This adds a pair of tests, one which does almost all the work
from the test case, the other just a client test to check that
we can connect to an HTTP server running in a container on the
host. We also have to bump the _console_wait_login timeout on
this path a bit as we're booting a disk image that was installed
with DHCP working, but we change the network setup so DHCP does
not work any more, and the system spends quite some time trying
to bring the network up on boot before eventually giving up and
proceeding.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
I started out trying to fix os-release for the recent change to
add "Prerelease" tags to the VERSION and PRETTY_NAME fields, then
things spiralled. It got me thinking about the awkward DEVELOPMENT
variable we use, so I decided to get rid of it and refactor the
few things that use it. I refactored the anaconda prerelease tag
check, and wrote a new giant comment that gives details about
exactly how anaconda decides whether to show those tags, to give
context to our choices about when to expect them. This check now
uses a new LABEL variable the scheduler now sets. I also wound up
creating new UP1REL and UP2REL vars to define the 'source' release
for upgrade tests, separate from CURRREL and PREVREL, which are
now never lies - they really are the current stable and previous
stable release, even for update upgrade tests.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
This adds a new test that implementsQA:Testcase_desktop_login
on both GNOME and KDE.
While working on this, we realized that the "desktop_clean"
needles were really "app menu" needles, and for KDE, this was
a duplication with the new "system menu" needles, because on KDE
the app menu and the system menu are the same. So I (Adam)
started to de-duplicate that, but also realized that "app menu
button" is a much more accurate name for these needles, so I was
renaming the old desktop_clean needles to app_menu_button. That
led me to the realization that "check_desktop_clean" is itself a
dumb name, because we don't (at least, any more, way back in the
mists of time we may have done) do anything to check that the
desktop is "clean" - we're really just asserting that we're at a
desktop *at all*. While thinking *that* through, I *also* realized
that the whole "open the overview and look for the app grid icon"
workaround it did is no longer necessary, because GNOME doesn't
use a translucent top bar any more. That went away in GNOME 3.32,
which is in Fedora 30, our oldest supported release.
So I threw that away, renamed the function "check_desktop",
cleaned up all the needle naming and tagging, and also added an
app menu needle for GNOME in Japanese because we were missing
one (the Japanese tests have been using the "app grid icon"
workaround the whole time).
IoT is becoming a release-blocking edition for F32, so we should
be testing it for sure. We may add specific tests, but for now
let's run the install and base tests on it.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
We were only running this test on the Workstation boot ISO...
then that was removed, and so we actually never ran this test at
all any more. We should run it on at least one image as check-
compose uses the output to check whether installer memory usage
has increased. I initially ran it on Workstation as that installs
the most packages; so let's run it on Everything but use the
Workstation package set.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
I and @lruzicka (and I think @jskladan and @jsedlak and
@michelmno and everyone else who's ever touched it...) are being
gradually driven nuts by manually editing the test templates.
The bigger the files get the more awkward it is to keep them
straight and be sure we're doing it right. Upstream doesn't do
things the same way we do (they mostly edit in the web UI and
dump to file for the record), but we do still think making
changes in the repo and posting to the web UI is the right way
around to do it, we just wish the format was saner.
Upstream has actually recently introduced a YAML-based approach
to storing job templates which tries to condense things a bit,
and you can dump to that format with dump-templates --json, but
@lruzicka and I agree that that format is barely better for
hand editing in a text editor than the older one our templates
currently use.
So, this commit introduces...Fedora Intermediate Format (FIF) -
an alternative format for representing job templates - and some
tools for working with it. It also contains our existing
templates in this new format, and removes the old template files.
The format is documented in the docstrings of the tools, but
briefly, it keeps Machines, Products and TestSuites but improves
their format a bit (by turning dicts-of-lists into dicts-of-
dicts), and adds Profiles, which are combinations of Machines and
Products. TestSuites can indicate which Profiles they should be
run on.
The intermediate format converter (`fifconverter`) converts
existing template data (in JSON format; use tojson.pm to convert
our perl templates to JSON) to the intermediate format and
writes it out. As this was really intended only for one-time use
(the idea is that after one-time conversion, we will edit the
templates in the intermediate format from now on), its operation
is hardcoded and relies on specific filenames.
The intermediate format loader (`fifloader`) generates
JobTemplates from the TestSuites and Profiles, reverses the
quality-of-life improvements of the intermediate format, and
produces template data compatible with the upstream loader, then
can write it to disk and/or call the upstream loader directly.
The check script (`fifcheck`) runs existing template data through
both the converter and the loader, then checks that the result is
equivalent to the input. Again this was mostly written for one-
time use so is fairly rough and hard-coded, but I'm including it
in the commit so others can check the work and so on.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
