1
0
mirror of https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/os-autoinst-distri-fedora.git synced 2024-11-28 16:43:09 +00:00
os-autoinst-distri-fedora/lib/fedorabase.pm

240 lines
7.7 KiB
Perl
Raw Normal View History

create fedora base class, factor out console login Summary: Root console in anaconda got broken by RHBZ #1222413 - no shell on tty2. Decided to clean up console use in general as part of fixing it. This creates a class 'fedorabase' and has 'anacondalog' and 'fedoralog' both inherit from it. boot_to_login_screen is moved there (as it seems appropriate) and it has a new method, console_login, which basically handles 'get me a shell on a console': if we're already at one it returns, if not it'll type the user name and the password *if necessary* (sometimes it's not) and return once it sees a prompt. It takes a hash of named parameters for user, password and 'check', which is whether it should die if it fails to reach a console or not (some users don't want it to). anacondalog and fedoralog both get 'root_console' methods which do something appropriate and then call console_login; both have a hash of named parameters, anacondalog's version only bothers with 'check', while fedoralog's also accepts 'tty' to pick the tty to use. This also adjusts all things which try to get to a console prompt to use either root_console or console_login as appropriate. It also tweaks the needle tags a bit, drops some unneeded needles, and adds a new 'user console prompt' needle; we really just need two versions of the root prompt needle and two of the user prompt needle (one for <F23, one for F23+ - the console font changed in F23, and the @ character at least doesn't match between the two). I think we still need the <F23 case for upgrade tests, for now. Test Plan: Do a full test run and see that more tests succeed. I've done a run on happyassassin with a hack to workaround the SELinux issue for interactive installs, and the results look good. I also fiddled about a bit to test some different cases, like forcing a failure in a live test to test post_fail_hook (and hence root_console) in that scenario, and forcing failures after some console commands had been run to check that it DTRT when we've already reached a console, etc. Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel Reviewed By: jskladan, garretraziel Subscribers: tflink Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D462
2015-07-22 18:24:40 +00:00
package fedorabase;
use base 'basetest';
add FreeIPA server role deploy and kickstart enrolment tests Summary: These require openQA tap networking to allow the server and client boxes to communicate, and require masquerading (NAT) so the server at least can reach a repository (dnf/rolekit really, really do not want to work without a repo connection). They use the 'parallel' test support to have the server deploy run first while the client enrol test waits at the grub menu until the server is done before it goes ahead. This is all deployed and working on stg. The really tricky bit was getting all the openvswitch and firewall config right in ansible. We *could* do the server deploy test as a follow-on from the default install test to save the install, but then we'd have to teach it to change the hostname and set up static networking post-install. I'm not sure if it's worth doing that. This requires the corresponding openqa_fedora_tools commit that adds the hard disks (containing the kickstarts - it's possible to get them from remote during install, but we have to set up name resolution or hard code the IP of the server). Test Plan: Deploy this and the openqa_fedora_tools commit, generate the disks, configure the networking (good luck! See the docs in openqa_fedora_tools) and see if you can run the tests. If you're using Docker, uh...sorry. You somehow need to set things up so the workers can use tap interfaces that can talk to each other and are NATed to the outside world. Have fun. I can talk you through it on IRC... Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel Reviewed By: garretraziel Subscribers: tflink Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D831
2016-05-04 18:53:11 +00:00
use lockapi;
create fedora base class, factor out console login Summary: Root console in anaconda got broken by RHBZ #1222413 - no shell on tty2. Decided to clean up console use in general as part of fixing it. This creates a class 'fedorabase' and has 'anacondalog' and 'fedoralog' both inherit from it. boot_to_login_screen is moved there (as it seems appropriate) and it has a new method, console_login, which basically handles 'get me a shell on a console': if we're already at one it returns, if not it'll type the user name and the password *if necessary* (sometimes it's not) and return once it sees a prompt. It takes a hash of named parameters for user, password and 'check', which is whether it should die if it fails to reach a console or not (some users don't want it to). anacondalog and fedoralog both get 'root_console' methods which do something appropriate and then call console_login; both have a hash of named parameters, anacondalog's version only bothers with 'check', while fedoralog's also accepts 'tty' to pick the tty to use. This also adjusts all things which try to get to a console prompt to use either root_console or console_login as appropriate. It also tweaks the needle tags a bit, drops some unneeded needles, and adds a new 'user console prompt' needle; we really just need two versions of the root prompt needle and two of the user prompt needle (one for <F23, one for F23+ - the console font changed in F23, and the @ character at least doesn't match between the two). I think we still need the <F23 case for upgrade tests, for now. Test Plan: Do a full test run and see that more tests succeed. I've done a run on happyassassin with a hack to workaround the SELinux issue for interactive installs, and the results look good. I also fiddled about a bit to test some different cases, like forcing a failure in a live test to test post_fail_hook (and hence root_console) in that scenario, and forcing failures after some console commands had been run to check that it DTRT when we've already reached a console, etc. Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel Reviewed By: jskladan, garretraziel Subscribers: tflink Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D462
2015-07-22 18:24:40 +00:00
# base class for all Fedora tests
# use this class when using other base class doesn't make sense
create fedora base class, factor out console login Summary: Root console in anaconda got broken by RHBZ #1222413 - no shell on tty2. Decided to clean up console use in general as part of fixing it. This creates a class 'fedorabase' and has 'anacondalog' and 'fedoralog' both inherit from it. boot_to_login_screen is moved there (as it seems appropriate) and it has a new method, console_login, which basically handles 'get me a shell on a console': if we're already at one it returns, if not it'll type the user name and the password *if necessary* (sometimes it's not) and return once it sees a prompt. It takes a hash of named parameters for user, password and 'check', which is whether it should die if it fails to reach a console or not (some users don't want it to). anacondalog and fedoralog both get 'root_console' methods which do something appropriate and then call console_login; both have a hash of named parameters, anacondalog's version only bothers with 'check', while fedoralog's also accepts 'tty' to pick the tty to use. This also adjusts all things which try to get to a console prompt to use either root_console or console_login as appropriate. It also tweaks the needle tags a bit, drops some unneeded needles, and adds a new 'user console prompt' needle; we really just need two versions of the root prompt needle and two of the user prompt needle (one for <F23, one for F23+ - the console font changed in F23, and the @ character at least doesn't match between the two). I think we still need the <F23 case for upgrade tests, for now. Test Plan: Do a full test run and see that more tests succeed. I've done a run on happyassassin with a hack to workaround the SELinux issue for interactive installs, and the results look good. I also fiddled about a bit to test some different cases, like forcing a failure in a live test to test post_fail_hook (and hence root_console) in that scenario, and forcing failures after some console commands had been run to check that it DTRT when we've already reached a console, etc. Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel Reviewed By: jskladan, garretraziel Subscribers: tflink Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D462
2015-07-22 18:24:40 +00:00
use testapi;
# this subroutine handles logging in as a root/specified user into console
# it requires TTY to be already displayed (handled by the root_console() method of subclasses)
create fedora base class, factor out console login Summary: Root console in anaconda got broken by RHBZ #1222413 - no shell on tty2. Decided to clean up console use in general as part of fixing it. This creates a class 'fedorabase' and has 'anacondalog' and 'fedoralog' both inherit from it. boot_to_login_screen is moved there (as it seems appropriate) and it has a new method, console_login, which basically handles 'get me a shell on a console': if we're already at one it returns, if not it'll type the user name and the password *if necessary* (sometimes it's not) and return once it sees a prompt. It takes a hash of named parameters for user, password and 'check', which is whether it should die if it fails to reach a console or not (some users don't want it to). anacondalog and fedoralog both get 'root_console' methods which do something appropriate and then call console_login; both have a hash of named parameters, anacondalog's version only bothers with 'check', while fedoralog's also accepts 'tty' to pick the tty to use. This also adjusts all things which try to get to a console prompt to use either root_console or console_login as appropriate. It also tweaks the needle tags a bit, drops some unneeded needles, and adds a new 'user console prompt' needle; we really just need two versions of the root prompt needle and two of the user prompt needle (one for <F23, one for F23+ - the console font changed in F23, and the @ character at least doesn't match between the two). I think we still need the <F23 case for upgrade tests, for now. Test Plan: Do a full test run and see that more tests succeed. I've done a run on happyassassin with a hack to workaround the SELinux issue for interactive installs, and the results look good. I also fiddled about a bit to test some different cases, like forcing a failure in a live test to test post_fail_hook (and hence root_console) in that scenario, and forcing failures after some console commands had been run to check that it DTRT when we've already reached a console, etc. Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel Reviewed By: jskladan, garretraziel Subscribers: tflink Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D462
2015-07-22 18:24:40 +00:00
sub console_login {
my $self = shift;
my %args = (
user => "root",
password => get_var("ROOT_PASSWORD", "weakpassword"),
check => 1,
@_);
# There's a timing problem when we switch from a logged-in console
# to a non-logged in console and immediately call this function;
# if the switch lags a bit, this function will match one of the
# logged-in needles for the console we switched from, and get out
# of sync (e.g. https://openqa.stg.fedoraproject.org/tests/1664 )
# To avoid this, we'll sleep a couple of seconds before starting
sleep 2;
create fedora base class, factor out console login Summary: Root console in anaconda got broken by RHBZ #1222413 - no shell on tty2. Decided to clean up console use in general as part of fixing it. This creates a class 'fedorabase' and has 'anacondalog' and 'fedoralog' both inherit from it. boot_to_login_screen is moved there (as it seems appropriate) and it has a new method, console_login, which basically handles 'get me a shell on a console': if we're already at one it returns, if not it'll type the user name and the password *if necessary* (sometimes it's not) and return once it sees a prompt. It takes a hash of named parameters for user, password and 'check', which is whether it should die if it fails to reach a console or not (some users don't want it to). anacondalog and fedoralog both get 'root_console' methods which do something appropriate and then call console_login; both have a hash of named parameters, anacondalog's version only bothers with 'check', while fedoralog's also accepts 'tty' to pick the tty to use. This also adjusts all things which try to get to a console prompt to use either root_console or console_login as appropriate. It also tweaks the needle tags a bit, drops some unneeded needles, and adds a new 'user console prompt' needle; we really just need two versions of the root prompt needle and two of the user prompt needle (one for <F23, one for F23+ - the console font changed in F23, and the @ character at least doesn't match between the two). I think we still need the <F23 case for upgrade tests, for now. Test Plan: Do a full test run and see that more tests succeed. I've done a run on happyassassin with a hack to workaround the SELinux issue for interactive installs, and the results look good. I also fiddled about a bit to test some different cases, like forcing a failure in a live test to test post_fail_hook (and hence root_console) in that scenario, and forcing failures after some console commands had been run to check that it DTRT when we've already reached a console, etc. Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel Reviewed By: jskladan, garretraziel Subscribers: tflink Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D462
2015-07-22 18:24:40 +00:00
my $good = "";
my $bad = "";
my $needuser = 1;
my $needpass = 1;
if ($args{user} eq "root") {
$good = "root_console";
$bad = "user_console";
}
else {
$good = "user_console";
$bad = "root_console";
