Explicitly specify the ahci0.0 bus for the HDD in install_sata.
This is needed to work if we are using CDMODEL=ide-cd (which we
need at present to work around a bug with SCSI CDs), and is a
good idea anyway to ensure the drive is actually connected to
the SATA bus (I dunno if it was before or not).
Summary:
This adds an entirely new workflow for testing distribution
updates. The `ADVISORY` variable is introduced: when set,
`main.pm` will load an early post-install test that sets up
a repository containing the packages from the specified update,
runs `dnf -y update`, and reboots. A new templates file is
added, `templates-updates`, which adds two new flavors called
`updates-server` and `updates-workstation`, each containing
job templates for appropriate post-install tests. Scheduler is
expected to post `ADVISORY=(update ID) HDD_1=(base image)
FLAVOR=updates-(server|workstation)`, where (base image) is one
of the stable release base disk images produced by `createhdds`
and usually used for upgrade testing. This will result in the
appropriate job templates being loaded.
We rejig postinstall test loading and static network config a
bit so that this works for both the 'compose' and 'updates' test
flows: we have to ensure we bring up networking for the tap
tests before we try and install the updates, but still allow
later adjustment of the configuration. We take advantage of the
openQA feature that was added a few months back to run the same
module multiple times, so the `_advisory_update` module can
reboot after installing the updates and the modules that take
care of bootloader, encryption and login get run again. This
looks slightly wacky in the web UI, though - it doesn't show the
later runs of each module.
We also use the recently added feature to specify `+HDD_1` in
the test suites which use a disk image uploaded by an earlier
post-install test, so the test suite value will take priority
over the value POSTed by the scheduler for those tests, and we
will use the uploaded disk image (and not the clean base image
POSTed by the scheduler) for those tests.
My intent here is to enhance the scheduler, adding a consumer
which listens out for critpath updates, and runs this test flow
for each one, then reports the results to ResultsDB where Bodhi
could query and display them. We could also add a list of other
packages to have one or both sets of update tests run on it, I
guess.
Test Plan:
Try a post something like:
HDD_1=disk_f25_server_3_x86_64.img DISTRI=fedora VERSION=25
FLAVOR=updates-server ARCH=x86_64 BUILD=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c
ADVISORY=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c CURRREL=25 PREVREL=24
Pick an appropriate `ADVISORY` (ideally, one containing some
packages which might actually be involved in the tests), and
matching `FLAVOR` and `HDD_1`. The appropriate tests should run,
a repo with the update packages should be created and enabled
(and dnf update run), and the tests should work properly. Also
test a regular compose run to make sure I didn't break anything.
Reviewers: jskladan, jsedlak
Reviewed By: jsedlak
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qa.fedoraproject.org/D1143
The rule for test priorities is pretty simple. Ranges of
priority values map to the 'Milestone' by which the test must
be passing, per the release criteria. The priority for each
openQA test is the *highest* priority for any wiki test case /
criterion it covers.
0-20: critical smoke tests (higher than Alpha priority)
20-29: Alpha priority
30-39: Beta priority
40-49: Final priority
50+: Optional priority
Note that tests for non-release-blocking arches or images must
always be over 50; I've simply added 50 to the values for all
i386 tests in this change. Other than that, I just corrected a
few values which had got out of whack or were originally set
wrong.
Summary:
This adds a new test, memory_check, which just does a default
package set install with `inst.debug` parameter then uploads
the memory usage file (`/tmp/memory.dat`) at the end. We can
have check-compose use the data to analyze changes in memory
usage over time.
Test Plan:
Fire off the Workstation network install image tests
and make sure the memory usage test runs and works on all three
machines. This is live on staging already.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel_but_actually_jsedlak_who_uses_stupid_nicknames
Reviewed By: garretraziel_but_actually_jsedlak_who_uses_stupid_nicknames
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qa.fedoraproject.org/D1082
Summary:
Include some basic testing of Japanese input, and split the
input testing (including Russian) into a separate module, since
it's not really part of 'login' testing.
Test Plan:
Run the test, and the Russian and French tests too to
make sure they didn't break. Tested on staging. Note the Japanese
test soft fails, intentionally, at present, as I discovered a bug
while working on it:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=776189
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D1072
Using 'host' is, for some reason, causing the problem where non-
minimal installs fail to boot. No idea why, but switching the
CPU model to Nehalem solves it.
