Summary:
This adds an entirely new workflow for testing distribution
updates. The `ADVISORY` variable is introduced: when set,
`main.pm` will load an early post-install test that sets up
a repository containing the packages from the specified update,
runs `dnf -y update`, and reboots. A new templates file is
added, `templates-updates`, which adds two new flavors called
`updates-server` and `updates-workstation`, each containing
job templates for appropriate post-install tests. Scheduler is
expected to post `ADVISORY=(update ID) HDD_1=(base image)
FLAVOR=updates-(server|workstation)`, where (base image) is one
of the stable release base disk images produced by `createhdds`
and usually used for upgrade testing. This will result in the
appropriate job templates being loaded.
We rejig postinstall test loading and static network config a
bit so that this works for both the 'compose' and 'updates' test
flows: we have to ensure we bring up networking for the tap
tests before we try and install the updates, but still allow
later adjustment of the configuration. We take advantage of the
openQA feature that was added a few months back to run the same
module multiple times, so the `_advisory_update` module can
reboot after installing the updates and the modules that take
care of bootloader, encryption and login get run again. This
looks slightly wacky in the web UI, though - it doesn't show the
later runs of each module.
We also use the recently added feature to specify `+HDD_1` in
the test suites which use a disk image uploaded by an earlier
post-install test, so the test suite value will take priority
over the value POSTed by the scheduler for those tests, and we
will use the uploaded disk image (and not the clean base image
POSTed by the scheduler) for those tests.
My intent here is to enhance the scheduler, adding a consumer
which listens out for critpath updates, and runs this test flow
for each one, then reports the results to ResultsDB where Bodhi
could query and display them. We could also add a list of other
packages to have one or both sets of update tests run on it, I
guess.
Test Plan:
Try a post something like:
HDD_1=disk_f25_server_3_x86_64.img DISTRI=fedora VERSION=25
FLAVOR=updates-server ARCH=x86_64 BUILD=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c
ADVISORY=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c CURRREL=25 PREVREL=24
Pick an appropriate `ADVISORY` (ideally, one containing some
packages which might actually be involved in the tests), and
matching `FLAVOR` and `HDD_1`. The appropriate tests should run,
a repo with the update packages should be created and enabled
(and dnf update run), and the tests should work properly. Also
test a regular compose run to make sure I didn't break anything.
Reviewers: jskladan, jsedlak
Reviewed By: jsedlak
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qa.fedoraproject.org/D1143
Summary:
This adds a couple of new exporter modules, renames main_common
to utils (this is a better name: openSUSE's main_common is
functions used in main.pm, utils is what they call their module
full of miscellaneous commonly-used functions), and moves a
bunch of utility functions that were previously needlessly
implemented as instance methods in base classes into the
exporter modules. That means we can get rid of all the annoying
$self-> syntax for calling them.
We get rid of `fedorabase` entirely, as it's no longer useful
for anything. Other base classes keep the 'standard' methods
(like `post_fail_hook`) and methods which actually need to be
methods (like `root_console`, whose behaviour is different in
anacondatest and installedtest).
Test Plan:
Do a full test suite run and check everything lines
up. There should be no functional differences from before at all,
this is just a re-org.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel_but_actually_jsedlak_who_uses_stupid_nicknames
Reviewed By: garretraziel_but_actually_jsedlak_who_uses_stupid_nicknames
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qa.fedoraproject.org/D1080
The README looks pretty ugly on Pagure. So let's unwrap it.
Let's also move the function docs into the source files. We're
much more likely to keep them up to date that way, I think. We
should probably change over to proper perl POD documentation at
some point, but comments in-line are OK for now I think.
Summary:
Since we can match on multiple needles, we can drop the loop
from console_login and instead do it this way, which is simpler
and should work better on ARM (the timeouts will scale and
allow ARM to be slow here). Also move it to main_common as
there's no logical reason for it to be a class method.
Also remove the `check` arg. `check` was only set to 0 by two
tests, _console_shutdown and anacondatest's _post_fail_hook.
For _console_shutdown, I think I just wanted to give it the
best possible chance of succeeding. But we're really not going
to lose anything significant by checking, the only case where
check=>0 would've helped is if the 'good' needle had stopped
matching, and all sorts of other tests will fail in that case.
anacondatest was only using it to save a screenshot of whatever
was on the tty if it didn't reach a root console, which doesn't
seem that useful, and we'll get screenshots from check_screen
and assert_screen anyway.
Test Plan:
Run all tests, check they behave as expected and
none inappropriately fails on console login.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D1016
Summary:
These require openQA tap networking to allow the server and
client boxes to communicate, and require masquerading (NAT) so
the server at least can reach a repository (dnf/rolekit really,
really do not want to work without a repo connection).
