstart tests except it
gets the kickstart from the support server via NFS. Also add NFS
repository tests and a second support server for Server-dvd-iso
flavor: this test must run on that flavor to ensure that packages
are actually available. The support server just mounts the
attached 'DVD' and exports it via NFS.
Note we don't need to do anything clever to avoid IP conflicts
between the two support servers, because os-autoinst-openvswitch
ensures each worker group is on its own VLAN.
As part of adding the NFS repo tests, I did a bit of cleanup,
moving little things we were repeating a lot into anacondatest,
and sharing the 'check if the repo was used' logic between all
the tests (by making it into a test step that's loaded for all
of them). I also simplified the 'was repo used' checks a bit,
it seems silly to run a 'grep' command inside the VM then have
os-autoinst do a grep on the output (which is effectively what
we were doing before), instead we'll just use a single grep
within the VM, and clean up the messy quoting/escaping a bit.
Test Plan:
Run all tests - at least all repository tests - and
check they work (make sure the tests are actually still sane,
not just that they pass). I've done runs of all the repo tests
and they look good to me, but please double-check. I'm currently
re-running the whole 24-20160609.n.0 test on staging with these
changes.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D888
Summary:
this is following a SUSE model for tests where we need a server
end but don't want setting up the server to constitute a real
test in itself, we want it to be stable. The 'support_server'
test just boots a pre-built (by createhdds) disk image, sets up
networking, and runs the iSCSI server.
To run the iSCSI test we need to handle networking config in
anaconda (or we would need to set the support server up as a
DHCP server, which may be worth considering), so this adds that.
We also need to be able to specify the target device for a
volume in custom partitioning, so this adds that too.
Test Plan:
Build the necessary support server disk image (use
D883), then run the test and make sure it works. Also make sure
all other tests continue to work.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D884
Summary:
This requires a few other changes:
* turn clone_host_resolv into clone_host_file, letting you clone
any given host file (cloning /etc/hosts seems to make both
server deployment and client enrolment faster/more reliable)
* allow loading of multiple POSTINSTALL tests (so we can share
the freeipa_client_postinstall test). Note this is compatible,
existing uses will work fine
* move initial password change for the IPA test users into the
server deployment test (so the client tests don't conflict over
doing that)
* add GRUB_POSTINSTALL, for specifying boot parameters for boot of
the installed system, and make it work by tweaking _console_wait
_login (doesn't work for _graphical_wait_login yet, as I didn't
need that)
* make the static networking config for tap tests into a library
function so the tests can share it
* handle ABRT problem dirs showing up in /var/spool/abrt as well
as /var/tmp/abrt (because the enrol attempt hits #1330766 and
the crash report shows up in /var/spool/abrt, don't ask me why
the difference, I just work here)
* specify the DNS servers from the worker host's resolv.conf as
the forwarders for the FreeIPA server when deploying it; if we
don't do this, rolekit defaults to using the root servers as
forwarders(!) and thus we get the public, not phx2-appropriate,
results for e.g. mirrors.fedoraproject.org, some of which the
workers can't reach, so PackageKit package install always fails
(boy, was it fun figuring THAT mess out)
Even after all that, the test still doesn't actually pass, but
I'm reasonably confident this is because it's hitting actual bugs,
not because it's broken. It runs into #1330766 nearly every time
(I think I saw *one* time the enrolment actually succeeded), and
seems to run into a subsequent bug I hadn't seen before when
trying to work around that by trying the join again (see
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1330766#c37 ).
Test Plan:
Run the test, see what happens. If you're really lucky,
it'll actually pass. But you'll probably run into #1330766#c37,
I'm mostly posting for comment. You'll need a tap-capable openQA
instance to test this.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D880
Summary:
This adds tests for the Server_cockpit_default and cockpit_basic
test cases. Some notes: I was initially thinking of combining
these into a single test with multiple test modules and coming
up with a system for doing wiki reporting based on individual
test module status, but because we'll also want to do a cockpit
FreeIPA enrol test, I decided against it. We don't really want
to combine all three because then we would skip the cockpit
tests whenever FreeIPA server deployment failed, which isn't
ideal. So since we'll need a separate FreeIPA enrolment test
anyway it doesn't really make sense to go to the trouble of
designing a system for loading multiple postinstall tests (though
I have an idea for that!) and a per-module wiki reporting system.