Summary:
The non-English tests so far did not test that graphical login
worked as expected, which is a fairly large hole. With this
change, they should do a Workstation install and test login to
both GNOME and the console works as expected. KDE is not yet
tested.
As part of this we tweak the implementation of keyboard layout
switching in graphical environments to use a generic function
in main_common which can handle both anaconda and desktops
(just GNOME at present, but should extend easily to any desktop
with a known switcher key and a visible layout indicator),
replacing the anacondatest class method. I kinda don't like that
the test has to specifically tell the function when it's in
anaconda, but I don't think I want to start experimenting with
a global 'test phase' openQA variable or anything like that at
present.
Fixes T842.
Test Plan:
Run the French and Russian install tests and check
they work as expected. Also run an English Workstation install
if you like, and make sure that didn't break. This change is
live on staging ATM, seems to work fine.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Maniphest Tasks: T842
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D1071
Summary:
I've been wanting to do this for a while; I think it'll let us
check for some significant changes between composes. This should
cause runs of a few test cases to collect and upload info on:
* installed packages
* free memory
* disk space
* active services
* 1 minute of CPU usage info (via top)
immediately after install and initial login. In some cases this
will be useful / interesting simply to look at directly, but
we can also have check-compose analyze the data and include
significant changes in its reports.
Test Plan:
Run affected tests, make sure the data collection
works.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D1046
Summary:
GNOME's update notification criteria are pretty braindead: it
fires the update check timer once on login then once every hour
thereafter, but only actually checks for and notifies of updates
once a day if it's after 6am(?!?!?!). So we have to do a bunch
of fiddling around to ensure we reliably get a notification.
Move the clock to 6am if it's earlier than that, and reset the
'last update check' timer to 48 hours ago, then log in to GNOME
after that.
Note: I thought this still wasn't fully reliable, but I've looked
into all the recent failures of either test on staging and
there's only one which was really 'no update notification came
up', and the logs clearly indicate PK did run an update check,
so I don't think that was a test bug (I think something went
wrong with the update check). The other failures are all 'GNOME
did something wacky', plus one case where the needle didn't quite
match because I think the match area is slightly too tall; I'll
fix that in a second.
Test Plan:
Run the tests on both KDE and GNOME and check they
work properly now (assuming nothing unrelated breaks, like KDE
crashing...)
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D1039
These keep failing because they don't work right. I have it
partially fixed on a branch but not fully fixed yet, and it's
been this way for a few weeks already, so let's disable the
tests for now until I can actually complete the fix.
Goes along with the commit to openqa_fedora_tools that makes
flavor generation go through fedfind's `correct_image` helper,
which changes the 'type' of ostree installer images from 'boot'
to 'dvd-ostree'. See https://pagure.io/pungi/issue/417 for
more background on this. Committing without review as it's an
urgent issue we have to fix right away.
Summary:
I started out wanting to fix an issue I noticed today where
graphical upgrade tests were failing because they didn't wait
for the graphical login screen properly; the test was sitting
at the 'full Fedora logo' state of plymouth for a long time,
so the current boot_to_login_screen's wait_still_screen was
triggered by it and the function wound up failing on the
assert_screen, because it was still some time before the real
login screen appeared.
So I tweaked the boot_to_login_screen implementation to work
slightly differently (look for a login screen match, *then* -
if we're dealing with a graphical login - wait_still_screen
to defeat the 'old GPU buffer showing login screen' problem
and assert the login screen again). But while working on it,
I figured we really should consolidate all the various places
that handle the bootloader -> login, we were doing it quite
differently in all sorts of different places. And as part of
that, I converted the base tests to use POSTINSTALL (and thus
go through the shared _wait_login tests) instead of handling
boot themselves. As part of *that*, I tweaked main.pm to not
require all POSTINSTALL tests have the _postinstall suffix on
their names, as it really doesn't make sense, and renamed the
tests.
Test Plan: Run all tests, see if they work.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D1015
Summary:
this more or less covers desktop_error_checks and desktop_
update_notification, though it can't really distinguish
between them easily. All we know is that if both the live and
postinstall versions of this test pass, both of those tests
pass. Any fails will have to be investigated manually.
