2015-01-26 10:33:26 +00:00
|
|
|
#!/usr/share/openqa/script/load_templates
|
|
|
|
|
#
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
# Fedora Machines, Products, TestSuites and JobTemplates
|
2015-01-26 10:33:26 +00:00
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
|
# use load_templates to load the file into the database
|
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
JobTemplates => [
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
2015-01-26 13:39:49 +00:00
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
templates: drop 'variables', move 'prio' to JobTemplates
Summary:
this is following a couple of upstream changes I noticeed while
playing with dump_templates. Upstream has completely got rid of
the 'variables' keys from all dicts, and when you run dump_
templates the output does not contain any 'variables' keys, so
it seems reasonable to ditch these entirely (I think it was some
old thing that got subsumed into 'settings'). Also, when you
run dump_templates the 'prio' values come out in JobTemplates,
not in TestSuites; if you look at load_templates there's a bit
marked "we have to migrate the prio from the TestSuite to the
JobTemplate" which does exactly what it sounds like, so it
seems a good idea to move these instead of relying on that to
always be there.
While I had to re-do all the priorities anyway I tried to clean
them up a bit. The idea is roughly this:
10 - 19: most-critical sanity tests (i.e. default_install)
20 - 29: Alpha tests
30 - 39: Beta tests
40 - 49: Final tests
50+ : Optional tests
within each group I ordered 64-bit first, UEFI second, and
32-bit last (usually just as x0 / x1 / x2).
Test Plan:
Check that the file is valid and loads correctly,
and that everything works more or less the same except the
order of tests run is a bit different.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: jskladan, garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D692
2015-12-16 21:03:41 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 10,
|
2015-01-26 10:33:26 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
2015-01-26 13:39:49 +00:00
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
Pungi 4 conversion: handle Pungi-derived BUILD and FLAVOR
With the arrival of Pungi 4, the scheduler is no longer using
fedfind-provided BUILD and FLAVOR values, but ones derived from
Pungi properties. BUILD is now simply the Pungi compose_id.
FLAVOR is produced by joining the Pungi variant, type, and
format with '-' characters as the separators.
Pungi, unfortunately, does not treat 'Rawhide' as a release, it
synthesizes a release number for Rawhide composes and places
that in the compose ID. To cope with that, for now, the
scheduler will set RAWHIDE to '1' if the compose is a Rawhide
one. As we have to adapt all places where we parse the release
in any case, this commit consolidates them into a fedorabase
subroutine.
For the one place where we also used to parse the 'milestone'
from fedfind, there is a placeholder get_milestone subroutine
which currently returns an empty string, as I don't yet have a
good handle on how to draw the kinds of distinctions fedfind
mapped to 'milestone' from Pungi metadata.
2016-01-28 04:48:04 +00:00
|
|
|
flavor => "Workstation-live-iso",
|
2015-03-18 21:28:03 +00:00
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
2015-01-26 10:33:26 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
2016-03-24 20:38:32 +00:00
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_default_upload" },
|
2015-01-26 10:33:26 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
2015-09-15 09:04:01 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "uefi" },
|
templates: drop 'variables', move 'prio' to JobTemplates
Summary:
this is following a couple of upstream changes I noticeed while
playing with dump_templates. Upstream has completely got rid of
the 'variables' keys from all dicts, and when you run dump_
templates the output does not contain any 'variables' keys, so
it seems reasonable to ditch these entirely (I think it was some
old thing that got subsumed into 'settings'). Also, when you
run dump_templates the 'prio' values come out in JobTemplates,
not in TestSuites; if you look at load_templates there's a bit
marked "we have to migrate the prio from the TestSuite to the
JobTemplate" which does exactly what it sounds like, so it
seems a good idea to move these instead of relying on that to
always be there.
While I had to re-do all the priorities anyway I tried to clean
them up a bit. The idea is roughly this:
10 - 19: most-critical sanity tests (i.e. default_install)
20 - 29: Alpha tests
30 - 39: Beta tests
40 - 49: Final tests
50+ : Optional tests
within each group I ordered 64-bit first, UEFI second, and
32-bit last (usually just as x0 / x1 / x2).
Test Plan:
Check that the file is valid and loads correctly,
and that everything works more or less the same except the
order of tests run is a bit different.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: jskladan, garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D692
2015-12-16 21:03:41 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 11,
|
2015-09-15 09:04:01 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
Pungi 4 conversion: handle Pungi-derived BUILD and FLAVOR
With the arrival of Pungi 4, the scheduler is no longer using
fedfind-provided BUILD and FLAVOR values, but ones derived from
Pungi properties. BUILD is now simply the Pungi compose_id.
FLAVOR is produced by joining the Pungi variant, type, and
format with '-' characters as the separators.
Pungi, unfortunately, does not treat 'Rawhide' as a release, it
synthesizes a release number for Rawhide composes and places
that in the compose ID. To cope with that, for now, the
scheduler will set RAWHIDE to '1' if the compose is a Rawhide
one. As we have to adapt all places where we parse the release
in any case, this commit consolidates them into a fedorabase
subroutine.
For the one place where we also used to parse the 'milestone'
from fedfind, there is a placeholder get_milestone subroutine
which currently returns an empty string, as I don't yet have a
good handle on how to draw the kinds of distinctions fedfind
mapped to 'milestone' from Pungi metadata.
2016-01-28 04:48:04 +00:00
|
|
|
flavor => "Workstation-live-iso",
|
2015-09-15 09:04:01 +00:00
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_default" },
|
2015-09-15 09:04:01 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
2016-05-18 12:04:45 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "ARM" },
|
2017-02-21 01:33:14 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 12,
|
2016-05-18 12:04:45 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "arm",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_arm_image_deployment_upload" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2015-02-13 09:58:24 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
templates: drop 'variables', move 'prio' to JobTemplates
Summary:
this is following a couple of upstream changes I noticeed while
playing with dump_templates. Upstream has completely got rid of
the 'variables' keys from all dicts, and when you run dump_
templates the output does not contain any 'variables' keys, so
it seems reasonable to ditch these entirely (I think it was some
old thing that got subsumed into 'settings'). Also, when you
run dump_templates the 'prio' values come out in JobTemplates,
not in TestSuites; if you look at load_templates there's a bit
marked "we have to migrate the prio from the TestSuite to the
JobTemplate" which does exactly what it sounds like, so it
seems a good idea to move these instead of relying on that to
always be there.
While I had to re-do all the priorities anyway I tried to clean
them up a bit. The idea is roughly this:
10 - 19: most-critical sanity tests (i.e. default_install)
20 - 29: Alpha tests
30 - 39: Beta tests
40 - 49: Final tests
50+ : Optional tests
within each group I ordered 64-bit first, UEFI second, and
32-bit last (usually just as x0 / x1 / x2).
Test Plan:
Check that the file is valid and loads correctly,
and that everything works more or less the same except the
order of tests run is a bit different.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: jskladan, garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D692
2015-12-16 21:03:41 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 10,
|
2015-02-13 09:58:24 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
Pungi 4 conversion: handle Pungi-derived BUILD and FLAVOR
With the arrival of Pungi 4, the scheduler is no longer using
fedfind-provided BUILD and FLAVOR values, but ones derived from
Pungi properties. BUILD is now simply the Pungi compose_id.
FLAVOR is produced by joining the Pungi variant, type, and
format with '-' characters as the separators.
Pungi, unfortunately, does not treat 'Rawhide' as a release, it
synthesizes a release number for Rawhide composes and places
that in the compose ID. To cope with that, for now, the
scheduler will set RAWHIDE to '1' if the compose is a Rawhide
one. As we have to adapt all places where we parse the release
in any case, this commit consolidates them into a fedorabase
subroutine.
For the one place where we also used to parse the 'milestone'
from fedfind, there is a placeholder get_milestone subroutine
which currently returns an empty string, as I don't yet have a
good handle on how to draw the kinds of distinctions fedfind
mapped to 'milestone' from Pungi metadata.
2016-01-28 04:48:04 +00:00
|
|
|
flavor => "Server-boot-iso",
|
2015-03-18 21:28:03 +00:00
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_default" },
|
2015-03-18 21:28:03 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
2015-09-15 09:04:01 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "uefi" },
|
templates: drop 'variables', move 'prio' to JobTemplates
Summary:
this is following a couple of upstream changes I noticeed while
playing with dump_templates. Upstream has completely got rid of
the 'variables' keys from all dicts, and when you run dump_
templates the output does not contain any 'variables' keys, so
it seems reasonable to ditch these entirely (I think it was some
old thing that got subsumed into 'settings'). Also, when you
run dump_templates the 'prio' values come out in JobTemplates,
not in TestSuites; if you look at load_templates there's a bit
marked "we have to migrate the prio from the TestSuite to the
JobTemplate" which does exactly what it sounds like, so it
seems a good idea to move these instead of relying on that to
always be there.
While I had to re-do all the priorities anyway I tried to clean
them up a bit. The idea is roughly this:
10 - 19: most-critical sanity tests (i.e. default_install)
20 - 29: Alpha tests
30 - 39: Beta tests
40 - 49: Final tests
50+ : Optional tests
within each group I ordered 64-bit first, UEFI second, and
32-bit last (usually just as x0 / x1 / x2).
Test Plan:
Check that the file is valid and loads correctly,
and that everything works more or less the same except the
order of tests run is a bit different.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: jskladan, garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D692
2015-12-16 21:03:41 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 11,
|
2015-09-15 09:04:01 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
Pungi 4 conversion: handle Pungi-derived BUILD and FLAVOR
With the arrival of Pungi 4, the scheduler is no longer using
fedfind-provided BUILD and FLAVOR values, but ones derived from
Pungi properties. BUILD is now simply the Pungi compose_id.
FLAVOR is produced by joining the Pungi variant, type, and
format with '-' characters as the separators.
Pungi, unfortunately, does not treat 'Rawhide' as a release, it
synthesizes a release number for Rawhide composes and places
that in the compose ID. To cope with that, for now, the
scheduler will set RAWHIDE to '1' if the compose is a Rawhide
one. As we have to adapt all places where we parse the release
in any case, this commit consolidates them into a fedorabase
subroutine.
For the one place where we also used to parse the 'milestone'
from fedfind, there is a placeholder get_milestone subroutine
which currently returns an empty string, as I don't yet have a
good handle on how to draw the kinds of distinctions fedfind
mapped to 'milestone' from Pungi metadata.
2016-01-28 04:48:04 +00:00
|
|
|
flavor => "Server-boot-iso",
|
2015-09-15 09:04:01 +00:00
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_default" },
|
2015-09-15 09:04:01 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
2015-10-06 22:27:27 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
templates: drop 'variables', move 'prio' to JobTemplates
Summary:
this is following a couple of upstream changes I noticeed while
playing with dump_templates. Upstream has completely got rid of
the 'variables' keys from all dicts, and when you run dump_
templates the output does not contain any 'variables' keys, so
it seems reasonable to ditch these entirely (I think it was some
old thing that got subsumed into 'settings'). Also, when you
run dump_templates the 'prio' values come out in JobTemplates,
not in TestSuites; if you look at load_templates there's a bit
marked "we have to migrate the prio from the TestSuite to the
JobTemplate" which does exactly what it sounds like, so it
seems a good idea to move these instead of relying on that to
always be there.
While I had to re-do all the priorities anyway I tried to clean
them up a bit. The idea is roughly this:
10 - 19: most-critical sanity tests (i.e. default_install)
20 - 29: Alpha tests
30 - 39: Beta tests
40 - 49: Final tests
50+ : Optional tests
within each group I ordered 64-bit first, UEFI second, and
32-bit last (usually just as x0 / x1 / x2).
Test Plan:
Check that the file is valid and loads correctly,
and that everything works more or less the same except the
order of tests run is a bit different.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: jskladan, garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D692
2015-12-16 21:03:41 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 10,
|
2015-10-06 22:27:27 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
Pungi 4 conversion: handle Pungi-derived BUILD and FLAVOR
With the arrival of Pungi 4, the scheduler is no longer using
fedfind-provided BUILD and FLAVOR values, but ones derived from
Pungi properties. BUILD is now simply the Pungi compose_id.
