This is how our Pungi config has been set up since F32, so we
should match it here to be accurate.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
I started out trying to fix os-release for the recent change to
add "Prerelease" tags to the VERSION and PRETTY_NAME fields, then
things spiralled. It got me thinking about the awkward DEVELOPMENT
variable we use, so I decided to get rid of it and refactor the
few things that use it. I refactored the anaconda prerelease tag
check, and wrote a new giant comment that gives details about
exactly how anaconda decides whether to show those tags, to give
context to our choices about when to expect them. This check now
uses a new LABEL variable the scheduler now sets. I also wound up
creating new UP1REL and UP2REL vars to define the 'source' release
for upgrade tests, separate from CURRREL and PREVREL, which are
now never lies - they really are the current stable and previous
stable release, even for update upgrade tests.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-1070052d10#comment-1284223
It seems the rootfs on the Fedora 30 installer images we build at
present has gotten very big, so big that an update which contains
some very slightly larger firmware packages causes the rootfs to
be completely full (though lorax doesn't fail) and the image
doesn't boot.
I don't yet know when or why the rootfs got that big, but it's
not really a bug in this update, so for now let's just tell
lorax to use a bigger rootfs so the tests pass for this and any
similar future updates, until I can maybe find time to pinpoint
the culprit more precisely.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
We quite often want to run the update tests on a Koji task (not
a Bodhi update) for some reason - usually to test a potential
fix for an issue, or at a maintainer's request to test a change
before it is merged upstream and officially sent out as an
update. Up till now I've always hacked up utils.pm on the
staging server by hand to do this, which is horrible. Together
with a commit to fedora_openqa, this should allow us to do it in
a nice, sane way via the CLI. It's mostly just tweaking the
"updates" repo setup in utils.pm as you'd expect, but there's a
bit of subtlety to it because of the installer tests that use
%ADVISORY% as a variable substitution in the disk image name;
you can't do something like `%ADVISORY or KOJITASK%`, sadly, so
I had to have almost-redundant variables ADVISORY, KOJITASK and
ADVISORY_OR_TASK (we could kinda just live with ADVISORY_OR_TASK
except I didn't want to drop ADVISORY as it's an unnecessary
change from previous behavior).
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
This adds a test which builds a netinst image potentially with
the package(s) from the update, and uploads that image. It also
adds a test which runs a default install using that image. This
is intended to check whether the update breaks the creation or
use of install images; particularly this will let us test
anaconda etc. updates. We also update the minimal disk image
name, as we have to make it bigger to accommodate this test,
and making it bigger changes its name - the actual change to
the disk image itself is in createhdds. We also have to redo a
bunch of installer needles for F28 fonts, after I removed them
a month or so back...
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