They use the 'parallel' test support to have the server deploy
run first while the client enrol test waits at the grub menu
until the server is done before it goes ahead.
This is all deployed and working on stg. The really tricky bit
was getting all the openvswitch and firewall config right in
ansible.
We *could* do the server deploy test as a follow-on from the
default install test to save the install, but then we'd have to
teach it to change the hostname and set up static networking
post-install. I'm not sure if it's worth doing that.
This requires the corresponding openqa_fedora_tools commit that
adds the hard disks (containing the kickstarts - it's possible
to get them from remote during install, but we have to set up
name resolution or hard code the IP of the server).
Test Plan:
Deploy this and the openqa_fedora_tools commit,
generate the disks, configure the networking (good luck! See
the docs in openqa_fedora_tools) and see if you can run the
tests. If you're using Docker, uh...sorry. You somehow need to
set things up so the workers can use tap interfaces that can
talk to each other and are NATed to the outside world. Have fun.
I can talk you through it on IRC...
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D831
Summary:
T617 makes some good points about the language tags; this is my
suggestion for an improvement. It requires a bit of cleverness
in unregister_prefix_tags(), but the upshot is that you don't
need to know to set any special tags when creating needles, a
needle with no language-related tags will be considered as valid
for all languages. You have to explicitly add LANGUAGE- tag(s)
to a needle for the language filtering to 'kick in' in any way.
If a needle has at least one LANGUAGE- tag, it will be filtered
unless it has the appropriate tag for the job's specified
language (default is still 'english').
With this approach, only needles which we specifically want to
*only* match their tagged language(s) need the tags, so we can
drop all those -ALL tags.
We're using LANGUAGE- instead of ENV-LANGUAGE- now because the
ENV- tag names denote tags that are treated slightly specially
by openQA, and this is not one. We cannot cleanly use
ENV-INSTLANG because openQA has a hardwired default of 'en_US'
for that.
Test Plan:
Check both English and French tests still work as
intended.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D589
Summary:
this handles Non-English European Language Install. Basically
it's a bunch of new screenshots for existing tag names, plus
a bit of configurability in _boot_to_anaconda and tweaking some
existing needles to do non-text matches. The weird 'half-the-
icon' needles are for cases where there may or may not be a
warning triangle but we want to click it either way (saves
duplicating the needle).
This also sets up a convention for tagging what languages a
needle is appropriate for. If it's specifically appropriate for
one or more languages, a tag ENV-LANGUAGE-(LANGUAGE) should be
applied for each language, where (LANGUAGE) is the install
language in upper-case ('LANGUAGE' variable, which should also
be the string that will be typed into the language selection
screen). If the needle ought to be used for *all* languages -
i.e. it's not a text match, or any text in the match is known
not to be translated - the tag ENV-INSTLANG-ALL should be
applied.
To back this, main.pm now unregisters all needles that are not
tagged with either ENV-LANGUAGE-ALL or the tag for the language
actually being used (if the LANGUAGE var is not set, we assume
english). The point of this is to check the install is actually
translated; if we allow all needles to match, the test would
pass even if no translations appeared at all.
Test Plan:
Run all tests and make sure you get the expected
results. You can schedule a run against 23 Beta TC1 to see the
French test fails 'correctly' when translations are missing.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D577
Summary:
This is a first cut which more or less works for now. Issues:
1) We're not really testing the BUILD, here. All the test does
is try and upgrade to the specified VERSION - so it'll be using
the latest 'stable' for the given VERSION at the time the test
runs. This isn't really that terrible, but especially for TC/RC
validation, we might want to make things a bit more elaborate
and set up the repo for the actual BUILD (and disable the main
repos).
2) We'd actually need --nogpgcheck for non-Rawhide, at one
specific point in the release cycle - after Branching but
before Bodhi activation (which is when we can be sure all
packages are signed). This won't matter until 24 branches, and
maybe releng will have it fixed by then...if not, I'll tweak
it.
3) We don't really test that the upgrade actually *happened*
for desktop, at the moment - the only thing in the old test
that really checked that was where we checked for the fedup
boot menu entry, but that has no analog in dnf. What we should
probably do is check that GUI login works, then switch to a
console and check /etc/fedora-release just as the minimal test
does.
Test Plan:
Run the tests. Note that creating the desktop disk
image doesn't work ATM, so I can't verify the desktop test
works, but the minimal one seems to (with D565). There'll be
a matching diff for openqa_fedora_tools to update the test
case names there.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: jskladan, garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D567
