This is failing on every update and that's not telling us anything
useful - we already know about the bug - so let's work around it.
Not adding a softfail as it's a bit more awkward to do that.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
We can get tripped up by the tutorial screen when launching
Boxes; borrow some code from the app start/stop test to check for
and handle it.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
The default timeout for check_screen is 0, so we were only giving
the enter key press a fraction of a second to take effect before
expecting to see locked_screen_switch_user. This is too tight,
see https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/586257 . Let's give it
five seconds before we give up.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
Since GDM shows the "system-menu-button", it could not correctly
switch users on a locked screen. I added a check to see
if we are on a locked screen and behave accordingly.
This adds a new test that implementsQA:Testcase_desktop_login
on both GNOME and KDE.
While working on this, we realized that the "desktop_clean"
needles were really "app menu" needles, and for KDE, this was
a duplication with the new "system menu" needles, because on KDE
the app menu and the system menu are the same. So I (Adam)
started to de-duplicate that, but also realized that "app menu
button" is a much more accurate name for these needles, so I was
renaming the old desktop_clean needles to app_menu_button. That
led me to the realization that "check_desktop_clean" is itself a
dumb name, because we don't (at least, any more, way back in the
mists of time we may have done) do anything to check that the
desktop is "clean" - we're really just asserting that we're at a
desktop *at all*. While thinking *that* through, I *also* realized
that the whole "open the overview and look for the app grid icon"
workaround it did is no longer necessary, because GNOME doesn't
use a translucent top bar any more. That went away in GNOME 3.32,
which is in Fedora 30, our oldest supported release.
So I threw that away, renamed the function "check_desktop",
cleaned up all the needle naming and tagging, and also added an
app menu needle for GNOME in Japanese because we were missing
one (the Japanese tests have been using the "app grid icon"
workaround the whole time).
This stuff is kinda broken in various ways and halfline thinks
he can fix the underlying bug anyway. So let's go back to just
the GNOME live test being broken for now.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
I tested this workaround on staging before pushing it to git and
it worked, but then when I pushed it to prod it didn't work. On
stg I also had this to set GDM to debugging mode, so maybe this
is also needed for the workaround to work for some reason?
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
A GNOME bug seems to result in us getting to GDM, not a liveuser
desktop, after running 'systemctl isolate graphical.target' from
a live boot to runlevel 3 since the end of March. This works
around that to let the test run, as it's not really a failure of
the test per se.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
Previous commit same summary had some side effect
solved by this new one.
And avoid a warning in autoinst-log when ABRT var not defined.
Signed-off-by: Michel Normand <normand@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
I merged the previous commit before realizing the ordering was
wrong. All other 'actions' lines have to come *before* the one
that adds 'reboot', because one of the conditions for that is
whether @actions is populated - basically, if we're taking any
actions, we also have to reboot afterwards. If we add an action
*after* that line (but no actions were added before that line),
we'll do it but then not reboot and the test will break.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
This reverts commit 00b756f0e2.
Unfortunately, I made a typo in the script and the fix did not
work. I do not want to rebase the master (in order not to break
things for everyone) so I am reverting again.
Sorry.
This reverts commit d784bf54ca.
It turned out that Locations are not connected to Konqueror
at all. The reason why the test is failing is that the
application has been removed to limit the number of
web browsers.
We seem to be seeing the bug this works around:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1765685
in F30 and F31 update tests even with this wait. At least, it
looks that way. Trying this to see if a longer wait helps.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
RHBZ #1692972 was fixed long ago, so we don't need to worry
about that any more. But this test failed on the recent F31 live
respin compose because it was changed to assume the tutorial
would appear on startup, which only happens on F32+. To make the
test work on F31 respins, let's handle both paths. Once F32 is
stable we can drop this as we won't run the test on F31 any more
after that.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
IoT created a branch that's basically Rawhide but is versioned
33. This causes the release_identification tests to fail. I don't
think they'll change this on their end, so let's just have the
test cope with it and expect branches versioned as the Rawhide
release number to behave as Rawhide does here.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
It seems to be actually installing fedora-release-silverblue now
so we get correct identification here. Update the tests.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-1070052d10#comment-1284223
It seems the rootfs on the Fedora 30 installer images we build at
present has gotten very big, so big that an update which contains
some very slightly larger firmware packages causes the rootfs to
be completely full (though lorax doesn't fail) and the image
doesn't boot.
I don't yet know when or why the rootfs got that big, but it's
not really a bug in this update, so for now let's just tell
lorax to use a bigger rootfs so the tests pass for this and any
similar future updates, until I can maybe find time to pinpoint
the culprit more precisely.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
Initial implementation wasn't correct, I forgot CURRREL is not
'the pre-upgrade release version' but just 'the current stable
release'. This is a dumb way to figure out the correct release
number for this context but off-hand I can't think of a better
one.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
When there's a failed service we get a stupid bullet-point char
at the start of its line, and all the other lines are space-
padded to match indentation. Which is annoying! This (I hope)
ditches that crap without losing anything of value.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
Also comment this better. We need to index from the end of the
string here, not the start, because going from the start breaks
when the compose shortname has a dash in it.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
Per https://github.com/weldr/lorax/pull/881 it wasn't doing
anything anyway, and using it causes the command to fail in F32
and later.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/commit/cb25d3ba
changes existing mock configs for stable releases to have a
`dnf.conf` section instead of a `yum.conf` section, and this
change got pushed out to F30 and F31, which breaks us :( Our
mock config that we use for building live images assumes the
existence of a `yum.conf` section in the config it inherits
from.
This change is now stable for F30 and F31, so at least we don't
have to do any conditional shenanigans; we can just change to
'the new style' unconditionally and things should work OK.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
IoT is becoming a release-blocking edition for F32, so we should
be testing it for sure. We may add specific tests, but for now
let's run the install and base tests on it.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
On graphical flavors we are not at a console when this test runs.
We need to do root_console to get there, and also bypass_1691487
for ppc64le. Copied from base_selinux.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
This is failing a lot lately. I've no idea why, but it's not
really part of the actual test and we don't need it for debugging
all the time, so let's drop it for now.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