FLAVOR is produced by joining the Pungi variant, type, and
format with '-' characters as the separators.
Pungi, unfortunately, does not treat 'Rawhide' as a release, it
synthesizes a release number for Rawhide composes and places
that in the compose ID. To cope with that, for now, the
scheduler will set RAWHIDE to '1' if the compose is a Rawhide
one. As we have to adapt all places where we parse the release
in any case, this commit consolidates them into a fedorabase
subroutine.
For the one place where we also used to parse the 'milestone'
from fedfind, there is a placeholder get_milestone subroutine
which currently returns an empty string, as I don't yet have a
good handle on how to draw the kinds of distinctions fedfind
mapped to 'milestone' from Pungi metadata.
2016-01-28 04:48:04 +00:00
|
|
|
flavor => "Server-dvd-iso",
|
2015-10-06 22:27:27 +00:00
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-03-24 20:38:32 +00:00
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_default_upload" },
|
2015-10-06 22:27:27 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
2015-12-22 08:23:25 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "uefi" },
|
|
|
|
|
prio => 11,
|
|
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
Pungi 4 conversion: handle Pungi-derived BUILD and FLAVOR
With the arrival of Pungi 4, the scheduler is no longer using
fedfind-provided BUILD and FLAVOR values, but ones derived from
Pungi properties. BUILD is now simply the Pungi compose_id.
FLAVOR is produced by joining the Pungi variant, type, and
format with '-' characters as the separators.
Pungi, unfortunately, does not treat 'Rawhide' as a release, it
synthesizes a release number for Rawhide composes and places
that in the compose ID. To cope with that, for now, the
scheduler will set RAWHIDE to '1' if the compose is a Rawhide
one. As we have to adapt all places where we parse the release
in any case, this commit consolidates them into a fedorabase
subroutine.
For the one place where we also used to parse the 'milestone'
from fedfind, there is a placeholder get_milestone subroutine
which currently returns an empty string, as I don't yet have a
good handle on how to draw the kinds of distinctions fedfind
mapped to 'milestone' from Pungi metadata.
2016-01-28 04:48:04 +00:00
|
|
|
flavor => "Server-dvd-iso",
|
2015-12-22 08:23:25 +00:00
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_default" },
|
2015-12-22 08:23:25 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
2015-03-18 21:28:03 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
templates: drop 'variables', move 'prio' to JobTemplates
Summary:
this is following a couple of upstream changes I noticeed while
playing with dump_templates. Upstream has completely got rid of
the 'variables' keys from all dicts, and when you run dump_
templates the output does not contain any 'variables' keys, so
it seems reasonable to ditch these entirely (I think it was some
old thing that got subsumed into 'settings'). Also, when you
run dump_templates the 'prio' values come out in JobTemplates,
not in TestSuites; if you look at load_templates there's a bit
marked "we have to migrate the prio from the TestSuite to the
JobTemplate" which does exactly what it sounds like, so it
seems a good idea to move these instead of relying on that to
always be there.
While I had to re-do all the priorities anyway I tried to clean
them up a bit. The idea is roughly this:
10 - 19: most-critical sanity tests (i.e. default_install)
20 - 29: Alpha tests
30 - 39: Beta tests
40 - 49: Final tests
50+ : Optional tests
within each group I ordered 64-bit first, UEFI second, and
32-bit last (usually just as x0 / x1 / x2).
Test Plan:
Check that the file is valid and loads correctly,
and that everything works more or less the same except the
order of tests run is a bit different.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: jskladan, garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D692
2015-12-16 21:03:41 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 10,
|
2015-03-18 21:28:03 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
Pungi 4 conversion: handle Pungi-derived BUILD and FLAVOR
With the arrival of Pungi 4, the scheduler is no longer using
fedfind-provided BUILD and FLAVOR values, but ones derived from
Pungi properties. BUILD is now simply the Pungi compose_id.
FLAVOR is produced by joining the Pungi variant, type, and
format with '-' characters as the separators.
Pungi, unfortunately, does not treat 'Rawhide' as a release, it
synthesizes a release number for Rawhide composes and places
that in the compose ID. To cope with that, for now, the
scheduler will set RAWHIDE to '1' if the compose is a Rawhide
one. As we have to adapt all places where we parse the release
in any case, this commit consolidates them into a fedorabase
subroutine.
For the one place where we also used to parse the 'milestone'
from fedfind, there is a placeholder get_milestone subroutine
which currently returns an empty string, as I don't yet have a
good handle on how to draw the kinds of distinctions fedfind
mapped to 'milestone' from Pungi metadata.
2016-01-28 04:48:04 +00:00
|
|
|
flavor => "Everything-boot-iso",
|
2015-03-18 21:28:03 +00:00
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_default" },
|
2015-03-18 21:28:03 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
2015-09-15 09:04:01 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "uefi" },
|
templates: drop 'variables', move 'prio' to JobTemplates
Summary:
this is following a couple of upstream changes I noticeed while
playing with dump_templates. Upstream has completely got rid of
the 'variables' keys from all dicts, and when you run dump_
templates the output does not contain any 'variables' keys, so
it seems reasonable to ditch these entirely (I think it was some
old thing that got subsumed into 'settings'). Also, when you
run dump_templates the 'prio' values come out in JobTemplates,
not in TestSuites; if you look at load_templates there's a bit
marked "we have to migrate the prio from the TestSuite to the
JobTemplate" which does exactly what it sounds like, so it
seems a good idea to move these instead of relying on that to
always be there.
While I had to re-do all the priorities anyway I tried to clean
them up a bit. The idea is roughly this:
10 - 19: most-critical sanity tests (i.e. default_install)
20 - 29: Alpha tests
30 - 39: Beta tests
40 - 49: Final tests
50+ : Optional tests
within each group I ordered 64-bit first, UEFI second, and
32-bit last (usually just as x0 / x1 / x2).
Test Plan:
Check that the file is valid and loads correctly,
and that everything works more or less the same except the
order of tests run is a bit different.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: jskladan, garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D692
2015-12-16 21:03:41 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 11,
|
2015-09-15 09:04:01 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
Pungi 4 conversion: handle Pungi-derived BUILD and FLAVOR
With the arrival of Pungi 4, the scheduler is no longer using
fedfind-provided BUILD and FLAVOR values, but ones derived from
Pungi properties. BUILD is now simply the Pungi compose_id.
FLAVOR is produced by joining the Pungi variant, type, and
format with '-' characters as the separators.
Pungi, unfortunately, does not treat 'Rawhide' as a release, it
synthesizes a release number for Rawhide composes and places
that in the compose ID. To cope with that, for now, the
scheduler will set RAWHIDE to '1' if the compose is a Rawhide
one. As we have to adapt all places where we parse the release
in any case, this commit consolidates them into a fedorabase
subroutine.
For the one place where we also used to parse the 'milestone'
from fedfind, there is a placeholder get_milestone subroutine
which currently returns an empty string, as I don't yet have a
good handle on how to draw the kinds of distinctions fedfind
mapped to 'milestone' from Pungi metadata.
2016-01-28 04:48:04 +00:00
|
|
|
flavor => "Everything-boot-iso",
|
2015-09-15 09:04:01 +00:00
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_default" },
|
2015-09-15 09:04:01 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
2015-09-14 06:52:37 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
templates: drop 'variables', move 'prio' to JobTemplates
Summary:
this is following a couple of upstream changes I noticeed while
playing with dump_templates. Upstream has completely got rid of
the 'variables' keys from all dicts, and when you run dump_
templates the output does not contain any 'variables' keys, so
it seems reasonable to ditch these entirely (I think it was some
old thing that got subsumed into 'settings'). Also, when you
run dump_templates the 'prio' values come out in JobTemplates,
not in TestSuites; if you look at load_templates there's a bit
marked "we have to migrate the prio from the TestSuite to the
JobTemplate" which does exactly what it sounds like, so it
seems a good idea to move these instead of relying on that to
always be there.
While I had to re-do all the priorities anyway I tried to clean
them up a bit. The idea is roughly this:
10 - 19: most-critical sanity tests (i.e. default_install)
20 - 29: Alpha tests
30 - 39: Beta tests
40 - 49: Final tests
50+ : Optional tests
within each group I ordered 64-bit first, UEFI second, and
32-bit last (usually just as x0 / x1 / x2).
Test Plan:
Check that the file is valid and loads correctly,
and that everything works more or less the same except the
order of tests run is a bit different.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: jskladan, garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D692
2015-12-16 21:03:41 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 15,
|
2015-12-22 08:23:25 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
Pungi 4 conversion: handle Pungi-derived BUILD and FLAVOR
With the arrival of Pungi 4, the scheduler is no longer using
fedfind-provided BUILD and FLAVOR values, but ones derived from
Pungi properties. BUILD is now simply the Pungi compose_id.
FLAVOR is produced by joining the Pungi variant, type, and
format with '-' characters as the separators.
Pungi, unfortunately, does not treat 'Rawhide' as a release, it
synthesizes a release number for Rawhide composes and places
that in the compose ID. To cope with that, for now, the
scheduler will set RAWHIDE to '1' if the compose is a Rawhide
one. As we have to adapt all places where we parse the release
in any case, this commit consolidates them into a fedorabase
subroutine.
For the one place where we also used to parse the 'milestone'
from fedfind, there is a placeholder get_milestone subroutine
which currently returns an empty string, as I don't yet have a
good handle on how to draw the kinds of distinctions fedfind
mapped to 'milestone' from Pungi metadata.
2016-01-28 04:48:04 +00:00
|
|
|
flavor => "Workstation-boot-iso",
|
2015-12-22 08:23:25 +00:00
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_default" },
|
2015-12-22 08:23:25 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
2017-01-16 17:30:14 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
|
|
|
|
prio => 100,
|
|
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "Workstation-boot-iso",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "memory_check" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "uefi" },
|
|
|
|
|
prio => 100,
|
|
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "Workstation-boot-iso",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "memory_check" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2015-12-22 08:23:25 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "uefi" },
|
|
|
|
|
prio => 16,
|
|
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
Pungi 4 conversion: handle Pungi-derived BUILD and FLAVOR
With the arrival of Pungi 4, the scheduler is no longer using
fedfind-provided BUILD and FLAVOR values, but ones derived from
Pungi properties. BUILD is now simply the Pungi compose_id.
FLAVOR is produced by joining the Pungi variant, type, and
format with '-' characters as the separators.
Pungi, unfortunately, does not treat 'Rawhide' as a release, it
synthesizes a release number for Rawhide composes and places
that in the compose ID. To cope with that, for now, the
scheduler will set RAWHIDE to '1' if the compose is a Rawhide
one. As we have to adapt all places where we parse the release
in any case, this commit consolidates them into a fedorabase
subroutine.
For the one place where we also used to parse the 'milestone'
from fedfind, there is a placeholder get_milestone subroutine
which currently returns an empty string, as I don't yet have a
good handle on how to draw the kinds of distinctions fedfind
mapped to 'milestone' from Pungi metadata.
2016-01-28 04:48:04 +00:00
|
|
|
flavor => "Workstation-boot-iso",
|
2015-12-22 08:23:25 +00:00
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_default" },
|
2015-12-22 08:23:25 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
|
|
|
|
prio => 15,
|
|
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
Pungi 4 conversion: handle Pungi-derived BUILD and FLAVOR
With the arrival of Pungi 4, the scheduler is no longer using
fedfind-provided BUILD and FLAVOR values, but ones derived from
Pungi properties. BUILD is now simply the Pungi compose_id.
FLAVOR is produced by joining the Pungi variant, type, and
format with '-' characters as the separators.
Pungi, unfortunately, does not treat 'Rawhide' as a release, it
synthesizes a release number for Rawhide composes and places
that in the compose ID. To cope with that, for now, the
scheduler will set RAWHIDE to '1' if the compose is a Rawhide
one. As we have to adapt all places where we parse the release
in any case, this commit consolidates them into a fedorabase
subroutine.