}
for my $n (1 .. 10) {
# This little loop should handle all possibilities quite
# efficiently: already at a prompt (previously logged in, or
# anaconda case), only need to enter username (live case),
# need to enter both username and password (installed system
# case). There are some annoying cases here involving delays
# to various commands and the limitations of needles;
# text_console_login also matches when the password prompt
# is displayed (as the login prompt is still visible), and
# both still match after login is complete, unless something
# runs 'clear'. The sleeps and $needuser / $needpass attempt
# to mitigate these problems.
if (check_screen $good, 0) {
return;
}
elsif (check_screen $bad, 0) {
add QA:Testcase_FreeIPA_password_change test Summary: again, added as a non-fatal module for realmd_join_cockpit as it's convenient to do it here. Also abstract a couple of ipa bits into a new exporter package in the style of SUSE's mm_network, rather than using ill-fitting class inheritance as we have before - we should probably convert our existing class based stuff to work this way. Also a few minor tweaks and clean-ups of the other tests: The path in console_login() where we detect login of a regular user when we want root or vice versa and log out was actually broken because it would 'wait' for the result of the 'exit' command, which obviously doesn't work (as it relies on running another command afterwards, and we're no longer at a shell). This commit no longer actually uses that path, but I spotted the bug with an earlier version of this which did, and we may as well keep the fix. /var/log/lastlog is an apparently-extremely-large sparse file. A couple of times it seemed to cause tar to run very slowly while creating the /var/log archive for upload on failure. It's no use for diagnosing bugs, so we may as well exclude it from the archive. I caught cockpit webUI login failing one time when testing the test, so threw in a wait_still_screen before starting to type the URL, as we have for the FreeIPA webUI. I also caught a timing issue with the openQA webUI policy add step; the test flips from the Users screen to the HBAC screen then clicks the 'add' button, but there's actually an identical 'add' button on *both* screens, so it could wind up trying to click the one on the Users screen instead, if the web UI took a few milliseconds to switch. So we throw in a needle match to make sure we're actually on the HBAC screen before clicking the button. We make the freeipa_webui test a 'milestone' so that if the new test fails, restoring to the last-known-good milestone doesn't take so long; it actually seems like openQA can get confused and try to cancel the test if restoring the milestone takes a *really* long time, and wind up with a zombie qemu process, which isn't good. This seems to avoid that happening. Test Plan: In the simple case, just run all the FreeIPA-related tests on Fedora 24 (as Rawhide is broken) and make sure they all work properly. To get a bit more advanced you can throw in an `assert_script_run 'false'` in either of the non-fatal tests to break it and make sure things go properly when that happens (the last milestone should be restored - which should be right after freeipa_webui, sitting at tty1 - and run properly; things are set up so each test starts with root logged in on tty1). Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel Reviewed By: garretraziel Subscribers: tflink Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D935
2016-08-03 20:21:12 +00:00
# we don't want to 'wait' for this as it won't return
script_run "exit", 0;
create fedora base class, factor out console login Summary: Root console in anaconda got broken by RHBZ #1222413 - no shell on tty2. Decided to clean up console use in general as part of fixing it. This creates a class 'fedorabase' and has 'anacondalog' and 'fedoralog' both inherit from it. boot_to_login_screen is moved there (as it seems appropriate) and it has a new method, console_login, which basically handles 'get me a shell on a console': if we're already at one it returns, if not it'll type the user name and the password *if necessary* (sometimes it's not) and return once it sees a prompt. It takes a hash of named parameters for user, password and 'check', which is whether it should die if it fails to reach a console or not (some users don't want it to). anacondalog and fedoralog both get 'root_console' methods which do something appropriate and then call console_login; both have a hash of named parameters, anacondalog's version only bothers with 'check', while fedoralog's also accepts 'tty' to pick the tty to use. This also adjusts all things which try to get to a console prompt to use either root_console or console_login as appropriate. It also tweaks the needle tags a bit, drops some unneeded needles, and adds a new 'user console prompt' needle; we really just need two versions of the root prompt needle and two of the user prompt needle (one for <F23, one for F23+ - the console font changed in F23, and the @ character at least doesn't match between the two). I think we still need the <F23 case for upgrade tests, for now. Test Plan: Do a full test run and see that more tests succeed. I've done a run on happyassassin with a hack to workaround the SELinux issue for interactive installs, and the results look good. I also fiddled about a bit to test some different cases, like forcing a failure in a live test to test post_fail_hook (and hence root_console) in that scenario, and forcing failures after some console commands had been run to check that it DTRT when we've already reached a console, etc. Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel Reviewed By: jskladan, garretraziel Subscribers: tflink Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D462
2015-07-22 18:24:40 +00:00
sleep 2;
}
if ($needuser and check_screen "text_console_login", 0) {
type_string "$args{user}\n";
$needuser = 0;
sleep 2;
}
elsif ($needpass and check_screen "console_password_required", 0) {
type_string "$args{password}";
if (get_var("SWITCHED_LAYOUT") and $args{user} ne "root") {
# see _do_install_and_reboot; when layout is switched
# user password is doubled to contain both US and native
# chars
$self->console_switch_layout();
type_string "$args{password}";
$self->console_switch_layout();
}
send_key "ret";
create fedora base class, factor out console login Summary: Root console in anaconda got broken by RHBZ #1222413 - no shell on tty2. Decided to clean up console use in general as part of fixing it. This creates a class 'fedorabase' and has 'anacondalog' and 'fedoralog' both inherit from it. boot_to_login_screen is moved there (as it seems appropriate) and it has a new method, console_login, which basically handles 'get me a shell on a console': if we're already at one it returns, if not it'll type the user name and the password *if necessary* (sometimes it's not) and return once it sees a prompt. It takes a hash of named parameters for user, password and 'check', which is whether it should die if it fails to reach a console or not (some users don't want it to). anacondalog and fedoralog both get 'root_console' methods which do something appropriate and then call console_login; both have a hash of named parameters, anacondalog's version only bothers with 'check', while fedoralog's also accepts 'tty' to pick the tty to use. This also adjusts all things which try to get to a console prompt to use either root_console or console_login as appropriate. It also tweaks the needle tags a bit, drops some unneeded needles, and adds a new 'user console prompt' needle; we really just need two versions of the root prompt needle and two of the user prompt needle (one for <F23, one for F23+ - the console font changed in F23, and the @ character at least doesn't match between the two). I think we still need the <F23 case for upgrade tests, for now. Test Plan: Do a full test run and see that more tests succeed. I've done a run on happyassassin with a hack to workaround the SELinux issue for interactive installs, and the results look good. I also fiddled about a bit to test some different cases, like forcing a failure in a live test to test post_fail_hook (and hence root_console) in that scenario, and forcing failures after some console commands had been run to check that it DTRT when we've already reached a console, etc. Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel Reviewed By: jskladan, garretraziel Subscribers: tflink Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D462
2015-07-22 18:24:40 +00:00
$needpass = 0;
# Sometimes login takes a bit of time, so add an extra sleep
sleep 2;
}
sleep 1;
}
# If we got here we failed; if 'check' is set, die.
$args{check} && die "Failed to reach console!"
