The bug seems to have gone away, at least I don't see that this
soft failure has been hit much for the last two months.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
This turns out to be overcomplicated. We don't need the special
handling for updates any more, because a few months after we
implemented it, we had to make sure the affected update tests had
an empty START_AFTER_TEST anyway, or else openQA would refuse to
schedule them. So we can just rely on the START_AFTER_TEST
condition for those now. We also don't need the additional
INSTALL_NO_USER condition; the only case where it's actually used
is for install_arm_image_deployment_upload on Workstation, and
that test does not have START_AFTER_TEST set, so the other
condition catches it for welcome screen handling purposes. There
is no need to nest the IMAGE_DEPLOY conditional inside a check
for the desktop and the INSTALL_NO_USER var either; we don't
test any other desktop on ARM, and the IMAGE_DEPLOY var is only
set for that one install_arm_image_deployment_upload test.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
We currently snapshot after every run of _console_wait_login or
_graphical_wait_login, which means we snapshot *twice* on most
update tests as those modules get run twice. However, we almost
never use those snapshots. Snapshotting takes quite some time,
and hits the disk pretty hard, so we should avoid it unless it
is really needed.
We only have a few modules that are not fatal (and so might use
the snapshots), and most of those don't run after one of these
tests, or run after a later module that's also a milestone. Best
I can tell, only two test suites really need to use a snapshot
from a login test: server_cockpit_updates and modularity_tests.
To handle these and potential future cases, we'll add a new
module that does nothing, but is marked 'milestone', so it will
take a snapshot, and load that test after the login test if the
var LOGIN_SNAPSHOT is set, and set that var for those two suites.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
We use variables to track test state across modules, sometimes.
As this is all internal to the test logic I didn't bother always
making these variables upper-case, but os-autoinst now treats
lower-case variables as a fatal error, so we have to change.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
Also stop re-doing get_var("DESKTOP") because that's dumb. This
should only, at worst, make things slower if unexpected things
happen - it shouldn't cause failures that wouldn't happen anyway.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
In GNOME 40, the new-user mode of g-i-s is gone and we get the
welcome tour where we would previously have seen that. This
should handle that, I hope. I probably messed up somewhere.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
Another aarch64 robustness fix...sometimes hitting enter at GDM
just doesn't seem to work, let's give it three tries if needed.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
Seems like this often fails when booting the desktop disk image
on aarch64 if we start typing right away.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
This sets us up to test the release-blocking aarch64 disk images
(Minimal, Server and Workstation). It also allows for testing
armhfp disk images on aarch64 worker hosts (though my testing of
that isn't going too well so far), and fixes the initial-setup
handling for a change upstream ('use password' is now the default
so we don't need to choose it). We rewire disk image deployment
test loading to work through the generic loader code rather than
using ENTRYPOINT, as it allows us to more gracefully handle
graphical (Workstation) vs. console (Server, Minimal), moving
the code for handling console initial-setup to a helper function
just like the code for gnome-initial-setup and having _console_
wait_login call it when appropriate. We also tweak desktop_vt a
bit because now we need to switch from a console running as test
to a desktop, which breaks the assumption that the highest
numbered session of user test is the desktop...
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
This adds a new test that implementsQA:Testcase_desktop_login
on both GNOME and KDE.
While working on this, we realized that the "desktop_clean"
needles were really "app menu" needles, and for KDE, this was
a duplication with the new "system menu" needles, because on KDE
the app menu and the system menu are the same. So I (Adam)
started to de-duplicate that, but also realized that "app menu
button" is a much more accurate name for these needles, so I was
renaming the old desktop_clean needles to app_menu_button. That
led me to the realization that "check_desktop_clean" is itself a
dumb name, because we don't (at least, any more, way back in the
mists of time we may have done) do anything to check that the
desktop is "clean" - we're really just asserting that we're at a
desktop *at all*. While thinking *that* through, I *also* realized
that the whole "open the overview and look for the app grid icon"
workaround it did is no longer necessary, because GNOME doesn't
use a translucent top bar any more. That went away in GNOME 3.32,
which is in Fedora 30, our oldest supported release.
