This adds a pair of tests, one which does almost all the work
from the test case, the other just a client test to check that
we can connect to an HTTP server running in a container on the
host. We also have to bump the _console_wait_login timeout on
this path a bit as we're booting a disk image that was installed
with DHCP working, but we change the network setup so DHCP does
not work any more, and the system spends quite some time trying
to bring the network up on boot before eventually giving up and
proceeding.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
Here we are creating ~/.config for a newly-created user with root
ownership. We can't leave it that way, as commands run as the
user account won't be able to change it, as they should be able
to. So we need to change the ownership (and, just in case, fix
SELinux contexts) afterwards.
This was the real source of the problem we were seeing (the test
failing early due to the gsettings command which should turn the
screen background black failing).
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
We're trying to launch stuff the instant we see a desktop, and
it seems to be failing quite often in GNOME. Let's give it a few
seconds.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
IoT does nightly Branched and Rawhide composes that are built
as RC candidates, for some reason. So let's except it from this
check.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
I started out trying to fix os-release for the recent change to
add "Prerelease" tags to the VERSION and PRETTY_NAME fields, then
things spiralled. It got me thinking about the awkward DEVELOPMENT
variable we use, so I decided to get rid of it and refactor the
few things that use it. I refactored the anaconda prerelease tag
check, and wrote a new giant comment that gives details about
exactly how anaconda decides whether to show those tags, to give
context to our choices about when to expect them. This check now
uses a new LABEL variable the scheduler now sets. I also wound up
creating new UP1REL and UP2REL vars to define the 'source' release
for upgrade tests, separate from CURRREL and PREVREL, which are
now never lies - they really are the current stable and previous
stable release, even for update upgrade tests.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
The update live image build test keeps running out of disk space.
We've bumped the minimal disk image from 12GB all the way up to
20GB so far but it keeps happening. So let's try a different
strategy: use a scratch disk to mount /var/lib/mock. That's where
all the space gets used. This should allow us to reduce the size
of the minimal disk image again, and giving it 25GB of empty disk
should avoid it running out of space again for a while.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
This is failing on every update and that's not telling us anything
useful - we already know about the bug - so let's work around it.
Not adding a softfail as it's a bit more awkward to do that.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
We can get tripped up by the tutorial screen when launching
Boxes; borrow some code from the app start/stop test to check for
and handle it.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
The default timeout for check_screen is 0, so we were only giving
the enter key press a fraction of a second to take effect before
expecting to see locked_screen_switch_user. This is too tight,
see https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/586257 . Let's give it
five seconds before we give up.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
Since GDM shows the "system-menu-button", it could not correctly
switch users on a locked screen. I added a check to see
if we are on a locked screen and behave accordingly.
This adds a new test that implementsQA:Testcase_desktop_login
on both GNOME and KDE.
While working on this, we realized that the "desktop_clean"
needles were really "app menu" needles, and for KDE, this was
a duplication with the new "system menu" needles, because on KDE
the app menu and the system menu are the same. So I (Adam)
started to de-duplicate that, but also realized that "app menu
button" is a much more accurate name for these needles, so I was
renaming the old desktop_clean needles to app_menu_button. That
led me to the realization that "check_desktop_clean" is itself a
dumb name, because we don't (at least, any more, way back in the
mists of time we may have done) do anything to check that the
desktop is "clean" - we're really just asserting that we're at a
desktop *at all*. While thinking *that* through, I *also* realized
that the whole "open the overview and look for the app grid icon"
workaround it did is no longer necessary, because GNOME doesn't
use a translucent top bar any more. That went away in GNOME 3.32,
which is in Fedora 30, our oldest supported release.
So I threw that away, renamed the function "check_desktop",
cleaned up all the needle naming and tagging, and also added an
app menu needle for GNOME in Japanese because we were missing
one (the Japanese tests have been using the "app grid icon"
workaround the whole time).
This stuff is kinda broken in various ways and halfline thinks
he can fix the underlying bug anyway. So let's go back to just
the GNOME live test being broken for now.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
I tested this workaround on staging before pushing it to git and
it worked, but then when I pushed it to prod it didn't work. On
stg I also had this to set GDM to debugging mode, so maybe this
is also needed for the workaround to work for some reason?
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
A GNOME bug seems to result in us getting to GDM, not a liveuser
desktop, after running 'systemctl isolate graphical.target' from
a live boot to runlevel 3 since the end of March. This works
around that to let the test run, as it's not really a failure of
the test per se.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
Previous commit same summary had some side effect
solved by this new one.
And avoid a warning in autoinst-log when ABRT var not defined.
Signed-off-by: Michel Normand <normand@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
I merged the previous commit before realizing the ordering was
wrong. All other 'actions' lines have to come *before* the one
that adds 'reboot', because one of the conditions for that is
whether @actions is populated - basically, if we're taking any
actions, we also have to reboot afterwards. If we add an action
*after* that line (but no actions were added before that line),
we'll do it but then not reboot and the test will break.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
This reverts commit 00b756f0e2.
Unfortunately, I made a typo in the script and the fix did not
work. I do not want to rebase the master (in order not to break
things for everyone) so I am reverting again.
Sorry.
This reverts commit d784bf54ca.
It turned out that Locations are not connected to Konqueror
at all. The reason why the test is failing is that the
application has been removed to limit the number of
web browsers.
We seem to be seeing the bug this works around:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1765685
in F30 and F31 update tests even with this wait. At least, it
looks that way. Trying this to see if a longer wait helps.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
RHBZ #1692972 was fixed long ago, so we don't need to worry
about that any more. But this test failed on the recent F31 live
respin compose because it was changed to assume the tutorial
would appear on startup, which only happens on F32+. To make the
test work on F31 respins, let's handle both paths. Once F32 is
stable we can drop this as we won't run the test on F31 any more
after that.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
IoT created a branch that's basically Rawhide but is versioned
33. This causes the release_identification tests to fail. I don't
think they'll change this on their end, so let's just have the
test cope with it and expect branches versioned as the Rawhide
release number to behave as Rawhide does here.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
It seems to be actually installing fedora-release-silverblue now
so we get correct identification here. Update the tests.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