Test Plan:
Run the tests for both KDE and Workstation, see
what happens. Workstation will fail for F25 and Rawhide at
present, due to SELinux/abrt notifications.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D1004
Summary:
Very similar to the CLI update test, but using the desktops'
update applications. This is based off the CLI update test
branch as it uses the shared functions that branch introduced.
We do not use the fake update packages, as they don't really
do anything useful for these tests; for dnf they can help us
distinguish between issues with the dnf mechanism and issues
with the repos, but we can't really tell that in the graphical
case. So we only use the python3-kickstart package here.
Test Plan:
Run the test on both KDE and GNOME and ensure it
performs as intended. I've been testing it on staging, so you
can see it there.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D1010
Summary:
this uses a couple of test repos with fake packages to test the
basic dnf mechanisms are working, then messes around with the
python3-kickstart package a bit to try and test the default repo
configuration is working, keys are in place and so on. We use
python3-kickstart because we should be able to rely on the copy
of that package in the 'stable' repo being installable (or else
the compose would have failed), but it shouldn't be vital to
the operation of the system.
Test Plan: Run the test, see if it works.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D1006
Summary:
Pretty straightforward tests which deploy the database
server role and exercise it a bit.
Test Plan: Run the tests, check they work properly.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D991
Summary:
we have a long-standing problem with all the tests that hit
the repositories. The tests are triggered as soon as a compose
completes. At this point in time, the compose is not synced to
the mirrors, where the default 'fedora' repo definition looks;
the sync happens after the compose completes, and there is also
a metadata sync step that must happen after *that* before any
operation that uses the 'fedora' repository definition will
actually use the packages from the new compose. Thus all net
install tests and tests that installed packages have been
effectively testing the previous compose, not the current one.
We have some thoughts about how to fix this 'properly' (such
that the openQA tests wouldn't have to do anything special,
but their 'fedora' repository would somehow reflect the compose
under test), but none of them is in place right now or likely
to happen in the short term, so in the mean time this should
deal with most of the issues. With this change, everything but
the default_install tests for the netinst images should use
the compose-under-test's Everything tree instead of the 'fedora'
repository, and thus should install and test the correct
packages.
This relies on a corresponding change to openqa_fedora_tools
to set the LOCATION openQA setting (which is simply the base
location of the compose under test).
Test Plan:
Do a full test run, check (as far as you can) tests run sensibly
and use appropriate repositories.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D989
This adds possiblity to specify more than one test in ENTRYPOINT
variable - test names should be separated with spaces and loading is done
as with POSTINSTALL.
Add _console_shutdown test to ARM image deployment.
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D973
Summary:
This goes with D968, which bumped the version of the disk_ks
image, so templates has to stay in sync.
Test Plan:
As per D968 (you'll need this diff as well or else
the tests will try to use the wrong disk image).
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D969
Summary:
pretty simple stuff here. The distinction between 'firefox' and
'browser' is that the 'browser' needles I expect would also be
correct for other default browsers, while the 'firefox' needles
are specific to Firefox. We need '-kde' variants of some Firefox
needles where interface text is included, because the font is
Cantarell in GNOME but whatever the default 'sans' font is in
KDE - I suppose we should really use -thatfontsname rather than
-kde, but I can't think what it's called...
I couldn't do the 'log in to FAS' bit of the test since we don't
really have a sane way to provide a password while not exposing
it to the public.
Test Plan:
Run the test, check it works - for both KDE and
Workstation.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D938
Summary:
again, added as a non-fatal module for realmd_join_cockpit as
it's convenient to do it here. Also abstract a couple of ipa
bits into a new exporter package in the style of SUSE's
mm_network, rather than using ill-fitting class inheritance as
we have before - we should probably convert our existing class
based stuff to work this way.
Also a few minor tweaks and clean-ups of the other tests:
The path in console_login() where we detect login of a regular
user when we want root or vice versa and log out was actually
broken because it would 'wait' for the result of the 'exit'
command, which obviously doesn't work (as it relies on running
another command afterwards, and we're no longer at a shell).
This commit no longer actually uses that path, but I spotted
the bug with an earlier version of this which did, and we may
as well keep the fix.
/var/log/lastlog is an apparently-extremely-large sparse file.
A couple of times it seemed to cause tar to run very slowly
while creating the /var/log archive for upload on failure. It's
no use for diagnosing bugs, so we may as well exclude it from
the archive.
I caught cockpit webUI login failing one time when testing the
test, so threw in a wait_still_screen before starting to type
the URL, as we have for the FreeIPA webUI.