}
add FreeIPA server role deploy and kickstart enrolment tests Summary: These require openQA tap networking to allow the server and client boxes to communicate, and require masquerading (NAT) so the server at least can reach a repository (dnf/rolekit really, really do not want to work without a repo connection). They use the 'parallel' test support to have the server deploy run first while the client enrol test waits at the grub menu until the server is done before it goes ahead. This is all deployed and working on stg. The really tricky bit was getting all the openvswitch and firewall config right in ansible. We *could* do the server deploy test as a follow-on from the default install test to save the install, but then we'd have to teach it to change the hostname and set up static networking post-install. I'm not sure if it's worth doing that. This requires the corresponding openqa_fedora_tools commit that adds the hard disks (containing the kickstarts - it's possible to get them from remote during install, but we have to set up name resolution or hard code the IP of the server). Test Plan: Deploy this and the openqa_fedora_tools commit, generate the disks, configure the networking (good luck! See the docs in openqa_fedora_tools) and see if you can run the tests. If you're using Docker, uh...sorry. You somehow need to set things up so the workers can use tap interfaces that can talk to each other and are NATed to the outside world. Have fun. I can talk you through it on IRC... Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel Reviewed By: garretraziel Subscribers: tflink Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D831
2016-05-04 18:53:11 +00:00
sub do_bootloader {
# Handle bootloader screen. 'bootloader' is syslinux or grub.
# 'uefi' is whether this is a UEFI install, will get_var UEFI if
# not explicitly set. 'postinstall' is whether we're on an
# installed system or at the installer (this matters for how many
# times we press 'down' to find the kernel line when typing args).
# 'args' is a string of extra kernel args, if desired. 'mutex' is
# a parallel test mutex lock to wait for before proceeding, if
# desired. 'first' is whether to hit 'up' a couple of times to
add a cockpit realmd FreeIPA join test Summary: This requires a few other changes: * turn clone_host_resolv into clone_host_file, letting you clone any given host file (cloning /etc/hosts seems to make both server deployment and client enrolment faster/more reliable) * allow loading of multiple POSTINSTALL tests (so we can share the freeipa_client_postinstall test). Note this is compatible, existing uses will work fine * move initial password change for the IPA test users into the server deployment test (so the client tests don't conflict over doing that) * add GRUB_POSTINSTALL, for specifying boot parameters for boot of the installed system, and make it work by tweaking _console_wait _login (doesn't work for _graphical_wait_login yet, as I didn't need that) * make the static networking config for tap tests into a library function so the tests can share it * handle ABRT problem dirs showing up in /var/spool/abrt as well as /var/tmp/abrt (because the enrol attempt hits #1330766 and the crash report shows up in /var/spool/abrt, don't ask me why the difference, I just work here) * specify the DNS servers from the worker host's resolv.conf as the forwarders for the FreeIPA server when deploying it; if we don't do this, rolekit defaults to using the root servers as forwarders(!) and thus we get the public, not phx2-appropriate, results for e.g. mirrors.fedoraproject.org, some of which the workers can't reach, so PackageKit package install always fails (boy, was it fun figuring THAT mess out) Even after all that, the test still doesn't actually pass, but I'm reasonably confident this is because it's hitting actual bugs, not because it's broken. It runs into #1330766 nearly every time (I think I saw *one* time the enrolment actually succeeded), and seems to run into a subsequent bug I hadn't seen before when trying to work around that by trying the join again (see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1330766#c37 ). Test Plan: Run the test, see what happens. If you're really lucky, it'll actually pass. But you'll probably run into #1330766#c37, I'm mostly posting for comment. You'll need a tap-capable openQA instance to test this. Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel Reviewed By: garretraziel Subscribers: tflink Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D880
2016-06-07 20:00:39 +00:00
# make sure we boot the first menu entry. 'timeout' is how long to
# wait for the bootloader screen.
my $self = shift;
my %args = (
postinstall => 0,
params => "",
mutex => "",
first => 1,
timeout => 30,
uefi => get_var("UEFI"),
@_
);
add FreeIPA server role deploy and kickstart enrolment tests Summary: These require openQA tap networking to allow the server and client boxes to communicate, and require masquerading (NAT) so the server at least can reach a repository (dnf/rolekit really, really do not want to work without a repo connection). They use the 'parallel' test support to have the server deploy run first while the client enrol test waits at the grub menu until the server is done before it goes ahead. This is all deployed and working on stg. The really tricky bit was getting all the openvswitch and firewall config right in ansible. We *could* do the server deploy test as a follow-on from the default install test to save the install, but then we'd have to teach it to change the hostname and set up static networking post-install. I'm not sure if it's worth doing that. This requires the corresponding openqa_fedora_tools commit that adds the hard disks (containing the kickstarts - it's possible to get them from remote during install, but we have to set up name resolution or hard code the IP of the server). Test Plan: Deploy this and the openqa_fedora_tools commit, generate the disks, configure the networking (good luck! See the docs in openqa_fedora_tools) and see if you can run the tests. If you're using Docker, uh...sorry. You somehow need to set things up so the workers can use tap interfaces that can talk to each other and are NATed to the outside world. Have fun. I can talk you through it on IRC... Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel Reviewed By: garretraziel Subscribers: tflink Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D831
2016-05-04 18:53:11 +00:00
# if not postinstall and not UEFI, syslinux
add a cockpit realmd FreeIPA join test Summary: This requires a few other changes: * turn clone_host_resolv into clone_host_file, letting you clone any given host file (cloning /etc/hosts seems to make both server deployment and client enrolment faster/more reliable) * allow loading of multiple POSTINSTALL tests (so we can share the freeipa_client_postinstall test). Note this is compatible, existing uses will work fine * move initial password change for the IPA test users into the server deployment test (so the client tests don't conflict over doing that) * add GRUB_POSTINSTALL, for specifying boot parameters for boot of the installed system, and make it work by tweaking _console_wait _login (doesn't work for _graphical_wait_login yet, as I didn't need that) * make the static networking config for tap tests into a library function so the tests can share it * handle ABRT problem dirs showing up in /var/spool/abrt as well as /var/tmp/abrt (because the enrol attempt hits #1330766 and the crash report shows up in /var/spool/abrt, don't ask me why the difference, I just work here) * specify the DNS servers from the worker host's resolv.conf as the forwarders for the FreeIPA server when deploying it; if we don't do this, rolekit defaults to using the root servers as forwarders(!) and thus we get the public, not phx2-appropriate, results for e.g. mirrors.fedoraproject.org, some of which the workers can't reach, so PackageKit package install always fails (boy, was it fun figuring THAT mess out) Even after all that, the test still doesn't actually pass, but I'm reasonably confident this is because it's hitting actual bugs, not because it's broken. It runs into #1330766 nearly every time (I think I saw *one* time the enrolment actually succeeded), and seems to run into a subsequent bug I hadn't seen before when trying to work around that by trying the join again (see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1330766#c37 ). Test Plan: Run the test, see what happens. If you're really lucky, it'll actually pass. But you'll probably run into #1330766#c37, I'm mostly posting for comment. You'll need a tap-capable openQA instance to test this. Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel Reviewed By: garretraziel Subscribers: tflink Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D880
2016-06-07 20:00:39 +00:00
$args{bootloader} //= ($args{uefi} || $args{postinstall}) ? "grub" : "syslinux";
if ($args{uefi}) {
add FreeIPA server role deploy and kickstart enrolment tests Summary: These require openQA tap networking to allow the server and client boxes to communicate, and require masquerading (NAT) so the server at least can reach a repository (dnf/rolekit really, really do not want to work without a repo connection). They use the 'parallel' test support to have the server deploy run first while the client enrol test waits at the grub menu until the server is done before it goes ahead. This is all deployed and working on stg. The really tricky bit was getting all the openvswitch and firewall config right in ansible. We *could* do the server deploy test as a follow-on from the default install test to save the install, but then we'd have to teach it to change the hostname and set up static networking post-install. I'm not sure if it's worth doing that. This requires the corresponding openqa_fedora_tools commit that adds the hard disks (containing the kickstarts - it's possible to get them from remote during install, but we have to set up name resolution or hard code the IP of the server). Test Plan: Deploy this and the openqa_fedora_tools commit, generate the disks, configure the networking (good luck! See the docs in openqa_fedora_tools) and see if you can run the tests. If you're using Docker, uh...sorry. You somehow need to set things up so the workers can use tap interfaces that can talk to each other and are NATed to the outside world. Have fun. I can talk you through it on IRC... Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel Reviewed By: garretraziel Subscribers: tflink Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D831
2016-05-04 18:53:11 +00:00
# we don't just tag all screens with 'bootloader' because we
# want to be sure we actually did a UEFI boot
add a cockpit realmd FreeIPA join test Summary: This requires a few other changes: * turn clone_host_resolv into clone_host_file, letting you clone any given host file (cloning /etc/hosts seems to make both server deployment and client enrolment faster/more reliable) * allow loading of multiple POSTINSTALL tests (so we can share the freeipa_client_postinstall test). Note this is compatible, existing uses will work fine * move initial password change for the IPA test users into the server deployment test (so the client tests don't conflict over doing that) * add GRUB_POSTINSTALL, for specifying boot parameters for boot of the installed system, and make it work by tweaking _console_wait _login (doesn't work for _graphical_wait_login yet, as I didn't need that) * make the static networking config for tap tests into a library function so the tests can share it * handle ABRT problem dirs showing up in /var/spool/abrt as well as /var/tmp/abrt (because the enrol attempt hits #1330766 and the crash report shows up in /var/spool/abrt, don't ask me why the difference, I just work here) * specify the DNS servers from the worker host's resolv.conf as the forwarders for the FreeIPA server when deploying it; if we don't do this, rolekit defaults to using the root servers as forwarders(!) and thus we get the public, not phx2-appropriate, results for e.g. mirrors.fedoraproject.org, some of which the workers can't reach, so PackageKit package install always fails (boy, was it fun figuring THAT mess out) Even after all that, the test still doesn't actually pass, but I'm reasonably confident this is because it's hitting actual bugs, not because it's broken. It runs into #1330766 nearly every time (I think I saw *one* time the enrolment actually succeeded), and seems to run into a subsequent bug I hadn't seen before when trying to work around that by trying the join again (see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1330766#c37 ). Test Plan: Run the test, see what happens. If you're really lucky, it'll actually pass. But you'll probably run into #1330766#c37, I'm mostly posting for comment. You'll need a tap-capable openQA instance to test this. Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel Reviewed By: garretraziel Subscribers: tflink Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D880
