This adds a Samba AD server test, and client enrolment tests via
sssd, Cockpit and kickstart. Requires the matching createhdds
commit to add the kickstart to the disk_ks image.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
The cluster of bugs for F37/Rawhide should all be resolved now,
and I'm hoping the old upgrade bug is no longer relevant.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
Using .local is apparently Bad Form because it's reserved for
mDNS. However there doesn't appear to be any particularly Good
Form for what to call a test domain you never want to exist
outside of a closed system, apparently. Sigh. Let's try this.
Includes a bump to disk_ks version because the kickstarts on
that image also need to have this change applied.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
The weird bug turned out to be caused by an internal DNS zone
in the new infra not being signed:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9411
This is now resolved, so we can drop the workaround.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
I noticed today that if we deploy FreeIPA with dnssec validation
enabled, dnf can't resolve dl.fedoraproject.org afterwards, which
is a problem because it means we wind up falling through to
random mirrors for metadata and package download once the server
is deployed, which can be slow and give old packages. This seems
to be why the server upgrade test on F33 is sometimes failing
because we get an older FreeIPA package on upgrade, even though
the newer one has been stable for a week.
It's difficult to pin down exactly where this bug is and fix it,
I've mailed some folks to try and work it out, but until that's
figured out, let's just disable dnssec validation.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
This does some of the things suggested by cheimes in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880628#c24 . It
seems to make the replica tests work with resolved, still work
with pre-F33 resolving, and not break anything. Also remove the
workaround to disable resolved if it's running, as we can now
work with it.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
Having systemd-resolved in use seems to cause problems for
FreeIPA servers:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880628
until the scripts are enhanced to do this or something, let's
disable it before server/replica deployment.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
ipa-replica-install already changes the DNS config to use the
local bind instance, we don't need to do this and it's actually
wrong (as it bypasses the local BIND we should use and uses
the VM host's DNS servers instead).
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
Seems what they had before worked until systemd-resolved became
the default; now we need to make sure we do nmcli mod and then
bring the connection down and up, as we do in tapnet.pm. Writing
to resolv.conf is kinda "wrong" for resolved but I don't think
it really breaks anything so I think I'll just leave those bits
in until F32 goes EOL just in case they're still somehow needed
on F31 or F32.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
This should work even if the ifcfg plugin is not present (hi,
CoreOS) or 'predictable' (har) network names are on.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
This is to make the infra folks happy, apparently using 10.0.x.x
and 10.1.x.x is causing conflicts since our actual infra network
uses those ranges too.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
I'm going to figure out if it's a bug that it takes so long, but
for now let's just bump the timeout.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
This adds a set of jobs to test FreeIPA replication. We deploy
a server, deploy a replica of that server, then enrol a client
against the replica and run the client tests.
At first I was planning to add the replica testing into the
main set of FreeIPA tests, but the test ordering/blocking (via
mutexes and barriers and what-have-you) just turns into a big
nightmare that way. This way seems rather simpler to deal with.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
Summary:
This adds an upgrade variant of the FreeIPA tests, with only
the simplest client enrolment (sssd) for now. The server test
starts from the N-1 release and deploys the domain controller
role. The client test similarly starts from the N-1 release
and, when the server is deployed, enrols as a domain client.
Then the server upgrades itself, while the client waits (as the
server is its name server). Then the client upgrades itself,
while the server does some self-checks. The server then waits
for the client to do its checks before decommissioning itself,
as usual. So, summary: *deployment* of both server and client
occurs on N-1, then both are upgraded, then the actual *checks*
occur on N.
In my testing, this all more or less works, except the role
decommission step fails. This failure seems to be a genuine one
so far as I can tell; I intend to file a bug for it soon.
Test Plan:
Run the new tests, check they work. Run the existing
FreeIPA tests (both the compose and the update variants), check
they both behave the same.
Reviewers: jsedlak, jskladan
Reviewed By: jsedlak
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qa.fedoraproject.org/D1204
It's not really a good idea to have the comments that explain
the test_flags in *every* test, because they can go stale and
then we either have to live with them being old or update them
all. Like, now. So let's just take 'em all out. There's always
a reference in the openQA and os-autoinst docs, and those get
updated faster.
More importantly, add the new `ignore_failure` flag to relevant
tests - all the tests that don't have the 'important' or
'fatal' flag at present. Upstream killed the 'important' flag
(making all tests 'important' by default), I got it replaced
with the 'ignore_failure' flag, we now need to explicitly mark
all modules we want the 'ignore_failure' behaviour for.