I also caught a timing issue with the openQA webUI policy add
step; the test flips from the Users screen to the HBAC screen
then clicks the 'add' button, but there's actually an identical
'add' button on *both* screens, so it could wind up trying to
click the one on the Users screen instead, if the web UI took
a few milliseconds to switch. So we throw in a needle match to
make sure we're actually on the HBAC screen before clicking the
button.
We make the freeipa_webui test a 'milestone' so that if the
new test fails, restoring to the last-known-good milestone
doesn't take so long; it actually seems like openQA can get
confused and try to cancel the test if restoring the milestone
takes a *really* long time, and wind up with a zombie qemu
process, which isn't good. This seems to avoid that happening.
Test Plan:
In the simple case, just run all the FreeIPA-related
tests on Fedora 24 (as Rawhide is broken) and make sure they all
work properly. To get a bit more advanced you can throw in an
`assert_script_run 'false'` in either of the non-fatal tests to
break it and make sure things go properly when that happens (the
last milestone should be restored - which should be right after
freeipa_webui, sitting at tty1 - and run properly; things are
set up so each test starts with root logged in on tty1).
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D935
Summary:
we can test this quite easily by placing the standard openQA
updates image in the NFS repo used for the NFS repo install
tests. We just have to copy the contents of the ISO (instead of
directly exporting the ISO loop mount as an NFS share) so we
can add this extra file.
At first I planned to combine this with the NFS repo variation
test, but when you use a remote stage2 like this it changes repo
setup such that the packaging.log line we look for to verify
the remote repo was used does not show up, and there's enough
fuzziness in how anaconda-dracut fudges inst.repo and
inst.stage2 that it's probably a good idea to test them
separately anyhow.
Test Plan:
Run the new test and the other NFS tests, make sure
this one works and the others don't break.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D929
Summary:
This requires us to handle decryption each time we reboot in
the upgrade process, so factor that little block out into the
base class so we don't have to keep pasting it. It's also a
bit tricky to integrate into the 'catch a boot loop' code we
have to deal with #1349721, but I think this should work. There
is a matching openqa_fedora_tools diff to generate the disk
image.
Test Plan:
Run the tests, check that they work, run the other
upgrade and encrypted install tests and check they still work
properly too.
Reviewers: garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D922
Summary:
goes with the openqa_fedora_tools commit to switch from virt-
builder to virt-install. That bumps all the imgvers, so we must
update templates correspondingly.
Test Plan: As per D917.
Reviewers: garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D918
Summary:
as a new, non-fatal test step in the cockpit enrolment test,
because it kinda fits in there; we have an enrolled system with
a web browser *right there*. This will require making the wiki
reporting stuff slightly cleverer so we can say 'report a pass
for this wiki test instance if this test step passed', but that
should be possible. Making this non-fatal means the rest of the
cockpit enrolment test will go ahead even if the freeipa web UI
fails.
The 'check if we can log in' stuff is identical to freeipa_
client_postinstall except with different user names, so we could
potentially factor that out somehow, but I couldn't think of a
super clean way to do it so for now it's just copied.
Note this diff is on top of the freeipa-realmd branch which
is for D894, it's not on top of develop.
Test Plan:
Run the modified test and see if it works. No other
tests are modified, so they should be OK.
Reviewers: garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D895
Summary:
This is a pretty straightforward IPA joining test. Since I
figured out how to set up a DHCP server for support_server,
let's do the same for the domain controller so we can simplify
these enrolment tests a bit.
We also extend the timeout on installing haveged on the server
a bit (2 minutes is a bit low when it hits a slow metadata
download), and drop an unnecessary clone_host_file from the
cockpit join test (it was only there for testing and the next
operation immediately overwrites it).
Test Plan:
Do a full server DVD test run, check the new test
works and none of the others broke.
Reviewers: garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D894
Summary:
Set up the support server to provide DHCP/DNS functionality and
an NFS server, providing a kickstart. Add a kickstart test just
like the other root-user-crypted-net kickstart tests except it
gets the kickstart from the support server via NFS. Also add NFS
repository tests and a second support server for Server-dvd-iso
flavor: this test must run on that flavor to ensure that packages
are actually available. The support server just mounts the
attached 'DVD' and exports it via NFS.