2016-06-07 20:00:39 +00:00
assert_screen "bootloader_uefi", $args{timeout};
add FreeIPA server role deploy and kickstart enrolment tests Summary: These require openQA tap networking to allow the server and client boxes to communicate, and require masquerading (NAT) so the server at least can reach a repository (dnf/rolekit really, really do not want to work without a repo connection). They use the 'parallel' test support to have the server deploy run first while the client enrol test waits at the grub menu until the server is done before it goes ahead. This is all deployed and working on stg. The really tricky bit was getting all the openvswitch and firewall config right in ansible. We *could* do the server deploy test as a follow-on from the default install test to save the install, but then we'd have to teach it to change the hostname and set up static networking post-install. I'm not sure if it's worth doing that. This requires the corresponding openqa_fedora_tools commit that adds the hard disks (containing the kickstarts - it's possible to get them from remote during install, but we have to set up name resolution or hard code the IP of the server). Test Plan: Deploy this and the openqa_fedora_tools commit, generate the disks, configure the networking (good luck! See the docs in openqa_fedora_tools) and see if you can run the tests. If you're using Docker, uh...sorry. You somehow need to set things up so the workers can use tap interfaces that can talk to each other and are NATed to the outside world. Have fun. I can talk you through it on IRC... Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel Reviewed By: garretraziel Subscribers: tflink Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D831
2016-05-04 18:53:11 +00:00
} else {
add a cockpit realmd FreeIPA join test Summary: This requires a few other changes: * turn clone_host_resolv into clone_host_file, letting you clone any given host file (cloning /etc/hosts seems to make both server deployment and client enrolment faster/more reliable) * allow loading of multiple POSTINSTALL tests (so we can share the freeipa_client_postinstall test). Note this is compatible, existing uses will work fine * move initial password change for the IPA test users into the server deployment test (so the client tests don't conflict over doing that) * add GRUB_POSTINSTALL, for specifying boot parameters for boot of the installed system, and make it work by tweaking _console_wait _login (doesn't work for _graphical_wait_login yet, as I didn't need that) * make the static networking config for tap tests into a library function so the tests can share it * handle ABRT problem dirs showing up in /var/spool/abrt as well as /var/tmp/abrt (because the enrol attempt hits #1330766 and the crash report shows up in /var/spool/abrt, don't ask me why the difference, I just work here) * specify the DNS servers from the worker host's resolv.conf as the forwarders for the FreeIPA server when deploying it; if we don't do this, rolekit defaults to using the root servers as forwarders(!) and thus we get the public, not phx2-appropriate, results for e.g. mirrors.fedoraproject.org, some of which the workers can't reach, so PackageKit package install always fails (boy, was it fun figuring THAT mess out) Even after all that, the test still doesn't actually pass, but I'm reasonably confident this is because it's hitting actual bugs, not because it's broken. It runs into #1330766 nearly every time (I think I saw *one* time the enrolment actually succeeded), and seems to run into a subsequent bug I hadn't seen before when trying to work around that by trying the join again (see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1330766#c37 ). Test Plan: Run the test, see what happens. If you're really lucky, it'll actually pass. But you'll probably run into #1330766#c37, I'm mostly posting for comment. You'll need a tap-capable openQA instance to test this. Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel Reviewed By: garretraziel Subscribers: tflink Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D880
2016-06-07 20:00:39 +00:00
assert_screen "bootloader", $args{timeout};
add FreeIPA server role deploy and kickstart enrolment tests Summary: These require openQA tap networking to allow the server and client boxes to communicate, and require masquerading (NAT) so the server at least can reach a repository (dnf/rolekit really, really do not want to work without a repo connection). They use the 'parallel' test support to have the server deploy run first while the client enrol test waits at the grub menu until the server is done before it goes ahead. This is all deployed and working on stg. The really tricky bit was getting all the openvswitch and firewall config right in ansible. We *could* do the server deploy test as a follow-on from the default install test to save the install, but then we'd have to teach it to change the hostname and set up static networking post-install. I'm not sure if it's worth doing that. This requires the corresponding openqa_fedora_tools commit that adds the hard disks (containing the kickstarts - it's possible to get them from remote during install, but we have to set up name resolution or hard code the IP of the server). Test Plan: Deploy this and the openqa_fedora_tools commit, generate the disks, configure the networking (good luck! See the docs in openqa_fedora_tools) and see if you can run the tests. If you're using Docker, uh...sorry. You somehow need to set things up so the workers can use tap interfaces that can talk to each other and are NATed to the outside world. Have fun. I can talk you through it on IRC... Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel Reviewed By: garretraziel Subscribers: tflink Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D831
2016-05-04 18:53:11 +00:00
}
add a cockpit realmd FreeIPA join test Summary: This requires a few other changes: * turn clone_host_resolv into clone_host_file, letting you clone any given host file (cloning /etc/hosts seems to make both server deployment and client enrolment faster/more reliable) * allow loading of multiple POSTINSTALL tests (so we can share the freeipa_client_postinstall test). Note this is compatible, existing uses will work fine * move initial password change for the IPA test users into the server deployment test (so the client tests don't conflict over doing that) * add GRUB_POSTINSTALL, for specifying boot parameters for boot of the installed system, and make it work by tweaking _console_wait _login (doesn't work for _graphical_wait_login yet, as I didn't need that) * make the static networking config for tap tests into a library function so the tests can share it * handle ABRT problem dirs showing up in /var/spool/abrt as well as /var/tmp/abrt (because the enrol attempt hits #1330766 and the crash report shows up in /var/spool/abrt, don't ask me why the difference, I just work here) * specify the DNS servers from the worker host's resolv.conf as the forwarders for the FreeIPA server when deploying it; if we don't do this, rolekit defaults to using the root servers as forwarders(!) and thus we get the public, not phx2-appropriate, results for e.g. mirrors.fedoraproject.org, some of which the workers can't reach, so PackageKit package install always fails (boy, was it fun figuring THAT mess out) Even after all that, the test still doesn't actually pass, but I'm reasonably confident this is because it's hitting actual bugs, not because it's broken. It runs into #1330766 nearly every time (I think I saw *one* time the enrolment actually succeeded), and seems to run into a subsequent bug I hadn't seen before when trying to work around that by trying the join again (see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1330766#c37 ). Test Plan: Run the test, see what happens. If you're really lucky, it'll actually pass. But you'll probably run into #1330766#c37, I'm mostly posting for comment. You'll need a tap-capable openQA instance to test this. Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel Reviewed By: garretraziel Subscribers: tflink Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D880
2016-06-07 20:00:39 +00:00
if ($args{mutex}) {
add FreeIPA server role deploy and kickstart enrolment tests Summary: These require openQA tap networking to allow the server and client boxes to communicate, and require masquerading (NAT) so the server at least can reach a repository (dnf/rolekit really, really do not want to work without a repo connection). They use the 'parallel' test support to have the server deploy run first while the client enrol test waits at the grub menu until the server is done before it goes ahead. This is all deployed and working on stg. The really tricky bit was getting all the openvswitch and firewall config right in ansible. We *could* do the server deploy test as a follow-on from the default install test to save the install, but then we'd have to teach it to change the hostname and set up static networking post-install. I'm not sure if it's worth doing that. This requires the corresponding openqa_fedora_tools commit that adds the hard disks (containing the kickstarts - it's possible to get them from remote during install, but we have to set up name resolution or hard code the IP of the server). Test Plan: Deploy this and the openqa_fedora_tools commit, generate the disks, configure the networking (good luck! See the docs in openqa_fedora_tools) and see if you can run the tests. If you're using Docker, uh...sorry. You somehow need to set things up so the workers can use tap interfaces that can talk to each other and are NATed to the outside world. Have fun. I can talk you through it on IRC... Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel Reviewed By: garretraziel Subscribers: tflink Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D831
2016-05-04 18:53:11 +00:00
# cancel countdown
send_key "left";
add a cockpit realmd FreeIPA join test Summary: This requires a few other changes: * turn clone_host_resolv into clone_host_file, letting you clone any given host file (cloning /etc/hosts seems to make both server deployment and client enrolment faster/more reliable) * allow loading of multiple POSTINSTALL tests (so we can share the freeipa_client_postinstall test). Note this is compatible, existing uses will work fine * move initial password change for the IPA test users into the server deployment test (so the client tests don't conflict over doing that) * add GRUB_POSTINSTALL, for specifying boot parameters for boot of the installed system, and make it work by tweaking _console_wait _login (doesn't work for _graphical_wait_login yet, as I didn't need that) * make the static networking config for tap tests into a library function so the tests can share it * handle ABRT problem dirs showing up in /var/spool/abrt as well as /var/tmp/abrt (because the enrol attempt hits #1330766 and the crash report shows up in /var/spool/abrt, don't ask me why the difference, I just work here) * specify the DNS servers from the worker host's resolv.conf as the forwarders for the FreeIPA server when deploying it; if we don't do this, rolekit defaults to using the root servers as forwarders(!) and thus we get the public, not phx2-appropriate, results for e.g. mirrors.fedoraproject.org, some of which the workers can't reach, so PackageKit package install always fails (boy, was it fun figuring THAT mess out) Even after all that, the test still doesn't actually pass, but I'm reasonably confident this is because it's hitting actual bugs, not because it's broken. It runs into #1330766 nearly every time (I think I saw *one* time the enrolment actually succeeded), and seems to run into a subsequent bug I hadn't seen before when trying to work around that by trying the join again (see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1330766#c37 ). Test Plan: Run the test, see what happens. If you're really lucky, it'll actually pass. But you'll probably run into #1330766#c37, I'm mostly posting for comment. You'll need a tap-capable openQA instance to test this. Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel Reviewed By: garretraziel Subscribers: tflink Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D880