For the one place where we also used to parse the 'milestone'
from fedfind, there is a placeholder get_milestone subroutine
which currently returns an empty string, as I don't yet have a
good handle on how to draw the kinds of distinctions fedfind
mapped to 'milestone' from Pungi metadata.
2016-01-28 04:48:04 +00:00
|
|
|
flavor => "KDE-live-iso",
|
2015-12-22 08:23:25 +00:00
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-03-24 20:38:32 +00:00
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_default_upload" },
|
2015-12-22 08:23:25 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "uefi" },
|
|
|
|
|
prio => 16,
|
2015-09-14 06:52:37 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
Pungi 4 conversion: handle Pungi-derived BUILD and FLAVOR
With the arrival of Pungi 4, the scheduler is no longer using
fedfind-provided BUILD and FLAVOR values, but ones derived from
Pungi properties. BUILD is now simply the Pungi compose_id.
FLAVOR is produced by joining the Pungi variant, type, and
format with '-' characters as the separators.
Pungi, unfortunately, does not treat 'Rawhide' as a release, it
synthesizes a release number for Rawhide composes and places
that in the compose ID. To cope with that, for now, the
scheduler will set RAWHIDE to '1' if the compose is a Rawhide
one. As we have to adapt all places where we parse the release
in any case, this commit consolidates them into a fedorabase
subroutine.
For the one place where we also used to parse the 'milestone'
from fedfind, there is a placeholder get_milestone subroutine
which currently returns an empty string, as I don't yet have a
good handle on how to draw the kinds of distinctions fedfind
mapped to 'milestone' from Pungi metadata.
2016-01-28 04:48:04 +00:00
|
|
|
flavor => "KDE-live-iso",
|
2015-09-14 06:52:37 +00:00
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_default" },
|
2015-09-14 06:52:37 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
add a default_install test for cloud atomic installer image
Summary:
We have these 'atomic installer' images (so far just Cloud),
and maxamillion wanted to get them tested. Turns out it's
pretty trivial - they look much like other installs. Only
little wrinkle is they have a reduced hub (no repository
needles) like live images, but are not like live images in
any other way, so I rejigged the 'small hub needle filtering'
handling a bit.
There will be an accompanying diff for tools, and also some
changes in fedfind (these images are getting built nightly
for *current stable*, and it'd be good to test those).
Because we'd like to test the 22 nightlies, I had to add some
needles for 'olddpi' versions of a few screens. See 2e4c1c2 -
the 22 Atomic installer images still have the old GTK+ code
meaning they run at 96.09dpi. I only retook the necessary
needles for the default-install test, if we add any others we
made need to retake a few more needles.
Test Plan:
Schedule jobs for a compose with the atomic installer
image. You will need the matching openqa_fedora_tools diff and
the very latest git fedfind. Check the test for that image runs,
all other tests run as usual, excessive images are not
downloaded, and the atomic installer is not used for running
universal tests.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D595
2015-09-29 18:36:11 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
templates: drop 'variables', move 'prio' to JobTemplates
Summary:
this is following a couple of upstream changes I noticeed while
playing with dump_templates. Upstream has completely got rid of
the 'variables' keys from all dicts, and when you run dump_
templates the output does not contain any 'variables' keys, so
it seems reasonable to ditch these entirely (I think it was some
old thing that got subsumed into 'settings'). Also, when you
run dump_templates the 'prio' values come out in JobTemplates,
not in TestSuites; if you look at load_templates there's a bit
marked "we have to migrate the prio from the TestSuite to the
JobTemplate" which does exactly what it sounds like, so it
seems a good idea to move these instead of relying on that to
always be there.
While I had to re-do all the priorities anyway I tried to clean
them up a bit. The idea is roughly this:
10 - 19: most-critical sanity tests (i.e. default_install)
20 - 29: Alpha tests
30 - 39: Beta tests
40 - 49: Final tests
50+ : Optional tests
within each group I ordered 64-bit first, UEFI second, and
32-bit last (usually just as x0 / x1 / x2).
Test Plan:
Check that the file is valid and loads correctly,
and that everything works more or less the same except the
order of tests run is a bit different.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: jskladan, garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D692
2015-12-16 21:03:41 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 50,
|
add a default_install test for cloud atomic installer image
Summary:
We have these 'atomic installer' images (so far just Cloud),
and maxamillion wanted to get them tested. Turns out it's
pretty trivial - they look much like other installs. Only
little wrinkle is they have a reduced hub (no repository
needles) like live images, but are not like live images in
any other way, so I rejigged the 'small hub needle filtering'
handling a bit.
There will be an accompanying diff for tools, and also some
changes in fedfind (these images are getting built nightly
for *current stable*, and it'd be good to test those).
Because we'd like to test the 22 nightlies, I had to add some
needles for 'olddpi' versions of a few screens. See 2e4c1c2 -
the 22 Atomic installer images still have the old GTK+ code
meaning they run at 96.09dpi. I only retook the necessary
needles for the default-install test, if we add any others we
made need to retake a few more needles.
Test Plan:
Schedule jobs for a compose with the atomic installer
image. You will need the matching openqa_fedora_tools diff and
the very latest git fedfind. Check the test for that image runs,
all other tests run as usual, excessive images are not
downloaded, and the atomic installer is not used for running
universal tests.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D595
2015-09-29 18:36:11 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
2016-10-05 23:43:07 +00:00
|
|
|
flavor => "Atomic-dvd_ostree-iso",
|
add a default_install test for cloud atomic installer image
Summary:
We have these 'atomic installer' images (so far just Cloud),
and maxamillion wanted to get them tested. Turns out it's
pretty trivial - they look much like other installs. Only
little wrinkle is they have a reduced hub (no repository
needles) like live images, but are not like live images in
any other way, so I rejigged the 'small hub needle filtering'
handling a bit.
There will be an accompanying diff for tools, and also some
changes in fedfind (these images are getting built nightly
for *current stable*, and it'd be good to test those).
Because we'd like to test the 22 nightlies, I had to add some
needles for 'olddpi' versions of a few screens. See 2e4c1c2 -
the 22 Atomic installer images still have the old GTK+ code
meaning they run at 96.09dpi. I only retook the necessary
needles for the default-install test, if we add any others we
made need to retake a few more needles.
Test Plan:
Schedule jobs for a compose with the atomic installer
image. You will need the matching openqa_fedora_tools diff and
the very latest git fedfind. Check the test for that image runs,
all other tests run as usual, excessive images are not
downloaded, and the atomic installer is not used for running
universal tests.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D595
2015-09-29 18:36:11 +00:00
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_default" },
|
add a default_install test for cloud atomic installer image
Summary:
We have these 'atomic installer' images (so far just Cloud),
and maxamillion wanted to get them tested. Turns out it's
pretty trivial - they look much like other installs. Only
little wrinkle is they have a reduced hub (no repository
needles) like live images, but are not like live images in
any other way, so I rejigged the 'small hub needle filtering'
handling a bit.
There will be an accompanying diff for tools, and also some
changes in fedfind (these images are getting built nightly
for *current stable*, and it'd be good to test those).
Because we'd like to test the 22 nightlies, I had to add some
needles for 'olddpi' versions of a few screens. See 2e4c1c2 -
the 22 Atomic installer images still have the old GTK+ code
meaning they run at 96.09dpi. I only retook the necessary
needles for the default-install test, if we add any others we
made need to retake a few more needles.
Test Plan:
Schedule jobs for a compose with the atomic installer
image. You will need the matching openqa_fedora_tools diff and
the very latest git fedfind. Check the test for that image runs,
all other tests run as usual, excessive images are not
downloaded, and the atomic installer is not used for running
universal tests.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D595
2015-09-29 18:36:11 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
2017-04-18 23:48:37 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "uefi" },
|
|
|
|
|
prio => 51,
|
|
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "Atomic-dvd_ostree-iso",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_default" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2017-06-15 21:11:17 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
|
|
|
|
prio => 50,
|
|
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "Workstation-dvd_ostree-iso",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_default_upload" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "uefi" },
|
|
|
|
|
prio => 51,
|
|
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "Workstation-dvd_ostree-iso",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_default" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2017-04-03 23:23:45 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
|
|
|
|
prio => 20,
|
|
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "Workstation-live-iso",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_no_user" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
|
|
|
|
prio => 21,
|
|
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "KDE-live-iso",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_no_user" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2017-06-15 21:11:17 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
|
|
|
|
prio => 50,
|
|
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "Workstation-dvd_ostree-iso",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_no_user" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
add a base_selinux test (follow-on from default_install)
Summary:
so here's our first attempt to use the 'carry on from a previous
test' stuff! This adds a base_selinux test that uses a disk
image from a previous default_install run, and adds jobtemplates
to run base_selinux for appropriate products: generic_boot
(for nightly tests), server_dvd, and workstation_live. Note that
you'll want to either update to the newest openQA package I just
built in COPR or create /var/lib/openqa/share/factory/tmp owned
by geekotest; openQA tries to use that directory as MOJO_TMPDIR
but in 4.2, if the directory doesn't exist, it doesn't create it,
and we wind up with the default MOJO_TMPDIR which is /tmp; when
the disk image is uploaded it creates a huge temp file in /tmp
and may well exhaust the available space as it's a tmpfs. I've
backported a recent upstream commit that tries to create the
directory if it doesn't exist, in 4.2-10.
It seems like openQA is smart enough to figure out the
dependencies correctly, so the 'base_selinux' test for each
product depends on the 'default_install' test for the same
product (not any of the other default_install runs) and will
use the hard disk image it produces.
Test Plan:
Do a full test run and make sure base_selinux tests
appear for appropriate products, depend on the correct default_
install test, the default_install test uploads the hard disk
image correctly, and the base_selinux test runs correctly. And
of course that nothing else broke in the process...
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: jskladan
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D699
2015-12-17 20:46:14 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
|
|
|
|
prio => 40,
|
|
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
Pungi 4 conversion: handle Pungi-derived BUILD and FLAVOR
With the arrival of Pungi 4, the scheduler is no longer using
fedfind-provided BUILD and FLAVOR values, but ones derived from
Pungi properties. BUILD is now simply the Pungi compose_id.
FLAVOR is produced by joining the Pungi variant, type, and
format with '-' characters as the separators.
Pungi, unfortunately, does not treat 'Rawhide' as a release, it
synthesizes a release number for Rawhide composes and places
that in the compose ID. To cope with that, for now, the
scheduler will set RAWHIDE to '1' if the compose is a Rawhide
one. As we have to adapt all places where we parse the release
in any case, this commit consolidates them into a fedorabase
subroutine.
For the one place where we also used to parse the 'milestone'
from fedfind, there is a placeholder get_milestone subroutine
which currently returns an empty string, as I don't yet have a
good handle on how to draw the kinds of distinctions fedfind
mapped to 'milestone' from Pungi metadata.
2016-01-28 04:48:04 +00:00
|
|
|
flavor => "Workstation-live-iso",
|
add a base_selinux test (follow-on from default_install)
Summary:
so here's our first attempt to use the 'carry on from a previous
test' stuff! This adds a base_selinux test that uses a disk
image from a previous default_install run, and adds jobtemplates
to run base_selinux for appropriate products: generic_boot
(for nightly tests), server_dvd, and workstation_live. Note that
you'll want to either update to the newest openQA package I just
built in COPR or create /var/lib/openqa/share/factory/tmp owned
by geekotest; openQA tries to use that directory as MOJO_TMPDIR
but in 4.2, if the directory doesn't exist, it doesn't create it,
and we wind up with the default MOJO_TMPDIR which is /tmp; when
the disk image is uploaded it creates a huge temp file in /tmp
and may well exhaust the available space as it's a tmpfs. I've
backported a recent upstream commit that tries to create the
directory if it doesn't exist, in 4.2-10.
It seems like openQA is smart enough to figure out the
dependencies correctly, so the 'base_selinux' test for each
product depends on the 'default_install' test for the same
product (not any of the other default_install runs) and will
use the hard disk image it produces.
Test Plan:
Do a full test run and make sure base_selinux tests
appear for appropriate products, depend on the correct default_
install test, the default_install test uploads the hard disk
image correctly, and the base_selinux test runs correctly. And
of course that nothing else broke in the process...
