This adds a test for QA:Testcase_Anaconda_User_Interface_VNC -
the VNC install test case. It's implemented as a server/client
pair, with the server booting from the Server DVD image with
`inst.vnc` and the client booting from the desktop base disk
image, setting up networking, then running Boxes to connect to
the server and run the install.
There are various little tweaks to test loading and logic to
handle this, mostly pretty clear. We also move the workaround
for 'spurious auth prompt appears on desktop after you switch
away to a VT and back' out of the desktop update test and into
the `desktop_vt` helper function, since now this test can hit
it as well. We enhance _graphical_wait_login to handle the boot
loader if needed (it has never needed to until now).
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
There are three places where we basically want to click away
pop-up update notifications and the buggy akonadi_migration_agent
notification if it's there, in KDE tests. Let's share this code
between them, and also let's record soft failures for the buggy
cases in the desktop_notifications test.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
The way KDE does update notifications has changed - it's now a
permanent pop-up notification. This is a bit awkward for our
logic; it's hard to define a needle that proves this pop-up is
the only notification. Instead, let's dismiss it, then open the
notification tray and assert that there aren't any others. But
we also retain the old behaviour (more or less) for testing old
releases.
The popup notification also blocks the 'refresh' needle in the
systray and so breaks the desktop update test, so we deal with
that too.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
So, turns out new os-autoinst does *not* still accept the old
argument style for assert_and_click...and old os-autoinst
doesn't accept the new one. This adds a wrapper that handles
both, so our tests can work with old and new os-autoinst. We can
drop this once both deployments are on newer os-autoinst.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
In the new os-autoinst I just sent to staging, the old style
doesn't work any more, breaks all tests. This style should also
work with the older os-autoinst on stable.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
It seems that when this problem happens now we get *two* auth
requests, so we need to handle that.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
In the last few weeks Boxes is showing an auth dialog on start.
I've filed a bug on this; let's have the test handle it as a
soft failure, since this isn't a fatal problem. Do this by
making an existing needle for this dialog a bit more generic
in name and using it.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
We're getting a spurious "Authentication required" for a
background refresh of the system repos sometimes, depending on
whether it happens while we're at a tty. This is now accepted
by upstream, so let's handle it and make it a soft failure for
now.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
It seems Rawhide auto-signing is working fine now: openQA claims
this needle has 'never' been matched (which really means 'not
for a long time'), and I can't find any test fail in the last
year which looks like it landed on this 'authenticate' screen
but the needle failed to match, or anything like that.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
https://openqa.stg.fedoraproject.org/tests/424393 is a failure
where the 'Download' [updates] button was already visible when
we went to the tab. We already checked whether an 'apply' button
is visible and skipped the 'refresh' click if so, but because
the 'download' button is a new thing, we weren't skipping the
'refresh' click if 'download' was already visible.
So in this case, even though we could already see 'download', we
went ahead and clicked 'refresh'...then *immediately* started
looking for 'download'. It seems that Software did not refresh
and remove the 'Download' button *immediately* when we pressed
'refresh' - it left the 'Download' button visible briefly, and
*in this brief window*, we clicked it. *Then* Software kinda
'noticed' we'd clicked 'Update', and it seems it just sort of
throws away our click on 'Download' at that point and does the
refresh.
So at that point, the test thinks it's clicked 'Download' and
expects to see 'Apply', but actually the 'Download' click got
more or less thrown away, so the test fails, sitting at the
'Download' button.
To solve this, let's just extend the existing check to skip the
'refresh' click if 'download' *or* 'apply' are already visible.
There is a sort of possibility here that we could wind up
downloading and installing some updates that existed and were
noticed *before* we did our python3-kickstart trick, but not
install the python3-kickstart update, and cause the test to fail
because of that, but that doesn't seem to have happened before
when we were seeing the 'update' button, so I think I'm not
going to borrow trouble. If it happens, we'll deal with it I
guess.