2016-06-07 20:00:39 +00:00
mutex_lock $args{mutex};
mutex_unlock $args{mutex};
add FreeIPA server role deploy and kickstart enrolment tests Summary: These require openQA tap networking to allow the server and client boxes to communicate, and require masquerading (NAT) so the server at least can reach a repository (dnf/rolekit really, really do not want to work without a repo connection). They use the 'parallel' test support to have the server deploy run first while the client enrol test waits at the grub menu until the server is done before it goes ahead. This is all deployed and working on stg. The really tricky bit was getting all the openvswitch and firewall config right in ansible. We *could* do the server deploy test as a follow-on from the default install test to save the install, but then we'd have to teach it to change the hostname and set up static networking post-install. I'm not sure if it's worth doing that. This requires the corresponding openqa_fedora_tools commit that adds the hard disks (containing the kickstarts - it's possible to get them from remote during install, but we have to set up name resolution or hard code the IP of the server). Test Plan: Deploy this and the openqa_fedora_tools commit, generate the disks, configure the networking (good luck! See the docs in openqa_fedora_tools) and see if you can run the tests. If you're using Docker, uh...sorry. You somehow need to set things up so the workers can use tap interfaces that can talk to each other and are NATed to the outside world. Have fun. I can talk you through it on IRC... Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel Reviewed By: garretraziel Subscribers: tflink Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D831
2016-05-04 18:53:11 +00:00
}
add a cockpit realmd FreeIPA join test Summary: This requires a few other changes: * turn clone_host_resolv into clone_host_file, letting you clone any given host file (cloning /etc/hosts seems to make both server deployment and client enrolment faster/more reliable) * allow loading of multiple POSTINSTALL tests (so we can share the freeipa_client_postinstall test). Note this is compatible, existing uses will work fine * move initial password change for the IPA test users into the server deployment test (so the client tests don't conflict over doing that) * add GRUB_POSTINSTALL, for specifying boot parameters for boot of the installed system, and make it work by tweaking _console_wait _login (doesn't work for _graphical_wait_login yet, as I didn't need that) * make the static networking config for tap tests into a library function so the tests can share it * handle ABRT problem dirs showing up in /var/spool/abrt as well as /var/tmp/abrt (because the enrol attempt hits #1330766 and the crash report shows up in /var/spool/abrt, don't ask me why the difference, I just work here) * specify the DNS servers from the worker host's resolv.conf as the forwarders for the FreeIPA server when deploying it; if we don't do this, rolekit defaults to using the root servers as forwarders(!) and thus we get the public, not phx2-appropriate, results for e.g. mirrors.fedoraproject.org, some of which the workers can't reach, so PackageKit package install always fails (boy, was it fun figuring THAT mess out) Even after all that, the test still doesn't actually pass, but I'm reasonably confident this is because it's hitting actual bugs, not because it's broken. It runs into #1330766 nearly every time (I think I saw *one* time the enrolment actually succeeded), and seems to run into a subsequent bug I hadn't seen before when trying to work around that by trying the join again (see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1330766#c37 ). Test Plan: Run the test, see what happens. If you're really lucky, it'll actually pass. But you'll probably run into #1330766#c37, I'm mostly posting for comment. You'll need a tap-capable openQA instance to test this. Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel Reviewed By: garretraziel Subscribers: tflink Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D880
2016-06-07 20:00:39 +00:00
if ($args{first}) {
add FreeIPA server role deploy and kickstart enrolment tests Summary: These require openQA tap networking to allow the server and client boxes to communicate, and require masquerading (NAT) so the server at least can reach a repository (dnf/rolekit really, really do not want to work without a repo connection). They use the 'parallel' test support to have the server deploy run first while the client enrol test waits at the grub menu until the server is done before it goes ahead. This is all deployed and working on stg. The really tricky bit was getting all the openvswitch and firewall config right in ansible. We *could* do the server deploy test as a follow-on from the default install test to save the install, but then we'd have to teach it to change the hostname and set up static networking post-install. I'm not sure if it's worth doing that. This requires the corresponding openqa_fedora_tools commit that adds the hard disks (containing the kickstarts - it's possible to get them from remote during install, but we have to set up name resolution or hard code the IP of the server). Test Plan: Deploy this and the openqa_fedora_tools commit, generate the disks, configure the networking (good luck! See the docs in openqa_fedora_tools) and see if you can run the tests. If you're using Docker, uh...sorry. You somehow need to set things up so the workers can use tap interfaces that can talk to each other and are NATed to the outside world. Have fun. I can talk you through it on IRC... Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel Reviewed By: garretraziel Subscribers: tflink Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D831
2016-05-04 18:53:11 +00:00
# press up a couple of times to make sure we're at first entry
send_key "up";
send_key "up";
}
add a cockpit realmd FreeIPA join test Summary: This requires a few other changes: * turn clone_host_resolv into clone_host_file, letting you clone any given host file (cloning /etc/hosts seems to make both server deployment and client enrolment faster/more reliable) * allow loading of multiple POSTINSTALL tests (so we can share the freeipa_client_postinstall test). Note this is compatible, existing uses will work fine * move initial password change for the IPA test users into the server deployment test (so the client tests don't conflict over doing that) * add GRUB_POSTINSTALL, for specifying boot parameters for boot of the installed system, and make it work by tweaking _console_wait _login (doesn't work for _graphical_wait_login yet, as I didn't need that) * make the static networking config for tap tests into a library function so the tests can share it * handle ABRT problem dirs showing up in /var/spool/abrt as well as /var/tmp/abrt (because the enrol attempt hits #1330766 and the crash report shows up in /var/spool/abrt, don't ask me why the difference, I just work here) * specify the DNS servers from the worker host's resolv.conf as the forwarders for the FreeIPA server when deploying it; if we don't do this, rolekit defaults to using the root servers as forwarders(!) and thus we get the public, not phx2-appropriate, results for e.g. mirrors.fedoraproject.org, some of which the workers can't reach, so PackageKit package install always fails (boy, was it fun figuring THAT mess out) Even after all that, the test still doesn't actually pass, but I'm reasonably confident this is because it's hitting actual bugs, not because it's broken. It runs into #1330766 nearly every time (I think I saw *one* time the enrolment actually succeeded), and seems to run into a subsequent bug I hadn't seen before when trying to work around that by trying the join again (see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1330766#c37 ). Test Plan: Run the test, see what happens. If you're really lucky, it'll actually pass. But you'll probably run into #1330766#c37, I'm mostly posting for comment. You'll need a tap-capable openQA instance to test this. Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel Reviewed By: garretraziel Subscribers: tflink Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D880
2016-06-07 20:00:39 +00:00
if ($args{params}) {
if ($args{bootloader} eq "syslinux") {
add FreeIPA server role deploy and kickstart enrolment tests Summary: These require openQA tap networking to allow the server and client boxes to communicate, and require masquerading (NAT) so the server at least can reach a repository (dnf/rolekit really, really do not want to work without a repo connection). They use the 'parallel' test support to have the server deploy run first while the client enrol test waits at the grub menu until the server is done before it goes ahead. This is all deployed and working on stg. The really tricky bit was getting all the openvswitch and firewall config right in ansible. We *could* do the server deploy test as a follow-on from the default install test to save the install, but then we'd have to teach it to change the hostname and set up static networking post-install. I'm not sure if it's worth doing that. This requires the corresponding openqa_fedora_tools commit that adds the hard disks (containing the kickstarts - it's possible to get them from remote during install, but we have to set up name resolution or hard code the IP of the server). Test Plan: Deploy this and the openqa_fedora_tools commit, generate the disks, configure the networking (good luck! See the docs in openqa_fedora_tools) and see if you can run the tests. If you're using Docker, uh...sorry. You somehow need to set things up so the workers can use tap interfaces that can talk to each other and are NATed to the outside world. Have fun. I can talk you through it on IRC... Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel Reviewed By: garretraziel Subscribers: tflink Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D831
2016-05-04 18:53:11 +00:00
send_key "tab";
}
else {
send_key "e";