This was the most minimal and hopefully reliable method for
running Cockpit from a stock Server install that I could think
of. An alternative approach would be to have, say, the most
recent stable Workstation live as a 'stock' asset and have two
tests, one which runs a stock Server install and just waits and
another which boots the live image and accesses the cockpit
running on the other box, but that seems a bit over-complex. It
is not possible to have dependencies between tests for different
ISOs, in case you were wondering about having a Workstation live
test which runs parallel with a Server DVD test, we can't do
that. One funny thing is the font that winds up getting used for
the desktop, but I don't *think* that should be a problem.
Picking needles was a bit tricky; any improvement suggestions
are welcome. I'm hoping it turns out to be safe to rely on some
dbus log messages being present; I think logging into Cockpit
triggers activation of the realmd dbus interface, so there
*should* always be some messages related to that. An alternative
would just be to match on a sliver of the dark grey table header
and the light grey row beneath it and assume that'll always be
the first message (whatever the message is), but then we have to
find some area of the message details screen which is always
present for any message, and it just seems a tad more likely to
result in false passes. Similary I'm making an assumption that
auditd is always going to show up on the first page of the
Services screen and the details screen will always show that
'loaded...enabled' text.
Test Plan:
Run the tests and see if they work! See
https://openqa.stg.fedoraproject.org/tests/21373 and
https://openqa.stg.fedoraproject.org/tests/21371 for my tests.
Reviewers: garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D874
Summary:
The test here is a bit ugly, but it should work. Better ideas
welcome =)
Test Plan:
Run the test, check it works (and maybe hack it up
a bit and check it fails properly too, it worked first time for
me which is always suspicious)
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D870
Summary:
the Server DVD now just has 'Fedora Server' and 'Custom
Operating System' environments. Custom is basically minimal.
So we can use the DVD for 'universal' testing again, these
needles match the anaconda_minimal tags.
Test Plan:
Run the 'universal' tests on a DVD ISO with these
needles added, test that they work OK and use the 'Custom' env.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D844
Summary:
Requires new needles and test suite and job template, plus a
few tweaks to handle 'switched' keyboard layouts (so we use the
switched layout in the username and password).
Test Plan:
Run the test and see that it...fails. But that's OK!
It's a genuine bug: RHBZ #1333998 . At least make sure it gets
to that point and no other tests have broken and all the needles
look sane.
Reviewers: garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D846
ARM actually doesn't have "install" test, but in install matrix,
there is test whether ARM disk boots into initial_setup. HDD is saved
after this test for Base tests.
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D853
Summary:
I really just want to add the desktop_terminal test, but I think
this refactor is in order now. It splits up loading of the
various test phases (much as SUSE do it) and allows us to run
the post-install tests without the install tests, for e.g. I
tweaked things to allow the upgrade tests to use the existing
_wait_login tests for final login and combine the two upgrade
postinstall tests into one simple one.
This comes with a bit of a behaviour change to make graphical
wait login behave the same as console wait login: it will log
in unless USER_LOGIN is set to 'false'. Previously it only
logged in if both USER_LOGIN and USER_PASSWORD were set, which
I don't think ever happened in a graphical test, so we never
actually did a graphical login. The intent here is we should do
a login on the default_install tests. That's going a bit beyond
the test case, but it seems like a reasonable thing to test. We
can set USER_LOGIN to false if we don't want to do it.
Test Plan:
Do a full test run, make sure the new tests work and
no old tests break.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D839
Summary:
These require openQA tap networking to allow the server and
client boxes to communicate, and require masquerading (NAT) so
the server at least can reach a repository (dnf/rolekit really,
really do not want to work without a repo connection).
They use the 'parallel' test support to have the server deploy
run first while the client enrol test waits at the grub menu
until the server is done before it goes ahead.
This is all deployed and working on stg. The really tricky bit
was getting all the openvswitch and firewall config right in
ansible.
We *could* do the server deploy test as a follow-on from the
default install test to save the install, but then we'd have to
teach it to change the hostname and set up static networking
post-install. I'm not sure if it's worth doing that.
