I caught a few failed support_server update tests which failed
because packages from the update weren't installed; they weren't
installed because the update was for F28, but the support server
runs on an F29 disk image. Obviously we should skip the 'install
packages from the update' step in the support_server test unless
the versions match.
Arguably we could *never* install updates in support_server, but
I think it's actually valuable to know if the update breaks
support_server if we *are* on the right version.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
We're getting a spurious "Authentication required" for a
background refresh of the system repos sometimes, depending on
whether it happens while we're at a tty. This is now accepted
by upstream, so let's handle it and make it a soft failure for
now.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
New GTK+ changed something so the background of many interface
elements is a slightly lighter grey, this broke a bunch of
needles. Here are the retakes. Includes one not-strictly-related
SDDM update and a rename of the one @lruzicka did to match the
others.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
Obviously an installer image may work fine for a BIOS install
but fail for a UEFI install, so we should test it both ways.
This requires the invention of a new (terribly named, but I
couldn't think of anything better...) variable to allow us to
use the 'run test on machine A after test run on machine B'
mechanism without just hardcoding '64bit' as the machine name
in the START_AFTER setting (which would break if we ever wanted
to run update tests on any *other* arch).
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
We quite often want to run the update tests on a Koji task (not
a Bodhi update) for some reason - usually to test a potential
fix for an issue, or at a maintainer's request to test a change
before it is merged upstream and officially sent out as an
update. Up till now I've always hacked up utils.pm on the
staging server by hand to do this, which is horrible. Together
with a commit to fedora_openqa, this should allow us to do it in
a nice, sane way via the CLI. It's mostly just tweaking the
"updates" repo setup in utils.pm as you'd expect, but there's a
bit of subtlety to it because of the installer tests that use
%ADVISORY% as a variable substitution in the disk image name;
you can't do something like `%ADVISORY or KOJITASK%`, sadly, so
I had to have almost-redundant variables ADVISORY, KOJITASK and
ADVISORY_OR_TASK (we could kinda just live with ADVISORY_OR_TASK
except I didn't want to drop ADVISORY as it's an unnecessary
change from previous behavior).
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
The needle could sometimes fail because the item it was looking
for only appeared in a limited set of situations. The new
location should be safer to check and the test should not
fail as a result.
inst.addrepo was added in F29. In F28 it should just sorta not
do anything at all. It's not worth doing a big workaround to
make F28 graphically add the repo in this case; let's just allow
F28 to not actually add the repo. It's fine! This is fine.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
In https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1669256 it became
obvious that there's a missing feature in the new installer test
for updates: the update is both used in the image build process
and built into the installer environment itself, but it is not
actually included in the installed package set. This can be a
problem if the update has a bug that manifests *only* at install
time if it is in the install transaction (which is exactly the
case there), because the test will not catch this, and nor will
any other test.
So this commit makes `support_server` set up the update repo and
serve it out via NFS when it's run in an update context, and
makes the actual update install test run parallel with it and
use that repository. This way the install should include the
package(s) from the update. (It also of course means the test
fails if an update breaks NFS or something like that, but hey,
we want to know that!)
A parallel commit for fedora_openqa is necessary to add the
required CURRREL setting for the updates-installer flavor.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
This adds a test which builds a netinst image potentially with
the package(s) from the update, and uploads that image. It also
adds a test which runs a default install using that image. This
is intended to check whether the update breaks the creation or
use of install images; particularly this will let us test
anaconda etc. updates. We also update the minimal disk image
name, as we have to make it bigger to accommodate this test,
and making it bigger changes its name - the actual change to
the disk image itself is in createhdds. We also have to redo a
bunch of installer needles for F28 fonts, after I removed them
a month or so back...
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
If a test fails to the dracut shell, we currently don't do
anything useful. This should recognize when that happens, and
upload rdsosreport.txt.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
Today's Workstation live doesn't boot at all without enforcing=0.