So I threw that away, renamed the function "check_desktop",
cleaned up all the needle naming and tagging, and also added an
app menu needle for GNOME in Japanese because we were missing
one (the Japanese tests have been using the "app grid icon"
workaround the whole time).
This adds a test for QA:Testcase_Anaconda_User_Interface_VNC -
the VNC install test case. It's implemented as a server/client
pair, with the server booting from the Server DVD image with
`inst.vnc` and the client booting from the desktop base disk
image, setting up networking, then running Boxes to connect to
the server and run the install.
There are various little tweaks to test loading and logic to
handle this, mostly pretty clear. We also move the workaround
for 'spurious auth prompt appears on desktop after you switch
away to a VT and back' out of the desktop update test and into
the `desktop_vt` helper function, since now this test can hit
it as well. We enhance _graphical_wait_login to handle the boot
loader if needed (it has never needed to until now).
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
See https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/473215 - it failed
because we tried to click FINISH CONFIGURATION while it was
still animating downwards.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
Split this out of install_default, because it really is not a
part of that test and we do not want that test to fail because
the desktop background is wrong. Make it its own test module
and test suite instead. Don't do it on Rawhide, because we
really can't assert anything worthwhile about Rawhide at the
moment at least (this means the test runs but is a no-op and
will always pass on Rawhide, unfortunately). Move the needles
to a more appropriate location (this has nothing to do with
anaconda) and use 'background' not 'wallpaper' naming (that's
the name we use elsewhere in the project, e.g. package names).
Also, run the test on updates, and add an F29 needle for this
purpose.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
We quite often want to run the update tests on a Koji task (not
a Bodhi update) for some reason - usually to test a potential
fix for an issue, or at a maintainer's request to test a change
before it is merged upstream and officially sent out as an
update. Up till now I've always hacked up utils.pm on the
staging server by hand to do this, which is horrible. Together
with a commit to fedora_openqa, this should allow us to do it in
a nice, sane way via the CLI. It's mostly just tweaking the
"updates" repo setup in utils.pm as you'd expect, but there's a
bit of subtlety to it because of the installer tests that use
%ADVISORY% as a variable substitution in the disk image name;
you can't do something like `%ADVISORY or KOJITASK%`, sadly, so
I had to have almost-redundant variables ADVISORY, KOJITASK and
ADVISORY_OR_TASK (we could kinda just live with ADVISORY_OR_TASK
except I didn't want to drop ADVISORY as it's an unnecessary
change from previous behavior).
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
RHBZ#1625572 is for gnome-initial-setup running in 'first login'
mode after it's already run in 'user creation' mode (which isn't
meant to happen). This works around that so the subsequent tests
can run. We don't soft-fail because meh.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
If USER_LOGIN is false we can just return; when we reach the
login screen. We don't need a huge conditional when we don't do
anything *after* it, in the false case.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
Upstream is gonna change the default from 30 to 0, it seems:
https://github.com/os-autoinst/os-autoinst/pull/965
so let's go ahead and change these two cases where we have no
explicit timeout to have one.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
This mouse placement is in the middle of where the 'install
addon' popover appears in Firefox, and that seems like it
sometimes causes the popover to immediately disappear in KDE.
This is pretty corner-case-y so I don't wanna report it as a
bug, let's just tweak the cursor hiding location and see if it
solves the problem.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
There's a bug causing the 'getting started' screen to crash.
This doesn't really make the system unusable, so treating it
as a soft failure seems appropriate, especially as this will
unblock all the post-install tests on Workstation.
Since April there's been some kind of issue in the F26 base
image which means gnome-initial-setup doesn't run on the first
user login (as it should). The F25 base image is fine. I've
not yet had the time to look into this.
I put a workaround in place to prevent this problem causing
false fails of update tests that boot from the F26 base image,
but didn't apply the same workaround to upgrade tests, which
is why upgrade tests from F26 Workstation always fail - they
expect g-i-s to run on first login (which happens after the
upgrade, in upgrade tests) and it doesn't. So let's just extend
the workaround to apply to upgrade tests too, for now, until we
can figure out why this happens.