# ternary: 13 'downs' to reach the kernel line for installed
# system, 2 for UEFI installer
add a cockpit realmd FreeIPA join test Summary: This requires a few other changes: * turn clone_host_resolv into clone_host_file, letting you clone any given host file (cloning /etc/hosts seems to make both server deployment and client enrolment faster/more reliable) * allow loading of multiple POSTINSTALL tests (so we can share the freeipa_client_postinstall test). Note this is compatible, existing uses will work fine * move initial password change for the IPA test users into the server deployment test (so the client tests don't conflict over doing that) * add GRUB_POSTINSTALL, for specifying boot parameters for boot of the installed system, and make it work by tweaking _console_wait _login (doesn't work for _graphical_wait_login yet, as I didn't need that) * make the static networking config for tap tests into a library function so the tests can share it * handle ABRT problem dirs showing up in /var/spool/abrt as well as /var/tmp/abrt (because the enrol attempt hits #1330766 and the crash report shows up in /var/spool/abrt, don't ask me why the difference, I just work here) * specify the DNS servers from the worker host's resolv.conf as the forwarders for the FreeIPA server when deploying it; if we don't do this, rolekit defaults to using the root servers as forwarders(!) and thus we get the public, not phx2-appropriate, results for e.g. mirrors.fedoraproject.org, some of which the workers can't reach, so PackageKit package install always fails (boy, was it fun figuring THAT mess out) Even after all that, the test still doesn't actually pass, but I'm reasonably confident this is because it's hitting actual bugs, not because it's broken. It runs into #1330766 nearly every time (I think I saw *one* time the enrolment actually succeeded), and seems to run into a subsequent bug I hadn't seen before when trying to work around that by trying the join again (see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1330766#c37 ). Test Plan: Run the test, see what happens. If you're really lucky, it'll actually pass. But you'll probably run into #1330766#c37, I'm mostly posting for comment. You'll need a tap-capable openQA instance to test this. Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel Reviewed By: garretraziel Subscribers: tflink Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D880
2016-06-07 20:00:39 +00:00
my $presses = $args{postinstall} ? 13 : 2;
add FreeIPA server role deploy and kickstart enrolment tests Summary: These require openQA tap networking to allow the server and client boxes to communicate, and require masquerading (NAT) so the server at least can reach a repository (dnf/rolekit really, really do not want to work without a repo connection). They use the 'parallel' test support to have the server deploy run first while the client enrol test waits at the grub menu until the server is done before it goes ahead. This is all deployed and working on stg. The really tricky bit was getting all the openvswitch and firewall config right in ansible. We *could* do the server deploy test as a follow-on from the default install test to save the install, but then we'd have to teach it to change the hostname and set up static networking post-install. I'm not sure if it's worth doing that. This requires the corresponding openqa_fedora_tools commit that adds the hard disks (containing the kickstarts - it's possible to get them from remote during install, but we have to set up name resolution or hard code the IP of the server). Test Plan: Deploy this and the openqa_fedora_tools commit, generate the disks, configure the networking (good luck! See the docs in openqa_fedora_tools) and see if you can run the tests. If you're using Docker, uh...sorry. You somehow need to set things up so the workers can use tap interfaces that can talk to each other and are NATed to the outside world. Have fun. I can talk you through it on IRC... Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel Reviewed By: garretraziel Subscribers: tflink Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D831
2016-05-04 18:53:11 +00:00
foreach my $i (1..$presses) {
send_key "down";
}
send_key "end";
}
add a cockpit realmd FreeIPA join test Summary: This requires a few other changes: * turn clone_host_resolv into clone_host_file, letting you clone any given host file (cloning /etc/hosts seems to make both server deployment and client enrolment faster/more reliable) * allow loading of multiple POSTINSTALL tests (so we can share the freeipa_client_postinstall test). Note this is compatible, existing uses will work fine * move initial password change for the IPA test users into the server deployment test (so the client tests don't conflict over doing that) * add GRUB_POSTINSTALL, for specifying boot parameters for boot of the installed system, and make it work by tweaking _console_wait _login (doesn't work for _graphical_wait_login yet, as I didn't need that) * make the static networking config for tap tests into a library function so the tests can share it * handle ABRT problem dirs showing up in /var/spool/abrt as well as /var/tmp/abrt (because the enrol attempt hits #1330766 and the crash report shows up in /var/spool/abrt, don't ask me why the difference, I just work here) * specify the DNS servers from the worker host's resolv.conf as the forwarders for the FreeIPA server when deploying it; if we don't do this, rolekit defaults to using the root servers as forwarders(!) and thus we get the public, not phx2-appropriate, results for e.g. mirrors.fedoraproject.org, some of which the workers can't reach, so PackageKit package install always fails (boy, was it fun figuring THAT mess out) Even after all that, the test still doesn't actually pass, but I'm reasonably confident this is because it's hitting actual bugs, not because it's broken. It runs into #1330766 nearly every time (I think I saw *one* time the enrolment actually succeeded), and seems to run into a subsequent bug I hadn't seen before when trying to work around that by trying the join again (see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1330766#c37 ). Test Plan: Run the test, see what happens. If you're really lucky, it'll actually pass. But you'll probably run into #1330766#c37, I'm mostly posting for comment. You'll need a tap-capable openQA instance to test this. Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel Reviewed By: garretraziel Subscribers: tflink Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D880
2016-06-07 20:00:39 +00:00
type_string " $args{params}";
add FreeIPA server role deploy and kickstart enrolment tests Summary: These require openQA tap networking to allow the server and client boxes to communicate, and require masquerading (NAT) so the server at least can reach a repository (dnf/rolekit really, really do not want to work without a repo connection). They use the 'parallel' test support to have the server deploy run first while the client enrol test waits at the grub menu until the server is done before it goes ahead. This is all deployed and working on stg. The really tricky bit was getting all the openvswitch and firewall config right in ansible. We *could* do the server deploy test as a follow-on from the default install test to save the install, but then we'd have to teach it to change the hostname and set up static networking post-install. I'm not sure if it's worth doing that. This requires the corresponding openqa_fedora_tools commit that adds the hard disks (containing the kickstarts - it's possible to get them from remote during install, but we have to set up name resolution or hard code the IP of the server). Test Plan: Deploy this and the openqa_fedora_tools commit, generate the disks, configure the networking (good luck! See the docs in openqa_fedora_tools) and see if you can run the tests. If you're using Docker, uh...sorry. You somehow need to set things up so the workers can use tap interfaces that can talk to each other and are NATed to the outside world. Have fun. I can talk you through it on IRC... Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel Reviewed By: garretraziel Subscribers: tflink Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D831
2016-05-04 18:53:11 +00:00
}
# ctrl-X boots from grub editor mode
send_key "ctrl-x";
# return boots all other cases
send_key "ret";
}
create fedora base class, factor out console login Summary: Root console in anaconda got broken by RHBZ #1222413 - no shell on tty2. Decided to clean up console use in general as part of fixing it. This creates a class 'fedorabase' and has 'anacondalog' and 'fedoralog' both inherit from it. boot_to_login_screen is moved there (as it seems appropriate) and it has a new method, console_login, which basically handles 'get me a shell on a console': if we're already at one it returns, if not it'll type the user name and the password *if necessary* (sometimes it's not) and return once it sees a prompt. It takes a hash of named parameters for user, password and 'check', which is whether it should die if it fails to reach a console or not (some users don't want it to). anacondalog and fedoralog both get 'root_console' methods which do something appropriate and then call console_login; both have a hash of named parameters, anacondalog's version only bothers with 'check', while fedoralog's also accepts 'tty' to pick the tty to use. This also adjusts all things which try to get to a console prompt to use either root_console or console_login as appropriate. It also tweaks the needle tags a bit, drops some unneeded needles, and adds a new 'user console prompt' needle; we really just need two versions of the root prompt needle and two of the user prompt needle (one for <F23, one for F23+ - the console font changed in F23, and the @ character at least doesn't match between the two). I think we still need the <F23 case for upgrade tests, for now. Test Plan: Do a full test run and see that more tests succeed. I've done a run on happyassassin with a hack to workaround the SELinux issue for interactive installs, and the results look good. I also fiddled about a bit to test some different cases, like forcing a failure in a live test to test post_fail_hook (and hence root_console) in that scenario, and forcing failures after some console commands had been run to check that it DTRT when we've already reached a console, etc. Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel Reviewed By: jskladan, garretraziel Subscribers: tflink Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D462
2015-07-22 18:24:40 +00:00
sub boot_to_login_screen {
my $self = shift;
my $boot_done_screen = shift; # what to expect when system is booted (e. g. GDM), can be ""
create fedora base class, factor out console login Summary: Root console in anaconda got broken by RHBZ #1222413 - no shell on tty2. Decided to clean up console use in general as part of fixing it. This creates a class 'fedorabase' and has 'anacondalog' and 'fedoralog' both inherit from it. boot_to_login_screen is moved there (as it seems appropriate) and it has a new method, console_login, which basically handles 'get me a shell on a console': if we're already at one it returns, if not it'll type the user name and the password *if necessary* (sometimes it's not) and return once it sees a prompt. It takes a hash of named parameters for user, password and 'check', which is whether it should die if it fails to reach a console or not (some users don't want it to). anacondalog and fedoralog both get 'root_console' methods which do something appropriate and then call console_login; both have a hash of named parameters, anacondalog's version only bothers with 'check', while fedoralog's also accepts 'tty' to pick the tty to use. This also adjusts all things which try to get to a console prompt to use either root_console or console_login as appropriate. It also tweaks the needle tags a bit, drops some unneeded needles, and adds a new 'user console prompt' needle; we really just need two versions of the root prompt needle and two of the user prompt needle (one for <F23, one for F23+ - the console font changed in F23, and the @ character at least doesn't match between the two). I think we still need the <F23 case for upgrade tests, for now. Test Plan: Do a full test run and see that more tests succeed. I've done a run on happyassassin with a hack to workaround the SELinux issue for interactive installs, and the results look good. I also fiddled about a bit to test some different cases, like forcing a failure in a live test to test post_fail_hook (and hence root_console) in that scenario, and forcing failures after some console commands had been run to check that it DTRT when we've already reached a console, etc. Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel Reviewed By: jskladan, garretraziel Subscribers: tflink Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D462
2015-07-22 18:24:40 +00:00
my $stillscreen = shift || 10;
my $timeout = shift || 60;
wait_still_screen $stillscreen, $timeout;
if ($boot_done_screen ne "") {
assert_screen $boot_done_screen;
}
}
sub get_milestone {
my $self = shift;