We *still* want to see how subsequent tests run, so let's work
around this for now.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
There seems to be an issue in Rawhide ATM which can cause the
'beta nag' screen to take a very long time to appear. Bump the
timeout to avoid tests failing on this.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1666112
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
The packages from this update seem to be breaking F28 update
tests for some reason; a later update has gone stable anyway, so
this is no longer needed.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
We don't want the tests to fail on this now we know what the
bug is, really - we want to find if there are any subsequent
fails, and allow the post-install tests to run also. So, let's
make it a soft failure.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
A bug showed up in Rawhide where, when you run startx in a tty,
when you exit that X session, the tty quits and returns to the
login prompt. This is a slightly sloppy workaround for that
problem.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
It's my second least favorite day of the year again: Stale
Needle Cleanup Day!
This should get rid of all non-anaconda needles that definitely
are not being used any more. Cleanup of all anaconda needles was
in the previous commit.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
It's my second least favorite day of the year again: Stale
Needle Cleanup Day!
This should get rid of all anaconda needles that definitely are
not being used any more. A few borderline cases (where I'm not
100% sure if they may still be useful in odd corner cases, like
running universal tests on non-server images, and runs outside
of the US, and stuff) are kept around.
Cleanup of all non-anaconda needles will be in the next commit.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
This was part of a workaround for a Fedora Atomic Workstation
(old name for Silverblue) issue that got resolved a while back;
we forgot to take the needle out.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
I'm pretty sure we got all the bugs this was working around
fixed. Again, if not, we can put this back!
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
The bug never got explicitly addressed, but it's very old and
anaconda has been substantially changed since. The workaround
sometimes triggers erroneously now (because the icon sometimes
goes black while the spoke is still in 'Checking storage
configuration...' state), which is awkward. I can't be 100% sure
the bug doesn't sometimes still happen, but if it does, we'll
notice fairly soon, and we can tweak this and put it back.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
It seems Rawhide auto-signing is working fine now: openQA claims
this needle has 'never' been matched (which really means 'not
for a long time'), and I can't find any test fail in the last
year which looks like it landed on this 'authenticate' screen
but the needle failed to match, or anything like that.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
https://openqa.stg.fedoraproject.org/tests/424393 is a failure
where the 'Download' [updates] button was already visible when
we went to the tab. We already checked whether an 'apply' button
is visible and skipped the 'refresh' click if so, but because
the 'download' button is a new thing, we weren't skipping the
'refresh' click if 'download' was already visible.
So in this case, even though we could already see 'download', we
went ahead and clicked 'refresh'...then *immediately* started
looking for 'download'. It seems that Software did not refresh
and remove the 'Download' button *immediately* when we pressed
'refresh' - it left the 'Download' button visible briefly, and
*in this brief window*, we clicked it. *Then* Software kinda
'noticed' we'd clicked 'Update', and it seems it just sort of
throws away our click on 'Download' at that point and does the
refresh.
So at that point, the test thinks it's clicked 'Download' and
expects to see 'Apply', but actually the 'Download' click got
more or less thrown away, so the test fails, sitting at the
'Download' button.
To solve this, let's just extend the existing check to skip the
'refresh' click if 'download' *or* 'apply' are already visible.
There is a sort of possibility here that we could wind up
downloading and installing some updates that existed and were
noticed *before* we did our python3-kickstart trick, but not
install the python3-kickstart update, and cause the test to fail
because of that, but that doesn't seem to have happened before
when we were seeing the 'update' button, so I think I'm not
going to borrow trouble. If it happens, we'll deal with it I
guess.
The comment talks only about KDE, but clearly it can be the case
that an automatic check makes the button visible on GNOME too,
so let's rewrite the comment too.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
The fix for this bug was sent to all releases now, so we should
not need the workaround any more. Let's kill it.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
That clever-clever 'check the packages from the update were
installed' thing from yesterday breaks on kernel updates, as
they're installonly; after the update, the new version of the
package is installed, but the *old* version is too, and the way
I implemented the check, it treats that as a failure. Let's try
and handle this a somewhat-clever way (if this fails, I'm just
going to grep out lines with 'kernel' in them, as a *dumb* way).
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