This requires the corresponding openqa_fedora_tools commit that
adds the hard disks (containing the kickstarts - it's possible
to get them from remote during install, but we have to set up
name resolution or hard code the IP of the server).
Test Plan:
Deploy this and the openqa_fedora_tools commit,
generate the disks, configure the networking (good luck! See
the docs in openqa_fedora_tools) and see if you can run the
tests. If you're using Docker, uh...sorry. You somehow need to
set things up so the workers can use tap interfaces that can
talk to each other and are NATed to the outside world. Have fun.
I can talk you through it on IRC...
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D831
Summary:
BOOT_UPDATES_IMG_URL is a pretty misleading name - it used to
be the actual URL, but now it's simply a boolean that decides
whether we look for the effect of the openQA updates image or
not. TEST_UPDATES seems clearer.
GRUBADD does the same thing as GRUB, on top of it. The point of
this is so we can add an option to the scheduler CLI that lets
you say 'run the normal tests, but with this updates image' -
so we can easily (albeit manually triggered) check the impact
of some anaconda change that needs testing. It should never be
set in the templates or the tests, it's there strictly for the
scheduler (whether that's fedora_openqa_schedule or literally a
person calling `client isos post`) to use as a kind of override.
The tests that test updates image loading will probably fail
when doing this, but all other tests should work as intended,
including ones that specify GRUB, becase the extra params will
just get added on top. That's why I invented a new var instead
of just letting the scheduler override GRUB's value when POST
ing.
Test Plan:
Check the rename didn't break anything (updates tests
still work). Run tests with GRUBADD param, make sure value is
correctly appended to cmdline both when GRUB is also specified
and when it is not.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D801
Summary:
per details in T759, the 'unipony' updates image we use to test
the updates image features doesn't work with latest anaconda (f24
and Rawhide). I've built a new updates image which uses a neat
anaconda feature that allows you to override CSS with a file in
a special location; it sets the background for disk capacity
texts on the INSTALLATION DESTINATION spoke to be pink. This
lets us use a simple needle that just looks for a pink blob on
that spoke, on the basis that it's unlikely there'll ever be a
pink blob there for any other reason, so if there is one, the
updates image worked. There will be an accompanying tools diff
to change the updates disk image to use the new updates image.
Test Plan:
Do a test run and check the updates image tests pass
and no other tests are broken. You'll need to pull in the tools
diff and re-generate the updates disk image to check that test,
the scsi_updates_img test should work with just this diff.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D799
Summary:
this should avoid unnecessary disk uploads and hopefully help
further reduce the incidence of weird failures in the chained
tests.
With this change we should only upload disk images for the cases
where we're actually going to run the chained tests: we won't
upload disk images for default_install runs on images we don't
run the chained tests for, or for the UEFI job for images we
*do* run the chained tests for.
We only actually need to run the current chained tests
for Server DVD, Workstation live and KDE live x86_64; there's
no need to run them for Everything boot, so we drop that.
Test Plan:
Do a full test run and make sure all tests run
properly and we now only upload disk images where we really need
to.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D794
Summary:
these together test QA:Testcase_kickstart_firewall from the
Server matrix. I'll have to come up with some kinda way to
handle reporting that, might be tricky.
Couple of tweaks to overall test flow: tests can now specify
a POSTINSTALL variable which will load a post-install test
following a naming convention, and tests can specify USER_LOGIN
as 'false' to disable the 'log in as a user' step entirely. We
could easily adjust the kickstarts to create a user so the test
could log in as one, but it seems like an unnecessary step and
I liked the idea of allowing the user login to be skipped.
Test Plan:
Schedule 'universal' tests, check the new tests run
and pass or fail as they should, check no other test is broken
by the logic flow changes.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D792
Summary:
We named a bunch of the tests 'server_foo' back when we were
starting out and didn't really know what we were doing. They're
all really installation tests, not 'server' tests. I actually
want to start adding some Server tests now, so it seems like a
good time to fix that mess. This standardizes on 'install_' as
a prefix for installation tests, converting all the 'server_'
tests and fixing up a couple of odd cases to use 'install_'.