Committing without review as this is pretty trivial and I've
had it on staging for the last few days without issue. Just gets
us somewhat better info for debugging FreeIPA issues.
Summary:
This adds an entirely new workflow for testing distribution
updates. The `ADVISORY` variable is introduced: when set,
`main.pm` will load an early post-install test that sets up
a repository containing the packages from the specified update,
runs `dnf -y update`, and reboots. A new templates file is
added, `templates-updates`, which adds two new flavors called
`updates-server` and `updates-workstation`, each containing
job templates for appropriate post-install tests. Scheduler is
expected to post `ADVISORY=(update ID) HDD_1=(base image)
FLAVOR=updates-(server|workstation)`, where (base image) is one
of the stable release base disk images produced by `createhdds`
and usually used for upgrade testing. This will result in the
appropriate job templates being loaded.
We rejig postinstall test loading and static network config a
bit so that this works for both the 'compose' and 'updates' test
flows: we have to ensure we bring up networking for the tap
tests before we try and install the updates, but still allow
later adjustment of the configuration. We take advantage of the
openQA feature that was added a few months back to run the same
module multiple times, so the `_advisory_update` module can
reboot after installing the updates and the modules that take
care of bootloader, encryption and login get run again. This
looks slightly wacky in the web UI, though - it doesn't show the
later runs of each module.
We also use the recently added feature to specify `+HDD_1` in
the test suites which use a disk image uploaded by an earlier
post-install test, so the test suite value will take priority
over the value POSTed by the scheduler for those tests, and we
will use the uploaded disk image (and not the clean base image
POSTed by the scheduler) for those tests.
My intent here is to enhance the scheduler, adding a consumer
which listens out for critpath updates, and runs this test flow
for each one, then reports the results to ResultsDB where Bodhi
could query and display them. We could also add a list of other
packages to have one or both sets of update tests run on it, I
guess.
Test Plan:
Try a post something like:
HDD_1=disk_f25_server_3_x86_64.img DISTRI=fedora VERSION=25
FLAVOR=updates-server ARCH=x86_64 BUILD=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c
ADVISORY=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c CURRREL=25 PREVREL=24
Pick an appropriate `ADVISORY` (ideally, one containing some
packages which might actually be involved in the tests), and
matching `FLAVOR` and `HDD_1`. The appropriate tests should run,
a repo with the update packages should be created and enabled
(and dnf update run), and the tests should work properly. Also
test a regular compose run to make sure I didn't break anything.
Reviewers: jskladan, jsedlak
Reviewed By: jsedlak
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qa.fedoraproject.org/D1143
Summary:
This adds a couple of new exporter modules, renames main_common
to utils (this is a better name: openSUSE's main_common is
functions used in main.pm, utils is what they call their module
full of miscellaneous commonly-used functions), and moves a
bunch of utility functions that were previously needlessly
implemented as instance methods in base classes into the
exporter modules. That means we can get rid of all the annoying
$self-> syntax for calling them.
We get rid of `fedorabase` entirely, as it's no longer useful
for anything. Other base classes keep the 'standard' methods
(like `post_fail_hook`) and methods which actually need to be
methods (like `root_console`, whose behaviour is different in
anacondatest and installedtest).
Test Plan:
Do a full test suite run and check everything lines
up. There should be no functional differences from before at all,
this is just a re-org.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel_but_actually_jsedlak_who_uses_stupid_nicknames
Reviewed By: garretraziel_but_actually_jsedlak_who_uses_stupid_nicknames
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qa.fedoraproject.org/D1080
Summary:
I started out wanting to fix an issue I noticed today where
graphical upgrade tests were failing because they didn't wait
for the graphical login screen properly; the test was sitting
at the 'full Fedora logo' state of plymouth for a long time,
so the current boot_to_login_screen's wait_still_screen was
triggered by it and the function wound up failing on the
assert_screen, because it was still some time before the real
login screen appeared.
So I tweaked the boot_to_login_screen implementation to work
slightly differently (look for a login screen match, *then* -
if we're dealing with a graphical login - wait_still_screen
to defeat the 'old GPU buffer showing login screen' problem
and assert the login screen again). But while working on it,
I figured we really should consolidate all the various places
that handle the bootloader -> login, we were doing it quite
differently in all sorts of different places. And as part of
that, I converted the base tests to use POSTINSTALL (and thus
go through the shared _wait_login tests) instead of handling
boot themselves. As part of *that*, I tweaked main.pm to not
require all POSTINSTALL tests have the _postinstall suffix on
their names, as it really doesn't make sense, and renamed the
tests.
Test Plan: Run all tests, see if they work.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D1015