The comment talks only about KDE, but clearly it can be the case
that an automatic check makes the button visible on GNOME too,
so let's rewrite the comment too.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
The fix for this bug was sent to all releases now, so we should
not need the workaround any more. Let's kill it.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
The previous commit would lead to the 'workaround' getting hit
incorrectly, and might have had some other issues...tweak it a
bit.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
GNOME Software 3.30.5 split the offline update process into two
separate 'download' and 'apply' phases. So we need to handle
clicking 'download' before 'apply', if that happens.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
On F27 we don't get a 'Software is up to date' screen because
there's an upgrade available. Let's work with the refresh button
instead.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
We're not seeing *exactly* #1314991 any more, but we're seeing
something that looks quite similar: the first attempt to find
updates just doesn't find any. No error message, no updates. I
have reported a bug for this and am investigating it, in the
meantime, let's restore the workaround, elaborated a bit, and
looking for the 'Software is up to date' screen instead of the
error message.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
I rather suspect the *bug* is still basically present and it's
why this test often fails, but we no longer seem to see the
*error message* which lets us detect the bug happening. This
needle has not been hit by any test for six months. So let's
remove the workaround as it adds complexity.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
We do the 'desktop update' test for KDE via the notification
icon thingy, and it behaves differently depending on whether it
has already detected there are updates or not. The test only
works at present in the case where it *hasn't* - it expects the
notification icon to be in the extended panel and it expects to
see a 'refresh' button, neither of which is the case if it's
already noticed there are updates to install.
We should also force PackageKit to update its list of available
updates after we set up our 'special' update, otherwise on this
path KDE will only install the updates it found *before* we did
our stuff, and the test will fail as our special update won't be
there.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
The default action on the reboot confirmation dialog changed
from Reboot to Cancel, so when we hit enter, we just cancel the
reboot. Tweak this to hit tab on F27+ (but not <F26, so update
tests continue to work too).
We can deal with this annoying bug by looking out for the error
we see when it happens, hitting the 'refresh' button again, and
resetting the loop counter to 1 (requires changing the loop to
a C-style loop).
It's not really a good idea to have the comments that explain
the test_flags in *every* test, because they can go stale and
then we either have to live with them being old or update them
all. Like, now. So let's just take 'em all out. There's always
a reference in the openQA and os-autoinst docs, and those get
updated faster.
More importantly, add the new `ignore_failure` flag to relevant
tests - all the tests that don't have the 'important' or
'fatal' flag at present. Upstream killed the 'important' flag
(making all tests 'important' by default), I got it replaced
with the 'ignore_failure' flag, we now need to explicitly mark
all modules we want the 'ignore_failure' behaviour for.
We used to do this only for KDE, but I've seen the new update
tests sometimes fail at this point for no apparent reason, and
I'm thinking a wait may help (in case they're clicking the
button before it's really 'ready').
Summary:
This adds a couple of new exporter modules, renames main_common
to utils (this is a better name: openSUSE's main_common is
functions used in main.pm, utils is what they call their module
full of miscellaneous commonly-used functions), and moves a
bunch of utility functions that were previously needlessly
implemented as instance methods in base classes into the
exporter modules. That means we can get rid of all the annoying
$self-> syntax for calling them.
We get rid of `fedorabase` entirely, as it's no longer useful
for anything. Other base classes keep the 'standard' methods
(like `post_fail_hook`) and methods which actually need to be
methods (like `root_console`, whose behaviour is different in
anacondatest and installedtest).
Test Plan:
Do a full test suite run and check everything lines
up. There should be no functional differences from before at all,
this is just a re-org.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel_but_actually_jsedlak_who_uses_stupid_nicknames
Reviewed By: garretraziel_but_actually_jsedlak_who_uses_stupid_nicknames
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qa.fedoraproject.org/D1080
Summary:
I started out wanting to fix an issue I noticed today where
graphical upgrade tests were failing because they didn't wait
for the graphical login screen properly; the test was sitting
at the 'full Fedora logo' state of plymouth for a long time,
so the current boot_to_login_screen's wait_still_screen was
triggered by it and the function wound up failing on the
assert_screen, because it was still some time before the real
login screen appeared.
So I tweaked the boot_to_login_screen implementation to work
slightly differently (look for a login screen match, *then* -
if we're dealing with a graphical login - wait_still_screen
to defeat the 'old GPU buffer showing login screen' problem
and assert the login screen again). But while working on it,
I figured we really should consolidate all the various places
that handle the bootloader -> login, we were doing it quite
differently in all sorts of different places. And as part of
that, I converted the base tests to use POSTINSTALL (and thus
go through the shared _wait_login tests) instead of handling
boot themselves. As part of *that*, I tweaked main.pm to not
require all POSTINSTALL tests have the _postinstall suffix on
their names, as it really doesn't make sense, and renamed the
tests.
Test Plan: Run all tests, see if they work.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D1015