# FIXME: we don't know how to do this with Pungi 4 yet.
return '';
}
add a cockpit realmd FreeIPA join test Summary: This requires a few other changes: * turn clone_host_resolv into clone_host_file, letting you clone any given host file (cloning /etc/hosts seems to make both server deployment and client enrolment faster/more reliable) * allow loading of multiple POSTINSTALL tests (so we can share the freeipa_client_postinstall test). Note this is compatible, existing uses will work fine * move initial password change for the IPA test users into the server deployment test (so the client tests don't conflict over doing that) * add GRUB_POSTINSTALL, for specifying boot parameters for boot of the installed system, and make it work by tweaking _console_wait _login (doesn't work for _graphical_wait_login yet, as I didn't need that) * make the static networking config for tap tests into a library function so the tests can share it * handle ABRT problem dirs showing up in /var/spool/abrt as well as /var/tmp/abrt (because the enrol attempt hits #1330766 and the crash report shows up in /var/spool/abrt, don't ask me why the difference, I just work here) * specify the DNS servers from the worker host's resolv.conf as the forwarders for the FreeIPA server when deploying it; if we don't do this, rolekit defaults to using the root servers as forwarders(!) and thus we get the public, not phx2-appropriate, results for e.g. mirrors.fedoraproject.org, some of which the workers can't reach, so PackageKit package install always fails (boy, was it fun figuring THAT mess out) Even after all that, the test still doesn't actually pass, but I'm reasonably confident this is because it's hitting actual bugs, not because it's broken. It runs into #1330766 nearly every time (I think I saw *one* time the enrolment actually succeeded), and seems to run into a subsequent bug I hadn't seen before when trying to work around that by trying the join again (see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1330766#c37 ). Test Plan: Run the test, see what happens. If you're really lucky, it'll actually pass. But you'll probably run into #1330766#c37, I'm mostly posting for comment. You'll need a tap-capable openQA instance to test this. Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel Reviewed By: garretraziel Subscribers: tflink Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D880
2016-06-07 20:00:39 +00:00
sub clone_host_file {
# copy a given file from the host into the guest. Mainly used
# for networking config on tap tests. this is pretty crazy, but
# SUSE do almost the same thing...
add FreeIPA server role deploy and kickstart enrolment tests Summary: These require openQA tap networking to allow the server and client boxes to communicate, and require masquerading (NAT) so the server at least can reach a repository (dnf/rolekit really, really do not want to work without a repo connection). They use the 'parallel' test support to have the server deploy run first while the client enrol test waits at the grub menu until the server is done before it goes ahead. This is all deployed and working on stg. The really tricky bit was getting all the openvswitch and firewall config right in ansible. We *could* do the server deploy test as a follow-on from the default install test to save the install, but then we'd have to teach it to change the hostname and set up static networking post-install. I'm not sure if it's worth doing that. This requires the corresponding openqa_fedora_tools commit that adds the hard disks (containing the kickstarts - it's possible to get them from remote during install, but we have to set up name resolution or hard code the IP of the server). Test Plan: Deploy this and the openqa_fedora_tools commit, generate the disks, configure the networking (good luck! See the docs in openqa_fedora_tools) and see if you can run the tests. If you're using Docker, uh...sorry. You somehow need to set things up so the workers can use tap interfaces that can talk to each other and are NATed to the outside world. Have fun. I can talk you through it on IRC... Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel Reviewed By: garretraziel Subscribers: tflink Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D831
2016-05-04 18:53:11 +00:00
my $self = shift;
add a cockpit realmd FreeIPA join test Summary: This requires a few other changes: * turn clone_host_resolv into clone_host_file, letting you clone any given host file (cloning /etc/hosts seems to make both server deployment and client enrolment faster/more reliable) * allow loading of multiple POSTINSTALL tests (so we can share the freeipa_client_postinstall test). Note this is compatible, existing uses will work fine * move initial password change for the IPA test users into the server deployment test (so the client tests don't conflict over doing that) * add GRUB_POSTINSTALL, for specifying boot parameters for boot of the installed system, and make it work by tweaking _console_wait _login (doesn't work for _graphical_wait_login yet, as I didn't need that) * make the static networking config for tap tests into a library function so the tests can share it * handle ABRT problem dirs showing up in /var/spool/abrt as well as /var/tmp/abrt (because the enrol attempt hits #1330766 and the crash report shows up in /var/spool/abrt, don't ask me why the difference, I just work here) * specify the DNS servers from the worker host's resolv.conf as the forwarders for the FreeIPA server when deploying it; if we don't do this, rolekit defaults to using the root servers as forwarders(!) and thus we get the public, not phx2-appropriate, results for e.g. mirrors.fedoraproject.org, some of which the workers can't reach, so PackageKit package install always fails (boy, was it fun figuring THAT mess out) Even after all that, the test still doesn't actually pass, but I'm reasonably confident this is because it's hitting actual bugs, not because it's broken. It runs into #1330766 nearly every time (I think I saw *one* time the enrolment actually succeeded), and seems to run into a subsequent bug I hadn't seen before when trying to work around that by trying the join again (see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1330766#c37 ). Test Plan: Run the test, see what happens. If you're really lucky, it'll actually pass. But you'll probably run into #1330766#c37, I'm mostly posting for comment. You'll need a tap-capable openQA instance to test this. Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel Reviewed By: garretraziel Subscribers: tflink Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D880
2016-06-07 20:00:39 +00:00
my $file = shift;
my $text = '';
open(my $fh, '<', $file);
while (<$fh>) {
$text .= $_;
add FreeIPA server role deploy and kickstart enrolment tests Summary: These require openQA tap networking to allow the server and client boxes to communicate, and require masquerading (NAT) so the server at least can reach a repository (dnf/rolekit really, really do not want to work without a repo connection). They use the 'parallel' test support to have the server deploy run first while the client enrol test waits at the grub menu until the server is done before it goes ahead. This is all deployed and working on stg. The really tricky bit was getting all the openvswitch and firewall config right in ansible. We *could* do the server deploy test as a follow-on from the default install test to save the install, but then we'd have to teach it to change the hostname and set up static networking post-install. I'm not sure if it's worth doing that. This requires the corresponding openqa_fedora_tools commit that adds the hard disks (containing the kickstarts - it's possible to get them from remote during install, but we have to set up name resolution or hard code the IP of the server). Test Plan: Deploy this and the openqa_fedora_tools commit, generate the disks, configure the networking (good luck! See the docs in openqa_fedora_tools) and see if you can run the tests. If you're using Docker, uh...sorry. You somehow need to set things up so the workers can use tap interfaces that can talk to each other and are NATed to the outside world. Have fun. I can talk you through it on IRC... Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel Reviewed By: garretraziel Subscribers: tflink Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D831
2016-05-04 18:53:11 +00:00
}
add a cockpit realmd FreeIPA join test Summary: This requires a few other changes: * turn clone_host_resolv into clone_host_file, letting you clone any given host file (cloning /etc/hosts seems to make both server deployment and client enrolment faster/more reliable) * allow loading of multiple POSTINSTALL tests (so we can share the freeipa_client_postinstall test). Note this is compatible, existing uses will work fine * move initial password change for the IPA test users into the server deployment test (so the client tests don't conflict over doing that) * add GRUB_POSTINSTALL, for specifying boot parameters for boot of the installed system, and make it work by tweaking _console_wait _login (doesn't work for _graphical_wait_login yet, as I didn't need that) * make the static networking config for tap tests into a library function so the tests can share it * handle ABRT problem dirs showing up in /var/spool/abrt as well as /var/tmp/abrt (because the enrol attempt hits #1330766 and the crash report shows up in /var/spool/abrt, don't ask me why the difference, I just work here) * specify the DNS servers from the worker host's resolv.conf as the forwarders for the FreeIPA server when deploying it; if we don't do this, rolekit defaults to using the root servers as forwarders(!) and thus we get the public, not phx2-appropriate, results for e.g. mirrors.fedoraproject.org, some of which the workers can't reach, so PackageKit package install always fails (boy, was it fun figuring THAT mess out) Even after all that, the test still doesn't actually pass, but I'm reasonably confident this is because it's hitting actual bugs, not because it's broken. It runs into #1330766 nearly every time (I think I saw *one* time the enrolment actually succeeded), and seems to run into a subsequent bug I hadn't seen before when trying to work around that by trying the join again (see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1330766#c37 ). Test Plan: Run the test, see what happens. If you're really lucky, it'll actually pass. But you'll probably run into #1330766#c37, I'm mostly posting for comment. You'll need a tap-capable openQA instance to test this. Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel Reviewed By: garretraziel Subscribers: tflink Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D880
2016-06-07 20:00:39 +00:00
assert_script_run "printf '$text' > $file";
add FreeIPA server role deploy and kickstart enrolment tests Summary: These require openQA tap networking to allow the server and client boxes to communicate, and require masquerading (NAT) so the server at least can reach a repository (dnf/rolekit really, really do not want to work without a repo connection). They use the 'parallel' test support to have the server deploy run first while the client enrol test waits at the grub menu until the server is done before it goes ahead. This is all deployed and working on stg. The really tricky bit was getting all the openvswitch and firewall config right in ansible. We *could* do the server deploy test as a follow-on from the default install test to save the install, but then we'd have to teach it to change the hostname and set up static networking post-install. I'm not sure if it's worth doing that. This requires the corresponding openqa_fedora_tools commit that adds the hard disks (containing the kickstarts - it's possible to get them from remote during install, but we have to set up name resolution or hard code the IP of the server). Test Plan: Deploy this and the openqa_fedora_tools commit, generate the disks, configure the networking (good luck! See the docs in openqa_fedora_tools) and see if you can run the tests. If you're using Docker, uh...sorry. You somehow need to set things up so the workers can use tap interfaces that can talk to each other and are NATed to the outside world. Have fun. I can talk you through it on IRC... Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel Reviewed By: garretraziel Subscribers: tflink Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D831