Note we don't need to do anything clever to avoid IP conflicts
between the two support servers, because os-autoinst-openvswitch
ensures each worker group is on its own VLAN.
As part of adding the NFS repo tests, I did a bit of cleanup,
moving little things we were repeating a lot into anacondatest,
and sharing the 'check if the repo was used' logic between all
the tests (by making it into a test step that's loaded for all
of them). I also simplified the 'was repo used' checks a bit,
it seems silly to run a 'grep' command inside the VM then have
os-autoinst do a grep on the output (which is effectively what
we were doing before), instead we'll just use a single grep
within the VM, and clean up the messy quoting/escaping a bit.
Test Plan:
Run all tests - at least all repository tests - and
check they work (make sure the tests are actually still sane,
not just that they pass). I've done runs of all the repo tests
and they look good to me, but please double-check. I'm currently
re-running the whole 24-20160609.n.0 test on staging with these
changes.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D888
Summary:
this is following a SUSE model for tests where we need a server
end but don't want setting up the server to constitute a real
test in itself, we want it to be stable. The 'support_server'
test just boots a pre-built (by createhdds) disk image, sets up
networking, and runs the iSCSI server.
To run the iSCSI test we need to handle networking config in
anaconda (or we would need to set the support server up as a
DHCP server, which may be worth considering), so this adds that.
We also need to be able to specify the target device for a
volume in custom partitioning, so this adds that too.
Test Plan:
Build the necessary support server disk image (use
D883), then run the test and make sure it works. Also make sure
all other tests continue to work.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D884
Summary:
This requires a few other changes:
* turn clone_host_resolv into clone_host_file, letting you clone
any given host file (cloning /etc/hosts seems to make both
server deployment and client enrolment faster/more reliable)
* allow loading of multiple POSTINSTALL tests (so we can share
the freeipa_client_postinstall test). Note this is compatible,
existing uses will work fine
* move initial password change for the IPA test users into the
server deployment test (so the client tests don't conflict over
doing that)
* add GRUB_POSTINSTALL, for specifying boot parameters for boot of
the installed system, and make it work by tweaking _console_wait
_login (doesn't work for _graphical_wait_login yet, as I didn't
need that)
* make the static networking config for tap tests into a library
function so the tests can share it
* handle ABRT problem dirs showing up in /var/spool/abrt as well
as /var/tmp/abrt (because the enrol attempt hits #1330766 and
the crash report shows up in /var/spool/abrt, don't ask me why
the difference, I just work here)
* specify the DNS servers from the worker host's resolv.conf as
the forwarders for the FreeIPA server when deploying it; if we
don't do this, rolekit defaults to using the root servers as
forwarders(!) and thus we get the public, not phx2-appropriate,
results for e.g. mirrors.fedoraproject.org, some of which the
workers can't reach, so PackageKit package install always fails
(boy, was it fun figuring THAT mess out)
Even after all that, the test still doesn't actually pass, but
I'm reasonably confident this is because it's hitting actual bugs,
not because it's broken. It runs into #1330766 nearly every time
(I think I saw *one* time the enrolment actually succeeded), and
seems to run into a subsequent bug I hadn't seen before when
trying to work around that by trying the join again (see
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1330766#c37 ).
Test Plan:
Run the test, see what happens. If you're really lucky,
it'll actually pass. But you'll probably run into #1330766#c37,
I'm mostly posting for comment. You'll need a tap-capable openQA
instance to test this.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D880
Summary:
This adds tests for the Server_cockpit_default and cockpit_basic
test cases. Some notes: I was initially thinking of combining
these into a single test with multiple test modules and coming
up with a system for doing wiki reporting based on individual
test module status, but because we'll also want to do a cockpit
FreeIPA enrol test, I decided against it. We don't really want
to combine all three because then we would skip the cockpit
tests whenever FreeIPA server deployment failed, which isn't
ideal. So since we'll need a separate FreeIPA enrolment test
anyway it doesn't really make sense to go to the trouble of
designing a system for loading multiple postinstall tests (though
I have an idea for that!) and a per-module wiki reporting system.
This was the most minimal and hopefully reliable method for
running Cockpit from a stock Server install that I could think
of. An alternative approach would be to have, say, the most
recent stable Workstation live as a 'stock' asset and have two
tests, one which runs a stock Server install and just waits and
another which boots the live image and accesses the cockpit
running on the other box, but that seems a bit over-complex. It
is not possible to have dependencies between tests for different
ISOs, in case you were wondering about having a Workstation live
test which runs parallel with a Server DVD test, we can't do
that. One funny thing is the font that winds up getting used for
the desktop, but I don't *think* that should be a problem.
