On Silverblue, Fonts cannot be started using the menu_launch_type
for the first time, or it starts and crashes immediately.
However, if Fonts are started with flatpak run org.gnome.font-viewer,
it seems that the application starts and holds.
Let's start it using this workaround and when it still crashes, let's restart.
per https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/issue/766 , this is a hole in our
current test approach: we are testing whatever the current
'stable' toolbox image is for the release, not the image that
is produced as part of the compose. This enhances the test to
test both, when possible. If the var TOOLBOX_IMAGE is set, we
will first check that a 'normal' `toolbox create` works - i.e.
that all the toolbox logic works right and it can actually find
a default image to download - but then we throw that toolbox
away, download the image (the value of the var is expected to
be a URL for the image file), register it with skopeo, and then
recreate the container using that image. Then we proceed with
the rest of the test as usual.
If TOOLBOX_IMAGE is not set, the test should proceed as before,
using the 'default' downloaded image.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
We need to special-case the g-i-s update to get it stable before
we can actually change this in the real kickstarts repo...
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
these were duplicates. In GNOME 46-beta this dialog seems to be
in 'light mode' at least some of the time, so we'll keep the
'light mode' gnome_allow needle we added for Snapshot but
rename it and change its tags. We'll wipe the 'dark mode'
gnome_allow because it should be just the same as the existing
grant_access needle. The two tests that used gnome_allow are
changed to use grant_access.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
The rpmostree_rebase test has been failing on CoreOS 40+ for a
while. Per
https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-tracker/issues/1672
it turns out this is because FCOS actually deploys OCI remotes
by default now. Rebasing from an OCI remote to an ostree
remote (as we are trying to do here) requires specifying the
registry, so let's do that.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
Creating the .invisible.txt file was done using non-assertion commands.
The tests have been failing for some and it seems like the commands
did not run correctly. Running them with assertions will make sure
that they will run (or fail correctly).
These loops make us click extremely fast. This may cause
unreliable results, I think. At least, the test is failing a
lot lately, with results that look like it's not always getting
the expected four levels of zoom. Let's try a short sleep
between clicks.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
It seems like the export screen takes a while to appear on 40 and
Rawhide ATM, and we might start typing before it's there. Let's
assert it's actually there before we start doing stuff.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
In current F40 and Rawhide, this test is frequently failing
because gnome-software is behaving weirdly at startup - the
third-party software dialog moves around even more than before,
the app seems to get stuck in the "not responding" state
briefly sometimes, and there's a very weird state it gets into
sometimes where the window is shorter than usual and clicks
don't seem to register in the right place. While I'm trying to
bisect these bugs, these magic voodoo incantations (tested on
the staging instance) seem to mostly work around the weird
behaviour, and setting RETRY=2 should backstop it a bit further.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
The place where repos are defined changed on the F40+ branches
of workstation-ostree-config, this handles both possibilities.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
GNOME Software seems to be doing some kind of animation between
the third party dialog and the main UI, and we're clicking on
a banner instead of the update button. Try a wait_still_screen
to deal with this.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
Another bunch of these timed out. Not sure why. Maybe it's when
I run a lot of them at the same time? Let's try this, again.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
accounts.fp.o seems to be unreliable again today, let's drop this
again so tests don't fail on it.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
This reverts commit 56c9e80f60.
Things seem to have settled down with the mass rebuild and this
test seems to be back to consistently taking about 90 minutes.
It seems to be timing out a lot on Rawhide lately. Not sure if
it's just mass rebuild stuff, but anyhow...
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
This reverts commit ab5b1a4367. A
new colord build has been pushed which should resolve the issue,
so I'm disabling the workaround to ensure that's the case.
Somehow, colord is sometimes failing to start in stable Rawhide
ATM - I don't know how this problem got through testing. It's
now blocking other updates.
Doing this only on x86_64 is lazy and wrong, but the logic gets
way more complicated if we need to allow potentially *two* things
to fail on aarch64 and ppc64le, and it's the weekend and we
don't gate updates on those arches so I'm not doing it. Hopefully
this will be resolved quite quickly.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
We're taking a long time to reach it on aarch64 on prod recently
for some reason. It's probably some weirdness with qemu/edk2. So
let's just bump the timeout as I don't have an easy fix on hand
and this won't hurt anything.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
We seem to be getting quite a lot of failures in update tests
where this times out. Let's try a longer timeout.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
This is a surprisingly large change as we want to go back to
the console we were previously on after doing it. To do that we
need to know what console we were on, and to know *that*, we need
to port everything that currently uses (ctrl-)alt-fX to switch
consoles to use select_console instead.
This is primarily intended to make running setup_repos.py faster
when it has to download a lot of packages (as typing in hundreds
of package names is quite slow). But it actually makes the whole
thing faster, even when only downloading one or two packages.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
This uses a Python script which implements concurrent downloads
(via asyncio) to download workaround and update packages and
configure the repos. This should speed up the process for large
multi-package updates.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
This effectively reverts 97618193 - but had to be done manually
and adjusted to maintain support for testing side tags and for
testing multiple tasks, since those features were added since
the update ISO change.
The 'scheduler injects ISOs of packages into the tests' approach
was intended to speed things up, especially for large updates,
and it did, but it had a few drawbacks. It means restarting
older tests from the web UI doesn't work as the ISOs get garbage
collected (you have to re-schedule in this case). And it has the
rather large problem that you can now only schedule tests from
the openQA server (or at least a machine with the openQA asset
share mounted), because the package download and ISO creation
just happen wherever the scheduler is running and assume that
the openQA asset share that will be used by the tests is at
/var/lib/openqa/share in that filesystem.
That's too big of a drawback to continue with this approach, IMO,
so this reverts back to the old way of doing things, with a bit
of refactoring to clean up the flow a little, and with support
for testing side tags and multiple tasks maintained.
As a follow-up I'm going to see if I can replace
_download_packages with a much more efficient downloader script
to mitigate the time this process takes on each test, especially
for large updates.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
This test had special flags because it used to be run first and
did the prep steps for the other tests. Now the aaa_setup test
does that job, so there's no reason for this test to have these
flags any more, and somehow they seem to be breaking the test on
Rawhide. Let's give it the same flag as all the other normal
tests.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
Per the needle cleanup, it hasn't been seen for some time. The
test is failing ATM but even the last time it passed -
https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/2311371#step/kontakt/3 -
we did not see this.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
The bug this was meant to fix hasn't happened for months. Back
in Fedora-Rawhide-20230629.n.0 we were seeing every line in the
poem marked as a spelling error until we did this, but that's
not happening any more, we don't need this.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
This breaks things until a compose has happened and comps data
with the new group in it is actually out there in the repos. So
we need to hack it back out again till a compose goes through.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
In some tests on staging this seems to help with the 'clicks
don't work in later test steps' problem we're seeing a lot.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
It seems Python 3.12.1 changed unittests' behaviour so that all
tests being skipped is now a fail not a pass. That breaks this
test because TestAtomic01Status only does anything if this is
an atomic system. So, let's just skip that test entirely if we
aren't one. As things stand this means the test will never run,
because we only test on Cloud_Base which is not atomic.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
There used to be a theme.conf.user file, there isn't any more.
I think this should work both before and after.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