2016-05-04 18:53:11 +00:00
# for debugging...
add a cockpit realmd FreeIPA join test Summary: This requires a few other changes: * turn clone_host_resolv into clone_host_file, letting you clone any given host file (cloning /etc/hosts seems to make both server deployment and client enrolment faster/more reliable) * allow loading of multiple POSTINSTALL tests (so we can share the freeipa_client_postinstall test). Note this is compatible, existing uses will work fine * move initial password change for the IPA test users into the server deployment test (so the client tests don't conflict over doing that) * add GRUB_POSTINSTALL, for specifying boot parameters for boot of the installed system, and make it work by tweaking _console_wait _login (doesn't work for _graphical_wait_login yet, as I didn't need that) * make the static networking config for tap tests into a library function so the tests can share it * handle ABRT problem dirs showing up in /var/spool/abrt as well as /var/tmp/abrt (because the enrol attempt hits #1330766 and the crash report shows up in /var/spool/abrt, don't ask me why the difference, I just work here) * specify the DNS servers from the worker host's resolv.conf as the forwarders for the FreeIPA server when deploying it; if we don't do this, rolekit defaults to using the root servers as forwarders(!) and thus we get the public, not phx2-appropriate, results for e.g. mirrors.fedoraproject.org, some of which the workers can't reach, so PackageKit package install always fails (boy, was it fun figuring THAT mess out) Even after all that, the test still doesn't actually pass, but I'm reasonably confident this is because it's hitting actual bugs, not because it's broken. It runs into #1330766 nearly every time (I think I saw *one* time the enrolment actually succeeded), and seems to run into a subsequent bug I hadn't seen before when trying to work around that by trying the join again (see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1330766#c37 ). Test Plan: Run the test, see what happens. If you're really lucky, it'll actually pass. But you'll probably run into #1330766#c37, I'm mostly posting for comment. You'll need a tap-capable openQA instance to test this. Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel Reviewed By: garretraziel Subscribers: tflink Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D880
2016-06-07 20:00:39 +00:00
assert_script_run "cat $file";
}
sub setup_tap_static {
# this is a common thing for tap tests, where we set up networking
# for the system with a static IP address and possibly a specific
# hostname
my $self = shift;
my $ip = shift;
my $hostname = shift || "";
if ($hostname) {
# assigning output of split to a single-item array gives us just
# the first split
my ($short) = split(/\./, $hostname);
# set hostname
assert_script_run "hostnamectl set-hostname $hostname";
# add entry to /etc/hosts
assert_script_run "echo '$ip $hostname $short' >> /etc/hosts";
}
# bring up network. DEFROUTE is *vital* here
assert_script_run "printf 'DEVICE=eth0\nBOOTPROTO=none\nIPADDR=$ip\nGATEWAY=10.0.2.2\nPREFIX=24\nDEFROUTE=yes' > /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0";
script_run "systemctl restart NetworkManager.service";
add FreeIPA server role deploy and kickstart enrolment tests Summary: These require openQA tap networking to allow the server and client boxes to communicate, and require masquerading (NAT) so the server at least can reach a repository (dnf/rolekit really, really do not want to work without a repo connection). They use the 'parallel' test support to have the server deploy run first while the client enrol test waits at the grub menu until the server is done before it goes ahead. This is all deployed and working on stg. The really tricky bit was getting all the openvswitch and firewall config right in ansible. We *could* do the server deploy test as a follow-on from the default install test to save the install, but then we'd have to teach it to change the hostname and set up static networking post-install. I'm not sure if it's worth doing that. This requires the corresponding openqa_fedora_tools commit that adds the hard disks (containing the kickstarts - it's possible to get them from remote during install, but we have to set up name resolution or hard code the IP of the server). Test Plan: Deploy this and the openqa_fedora_tools commit, generate the disks, configure the networking (good luck! See the docs in openqa_fedora_tools) and see if you can run the tests. If you're using Docker, uh...sorry. You somehow need to set things up so the workers can use tap interfaces that can talk to each other and are NATed to the outside world. Have fun. I can talk you through it on IRC... Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel Reviewed By: garretraziel Subscribers: tflink Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D831
2016-05-04 18:53:11 +00:00
}
sub console_switch_layout {
# switcher key combo differs between layouts, for console
my $self = shift;
if (get_var("LANGUAGE", "") eq "russian") {
send_key "ctrl-shift";
}
}
sub get_host_dns {
# get DNS server addresses from the host
my @forwards;
open(FH, '<', "/etc/resolv.conf");
while (<FH>) {
if ($_ =~ m/^nameserver +(.+)/) {
push @forwards, $1;
}
}
return @forwards;
}
sub boot_decrypt {
# decrypt storage during boot; arg is timeout (in seconds)
my $self = shift;
my $timeout = shift || 60;
assert_screen "boot_enter_passphrase", $timeout; #
type_string get_var("ENCRYPT_PASSWORD");
send_key "ret";
}
create fedora base class, factor out console login Summary: Root console in anaconda got broken by RHBZ #1222413 - no shell on tty2. Decided to clean up console use in general as part of fixing it. This creates a class 'fedorabase' and has 'anacondalog' and 'fedoralog' both inherit from it. boot_to_login_screen is moved there (as it seems appropriate) and it has a new method, console_login, which basically handles 'get me a shell on a console': if we're already at one it returns, if not it'll type the user name and the password *if necessary* (sometimes it's not) and return once it sees a prompt. It takes a hash of named parameters for user, password and 'check', which is whether it should die if it fails to reach a console or not (some users don't want it to). anacondalog and fedoralog both get 'root_console' methods which do something appropriate and then call console_login; both have a hash of named parameters, anacondalog's version only bothers with 'check', while fedoralog's also accepts 'tty' to pick the tty to use. This also adjusts all things which try to get to a console prompt to use either root_console or console_login as appropriate. It also tweaks the needle tags a bit, drops some unneeded needles, and adds a new 'user console prompt' needle; we really just need two versions of the root prompt needle and two of the user prompt needle (one for <F23, one for F23+ - the console font changed in F23, and the @ character at least doesn't match between the two). I think we still need the <F23 case for upgrade tests, for now. Test Plan: Do a full test run and see that more tests succeed. I've done a run on happyassassin with a hack to workaround the SELinux issue for interactive installs, and the results look good. I also fiddled about a bit to test some different cases, like forcing a failure in a live test to test post_fail_hook (and hence root_console) in that scenario, and forcing failures after some console commands had been run to check that it DTRT when we've already reached a console, etc. Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel Reviewed By: jskladan, garretraziel Subscribers: tflink Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D462
2015-07-22 18:24:40 +00:00
1;
# vim: set sw=4 et: