This reverts commit 182bfdaa55. The
problem was not in the test code here, it's just that the tests
were run with RAWREL set to 36 when it should be 37; this is
because fedfind's data source hadn't been updated for 36 branch
when the tests ran. It's tricky to time this exactly right -
ideally we'd probably update fedfind's data source one second
before the first Branched compose completes, but of course that's
difficult in practice.
It seems that the IoT fix was not limited to the IoT
subvariant only, which caused wierd behaviour when
the version was set to Rawhide when it should not be.
This fixes it.
IoT does nightly Branched and Rawhide composes that are built
as RC candidates, for some reason. So let's except it from this
check.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
I started out trying to fix os-release for the recent change to
add "Prerelease" tags to the VERSION and PRETTY_NAME fields, then
things spiralled. It got me thinking about the awkward DEVELOPMENT
variable we use, so I decided to get rid of it and refactor the
few things that use it. I refactored the anaconda prerelease tag
check, and wrote a new giant comment that gives details about
exactly how anaconda decides whether to show those tags, to give
context to our choices about when to expect them. This check now
uses a new LABEL variable the scheduler now sets. I also wound up
creating new UP1REL and UP2REL vars to define the 'source' release
for upgrade tests, separate from CURRREL and PREVREL, which are
now never lies - they really are the current stable and previous
stable release, even for update upgrade tests.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
IoT created a branch that's basically Rawhide but is versioned
33. This causes the release_identification tests to fail. I don't
think they'll change this on their end, so let's just have the
test cope with it and expect branches versioned as the Rawhide
release number to behave as Rawhide does here.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
It seems to be actually installing fedora-release-silverblue now
so we get correct identification here. Update the tests.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
Also comment this better. We need to index from the end of the
string here, not the start, because going from the start breaks
when the compose shortname has a dash in it.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
IoT is becoming a release-blocking edition for F32, so we should
be testing it for sure. We may add specific tests, but for now
let's run the install and base tests on it.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
This PR fixes#124.
It uses the BUILD variable to get the build string from the
tested compose and uses it to compare correct values for Silverblue.
Originally, it used Workstation values that did not match the
Silveblue ones.
Delete bad yank.
Adam Williamson
Lukáš Růžička