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: jskladan
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D699
2015-12-17 20:46:14 +00:00
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "base_selinux" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
|
|
|
|
prio => 40,
|
|
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
Pungi 4 conversion: handle Pungi-derived BUILD and FLAVOR
With the arrival of Pungi 4, the scheduler is no longer using
fedfind-provided BUILD and FLAVOR values, but ones derived from
Pungi properties. BUILD is now simply the Pungi compose_id.
FLAVOR is produced by joining the Pungi variant, type, and
format with '-' characters as the separators.
Pungi, unfortunately, does not treat 'Rawhide' as a release, it
synthesizes a release number for Rawhide composes and places
that in the compose ID. To cope with that, for now, the
scheduler will set RAWHIDE to '1' if the compose is a Rawhide
one. As we have to adapt all places where we parse the release
in any case, this commit consolidates them into a fedorabase
subroutine.
For the one place where we also used to parse the 'milestone'
from fedfind, there is a placeholder get_milestone subroutine
which currently returns an empty string, as I don't yet have a
good handle on how to draw the kinds of distinctions fedfind
mapped to 'milestone' from Pungi metadata.
2016-01-28 04:48:04 +00:00
|
|
|
flavor => "Server-dvd-iso",
|
add a base_selinux test (follow-on from default_install)
Summary:
so here's our first attempt to use the 'carry on from a previous
test' stuff! This adds a base_selinux test that uses a disk
image from a previous default_install run, and adds jobtemplates
to run base_selinux for appropriate products: generic_boot
(for nightly tests), server_dvd, and workstation_live. Note that
you'll want to either update to the newest openQA package I just
built in COPR or create /var/lib/openqa/share/factory/tmp owned
by geekotest; openQA tries to use that directory as MOJO_TMPDIR
but in 4.2, if the directory doesn't exist, it doesn't create it,
and we wind up with the default MOJO_TMPDIR which is /tmp; when
the disk image is uploaded it creates a huge temp file in /tmp
and may well exhaust the available space as it's a tmpfs. I've
backported a recent upstream commit that tries to create the
directory if it doesn't exist, in 4.2-10.
It seems like openQA is smart enough to figure out the
dependencies correctly, so the 'base_selinux' test for each
product depends on the 'default_install' test for the same
product (not any of the other default_install runs) and will
use the hard disk image it produces.
Test Plan:
Do a full test run and make sure base_selinux tests
appear for appropriate products, depend on the correct default_
install test, the default_install test uploads the hard disk
image correctly, and the base_selinux test runs correctly. And
of course that nothing else broke in the process...
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: jskladan
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D699
2015-12-17 20:46:14 +00:00
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "base_selinux" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-01-14 18:38:14 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
|
|
|
|
prio => 42,
|
|
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
Pungi 4 conversion: handle Pungi-derived BUILD and FLAVOR
With the arrival of Pungi 4, the scheduler is no longer using
fedfind-provided BUILD and FLAVOR values, but ones derived from
Pungi properties. BUILD is now simply the Pungi compose_id.
FLAVOR is produced by joining the Pungi variant, type, and
format with '-' characters as the separators.
Pungi, unfortunately, does not treat 'Rawhide' as a release, it
synthesizes a release number for Rawhide composes and places
that in the compose ID. To cope with that, for now, the
scheduler will set RAWHIDE to '1' if the compose is a Rawhide
one. As we have to adapt all places where we parse the release
in any case, this commit consolidates them into a fedorabase
subroutine.
For the one place where we also used to parse the 'milestone'
from fedfind, there is a placeholder get_milestone subroutine
which currently returns an empty string, as I don't yet have a
good handle on how to draw the kinds of distinctions fedfind
mapped to 'milestone' from Pungi metadata.
2016-01-28 04:48:04 +00:00
|
|
|
flavor => "KDE-live-iso",
|
2016-01-14 18:38:14 +00:00
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "base_selinux" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2017-06-15 21:11:17 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
|
|
|
|
prio => 50,
|
|
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "Workstation-dvd_ostree-iso",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "base_selinux" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-01-08 17:01:33 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
|
|
|
|
prio => 40,
|
|
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
Pungi 4 conversion: handle Pungi-derived BUILD and FLAVOR
With the arrival of Pungi 4, the scheduler is no longer using
fedfind-provided BUILD and FLAVOR values, but ones derived from
Pungi properties. BUILD is now simply the Pungi compose_id.
FLAVOR is produced by joining the Pungi variant, type, and
format with '-' characters as the separators.
Pungi, unfortunately, does not treat 'Rawhide' as a release, it
synthesizes a release number for Rawhide composes and places
that in the compose ID. To cope with that, for now, the
scheduler will set RAWHIDE to '1' if the compose is a Rawhide
one. As we have to adapt all places where we parse the release
in any case, this commit consolidates them into a fedorabase
subroutine.
For the one place where we also used to parse the 'milestone'
from fedfind, there is a placeholder get_milestone subroutine
which currently returns an empty string, as I don't yet have a
good handle on how to draw the kinds of distinctions fedfind
mapped to 'milestone' from Pungi metadata.
2016-01-28 04:48:04 +00:00
|
|
|
flavor => "Workstation-live-iso",
|
2016-01-08 17:01:33 +00:00
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "base_services_start" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
|
|
|
|
prio => 40,
|
|
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
Pungi 4 conversion: handle Pungi-derived BUILD and FLAVOR
With the arrival of Pungi 4, the scheduler is no longer using
fedfind-provided BUILD and FLAVOR values, but ones derived from
Pungi properties. BUILD is now simply the Pungi compose_id.
FLAVOR is produced by joining the Pungi variant, type, and
format with '-' characters as the separators.
Pungi, unfortunately, does not treat 'Rawhide' as a release, it
synthesizes a release number for Rawhide composes and places
that in the compose ID. To cope with that, for now, the
scheduler will set RAWHIDE to '1' if the compose is a Rawhide
one. As we have to adapt all places where we parse the release
in any case, this commit consolidates them into a fedorabase
subroutine.
For the one place where we also used to parse the 'milestone'
from fedfind, there is a placeholder get_milestone subroutine
which currently returns an empty string, as I don't yet have a
good handle on how to draw the kinds of distinctions fedfind
mapped to 'milestone' from Pungi metadata.
2016-01-28 04:48:04 +00:00
|
|
|
flavor => "Server-dvd-iso",
|
2016-01-08 17:01:33 +00:00
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "base_services_start" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-01-14 18:38:14 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
|
|
|
|
prio => 42,
|
|
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
Pungi 4 conversion: handle Pungi-derived BUILD and FLAVOR
With the arrival of Pungi 4, the scheduler is no longer using
fedfind-provided BUILD and FLAVOR values, but ones derived from
Pungi properties. BUILD is now simply the Pungi compose_id.
FLAVOR is produced by joining the Pungi variant, type, and
format with '-' characters as the separators.
Pungi, unfortunately, does not treat 'Rawhide' as a release, it
synthesizes a release number for Rawhide composes and places
that in the compose ID. To cope with that, for now, the
scheduler will set RAWHIDE to '1' if the compose is a Rawhide
one. As we have to adapt all places where we parse the release
in any case, this commit consolidates them into a fedorabase
subroutine.
For the one place where we also used to parse the 'milestone'
from fedfind, there is a placeholder get_milestone subroutine
which currently returns an empty string, as I don't yet have a
good handle on how to draw the kinds of distinctions fedfind
mapped to 'milestone' from Pungi metadata.
2016-01-28 04:48:04 +00:00
|
|
|
flavor => "KDE-live-iso",
|
2016-01-14 18:38:14 +00:00
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "base_services_start" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2017-06-15 21:11:17 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
|
|
|
|
prio => 50,
|
|
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "Workstation-dvd_ostree-iso",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "base_services_start" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-05-27 10:36:15 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "ARM" },
|
2017-02-21 01:33:14 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 42,
|
2016-05-27 10:36:15 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "arm",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "base_services_start_arm" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-01-11 20:30:24 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
|
|
|
|
prio => 40,
|
|
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
Pungi 4 conversion: handle Pungi-derived BUILD and FLAVOR
With the arrival of Pungi 4, the scheduler is no longer using
fedfind-provided BUILD and FLAVOR values, but ones derived from
Pungi properties. BUILD is now simply the Pungi compose_id.
FLAVOR is produced by joining the Pungi variant, type, and
format with '-' characters as the separators.
Pungi, unfortunately, does not treat 'Rawhide' as a release, it
synthesizes a release number for Rawhide composes and places
that in the compose ID. To cope with that, for now, the
scheduler will set RAWHIDE to '1' if the compose is a Rawhide
one. As we have to adapt all places where we parse the release
in any case, this commit consolidates them into a fedorabase
subroutine.
For the one place where we also used to parse the 'milestone'
from fedfind, there is a placeholder get_milestone subroutine
which currently returns an empty string, as I don't yet have a
good handle on how to draw the kinds of distinctions fedfind
mapped to 'milestone' from Pungi metadata.
2016-01-28 04:48:04 +00:00
|
|
|
flavor => "Workstation-live-iso",
|
2016-01-11 20:30:24 +00:00
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "base_service_manipulation" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
|
|
|
|
prio => 40,
|
|
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
Pungi 4 conversion: handle Pungi-derived BUILD and FLAVOR
With the arrival of Pungi 4, the scheduler is no longer using
fedfind-provided BUILD and FLAVOR values, but ones derived from
Pungi properties. BUILD is now simply the Pungi compose_id.
FLAVOR is produced by joining the Pungi variant, type, and
format with '-' characters as the separators.
Pungi, unfortunately, does not treat 'Rawhide' as a release, it
synthesizes a release number for Rawhide composes and places
that in the compose ID. To cope with that, for now, the
scheduler will set RAWHIDE to '1' if the compose is a Rawhide
one. As we have to adapt all places where we parse the release
in any case, this commit consolidates them into a fedorabase
subroutine.
For the one place where we also used to parse the 'milestone'
from fedfind, there is a placeholder get_milestone subroutine
which currently returns an empty string, as I don't yet have a
good handle on how to draw the kinds of distinctions fedfind
mapped to 'milestone' from Pungi metadata.
2016-01-28 04:48:04 +00:00
|
|
|
flavor => "Server-dvd-iso",
|
2016-01-11 20:30:24 +00:00
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "base_service_manipulation" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-01-14 18:38:14 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
|
|
|
|
prio => 42,
|
|
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
Pungi 4 conversion: handle Pungi-derived BUILD and FLAVOR
With the arrival of Pungi 4, the scheduler is no longer using
fedfind-provided BUILD and FLAVOR values, but ones derived from
Pungi properties. BUILD is now simply the Pungi compose_id.
FLAVOR is produced by joining the Pungi variant, type, and
format with '-' characters as the separators.
Pungi, unfortunately, does not treat 'Rawhide' as a release, it
synthesizes a release number for Rawhide composes and places
that in the compose ID. To cope with that, for now, the
scheduler will set RAWHIDE to '1' if the compose is a Rawhide
one. As we have to adapt all places where we parse the release
in any case, this commit consolidates them into a fedorabase
subroutine.
For the one place where we also used to parse the 'milestone'
from fedfind, there is a placeholder get_milestone subroutine
which currently returns an empty string, as I don't yet have a
good handle on how to draw the kinds of distinctions fedfind
mapped to 'milestone' from Pungi metadata.