Picking needles was a bit tricky; any improvement suggestions
are welcome. I'm hoping it turns out to be safe to rely on some
dbus log messages being present; I think logging into Cockpit
triggers activation of the realmd dbus interface, so there
*should* always be some messages related to that. An alternative
would just be to match on a sliver of the dark grey table header
and the light grey row beneath it and assume that'll always be
the first message (whatever the message is), but then we have to
find some area of the message details screen which is always
present for any message, and it just seems a tad more likely to
result in false passes. Similary I'm making an assumption that
auditd is always going to show up on the first page of the
Services screen and the details screen will always show that
'loaded...enabled' text.
Test Plan:
Run the tests and see if they work! See
https://openqa.stg.fedoraproject.org/tests/21373 and
https://openqa.stg.fedoraproject.org/tests/21371 for my tests.
Reviewers: garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D874
Summary:
The test here is a bit ugly, but it should work. Better ideas
welcome =)
Test Plan:
Run the test, check it works (and maybe hack it up
a bit and check it fails properly too, it worked first time for
me which is always suspicious)
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D870
Summary:
the Server DVD now just has 'Fedora Server' and 'Custom
Operating System' environments. Custom is basically minimal.
So we can use the DVD for 'universal' testing again, these
needles match the anaconda_minimal tags.
Test Plan:
Run the 'universal' tests on a DVD ISO with these
needles added, test that they work OK and use the 'Custom' env.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D844
Summary:
Requires new needles and test suite and job template, plus a
few tweaks to handle 'switched' keyboard layouts (so we use the
switched layout in the username and password).
Test Plan:
Run the test and see that it...fails. But that's OK!
It's a genuine bug: RHBZ #1333998 . At least make sure it gets
to that point and no other tests have broken and all the needles
look sane.
Reviewers: garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D846
ARM actually doesn't have "install" test, but in install matrix,
there is test whether ARM disk boots into initial_setup. HDD is saved
after this test for Base tests.
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D853
Summary:
I really just want to add the desktop_terminal test, but I think
this refactor is in order now. It splits up loading of the
various test phases (much as SUSE do it) and allows us to run
the post-install tests without the install tests, for e.g. I
tweaked things to allow the upgrade tests to use the existing
_wait_login tests for final login and combine the two upgrade
postinstall tests into one simple one.
This comes with a bit of a behaviour change to make graphical
wait login behave the same as console wait login: it will log
in unless USER_LOGIN is set to 'false'. Previously it only
logged in if both USER_LOGIN and USER_PASSWORD were set, which
I don't think ever happened in a graphical test, so we never
actually did a graphical login. The intent here is we should do
a login on the default_install tests. That's going a bit beyond
the test case, but it seems like a reasonable thing to test. We
can set USER_LOGIN to false if we don't want to do it.
Test Plan:
Do a full test run, make sure the new tests work and
no old tests break.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D839
Summary:
These require openQA tap networking to allow the server and
client boxes to communicate, and require masquerading (NAT) so
the server at least can reach a repository (dnf/rolekit really,
really do not want to work without a repo connection).
They use the 'parallel' test support to have the server deploy
run first while the client enrol test waits at the grub menu
until the server is done before it goes ahead.
This is all deployed and working on stg. The really tricky bit
was getting all the openvswitch and firewall config right in
ansible.
We *could* do the server deploy test as a follow-on from the
default install test to save the install, but then we'd have to
teach it to change the hostname and set up static networking
post-install. I'm not sure if it's worth doing that.
This requires the corresponding openqa_fedora_tools commit that
adds the hard disks (containing the kickstarts - it's possible
to get them from remote during install, but we have to set up
name resolution or hard code the IP of the server).
Test Plan:
Deploy this and the openqa_fedora_tools commit,
generate the disks, configure the networking (good luck! See
the docs in openqa_fedora_tools) and see if you can run the
tests. If you're using Docker, uh...sorry. You somehow need to
set things up so the workers can use tap interfaces that can
talk to each other and are NATed to the outside world. Have fun.
I can talk you through it on IRC...
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D831
