1
0
mirror of https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/os-autoinst-distri-fedora.git synced 2024-11-22 22:13:08 +00:00
Commit Graph

38 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Adam Williamson
e1a6d2c22b Handle KDE defaulting to offline updates in F34+
We need to hit 'restart' after applying updates, and we also
need the 'done' needle *not* to match the restart message, so
change that to match on the text (unfortunately). That also
means we have to add another variant of the needle for F32 as
the background of the text is a different color there.

Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
2021-02-25 16:10:20 -08:00
Adam Williamson
de36bd2d12 Tweak desktop update matching logic
This gives apply and download longer to show up (which is an
issue for KDE right now) while also not waiting 10 seconds if
they don't.

Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
2021-02-25 14:33:17 -08:00
Adam Williamson
5652b62484 Wait a bit longer for desktop_package_tool_update_apply
In current KDE we get it on start of the tool, but only after a
few more seconds...

Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
2020-12-30 10:46:16 -08:00
Adam Williamson
a5c0f7ffbb Enable several desktop tests on Workstation aarch64 disk image
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
2020-12-04 11:55:33 -08:00
Adam Williamson
fc93309b41 Drop _assert_and_click shim
We're on newer code on both deployments now, no longer needed.

Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
2020-01-10 14:22:20 -08:00
Adam Williamson
b82a1dec6f Add test for QA:Testcase_Anaconda_User_Interface_VNC
This adds a test for QA:Testcase_Anaconda_User_Interface_VNC -
the VNC install test case. It's implemented as a server/client
pair, with the server booting from the Server DVD image with
`inst.vnc` and the client booting from the desktop base disk
image, setting up networking, then running Boxes to connect to
the server and run the install.

There are various little tweaks to test loading and logic to
handle this, mostly pretty clear. We also move the workaround
for 'spurious auth prompt appears on desktop after you switch
away to a VT and back' out of the desktop update test and into
the `desktop_vt` helper function, since now this test can hit
it as well. We enhance _graphical_wait_login to handle the boot
loader if needed (it has never needed to until now).

Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
2019-11-05 14:46:10 -08:00
Adam Williamson
25f408ea7e Factor out clicking of update and akonadi notifications in KDE
There are three places where we basically want to click away
pop-up update notifications and the buggy akonadi_migration_agent
notification if it's there, in KDE tests. Let's share this code
between them, and also let's record soft failures for the buggy
cases in the desktop_notifications test.

Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
2019-07-17 09:02:24 -07:00
Adam Williamson
dfce3e522d desktop_update: handle multiple KDE update available notifications
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
2019-07-10 12:37:26 -07:00
Adam Williamson
7953fb91d1 Try to handle spurious 'auth required' on KDE update test too
Sigh, now *this* is showing up in KDE too. Fun.

Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
2019-05-30 17:54:27 -07:00
Adam Williamson
2e56facb68 Try to handle changes to KDE update notifications in Rawhide
The way KDE does update notifications has changed - it's now a
permanent pop-up notification. This is a bit awkward for our
logic; it's hard to define a needle that proves this pop-up is
the only notification. Instead, let's dismiss it, then open the
notification tray and assert that there aren't any others. But
we also retain the old behaviour (more or less) for testing old
releases.

The popup notification also blocks the 'refresh' needle in the
systray and so breaks the desktop update test, so we deal with
that too.

Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
2019-05-30 17:34:09 -07:00
Adam Williamson
43b990195c Add a wrapper around assert_and_click to handle signature change
So, turns out new os-autoinst does *not* still accept the old
argument style for assert_and_click...and old os-autoinst
doesn't accept the new one. This adds a wrapper that handles
both, so our tests can work with old and new os-autoinst. We can
drop this once both deployments are on newer os-autoinst.

Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
2019-05-28 09:41:33 -07:00
Adam Williamson
87456f6b1d Use new arg style for assert_and_click
In the new os-autoinst I just sent to staging, the old style
doesn't work any more, breaks all tests. This style should also
work with the older os-autoinst on stable.

Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
2019-05-27 14:28:17 -07:00
Adam Williamson
6c22b55be5 Drop another part of branched buildroot repo workaround
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
2019-05-01 13:49:18 -07:00
Adam Williamson
ccb67bd5a7 Extend gnome-software/issues/582 workaround to 2 auth requests
It seems that when this problem happens now we get *two* auth
requests, so we need to handle that.

Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
2019-04-17 10:32:04 -07:00
Adam Williamson
dc81c64f4f Use type_very_safely for the desktop auth workaround
type_safely just ain't safe enough, it seems.

Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
2019-04-10 12:46:45 -07:00
Adam Williamson
e396341f31 Handle 'authentication required' appearing on Boxes startup
In the last few weeks Boxes is showing an auth dialog on start.
I've filed a bug on this; let's have the test handle it as a
soft failure, since this isn't a fatal problem. Do this by
making an existing needle for this dialog a bit more generic
in name and using it.

Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
2019-03-26 12:30:47 -07:00
Adam Williamson
d6c339e9ff Disable the 'f30-build' repo for the desktop update test
...GNOME Software doesn't like it.

Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
2019-03-06 19:51:09 -08:00
Adam Williamson
5cbc7df810 Work around GGO gnome-software/582 till it's fixed
We're getting a spurious "Authentication required" for a
background refresh of the system repos sometimes, depending on
whether it happens while we're at a tty. This is now accepted
by upstream, so let's handle it and make it a soft failure for
now.

Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
2019-02-07 09:58:10 -08:00
Adam Williamson
3d35ec9670 Update a comment to not mention a removed workaround
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
2018-12-17 14:36:10 -08:00
Adam Williamson
ef3555aaa1 Drop another old workaround (KDE package signature check)
It seems Rawhide auto-signing is working fine now: openQA claims
this needle has 'never' been matched (which really means 'not
for a long time'), and I can't find any test fail in the last
year which looks like it landed on this 'authenticate' screen
but the needle failed to match, or anything like that.

Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
2018-12-17 12:24:09 -08:00
Adam Williamson
1fd0097d1d Simplify an 'if >F26' thing
We don't care about anything older than 27 any more.

Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
2018-12-17 12:19:44 -08:00
Adam Williamson
d1e7b89efd Fix a potential race in desktop update test
https://openqa.stg.fedoraproject.org/tests/424393 is a failure
where the 'Download' [updates] button was already visible when
we went to the tab. We already checked whether an 'apply' button
is visible and skipped the 'refresh' click if so, but because
the 'download' button is a new thing, we weren't skipping the
'refresh' click if 'download' was already visible.

So in this case, even though we could already see 'download', we
went ahead and clicked 'refresh'...then *immediately* started
looking for 'download'. It seems that Software did not refresh
and remove the 'Download' button *immediately* when we pressed
'refresh' - it left the 'Download' button visible briefly, and
*in this brief window*, we clicked it. *Then* Software kinda
'noticed' we'd clicked 'Update', and it seems it just sort of
throws away our click on 'Download' at that point and does the
refresh.

So at that point, the test thinks it's clicked 'Download' and
expects to see 'Apply', but actually the 'Download' click got
more or less thrown away, so the test fails, sitting at the
'Download' button.

To solve this, let's just extend the existing check to skip the
'refresh' click if 'download' *or* 'apply' are already visible.

There is a sort of possibility here that we could wind up
downloading and installing some updates that existed and were
noticed *before* we did our python3-kickstart trick, but not
install the python3-kickstart update, and cause the test to fail
because of that, but that doesn't seem to have happened before
when we were seeing the 'update' button, so I think I'm not
going to borrow trouble. If it happens, we'll deal with it I
guess.

The comment talks only about KDE, but clearly it can be the case
that an automatic check makes the button visible on GNOME too,
so let's rewrite the comment too.

Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
2018-12-17 12:10:06 -08:00
Adam Williamson
517750443e Remove RHBZ #1638563 workaround
The fix for this bug was sent to all releases now, so we should
not need the workaround any more. Let's kill it.

Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
2018-12-17 12:02:57 -08:00
Adam Williamson
70ef3404f0 Tweak previous commit to avoid some bugs
The previous commit would lead to the 'workaround' getting hit
incorrectly, and might have had some other issues...tweak it a
bit.

Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
2018-10-31 12:45:11 -07:00
Adam Williamson
fd753b2e3a Handle split of 'download' and 'apply' phases in gnome-software
GNOME Software 3.30.5 split the offline update process into two
separate 'download' and 'apply' phases. So we need to handle
clicking 'download' before 'apply', if that happens.

Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
2018-10-31 11:50:14 -07:00
Adam Williamson
17b6d9f708 Tweak the workaround to work for F27 too
On F27 we don't get a 'Software is up to date' screen because
there's an upgrade available. Let's work with the refresh button
instead.

Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
2018-10-11 22:23:53 -07:00
Adam Williamson
63d8f34a0e Tweak the workaround loop a bit, refresh the comments
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
2018-10-11 16:18:04 -07:00
Adam Williamson
db4ab638da Restore modified version of the #1314991 workaround for #1638563
We're not seeing *exactly* #1314991 any more, but we're seeing
something that looks quite similar: the first attempt to find
updates just doesn't find any. No error message, no updates. I
have reported a bug for this and am investigating it, in the
meantime, let's restore the workaround, elaborated a bit, and
looking for the 'Software is up to date' screen instead of the
error message.

Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
2018-10-11 16:07:58 -07:00
Adam Williamson
25ad8a6aeb Drop workaround for #1314991, it doesn't work any more
I rather suspect the *bug* is still basically present and it's
why this test often fails, but we no longer seem to see the
*error message* which lets us detect the bug happening. This
needle has not been hit by any test for six months. So let's
remove the workaround as it adds complexity.

Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
2018-10-10 13:45:51 -07:00
Adam Williamson
acc4ccd7cc Add a sleep to desktop_update_graphical
Try and avoid failure to launch alt-f1 dialog...

Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
2018-07-30 11:23:59 -07:00
Adam Williamson
baa7ac4e39 Handle KDE update test when KDE has aleady found updates
We do the 'desktop update' test for KDE via the notification
icon thingy, and it behaves differently depending on whether it
has already detected there are updates or not. The test only
works at present in the case where it *hasn't* - it expects the
notification icon to be in the extended panel and it expects to
see a 'refresh' button, neither of which is the case if it's
already noticed there are updates to install.

We should also force PackageKit to update its list of available
updates after we set up our 'special' update, otherwise on this
path KDE will only install the updates it found *before* we did
our stuff, and the test will fail as our special update won't be
there.

Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
2018-03-28 19:53:19 -07:00
Adam Williamson
4323d8f533 Fix desktop_update_graphical for recent F27+ GNOME change
The default action on the reboot confirmation dialog changed
from Reboot to Cancel, so when we hit enter, we just cancel the
reboot. Tweak this to hit tab on F27+ (but not <F26, so update
tests continue to work too).
2017-10-19 12:46:40 -07:00
Adam Williamson
99a203b8e0 Catch RHBZ #1314991 and handle it, with a soft failure
We can deal with this annoying bug by looking out for the error
we see when it happens, hitting the 'refresh' button again, and
resetting the loop counter to 1 (requires changing the loop to
a C-style loop).
2017-09-06 14:19:37 -07:00
Adam Williamson
e68e113f76 Remove test_flags comments, add ignore_failure flag
It's not really a good idea to have the comments that explain
the test_flags in *every* test, because they can go stale and
then we either have to live with them being old or update them
all. Like, now. So let's just take 'em all out. There's always
a reference in the openQA and os-autoinst docs, and those get
updated faster.

More importantly, add the new `ignore_failure` flag to relevant
tests - all the tests that don't have the 'important' or
'fatal' flag at present. Upstream killed the 'important' flag
(making all tests 'important' by default), I got it replaced
with the 'ignore_failure' flag, we now need to explicitly mark
all modules we want the 'ignore_failure' behaviour for.
2017-04-10 15:00:10 -07:00
Adam Williamson
a581d20f8e Desktop update: Wait before clicking update apply button
We used to do this only for KDE, but I've seen the new update
tests sometimes fail at this point for no apparent reason, and
I'm thinking a wait may help (in case they're clicking the
button before it's really 'ready').
2017-03-02 15:33:23 -08:00
Adam Williamson
b67f604894 Move all remaining utility functions into exporter modules
Summary:
This adds a couple of new exporter modules, renames main_common
to utils (this is a better name: openSUSE's main_common is
functions used in main.pm, utils is what they call their module
full of miscellaneous commonly-used functions), and moves a
bunch of utility functions that were previously needlessly
implemented as instance methods in base classes into the
exporter modules. That means we can get rid of all the annoying
$self-> syntax for calling them.

We get rid of `fedorabase` entirely, as it's no longer useful
for anything. Other base classes keep the 'standard' methods
(like `post_fail_hook`) and methods which actually need to be
methods (like `root_console`, whose behaviour is different in
anacondatest and installedtest).

Test Plan:
Do a full test suite run and check everything lines
up. There should be no functional differences from before at all,
this is just a re-org.

Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel_but_actually_jsedlak_who_uses_stupid_nicknames

Reviewed By: garretraziel_but_actually_jsedlak_who_uses_stupid_nicknames

Subscribers: tflink

Differential Revision: https://phab.qa.fedoraproject.org/D1080
2017-01-17 23:15:44 -08:00
Adam Williamson
62ef578758 Extend a timeout in the graphical update test
The 'refresh' button takes a bit longer to appear on F24 respin
tests.
2016-12-07 17:27:35 -08:00
Adam Williamson
e9ce14a891 consolidate login waits, use postinstall not entrypoint for base
Summary:
I started out wanting to fix an issue I noticed today where
graphical upgrade tests were failing because they didn't wait
for the graphical login screen properly; the test was sitting
at the 'full Fedora logo' state of plymouth for a long time,
so the current boot_to_login_screen's wait_still_screen was
triggered by it and the function wound up failing on the
assert_screen, because it was still some time before the real
login screen appeared.

So I tweaked the boot_to_login_screen implementation to work
slightly differently (look for a login screen match, *then* -
if we're dealing with a graphical login - wait_still_screen
to defeat the 'old GPU buffer showing login screen' problem
and assert the login screen again). But while working on it,
I figured we really should consolidate all the various places
that handle the bootloader -> login, we were doing it quite
differently in all sorts of different places. And as part of
that, I converted the base tests to use POSTINSTALL (and thus
go through the shared _wait_login tests) instead of handling
boot themselves. As part of *that*, I tweaked main.pm to not
require all POSTINSTALL tests have the _postinstall suffix on
their names, as it really doesn't make sense, and renamed the
tests.

Test Plan: Run all tests, see if they work.

Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel

Reviewed By: garretraziel

Subscribers: tflink

Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D1015
2016-09-27 11:48:15 -07:00