2016-01-28 04:48:04 +00:00
|
|
|
flavor => "KDE-live-iso",
|
2016-01-14 18:38:14 +00:00
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "base_service_manipulation" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2017-06-15 21:11:17 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
|
|
|
|
prio => 50,
|
|
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "Workstation-dvd_ostree-iso",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "base_service_manipulation" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-09-20 18:41:12 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
2017-02-21 01:33:14 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 20,
|
2016-09-20 18:41:12 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "Workstation-live-iso",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "base_update_cli" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
2017-02-21 01:33:14 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 20,
|
2016-09-20 18:41:12 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "Server-dvd-iso",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "base_update_cli" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
2017-02-21 01:33:14 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 22,
|
2016-09-20 18:41:12 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "KDE-live-iso",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "base_update_cli" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2017-06-01 09:06:04 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
|
|
|
|
prio => 20,
|
|
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "Workstation-live-iso",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "base_system_logging" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
|
|
|
|
prio => 20,
|
|
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "Server-dvd-iso",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "base_system_logging" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
|
|
|
|
prio => 22,
|
|
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "KDE-live-iso",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "base_system_logging" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2017-06-15 21:11:17 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
|
|
|
|
prio => 50,
|
|
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "Workstation-dvd_ostree-iso",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "base_system_logging" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-09-20 22:32:44 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
|
|
|
|
prio => 30,
|
|
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "Workstation-live-iso",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "desktop_update_graphical" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
|
|
|
|
prio => 32,
|
|
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "KDE-live-iso",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "desktop_update_graphical" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-05-05 23:39:47 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
2017-02-21 01:33:14 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 20,
|
2016-05-05 23:39:47 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "Workstation-live-iso",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "desktop_terminal" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
2017-02-21 01:33:14 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 22,
|
2016-05-05 23:39:47 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "KDE-live-iso",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "desktop_terminal" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2017-06-15 21:11:17 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
|
|
|
|
prio => 50,
|
|
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "Workstation-dvd_ostree-iso",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "desktop_terminal" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-08-03 20:22:29 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
2017-02-21 01:33:14 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 20,
|
2016-08-03 20:22:29 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "Workstation-live-iso",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "desktop_browser" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
2017-02-21 01:33:14 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 22,
|
2016-08-03 20:22:29 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "KDE-live-iso",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "desktop_browser" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2017-06-15 21:11:17 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
|
|
|
|
prio => 50,
|
|
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "Workstation-dvd_ostree-iso",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "desktop_browser" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
Force GNOME to notify updates, re-enable test on Workstation
Summary:
GNOME's update notification criteria are pretty braindead: it
fires the update check timer once on login then once every hour
thereafter, but only actually checks for and notifies of updates
once a day if it's after 6am(?!?!?!). So we have to do a bunch
of fiddling around to ensure we reliably get a notification.
Move the clock to 6am if it's earlier than that, and reset the
'last update check' timer to 48 hours ago, then log in to GNOME
after that.
Note: I thought this still wasn't fully reliable, but I've looked
into all the recent failures of either test on staging and
there's only one which was really 'no update notification came
up', and the logs clearly indicate PK did run an update check,
so I don't think that was a test bug (I think something went
wrong with the update check). The other failures are all 'GNOME
did something wacky', plus one case where the needle didn't quite
match because I think the match area is slightly too tall; I'll
fix that in a second.
Test Plan:
Run the tests on both KDE and GNOME and check they
work properly now (assuming nothing unrelated breaks, like KDE
crashing...)
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D1039
2016-10-27 23:23:59 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
|
|
|
|
prio => 30,
|
|
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "Workstation-live-iso",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "desktop_notifications_live" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-10-26 21:08:01 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
|
|
|
|
prio => 32,
|
|
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "KDE-live-iso",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "desktop_notifications_live" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
Force GNOME to notify updates, re-enable test on Workstation
Summary:
GNOME's update notification criteria are pretty braindead: it
fires the update check timer once on login then once every hour
thereafter, but only actually checks for and notifies of updates
once a day if it's after 6am(?!?!?!). So we have to do a bunch
of fiddling around to ensure we reliably get a notification.
Move the clock to 6am if it's earlier than that, and reset the
'last update check' timer to 48 hours ago, then log in to GNOME
after that.
Note: I thought this still wasn't fully reliable, but I've looked
into all the recent failures of either test on staging and
there's only one which was really 'no update notification came
up', and the logs clearly indicate PK did run an update check,
so I don't think that was a test bug (I think something went
wrong with the update check). The other failures are all 'GNOME
did something wacky', plus one case where the needle didn't quite
match because I think the match area is slightly too tall; I'll
fix that in a second.
Test Plan:
Run the tests on both KDE and GNOME and check they
work properly now (assuming nothing unrelated breaks, like KDE
crashing...)
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D1039
2016-10-27 23:23:59 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
|
|
|
|
prio => 30,
|
|
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "Workstation-live-iso",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "desktop_notifications_postinstall" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-10-26 21:08:01 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
|
|
|
|
prio => 32,
|
|
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "KDE-live-iso",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "desktop_notifications_postinstall" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2015-03-18 21:28:03 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
templates: drop 'variables', move 'prio' to JobTemplates
Summary:
this is following a couple of upstream changes I noticeed while
playing with dump_templates. Upstream has completely got rid of
the 'variables' keys from all dicts, and when you run dump_
templates the output does not contain any 'variables' keys, so
it seems reasonable to ditch these entirely (I think it was some
old thing that got subsumed into 'settings'). Also, when you
run dump_templates the 'prio' values come out in JobTemplates,
not in TestSuites; if you look at load_templates there's a bit
marked "we have to migrate the prio from the TestSuite to the
JobTemplate" which does exactly what it sounds like, so it
seems a good idea to move these instead of relying on that to
always be there.
While I had to re-do all the priorities anyway I tried to clean
them up a bit. The idea is roughly this:
10 - 19: most-critical sanity tests (i.e. default_install)
20 - 29: Alpha tests
30 - 39: Beta tests
40 - 49: Final tests
50+ : Optional tests
within each group I ordered 64-bit first, UEFI second, and
32-bit last (usually just as x0 / x1 / x2).
Test Plan:
Check that the file is valid and loads correctly,
and that everything works more or less the same except the
order of tests run is a bit different.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: jskladan, garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D692
2015-12-16 21:03:41 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 30,
|
2015-03-18 21:28:03 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_package_set_minimal" },
|
2015-03-18 21:28:03 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
2016-09-07 08:34:54 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
2017-02-21 01:33:14 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 20,
|
2016-09-07 08:34:54 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_anaconda_text" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-09-16 12:44:03 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
|
|
|
|
prio => 31,
|
|
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_rescue_encrypted" },
|
2016-10-14 08:28:05 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
2016-12-13 08:18:34 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "uefi" },
|
|
|
|
|
prio => 32,
|
|
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_rescue_encrypted" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
add NFS tests (and DHCP/DNS in the support server)
Summary:
Set up the support server to provide DHCP/DNS functionality and
an NFS server, providing a kickstart. Add a kickstart test just
like the other root-user-crypted-net kickstart tests except it
gets the kickstart from the support server via NFS. Also add NFS
repository tests and a second support server for Server-dvd-iso
flavor: this test must run on that flavor to ensure that packages
are actually available. The support server just mounts the
attached 'DVD' and exports it via NFS.
Note we don't need to do anything clever to avoid IP conflicts
between the two support servers, because os-autoinst-openvswitch
ensures each worker group is on its own VLAN.
As part of adding the NFS repo tests, I did a bit of cleanup,
moving little things we were repeating a lot into anacondatest,
and sharing the 'check if the repo was used' logic between all
the tests (by making it into a test step that's loaded for all
of them). I also simplified the 'was repo used' checks a bit,
it seems silly to run a 'grep' command inside the VM then have
os-autoinst do a grep on the output (which is effectively what
we were doing before), instead we'll just use a single grep
within the VM, and clean up the messy quoting/escaping a bit.
Test Plan:
Run all tests - at least all repository tests - and
check they work (make sure the tests are actually still sane,
not just that they pass). I've done runs of all the repo tests
and they look good to me, but please double-check. I'm currently
re-running the whole 24-20160609.n.0 test on staging with these
changes.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D888
2016-06-13 15:42:30 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
|
|
|
|
prio => 10,
|
|
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "Server-dvd-iso",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "support_server" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
|
|
|
|
prio => 30,
|
|
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "Server-dvd-iso",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_repository_nfs_variation" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
|
|
|
|
prio => 30,
|
|
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "Server-dvd-iso",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_repository_nfs_graphical" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-05-04 18:53:11 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
2017-02-21 01:33:14 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 20,
|
2016-05-04 18:53:11 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "Server-dvd-iso",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "server_role_deploy_domain_controller" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
2017-02-21 01:33:14 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 20,
|
2016-05-04 18:53:11 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "Server-dvd-iso",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "server_realmd_join_kickstart" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
add cockpit_default and cockpit_basic tests
Summary:
This adds tests for the Server_cockpit_default and cockpit_basic
test cases. Some notes: I was initially thinking of combining
these into a single test with multiple test modules and coming
up with a system for doing wiki reporting based on individual
test module status, but because we'll also want to do a cockpit
FreeIPA enrol test, I decided against it. We don't really want
to combine all three because then we would skip the cockpit
tests whenever FreeIPA server deployment failed, which isn't
ideal. So since we'll need a separate FreeIPA enrolment test
anyway it doesn't really make sense to go to the trouble of
designing a system for loading multiple postinstall tests (though
I have an idea for that!) and a per-module wiki reporting system.
This was the most minimal and hopefully reliable method for
running Cockpit from a stock Server install that I could think
of. An alternative approach would be to have, say, the most
recent stable Workstation live as a 'stock' asset and have two
tests, one which runs a stock Server install and just waits and
another which boots the live image and accesses the cockpit
running on the other box, but that seems a bit over-complex. It
is not possible to have dependencies between tests for different
ISOs, in case you were wondering about having a Workstation live
test which runs parallel with a Server DVD test, we can't do
that. One funny thing is the font that winds up getting used for
the desktop, but I don't *think* that should be a problem.
Picking needles was a bit tricky; any improvement suggestions
are welcome. I'm hoping it turns out to be safe to rely on some
dbus log messages being present; I think logging into Cockpit
triggers activation of the realmd dbus interface, so there
*should* always be some messages related to that. An alternative
would just be to match on a sliver of the dark grey table header
and the light grey row beneath it and assume that'll always be
the first message (whatever the message is), but then we have to
find some area of the message details screen which is always
present for any message, and it just seems a tad more likely to
result in false passes. Similary I'm making an assumption that
auditd is always going to show up on the first page of the
Services screen and the details screen will always show that
'loaded...enabled' text.
Test Plan:
Run the tests and see if they work! See
https://openqa.stg.fedoraproject.org/tests/21373 and
https://openqa.stg.fedoraproject.org/tests/21371 for my tests.
Reviewers: garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D874
2016-06-01 16:05:33 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
2017-02-21 01:33:14 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 20,
|
add cockpit_default and cockpit_basic tests
Summary:
This adds tests for the Server_cockpit_default and cockpit_basic
test cases. Some notes: I was initially thinking of combining
these into a single test with multiple test modules and coming
up with a system for doing wiki reporting based on individual
test module status, but because we'll also want to do a cockpit
FreeIPA enrol test, I decided against it. We don't really want
to combine all three because then we would skip the cockpit
tests whenever FreeIPA server deployment failed, which isn't
ideal. So since we'll need a separate FreeIPA enrolment test
anyway it doesn't really make sense to go to the trouble of
designing a system for loading multiple postinstall tests (though
I have an idea for that!) and a per-module wiki reporting system.
This was the most minimal and hopefully reliable method for
running Cockpit from a stock Server install that I could think
of. An alternative approach would be to have, say, the most
recent stable Workstation live as a 'stock' asset and have two
tests, one which runs a stock Server install and just waits and
another which boots the live image and accesses the cockpit
running on the other box, but that seems a bit over-complex. It
is not possible to have dependencies between tests for different
ISOs, in case you were wondering about having a Workstation live
test which runs parallel with a Server DVD test, we can't do
that. One funny thing is the font that winds up getting used for
the desktop, but I don't *think* that should be a problem.
Picking needles was a bit tricky; any improvement suggestions
are welcome. I'm hoping it turns out to be safe to rely on some
dbus log messages being present; I think logging into Cockpit
triggers activation of the realmd dbus interface, so there
*should* always be some messages related to that. An alternative
would just be to match on a sliver of the dark grey table header
and the light grey row beneath it and assume that'll always be
the first message (whatever the message is), but then we have to
find some area of the message details screen which is always
present for any message, and it just seems a tad more likely to
result in false passes. Similary I'm making an assumption that
auditd is always going to show up on the first page of the
Services screen and the details screen will always show that
'loaded...enabled' text.