Well, that OCR needle isn't working out so great, as it seems
to match when it shouldn't:
https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/119217#step/_graphical_wait_login/5
So let's try another approach. Ditch the OCR needle and have a
function for checking we're at a clean desktop. It does the
normal needle match, but if we're on GNOME, it also tries
hitting alt+f1 and seeing if we're at the overview; if so, it
hits alt+f1 again (to go back to the desktop) and returns.
With the latest F26 base images, it seems like g-i-s fails to
run at first login. This is clearly some kind of bug somewhere
and I'll investigate it, but it shouldn't be causing the update
tests to fail - we can still validly run the tests with g-i-s
not running. So for now, adjust the _graphical_wait_login test
to tolerate this behaviour when running update tests.
It's not really a good idea to have the comments that explain
the test_flags in *every* test, because they can go stale and
then we either have to live with them being old or update them
all. Like, now. So let's just take 'em all out. There's always
a reference in the openQA and os-autoinst docs, and those get
updated faster.
More importantly, add the new `ignore_failure` flag to relevant
tests - all the tests that don't have the 'important' or
'fatal' flag at present. Upstream killed the 'important' flag
(making all tests 'important' by default), I got it replaced
with the 'ignore_failure' flag, we now need to explicitly mark
all modules we want the 'ignore_failure' behaviour for.
Summary:
This adds a new test suite, run for Workstation and KDE live
images, which does not create a user during install. It then
expects initial-setup (KDE) or gnome-initial-setup (Workstation)
to appear after install, creates a user, and proceeds with
normal boot.
Note the ARM image test already covers the initial-setup text
mode, and the ARM minimal image is the only case where that
actually matters (it's not included in Server).
Test Plan:
Run the new tests, check they work. Run all old
tests, check the changes didn't break them.
Reviewers: jsedlak, jskladan
Reviewed By: jsedlak
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qa.fedoraproject.org/D1185
Summary:
This adds an entirely new workflow for testing distribution
updates. The `ADVISORY` variable is introduced: when set,
`main.pm` will load an early post-install test that sets up
a repository containing the packages from the specified update,
runs `dnf -y update`, and reboots. A new templates file is
added, `templates-updates`, which adds two new flavors called
`updates-server` and `updates-workstation`, each containing
job templates for appropriate post-install tests. Scheduler is
expected to post `ADVISORY=(update ID) HDD_1=(base image)
FLAVOR=updates-(server|workstation)`, where (base image) is one
of the stable release base disk images produced by `createhdds`
and usually used for upgrade testing. This will result in the
appropriate job templates being loaded.
We rejig postinstall test loading and static network config a
bit so that this works for both the 'compose' and 'updates' test
flows: we have to ensure we bring up networking for the tap
tests before we try and install the updates, but still allow
later adjustment of the configuration. We take advantage of the
openQA feature that was added a few months back to run the same
module multiple times, so the `_advisory_update` module can
reboot after installing the updates and the modules that take
care of bootloader, encryption and login get run again. This
looks slightly wacky in the web UI, though - it doesn't show the
later runs of each module.
We also use the recently added feature to specify `+HDD_1` in
the test suites which use a disk image uploaded by an earlier
post-install test, so the test suite value will take priority
over the value POSTed by the scheduler for those tests, and we
will use the uploaded disk image (and not the clean base image
POSTed by the scheduler) for those tests.
My intent here is to enhance the scheduler, adding a consumer
which listens out for critpath updates, and runs this test flow
for each one, then reports the results to ResultsDB where Bodhi
could query and display them. We could also add a list of other
packages to have one or both sets of update tests run on it, I
guess.
Test Plan:
Try a post something like:
HDD_1=disk_f25_server_3_x86_64.img DISTRI=fedora VERSION=25
FLAVOR=updates-server ARCH=x86_64 BUILD=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c
ADVISORY=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c CURRREL=25 PREVREL=24
Pick an appropriate `ADVISORY` (ideally, one containing some
packages which might actually be involved in the tests), and
matching `FLAVOR` and `HDD_1`. The appropriate tests should run,
a repo with the update packages should be created and enabled
(and dnf update run), and the tests should work properly. Also
test a regular compose run to make sure I didn't break anything.