Test Plan:
Apply along with the matching commit for tools, do
a full test run and report test, and make sure all tests run
with the new names and correct ResTups are generated for wiki
submission.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D790
With the arrival of Pungi 4, the scheduler is no longer using
fedfind-provided BUILD and FLAVOR values, but ones derived from
Pungi properties. BUILD is now simply the Pungi compose_id.
FLAVOR is produced by joining the Pungi variant, type, and
format with '-' characters as the separators.
Pungi, unfortunately, does not treat 'Rawhide' as a release, it
synthesizes a release number for Rawhide composes and places
that in the compose ID. To cope with that, for now, the
scheduler will set RAWHIDE to '1' if the compose is a Rawhide
one. As we have to adapt all places where we parse the release
in any case, this commit consolidates them into a fedorabase
subroutine.
For the one place where we also used to parse the 'milestone'
from fedfind, there is a placeholder get_milestone subroutine
which currently returns an empty string, as I don't yet have a
good handle on how to draw the kinds of distinctions fedfind
mapped to 'milestone' from Pungi metadata.
Summary:
per T691, this has never actually tested SATA. With os-autoinst
4.2 it actually tests PATA, with os-autoinst 4.3 it breaks.
We can't find a way to make it do what we want with os-autoinst
4.3, so we're dropping the HDDMODEL bit entirely for now. We
will file a ticket upstream to see if this can be solved. We
keep the test itself because it's also the only test that hits
'guided_multi'; I'll post a matching diff for tools to change
the wiki reporting config to match.
Test Plan:
Schedule tests with os-autoinst 4.3 and see if this
one runs properly now.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D730
Summary:
we have a KDE column for the 'base' tests, so we should run
them on the kde_live flavor.
Test Plan:
Schedule a full test run, ensure all three base
tests are scheduled and run correctly for KDE live.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D720
Summary:
Not much to say, pretty much just implements the test case using
some commands I dug up that give us handy 0/1 exit statuses.
The assert_script_run function (from testapi) simply runs a
command/script and passes or fails based on the exit status;
we use a handy bash-ism when we *want* the exit status to be 1.
Test Plan: Run the test and check that it passes (properly).
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D713
I messed up the last commit and mistakenly included this test,
which I've been working on and is not yet reviewed. The commit
was only supposed to add base_services_start. I'll send a new
diff for service_manipulation.
Summary:
pretty simple, just make sure no services failed to start. We
may run into the rngd issue here, not sure, let's land it and
see!
Test Plan:
I guess run the test and see what happens? I haven't
actually tested this myself yet, so, yeah.
Reviewers: garretraziel, jskladan
Reviewed By: garretraziel, jskladan
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D710
Summary:
Along with the matching change to fedora-openqa-schedule to pass
these variables in when scheduling jobs, this avoids hardcoding
the release numbers for the upgrade tests (which means someone
has to remember to edit them every release). The new createhdds
similarly uses get_current_release() to decide what releases it
needs images for, so all this should hook up and work magically
without any human intervention required.
For clarity, the effect of the '_upgrade_' tests is "run an
upgrade from the 'current' Fedora release to whatever release
is being tested", and the effect of the '_upgrade_2_' tests is
"run an upgrade from the 'previous' Fedora release to whatever
release is being tested".
Test Plan:
Apply with D702, schedule upgrade tests, and make
sure the correct hard disk image filenames are used.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D703
This adds missing default_install tests to templates - we've missed
KDE live and Server DVD on UEFI for some reason and Workstation netinst was
missing. After this, we should have all non-optional tests from "Default
boot and install" section covered.
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D693
Summary:
so here's our first attempt to use the 'carry on from a previous
test' stuff! This adds a base_selinux test that uses a disk
image from a previous default_install run, and adds jobtemplates
to run base_selinux for appropriate products: generic_boot
(for nightly tests), server_dvd, and workstation_live. Note that
you'll want to either update to the newest openQA package I just
built in COPR or create /var/lib/openqa/share/factory/tmp owned
by geekotest; openQA tries to use that directory as MOJO_TMPDIR
but in 4.2, if the directory doesn't exist, it doesn't create it,
and we wind up with the default MOJO_TMPDIR which is /tmp; when
the disk image is uploaded it creates a huge temp file in /tmp
and may well exhaust the available space as it's a tmpfs. I've
backported a recent upstream commit that tries to create the
directory if it doesn't exist, in 4.2-10.
It seems like openQA is smart enough to figure out the
dependencies correctly, so the 'base_selinux' test for each
product depends on the 'default_install' test for the same
product (not any of the other default_install runs) and will
use the hard disk image it produces.
Test Plan:
Do a full test run and make sure base_selinux tests
appear for appropriate products, depend on the correct default_
install test, the default_install test uploads the hard disk
image correctly, and the base_selinux test runs correctly. And
of course that nothing else broke in the process...
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: jskladan
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D699
Summary:
this is following a couple of upstream changes I noticeed while
playing with dump_templates. Upstream has completely got rid of
the 'variables' keys from all dicts, and when you run dump_
templates the output does not contain any 'variables' keys, so
it seems reasonable to ditch these entirely (I think it was some
old thing that got subsumed into 'settings'). Also, when you
run dump_templates the 'prio' values come out in JobTemplates,
not in TestSuites; if you look at load_templates there's a bit
marked "we have to migrate the prio from the TestSuite to the
JobTemplate" which does exactly what it sounds like, so it
seems a good idea to move these instead of relying on that to
always be there.
While I had to re-do all the priorities anyway I tried to clean
them up a bit. The idea is roughly this:
10 - 19: most-critical sanity tests (i.e. default_install)
20 - 29: Alpha tests
30 - 39: Beta tests
40 - 49: Final tests
50+ : Optional tests
within each group I ordered 64-bit first, UEFI second, and
32-bit last (usually just as x0 / x1 / x2).
Test Plan:
Check that the file is valid and loads correctly,
and that everything works more or less the same except the
order of tests run is a bit different.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: jskladan, garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D692
add KDE package set testcase - this only adds needles and
new testcase configuration, because with needles cleanup from D670,
it should work without change in code.
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D673
Let's use the same principle with DESKTOP tag as we use with
LANGUAGE tag. Where there are any GNOME-only (or KDE-only) needles, tag
them with `DESKTOP-gnome` and delete then when different `DESKTOP` value
is specified. This will help with `QA:Testcase_Package_Sets_KDE_Package_Install`
testcase - we will be able to use almost the same code and check that KDE
got installed properly.
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D670
damnit, that was still wrong. This should do the trick: we can
do 32-bit F23 upgrade tests now (virt-builder added the base
image we need), so re-add that, and put things in the best
order and fix the priorities.
Noticed some problems with the commit while testing it: we
weren't doing 32-bit minimal (to avoid having too many tests,
I think) so let's not do it for upgrade_2 for now, and also
the arch on one test was wrong.
Summary:
This bumps the existing upgrade tests to F23, and drops the
32-bit ones for now, as there is no 32-bit F23 base image for
virt-builder - RHBZ #1288733. It then adds new tests named
'upgrade_2_(etc)' and associates them with the F22 images. The
intent is that we should always have two sets of upgrade tests,
one for each of the currently-supported stable releases; when
we bump to testing F25, the 'upgrade' tests will be bumped to
F24 and the 'upgrade_2' tests to F23, and so on. There will be
a matching diff for openqa_fedora_tools.
Test Plan:
Execute a test run and make sure all the upgrade
tests run; of course you need to make sure you've built the
required disk images.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D679
As we saw with F23 testing, qemu32 isn't really supported CPU. Also,
we cannot be sure that `std` is really supported graphics. This changes MACHINE
variables to use `host` CPU with 64bit machines (moreover, this is the case in
BOS now). It also deletes 32bit machine and schedules 32bit tests on 64bit
instead. It also changes graphics to `qxl`. Even though we aren't using SPICE, qxl has
better support (and higher priority) and it seems to work OK with VNC. Fixes T637.
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D655
There is a bug (it is fixed in newest unstable version though) in openQA
4.2-1.2 that when you use iSCI HDD device, it fails to boot. Workaround is to
set CDMODEL=scsi-cd (and it won't hurt even when this gets fixed in stable).
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D642
PART_TABLE_TYPE variable says which type of partition table type
should be on attached HDDs.
Some tests with uefi have to use disks with gpt.
Tests are amended to use right disks.
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D623
Summary: simple enough. scheduler should already have the necessary bits.