Test Plan:
Run the tests and see if they work! See
https://openqa.stg.fedoraproject.org/tests/21373 and
https://openqa.stg.fedoraproject.org/tests/21371 for my tests.
Reviewers: garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D874
2016-06-01 16:05:33 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "Server-dvd-iso",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "server_cockpit_default" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
2017-02-21 01:33:14 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 30,
|
add cockpit_default and cockpit_basic tests
Summary:
This adds tests for the Server_cockpit_default and cockpit_basic
test cases. Some notes: I was initially thinking of combining
these into a single test with multiple test modules and coming
up with a system for doing wiki reporting based on individual
test module status, but because we'll also want to do a cockpit
FreeIPA enrol test, I decided against it. We don't really want
to combine all three because then we would skip the cockpit
tests whenever FreeIPA server deployment failed, which isn't
ideal. So since we'll need a separate FreeIPA enrolment test
anyway it doesn't really make sense to go to the trouble of
designing a system for loading multiple postinstall tests (though
I have an idea for that!) and a per-module wiki reporting system.
This was the most minimal and hopefully reliable method for
running Cockpit from a stock Server install that I could think
of. An alternative approach would be to have, say, the most
recent stable Workstation live as a 'stock' asset and have two
tests, one which runs a stock Server install and just waits and
another which boots the live image and accesses the cockpit
running on the other box, but that seems a bit over-complex. It
is not possible to have dependencies between tests for different
ISOs, in case you were wondering about having a Workstation live
test which runs parallel with a Server DVD test, we can't do
that. One funny thing is the font that winds up getting used for
the desktop, but I don't *think* that should be a problem.
Picking needles was a bit tricky; any improvement suggestions
are welcome. I'm hoping it turns out to be safe to rely on some
dbus log messages being present; I think logging into Cockpit
triggers activation of the realmd dbus interface, so there
*should* always be some messages related to that. An alternative
would just be to match on a sliver of the dark grey table header
and the light grey row beneath it and assume that'll always be
the first message (whatever the message is), but then we have to
find some area of the message details screen which is always
present for any message, and it just seems a tad more likely to
result in false passes. Similary I'm making an assumption that
auditd is always going to show up on the first page of the
Services screen and the details screen will always show that
'loaded...enabled' text.
Test Plan:
Run the tests and see if they work! See
https://openqa.stg.fedoraproject.org/tests/21373 and
https://openqa.stg.fedoraproject.org/tests/21371 for my tests.
Reviewers: garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D874
2016-06-01 16:05:33 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "Server-dvd-iso",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "server_cockpit_basic" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
add a cockpit realmd FreeIPA join test
Summary:
This requires a few other changes:
* turn clone_host_resolv into clone_host_file, letting you clone
any given host file (cloning /etc/hosts seems to make both
server deployment and client enrolment faster/more reliable)
* allow loading of multiple POSTINSTALL tests (so we can share
the freeipa_client_postinstall test). Note this is compatible,
existing uses will work fine
* move initial password change for the IPA test users into the
server deployment test (so the client tests don't conflict over
doing that)
* add GRUB_POSTINSTALL, for specifying boot parameters for boot of
the installed system, and make it work by tweaking _console_wait
_login (doesn't work for _graphical_wait_login yet, as I didn't
need that)
* make the static networking config for tap tests into a library
function so the tests can share it
* handle ABRT problem dirs showing up in /var/spool/abrt as well
as /var/tmp/abrt (because the enrol attempt hits #1330766 and
the crash report shows up in /var/spool/abrt, don't ask me why
the difference, I just work here)
* specify the DNS servers from the worker host's resolv.conf as
the forwarders for the FreeIPA server when deploying it; if we
don't do this, rolekit defaults to using the root servers as
forwarders(!) and thus we get the public, not phx2-appropriate,
results for e.g. mirrors.fedoraproject.org, some of which the
workers can't reach, so PackageKit package install always fails
(boy, was it fun figuring THAT mess out)
Even after all that, the test still doesn't actually pass, but
I'm reasonably confident this is because it's hitting actual bugs,
not because it's broken. It runs into #1330766 nearly every time
(I think I saw *one* time the enrolment actually succeeded), and
seems to run into a subsequent bug I hadn't seen before when
trying to work around that by trying the join again (see
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1330766#c37 ).
Test Plan:
Run the test, see what happens. If you're really lucky,
it'll actually pass. But you'll probably run into #1330766#c37,
I'm mostly posting for comment. You'll need a tap-capable openQA
instance to test this.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D880
2016-06-07 20:00:39 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
2017-02-21 01:33:14 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 30,
|
add a cockpit realmd FreeIPA join test
Summary:
This requires a few other changes:
* turn clone_host_resolv into clone_host_file, letting you clone
any given host file (cloning /etc/hosts seems to make both
server deployment and client enrolment faster/more reliable)
* allow loading of multiple POSTINSTALL tests (so we can share
the freeipa_client_postinstall test). Note this is compatible,
existing uses will work fine
* move initial password change for the IPA test users into the
server deployment test (so the client tests don't conflict over
doing that)
* add GRUB_POSTINSTALL, for specifying boot parameters for boot of
the installed system, and make it work by tweaking _console_wait
_login (doesn't work for _graphical_wait_login yet, as I didn't
need that)
* make the static networking config for tap tests into a library
function so the tests can share it
* handle ABRT problem dirs showing up in /var/spool/abrt as well
as /var/tmp/abrt (because the enrol attempt hits #1330766 and
the crash report shows up in /var/spool/abrt, don't ask me why
the difference, I just work here)
* specify the DNS servers from the worker host's resolv.conf as
the forwarders for the FreeIPA server when deploying it; if we
don't do this, rolekit defaults to using the root servers as
forwarders(!) and thus we get the public, not phx2-appropriate,
results for e.g. mirrors.fedoraproject.org, some of which the
workers can't reach, so PackageKit package install always fails
(boy, was it fun figuring THAT mess out)
Even after all that, the test still doesn't actually pass, but
I'm reasonably confident this is because it's hitting actual bugs,
not because it's broken. It runs into #1330766 nearly every time
(I think I saw *one* time the enrolment actually succeeded), and
seems to run into a subsequent bug I hadn't seen before when
trying to work around that by trying the join again (see
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1330766#c37 ).
Test Plan:
Run the test, see what happens. If you're really lucky,
it'll actually pass. But you'll probably run into #1330766#c37,
I'm mostly posting for comment. You'll need a tap-capable openQA
instance to test this.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D880
2016-06-07 20:00:39 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "Server-dvd-iso",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "realmd_join_cockpit" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-06-28 19:00:13 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
2017-02-21 01:33:14 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 20,
|
2016-06-28 19:00:13 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "Server-dvd-iso",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "realmd_join_sssd" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-09-08 21:19:09 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
2017-02-21 01:33:14 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 20,
|
2016-09-08 21:19:09 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "Server-dvd-iso",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "server_role_deploy_database_server" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
2017-02-21 01:33:14 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 30,
|
2016-09-08 21:19:09 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "Server-dvd-iso",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "server_database_client" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-08-03 20:19:18 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
|
|
|
|
prio => 40,
|
|
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "Server-dvd-iso",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_updates_nfs" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-06-09 15:43:46 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
|
|
|
|
prio => 10,
|
|
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "support_server" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2015-03-18 21:28:03 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
templates: drop 'variables', move 'prio' to JobTemplates
Summary:
this is following a couple of upstream changes I noticeed while
playing with dump_templates. Upstream has completely got rid of
the 'variables' keys from all dicts, and when you run dump_
templates the output does not contain any 'variables' keys, so
it seems reasonable to ditch these entirely (I think it was some
old thing that got subsumed into 'settings'). Also, when you
run dump_templates the 'prio' values come out in JobTemplates,
not in TestSuites; if you look at load_templates there's a bit
marked "we have to migrate the prio from the TestSuite to the
JobTemplate" which does exactly what it sounds like, so it
seems a good idea to move these instead of relying on that to
always be there.
While I had to re-do all the priorities anyway I tried to clean
them up a bit. The idea is roughly this:
10 - 19: most-critical sanity tests (i.e. default_install)
20 - 29: Alpha tests
30 - 39: Beta tests
40 - 49: Final tests
50+ : Optional tests
within each group I ordered 64-bit first, UEFI second, and
32-bit last (usually just as x0 / x1 / x2).
Test Plan:
Check that the file is valid and loads correctly,
and that everything works more or less the same except the
order of tests run is a bit different.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: jskladan, garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D692
2015-12-16 21:03:41 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 20,
|
2015-03-18 21:28:03 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
2015-02-13 09:58:24 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_repository_http_variation" },
|
2015-02-13 09:58:24 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
templates: drop 'variables', move 'prio' to JobTemplates
Summary:
this is following a couple of upstream changes I noticeed while
playing with dump_templates. Upstream has completely got rid of
the 'variables' keys from all dicts, and when you run dump_
templates the output does not contain any 'variables' keys, so
it seems reasonable to ditch these entirely (I think it was some
old thing that got subsumed into 'settings'). Also, when you
run dump_templates the 'prio' values come out in JobTemplates,
not in TestSuites; if you look at load_templates there's a bit
marked "we have to migrate the prio from the TestSuite to the
JobTemplate" which does exactly what it sounds like, so it
seems a good idea to move these instead of relying on that to
always be there.
While I had to re-do all the priorities anyway I tried to clean
them up a bit. The idea is roughly this:
10 - 19: most-critical sanity tests (i.e. default_install)
20 - 29: Alpha tests
30 - 39: Beta tests
40 - 49: Final tests
50+ : Optional tests
within each group I ordered 64-bit first, UEFI second, and
32-bit last (usually just as x0 / x1 / x2).
Test Plan:
Check that the file is valid and loads correctly,
and that everything works more or less the same except the
order of tests run is a bit different.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: jskladan, garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D692
2015-12-16 21:03:41 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 20,
|
2015-02-13 09:58:24 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
2015-03-18 21:28:03 +00:00
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
2015-02-13 09:58:24 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_repository_http_graphical" },
|
2015-02-13 09:58:24 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
templates: drop 'variables', move 'prio' to JobTemplates
Summary:
this is following a couple of upstream changes I noticeed while
playing with dump_templates. Upstream has completely got rid of
the 'variables' keys from all dicts, and when you run dump_
templates the output does not contain any 'variables' keys, so
it seems reasonable to ditch these entirely (I think it was some
old thing that got subsumed into 'settings'). Also, when you
run dump_templates the 'prio' values come out in JobTemplates,
not in TestSuites; if you look at load_templates there's a bit
marked "we have to migrate the prio from the TestSuite to the
JobTemplate" which does exactly what it sounds like, so it
seems a good idea to move these instead of relying on that to
always be there.
While I had to re-do all the priorities anyway I tried to clean
them up a bit. The idea is roughly this:
10 - 19: most-critical sanity tests (i.e. default_install)
20 - 29: Alpha tests
30 - 39: Beta tests
40 - 49: Final tests
50+ : Optional tests
within each group I ordered 64-bit first, UEFI second, and
32-bit last (usually just as x0 / x1 / x2).
Test Plan:
Check that the file is valid and loads correctly,
and that everything works more or less the same except the
order of tests run is a bit different.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: jskladan, garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D692
2015-12-16 21:03:41 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 20,
|
2015-02-13 09:58:24 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
2015-03-18 21:28:03 +00:00
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
2015-02-13 09:58:24 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_mirrorlist_graphical" },
|
2015-02-13 09:58:24 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
templates: drop 'variables', move 'prio' to JobTemplates
Summary:
this is following a couple of upstream changes I noticeed while
playing with dump_templates. Upstream has completely got rid of
the 'variables' keys from all dicts, and when you run dump_
templates the output does not contain any 'variables' keys, so
it seems reasonable to ditch these entirely (I think it was some
old thing that got subsumed into 'settings'). Also, when you
run dump_templates the 'prio' values come out in JobTemplates,
not in TestSuites; if you look at load_templates there's a bit
marked "we have to migrate the prio from the TestSuite to the
JobTemplate" which does exactly what it sounds like, so it
seems a good idea to move these instead of relying on that to
always be there.