Reviewers: jskladan, jsedlak
Reviewed By: jsedlak
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qa.fedoraproject.org/D1143
Summary:
This adds a couple of new exporter modules, renames main_common
to utils (this is a better name: openSUSE's main_common is
functions used in main.pm, utils is what they call their module
full of miscellaneous commonly-used functions), and moves a
bunch of utility functions that were previously needlessly
implemented as instance methods in base classes into the
exporter modules. That means we can get rid of all the annoying
$self-> syntax for calling them.
We get rid of `fedorabase` entirely, as it's no longer useful
for anything. Other base classes keep the 'standard' methods
(like `post_fail_hook`) and methods which actually need to be
methods (like `root_console`, whose behaviour is different in
anacondatest and installedtest).
Test Plan:
Do a full test suite run and check everything lines
up. There should be no functional differences from before at all,
this is just a re-org.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel_but_actually_jsedlak_who_uses_stupid_nicknames
Reviewed By: garretraziel_but_actually_jsedlak_who_uses_stupid_nicknames
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qa.fedoraproject.org/D1080
Summary:
Include some basic testing of Japanese input, and split the
input testing (including Russian) into a separate module, since
it's not really part of 'login' testing.
Test Plan:
Run the test, and the Russian and French tests too to
make sure they didn't break. Tested on staging. Note the Japanese
test soft fails, intentionally, at present, as I discovered a bug
while working on it:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=776189
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D1072
Summary:
The non-English tests so far did not test that graphical login
worked as expected, which is a fairly large hole. With this
change, they should do a Workstation install and test login to
both GNOME and the console works as expected. KDE is not yet
tested.
As part of this we tweak the implementation of keyboard layout
switching in graphical environments to use a generic function
in main_common which can handle both anaconda and desktops
(just GNOME at present, but should extend easily to any desktop
with a known switcher key and a visible layout indicator),
replacing the anacondatest class method. I kinda don't like that
the test has to specifically tell the function when it's in
anaconda, but I don't think I want to start experimenting with
a global 'test phase' openQA variable or anything like that at
present.
Fixes T842.
Test Plan:
Run the French and Russian install tests and check
they work as expected. Also run an English Workstation install
if you like, and make sure that didn't break. This change is
live on staging ATM, seems to work fine.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Maniphest Tasks: T842
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D1071
Summary:
I started out wanting to fix an issue I noticed today where
graphical upgrade tests were failing because they didn't wait
for the graphical login screen properly; the test was sitting
at the 'full Fedora logo' state of plymouth for a long time,
so the current boot_to_login_screen's wait_still_screen was
triggered by it and the function wound up failing on the
assert_screen, because it was still some time before the real
login screen appeared.
So I tweaked the boot_to_login_screen implementation to work
slightly differently (look for a login screen match, *then* -
if we're dealing with a graphical login - wait_still_screen
to defeat the 'old GPU buffer showing login screen' problem
and assert the login screen again). But while working on it,
I figured we really should consolidate all the various places
that handle the bootloader -> login, we were doing it quite
differently in all sorts of different places. And as part of
that, I converted the base tests to use POSTINSTALL (and thus
go through the shared _wait_login tests) instead of handling
boot themselves. As part of *that*, I tweaked main.pm to not
require all POSTINSTALL tests have the _postinstall suffix on
their names, as it really doesn't make sense, and renamed the
tests.
Test Plan: Run all tests, see if they work.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D1015
Summary:
the main thing this does is try and type slower in X - this
should cover nearly everywhere we type anything in X, and make
it type slower. We also add a bit more safety checking to some
old tests which didn't have it (mainly _do_install_and_reboot)
- wait_still_screen after typing to make sure all the keypresses
were registered before continuing.
This is an attempt to mitigate the problems we've seen where
the wrong text gets typed into the wrong places and the tests
break.
This branch is live on staging atm. It still has *some* issues,
but I do think it's an improvement.
Test Plan:
run the tests (probably several times), compare to
runs without the change, see if it's better or worse...
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D993
