1
0
mirror of https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/os-autoinst-distri-fedora.git synced 2024-11-25 15:23:08 +00:00
Commit Graph

7 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Adam Williamson
2f1216c3b0 use lowercase $VERSION for upgrade version check
Summary:
For Rawhide, the text in os-release-fedora is 'rawhide' not
'Rawhide', so lc the $VERSION value when checking. For other
releases it's digits, so the lc won't change anything - lc('23')
is '23'.

Test Plan: Run the Rawhide upgrade tests, they should succeed.

Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel

Reviewed By: garretraziel

Subscribers: tflink

Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D620
2015-10-16 23:38:09 -07:00
Adam Williamson
68acecb6d4 convert upgrade tests to dnf-plugin-system-upgrade
Summary:
This is a first cut which more or less works for now. Issues:

1) We're not really testing the BUILD, here. All the test does
is try and upgrade to the specified VERSION - so it'll be using
the latest 'stable' for the given VERSION at the time the test
runs. This isn't really that terrible, but especially for TC/RC
validation, we might want to make things a bit more elaborate
and set up the repo for the actual BUILD (and disable the main
repos).

2) We'd actually need --nogpgcheck for non-Rawhide, at one
specific point in the release cycle - after Branching but
before Bodhi activation (which is when we can be sure all
packages are signed). This won't matter until 24 branches, and
maybe releng will have it fixed by then...if not, I'll tweak
it.

3) We don't really test that the upgrade actually *happened*
for desktop, at the moment - the only thing in the old test
that really checked that was where we checked for the fedup
boot menu entry, but that has no analog in dnf. What we should
probably do is check that GUI login works, then switch to a
console and check /etc/fedora-release just as the minimal test
does.

Test Plan:
Run the tests. Note that creating the desktop disk
image doesn't work ATM, so I can't verify the desktop test
works, but the minimal one seems to (with D565). There'll be
a matching diff for openqa_fedora_tools to update the test
case names there.

Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel

Reviewed By: jskladan, garretraziel

Subscribers: tflink

Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D567
2015-09-10 14:49:13 -07:00
Jan Sedlák
e000209967 add comments and documentation
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D481
2015-08-05 08:23:59 +02:00
Adam Williamson
4b8e411479 create fedora base class, factor out console login
Summary:
Root console in anaconda got broken by RHBZ #1222413 - no
shell on tty2. Decided to clean up console use in general as
part of fixing it.

This creates a class 'fedorabase' and has 'anacondalog' and
'fedoralog' both inherit from it. boot_to_login_screen is
moved there (as it seems appropriate) and it has a new
method, console_login, which basically handles 'get me a
shell on a console': if we're already at one it returns,
if not it'll type the user name and the password *if
necessary* (sometimes it's not) and return once it sees a
prompt. It takes a hash of named parameters for user,
password and 'check', which is whether it should die if it
fails to reach a console or not (some users don't want it
to).

anacondalog and fedoralog both get 'root_console' methods
which do something appropriate and then call
console_login; both have a hash of named parameters,
anacondalog's version only bothers with 'check', while
fedoralog's also accepts 'tty' to pick the tty to use.

This also adjusts all things which try to get to a console
prompt to use either root_console or console_login as
appropriate.

It also tweaks the needle tags a bit, drops some unneeded
needles, and adds a new 'user console prompt' needle; we
really just need two versions of the root prompt needle
and two of the user prompt needle (one for <F23, one for
F23+ - the console font changed in F23, and the @ character
at least doesn't match between the two). I think we still
need the <F23 case for upgrade tests, for now.

Test Plan:
Do a full test run and see that more tests
succeed. I've done a run on happyassassin with a hack to
workaround the SELinux issue for interactive installs,
and the results look good. I also fiddled about a bit to
test some different cases, like forcing a failure in a
live test to test post_fail_hook (and hence root_console)
in that scenario, and forcing failures after some console
commands had been run to check that it DTRT when we've
already reached a console, etc.

Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel

Reviewed By: jskladan, garretraziel

Subscribers: tflink

Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D462
2015-07-22 11:24:40 -07:00
Garret Raziel
c8f02969f2 add fedup desktop test
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D451
2015-07-17 12:52:56 +02:00
Garret Raziel
4abc1aecf2 move logging in as a root into parent class
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D440
2015-07-15 07:00:47 +02:00
Garret Raziel
1422d2c0e2 Add fedup_minimal test
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D358
2015-05-13 13:03:23 +02:00