While I had to re-do all the priorities anyway I tried to clean
them up a bit. The idea is roughly this:
10 - 19: most-critical sanity tests (i.e. default_install)
20 - 29: Alpha tests
30 - 39: Beta tests
40 - 49: Final tests
50+ : Optional tests
within each group I ordered 64-bit first, UEFI second, and
32-bit last (usually just as x0 / x1 / x2).
Test Plan:
Check that the file is valid and loads correctly,
and that everything works more or less the same except the
order of tests run is a bit different.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: jskladan, garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D692
2015-12-16 21:03:41 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 20,
|
2015-02-13 09:58:24 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
2015-03-18 21:28:03 +00:00
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
2015-02-13 09:58:24 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_delete_pata" },
|
2015-02-13 09:58:24 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
2015-09-15 09:04:01 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "uefi" },
|
templates: drop 'variables', move 'prio' to JobTemplates
Summary:
this is following a couple of upstream changes I noticeed while
playing with dump_templates. Upstream has completely got rid of
the 'variables' keys from all dicts, and when you run dump_
templates the output does not contain any 'variables' keys, so
it seems reasonable to ditch these entirely (I think it was some
old thing that got subsumed into 'settings'). Also, when you
run dump_templates the 'prio' values come out in JobTemplates,
not in TestSuites; if you look at load_templates there's a bit
marked "we have to migrate the prio from the TestSuite to the
JobTemplate" which does exactly what it sounds like, so it
seems a good idea to move these instead of relying on that to
always be there.
While I had to re-do all the priorities anyway I tried to clean
them up a bit. The idea is roughly this:
10 - 19: most-critical sanity tests (i.e. default_install)
20 - 29: Alpha tests
30 - 39: Beta tests
40 - 49: Final tests
50+ : Optional tests
within each group I ordered 64-bit first, UEFI second, and
32-bit last (usually just as x0 / x1 / x2).
Test Plan:
Check that the file is valid and loads correctly,
and that everything works more or less the same except the
order of tests run is a bit different.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: jskladan, garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D692
2015-12-16 21:03:41 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 21,
|
2015-09-15 09:04:01 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_delete_pata" },
|
2015-09-15 09:04:01 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
2017-01-16 12:07:47 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
|
|
|
|
prio => 20,
|
|
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_sata" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "uefi" },
|
|
|
|
|
prio => 21,
|
|
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_sata" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2015-02-13 09:58:24 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
templates: drop 'variables', move 'prio' to JobTemplates
Summary:
this is following a couple of upstream changes I noticeed while
playing with dump_templates. Upstream has completely got rid of
the 'variables' keys from all dicts, and when you run dump_
templates the output does not contain any 'variables' keys, so
it seems reasonable to ditch these entirely (I think it was some
old thing that got subsumed into 'settings'). Also, when you
run dump_templates the 'prio' values come out in JobTemplates,
not in TestSuites; if you look at load_templates there's a bit
marked "we have to migrate the prio from the TestSuite to the
JobTemplate" which does exactly what it sounds like, so it
seems a good idea to move these instead of relying on that to
always be there.
While I had to re-do all the priorities anyway I tried to clean
them up a bit. The idea is roughly this:
10 - 19: most-critical sanity tests (i.e. default_install)
20 - 29: Alpha tests
30 - 39: Beta tests
40 - 49: Final tests
50+ : Optional tests
within each group I ordered 64-bit first, UEFI second, and
32-bit last (usually just as x0 / x1 / x2).
Test Plan:
Check that the file is valid and loads correctly,
and that everything works more or less the same except the
order of tests run is a bit different.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: jskladan, garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D692
2015-12-16 21:03:41 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 20,
|
2015-02-13 09:58:24 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
2015-03-18 21:28:03 +00:00
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
2015-02-13 09:58:24 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_kickstart_user_creation" },
|
2015-02-13 09:58:24 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
templates: drop 'variables', move 'prio' to JobTemplates
Summary:
this is following a couple of upstream changes I noticeed while
playing with dump_templates. Upstream has completely got rid of
the 'variables' keys from all dicts, and when you run dump_
templates the output does not contain any 'variables' keys, so
it seems reasonable to ditch these entirely (I think it was some
old thing that got subsumed into 'settings'). Also, when you
run dump_templates the 'prio' values come out in JobTemplates,
not in TestSuites; if you look at load_templates there's a bit
marked "we have to migrate the prio from the TestSuite to the
JobTemplate" which does exactly what it sounds like, so it
seems a good idea to move these instead of relying on that to
always be there.
While I had to re-do all the priorities anyway I tried to clean
them up a bit. The idea is roughly this:
10 - 19: most-critical sanity tests (i.e. default_install)
20 - 29: Alpha tests
30 - 39: Beta tests
40 - 49: Final tests
50+ : Optional tests
within each group I ordered 64-bit first, UEFI second, and
32-bit last (usually just as x0 / x1 / x2).
Test Plan:
Check that the file is valid and loads correctly,
and that everything works more or less the same except the
order of tests run is a bit different.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: jskladan, garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D692
2015-12-16 21:03:41 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 20,
|
2015-02-13 09:58:24 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
2015-03-18 21:28:03 +00:00
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
2015-02-13 09:58:24 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_scsi_updates_img" },
|
2015-02-13 09:58:24 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
templates: drop 'variables', move 'prio' to JobTemplates
Summary:
this is following a couple of upstream changes I noticeed while
playing with dump_templates. Upstream has completely got rid of
the 'variables' keys from all dicts, and when you run dump_
templates the output does not contain any 'variables' keys, so
it seems reasonable to ditch these entirely (I think it was some
old thing that got subsumed into 'settings'). Also, when you
run dump_templates the 'prio' values come out in JobTemplates,
not in TestSuites; if you look at load_templates there's a bit
marked "we have to migrate the prio from the TestSuite to the
JobTemplate" which does exactly what it sounds like, so it
seems a good idea to move these instead of relying on that to
always be there.
While I had to re-do all the priorities anyway I tried to clean
them up a bit. The idea is roughly this:
10 - 19: most-critical sanity tests (i.e. default_install)
20 - 29: Alpha tests
30 - 39: Beta tests
40 - 49: Final tests
50+ : Optional tests
within each group I ordered 64-bit first, UEFI second, and
32-bit last (usually just as x0 / x1 / x2).
Test Plan:
Check that the file is valid and loads correctly,
and that everything works more or less the same except the
order of tests run is a bit different.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: jskladan, garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D692
2015-12-16 21:03:41 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 20,
|
2015-02-13 09:58:24 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
2015-03-18 21:28:03 +00:00
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
2015-02-13 09:58:24 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_multi" },
|
2015-02-13 09:58:24 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
2015-09-15 09:04:01 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "uefi" },
|
templates: drop 'variables', move 'prio' to JobTemplates
Summary:
this is following a couple of upstream changes I noticeed while
playing with dump_templates. Upstream has completely got rid of
the 'variables' keys from all dicts, and when you run dump_
templates the output does not contain any 'variables' keys, so
it seems reasonable to ditch these entirely (I think it was some
old thing that got subsumed into 'settings'). Also, when you
run dump_templates the 'prio' values come out in JobTemplates,
not in TestSuites; if you look at load_templates there's a bit
marked "we have to migrate the prio from the TestSuite to the
JobTemplate" which does exactly what it sounds like, so it
seems a good idea to move these instead of relying on that to
always be there.
While I had to re-do all the priorities anyway I tried to clean
them up a bit. The idea is roughly this:
10 - 19: most-critical sanity tests (i.e. default_install)
20 - 29: Alpha tests
30 - 39: Beta tests
40 - 49: Final tests
50+ : Optional tests
within each group I ordered 64-bit first, UEFI second, and
32-bit last (usually just as x0 / x1 / x2).
Test Plan:
Check that the file is valid and loads correctly,
and that everything works more or less the same except the
order of tests run is a bit different.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: jskladan, garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D692
2015-12-16 21:03:41 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 21,
|
2015-09-15 09:04:01 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_multi" },
|
2015-09-15 09:04:01 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
2015-02-13 09:58:24 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
templates: drop 'variables', move 'prio' to JobTemplates
Summary:
this is following a couple of upstream changes I noticeed while
playing with dump_templates. Upstream has completely got rid of
the 'variables' keys from all dicts, and when you run dump_
templates the output does not contain any 'variables' keys, so
it seems reasonable to ditch these entirely (I think it was some
old thing that got subsumed into 'settings'). Also, when you
run dump_templates the 'prio' values come out in JobTemplates,
not in TestSuites; if you look at load_templates there's a bit
marked "we have to migrate the prio from the TestSuite to the
JobTemplate" which does exactly what it sounds like, so it
seems a good idea to move these instead of relying on that to
always be there.
While I had to re-do all the priorities anyway I tried to clean
them up a bit. The idea is roughly this:
10 - 19: most-critical sanity tests (i.e. default_install)
20 - 29: Alpha tests
30 - 39: Beta tests
40 - 49: Final tests
50+ : Optional tests
within each group I ordered 64-bit first, UEFI second, and
32-bit last (usually just as x0 / x1 / x2).
Test Plan:
Check that the file is valid and loads correctly,
and that everything works more or less the same except the
order of tests run is a bit different.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: jskladan, garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D692
2015-12-16 21:03:41 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 30,
|
2015-02-13 09:58:24 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
2015-03-18 21:28:03 +00:00
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
2015-02-13 09:58:24 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_simple_encrypted" },
|
2015-02-13 09:58:24 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
2015-03-05 10:44:02 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
templates: drop 'variables', move 'prio' to JobTemplates
Summary:
this is following a couple of upstream changes I noticeed while
playing with dump_templates. Upstream has completely got rid of
the 'variables' keys from all dicts, and when you run dump_
templates the output does not contain any 'variables' keys, so
it seems reasonable to ditch these entirely (I think it was some
old thing that got subsumed into 'settings'). Also, when you
run dump_templates the 'prio' values come out in JobTemplates,
not in TestSuites; if you look at load_templates there's a bit
marked "we have to migrate the prio from the TestSuite to the
JobTemplate" which does exactly what it sounds like, so it
seems a good idea to move these instead of relying on that to
always be there.
While I had to re-do all the priorities anyway I tried to clean
them up a bit. The idea is roughly this:
10 - 19: most-critical sanity tests (i.e. default_install)
20 - 29: Alpha tests
30 - 39: Beta tests
40 - 49: Final tests
50+ : Optional tests
within each group I ordered 64-bit first, UEFI second, and
32-bit last (usually just as x0 / x1 / x2).
Test Plan:
Check that the file is valid and loads correctly,
and that everything works more or less the same except the
order of tests run is a bit different.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: jskladan, garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D692
2015-12-16 21:03:41 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 30,
|
2015-03-05 10:44:02 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
2015-03-19 21:11:17 +00:00
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
2015-03-05 10:44:02 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_simple_free_space" },
|
2015-03-05 10:44:02 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
2015-03-05 12:57:47 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
templates: drop 'variables', move 'prio' to JobTemplates
Summary:
this is following a couple of upstream changes I noticeed while
playing with dump_templates. Upstream has completely got rid of
the 'variables' keys from all dicts, and when you run dump_
templates the output does not contain any 'variables' keys, so
it seems reasonable to ditch these entirely (I think it was some
old thing that got subsumed into 'settings'). Also, when you
run dump_templates the 'prio' values come out in JobTemplates,
not in TestSuites; if you look at load_templates there's a bit
marked "we have to migrate the prio from the TestSuite to the
JobTemplate" which does exactly what it sounds like, so it
seems a good idea to move these instead of relying on that to
always be there.
While I had to re-do all the priorities anyway I tried to clean
them up a bit. The idea is roughly this:
10 - 19: most-critical sanity tests (i.e. default_install)
20 - 29: Alpha tests
30 - 39: Beta tests
40 - 49: Final tests
50+ : Optional tests
within each group I ordered 64-bit first, UEFI second, and
32-bit last (usually just as x0 / x1 / x2).