Test Plan:
Kick off a run and see if we get tests, and the results are
reported to the wiki (Final TC1 should work).
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D607
Summary:
We have these 'atomic installer' images (so far just Cloud),
and maxamillion wanted to get them tested. Turns out it's
pretty trivial - they look much like other installs. Only
little wrinkle is they have a reduced hub (no repository
needles) like live images, but are not like live images in
any other way, so I rejigged the 'small hub needle filtering'
handling a bit.
There will be an accompanying diff for tools, and also some
changes in fedfind (these images are getting built nightly
for *current stable*, and it'd be good to test those).
Because we'd like to test the 22 nightlies, I had to add some
needles for 'olddpi' versions of a few screens. See 2e4c1c2 -
the 22 Atomic installer images still have the old GTK+ code
meaning they run at 96.09dpi. I only retook the necessary
needles for the default-install test, if we add any others we
made need to retake a few more needles.
Test Plan:
Schedule jobs for a compose with the atomic installer
image. You will need the matching openqa_fedora_tools diff and
the very latest git fedfind. Check the test for that image runs,
all other tests run as usual, excessive images are not
downloaded, and the atomic installer is not used for running
universal tests.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D595
Summary:
So test runs are getting very long on BOS, and we have UEFI
tests coming. Try to help out by reducing the 32-bit test load
a bit. I tried to strategically drop the tests that are least
likely to differ, e.g. different storage layouts (but not
filesystem/device types), kickstart delivery, and only doing
one upgrade test.
Test Plan:
Check the templates file loads and there are no
obvious errors. See if you agree with the tests I cut.
Reviewers: garretraziel, jskladan
Reviewed By: jskladan
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D580
Summary:
this handles Non-English European Language Install. Basically
it's a bunch of new screenshots for existing tag names, plus
a bit of configurability in _boot_to_anaconda and tweaking some
existing needles to do non-text matches. The weird 'half-the-
icon' needles are for cases where there may or may not be a
warning triangle but we want to click it either way (saves
duplicating the needle).
This also sets up a convention for tagging what languages a
needle is appropriate for. If it's specifically appropriate for
one or more languages, a tag ENV-LANGUAGE-(LANGUAGE) should be
applied for each language, where (LANGUAGE) is the install
language in upper-case ('LANGUAGE' variable, which should also
be the string that will be typed into the language selection
screen). If the needle ought to be used for *all* languages -
i.e. it's not a text match, or any text in the match is known
not to be translated - the tag ENV-INSTLANG-ALL should be
applied.
To back this, main.pm now unregisters all needles that are not
tagged with either ENV-LANGUAGE-ALL or the tag for the language
actually being used (if the LANGUAGE var is not set, we assume
english). The point of this is to check the install is actually
translated; if we allow all needles to match, the test would
pass even if no translations appeared at all.
Test Plan:
Run all tests and make sure you get the expected
results. You can schedule a run against 23 Beta TC1 to see the
French test fails 'correctly' when translations are missing.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D577
Summary:
This is a first cut which more or less works for now. Issues:
1) We're not really testing the BUILD, here. All the test does
is try and upgrade to the specified VERSION - so it'll be using
the latest 'stable' for the given VERSION at the time the test
runs. This isn't really that terrible, but especially for TC/RC
validation, we might want to make things a bit more elaborate
and set up the repo for the actual BUILD (and disable the main
repos).
2) We'd actually need --nogpgcheck for non-Rawhide, at one
specific point in the release cycle - after Branching but
before Bodhi activation (which is when we can be sure all
packages are signed). This won't matter until 24 branches, and
maybe releng will have it fixed by then...if not, I'll tweak
it.
3) We don't really test that the upgrade actually *happened*
for desktop, at the moment - the only thing in the old test
that really checked that was where we checked for the fedup
boot menu entry, but that has no analog in dnf. What we should
probably do is check that GUI login works, then switch to a
console and check /etc/fedora-release just as the minimal test
does.
Test Plan:
Run the tests. Note that creating the desktop disk
image doesn't work ATM, so I can't verify the desktop test
works, but the minimal one seems to (with D565). There'll be
a matching diff for openqa_fedora_tools to update the test
case names there.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: jskladan, garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D567