Test Plan:
Check that the file is valid and loads correctly,
and that everything works more or less the same except the
order of tests run is a bit different.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: jskladan, garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D692
2015-12-16 21:03:41 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 30,
|
2015-03-05 12:57:47 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
2015-03-19 21:11:17 +00:00
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
2015-03-05 12:57:47 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_multi_empty" },
|
2015-03-05 12:57:47 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
2015-03-06 09:36:25 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
templates: drop 'variables', move 'prio' to JobTemplates
Summary:
this is following a couple of upstream changes I noticeed while
playing with dump_templates. Upstream has completely got rid of
the 'variables' keys from all dicts, and when you run dump_
templates the output does not contain any 'variables' keys, so
it seems reasonable to ditch these entirely (I think it was some
old thing that got subsumed into 'settings'). Also, when you
run dump_templates the 'prio' values come out in JobTemplates,
not in TestSuites; if you look at load_templates there's a bit
marked "we have to migrate the prio from the TestSuite to the
JobTemplate" which does exactly what it sounds like, so it
seems a good idea to move these instead of relying on that to
always be there.
While I had to re-do all the priorities anyway I tried to clean
them up a bit. The idea is roughly this:
10 - 19: most-critical sanity tests (i.e. default_install)
20 - 29: Alpha tests
30 - 39: Beta tests
40 - 49: Final tests
50+ : Optional tests
within each group I ordered 64-bit first, UEFI second, and
32-bit last (usually just as x0 / x1 / x2).
Test Plan:
Check that the file is valid and loads correctly,
and that everything works more or less the same except the
order of tests run is a bit different.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: jskladan, garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D692
2015-12-16 21:03:41 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 30,
|
2015-03-06 09:36:25 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
2015-03-19 21:11:17 +00:00
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
2015-03-06 09:36:25 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_software_raid" },
|
2015-03-06 09:36:25 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
2015-03-12 09:58:04 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
templates: drop 'variables', move 'prio' to JobTemplates
Summary:
this is following a couple of upstream changes I noticeed while
playing with dump_templates. Upstream has completely got rid of
the 'variables' keys from all dicts, and when you run dump_
templates the output does not contain any 'variables' keys, so
it seems reasonable to ditch these entirely (I think it was some
old thing that got subsumed into 'settings'). Also, when you
run dump_templates the 'prio' values come out in JobTemplates,
not in TestSuites; if you look at load_templates there's a bit
marked "we have to migrate the prio from the TestSuite to the
JobTemplate" which does exactly what it sounds like, so it
seems a good idea to move these instead of relying on that to
always be there.
While I had to re-do all the priorities anyway I tried to clean
them up a bit. The idea is roughly this:
10 - 19: most-critical sanity tests (i.e. default_install)
20 - 29: Alpha tests
30 - 39: Beta tests
40 - 49: Final tests
50+ : Optional tests
within each group I ordered 64-bit first, UEFI second, and
32-bit last (usually just as x0 / x1 / x2).
Test Plan:
Check that the file is valid and loads correctly,
and that everything works more or less the same except the
order of tests run is a bit different.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: jskladan, garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D692
2015-12-16 21:03:41 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 30,
|
2015-03-12 09:58:04 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
2015-03-19 21:11:17 +00:00
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
2015-03-12 09:58:04 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_delete_partial" },
|
2015-03-12 09:58:04 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
2015-08-10 18:01:12 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
templates: drop 'variables', move 'prio' to JobTemplates
Summary:
this is following a couple of upstream changes I noticeed while
playing with dump_templates. Upstream has completely got rid of
the 'variables' keys from all dicts, and when you run dump_
templates the output does not contain any 'variables' keys, so
it seems reasonable to ditch these entirely (I think it was some
old thing that got subsumed into 'settings'). Also, when you
run dump_templates the 'prio' values come out in JobTemplates,
not in TestSuites; if you look at load_templates there's a bit
marked "we have to migrate the prio from the TestSuite to the
JobTemplate" which does exactly what it sounds like, so it
seems a good idea to move these instead of relying on that to
always be there.
While I had to re-do all the priorities anyway I tried to clean
them up a bit. The idea is roughly this:
10 - 19: most-critical sanity tests (i.e. default_install)
20 - 29: Alpha tests
30 - 39: Beta tests
40 - 49: Final tests
50+ : Optional tests
within each group I ordered 64-bit first, UEFI second, and
32-bit last (usually just as x0 / x1 / x2).
Test Plan:
Check that the file is valid and loads correctly,
and that everything works more or less the same except the
order of tests run is a bit different.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: jskladan, garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D692
2015-12-16 21:03:41 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 40,
|
2015-08-10 18:01:12 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_btrfs" },
|
2015-08-10 18:01:12 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
templates: drop 'variables', move 'prio' to JobTemplates
Summary:
this is following a couple of upstream changes I noticeed while
playing with dump_templates. Upstream has completely got rid of
the 'variables' keys from all dicts, and when you run dump_
templates the output does not contain any 'variables' keys, so
it seems reasonable to ditch these entirely (I think it was some
old thing that got subsumed into 'settings'). Also, when you
run dump_templates the 'prio' values come out in JobTemplates,
not in TestSuites; if you look at load_templates there's a bit
marked "we have to migrate the prio from the TestSuite to the
JobTemplate" which does exactly what it sounds like, so it
seems a good idea to move these instead of relying on that to
always be there.
While I had to re-do all the priorities anyway I tried to clean
them up a bit. The idea is roughly this:
10 - 19: most-critical sanity tests (i.e. default_install)
20 - 29: Alpha tests
30 - 39: Beta tests
40 - 49: Final tests
50+ : Optional tests
within each group I ordered 64-bit first, UEFI second, and
32-bit last (usually just as x0 / x1 / x2).
Test Plan:
Check that the file is valid and loads correctly,
and that everything works more or less the same except the
order of tests run is a bit different.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: jskladan, garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D692
2015-12-16 21:03:41 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 40,
|
2015-08-10 18:01:12 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_ext3" },
|
2015-08-10 18:01:12 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
2015-11-26 12:50:45 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
templates: drop 'variables', move 'prio' to JobTemplates
Summary:
this is following a couple of upstream changes I noticeed while
playing with dump_templates. Upstream has completely got rid of
the 'variables' keys from all dicts, and when you run dump_
templates the output does not contain any 'variables' keys, so
it seems reasonable to ditch these entirely (I think it was some
old thing that got subsumed into 'settings'). Also, when you
run dump_templates the 'prio' values come out in JobTemplates,
not in TestSuites; if you look at load_templates there's a bit
marked "we have to migrate the prio from the TestSuite to the
JobTemplate" which does exactly what it sounds like, so it
seems a good idea to move these instead of relying on that to
always be there.
While I had to re-do all the priorities anyway I tried to clean
them up a bit. The idea is roughly this:
10 - 19: most-critical sanity tests (i.e. default_install)
20 - 29: Alpha tests
30 - 39: Beta tests
40 - 49: Final tests
50+ : Optional tests
within each group I ordered 64-bit first, UEFI second, and
32-bit last (usually just as x0 / x1 / x2).
Test Plan:
Check that the file is valid and loads correctly,
and that everything works more or less the same except the
order of tests run is a bit different.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: jskladan, garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D692
2015-12-16 21:03:41 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 40,
|
2015-11-26 12:50:45 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_xfs" },
|
2015-11-26 12:50:45 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
2015-08-10 18:01:12 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
templates: drop 'variables', move 'prio' to JobTemplates
Summary:
this is following a couple of upstream changes I noticeed while
playing with dump_templates. Upstream has completely got rid of
the 'variables' keys from all dicts, and when you run dump_
templates the output does not contain any 'variables' keys, so
it seems reasonable to ditch these entirely (I think it was some
old thing that got subsumed into 'settings'). Also, when you
run dump_templates the 'prio' values come out in JobTemplates,
not in TestSuites; if you look at load_templates there's a bit
marked "we have to migrate the prio from the TestSuite to the
JobTemplate" which does exactly what it sounds like, so it
seems a good idea to move these instead of relying on that to
always be there.
While I had to re-do all the priorities anyway I tried to clean
them up a bit. The idea is roughly this:
10 - 19: most-critical sanity tests (i.e. default_install)
20 - 29: Alpha tests
30 - 39: Beta tests
40 - 49: Final tests
50+ : Optional tests
within each group I ordered 64-bit first, UEFI second, and
32-bit last (usually just as x0 / x1 / x2).
Test Plan:
Check that the file is valid and loads correctly,
and that everything works more or less the same except the
order of tests run is a bit different.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: jskladan, garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D692
2015-12-16 21:03:41 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 40,
|
2015-08-10 18:01:12 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_lvmthin" },
|
2015-08-10 18:01:12 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
2015-08-19 21:41:41 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
templates: drop 'variables', move 'prio' to JobTemplates
Summary:
this is following a couple of upstream changes I noticeed while
playing with dump_templates. Upstream has completely got rid of
the 'variables' keys from all dicts, and when you run dump_
templates the output does not contain any 'variables' keys, so
it seems reasonable to ditch these entirely (I think it was some
old thing that got subsumed into 'settings'). Also, when you
run dump_templates the 'prio' values come out in JobTemplates,
not in TestSuites; if you look at load_templates there's a bit
marked "we have to migrate the prio from the TestSuite to the
JobTemplate" which does exactly what it sounds like, so it
seems a good idea to move these instead of relying on that to
always be there.
While I had to re-do all the priorities anyway I tried to clean
them up a bit. The idea is roughly this:
10 - 19: most-critical sanity tests (i.e. default_install)
20 - 29: Alpha tests
30 - 39: Beta tests
40 - 49: Final tests
50+ : Optional tests
within each group I ordered 64-bit first, UEFI second, and
32-bit last (usually just as x0 / x1 / x2).
Test Plan:
Check that the file is valid and loads correctly,
and that everything works more or less the same except the
order of tests run is a bit different.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: jskladan, garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D692
2015-12-16 21:03:41 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 50,
|
2015-08-19 21:41:41 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_no_swap" },
|
2015-08-19 21:41:41 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
2016-06-09 15:43:46 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
|
|
|
|
prio => 40,
|
|
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_iscsi" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2017-04-24 12:23:35 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
2017-05-19 11:58:16 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 40,
|
2017-04-24 12:23:35 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_blivet_ext3" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
2017-05-19 11:58:16 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 40,
|
|
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_blivet_btrfs" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
|
|
|
|
prio => 50,
|
2017-04-24 12:23:35 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_blivet_no_swap" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
2017-05-19 11:58:16 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 40,
|
2017-04-24 12:23:35 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_blivet_xfs" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
2017-05-19 11:58:16 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 40,
|
2017-04-24 12:23:35 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_blivet_software_raid" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
2017-05-19 11:58:16 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 40,
|
2017-04-24 12:23:35 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_blivet_lvmthin" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2017-05-22 07:26:58 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "uefi" },
|
|
|
|
|
prio => 41,
|
|
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_blivet_ext3" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "uefi" },
|
|
|
|
|
prio => 41,
|
|
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_blivet_btrfs" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "uefi" },
|
|
|
|
|
prio => 51,
|
|
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_blivet_no_swap" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "uefi" },
|
|
|
|
|
prio => 41,
|
|
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_blivet_xfs" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "uefi" },
|
|
|
|
|
prio => 41,
|
|
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_blivet_software_raid" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "uefi" },
|
|
|
|
|
prio => 41,
|
|
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_blivet_lvmthin" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2015-12-08 10:49:38 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
templates: drop 'variables', move 'prio' to JobTemplates
Summary:
this is following a couple of upstream changes I noticeed while
playing with dump_templates. Upstream has completely got rid of
the 'variables' keys from all dicts, and when you run dump_
templates the output does not contain any 'variables' keys, so
it seems reasonable to ditch these entirely (I think it was some
old thing that got subsumed into 'settings'). Also, when you
run dump_templates the 'prio' values come out in JobTemplates,
not in TestSuites; if you look at load_templates there's a bit
marked "we have to migrate the prio from the TestSuite to the
JobTemplate" which does exactly what it sounds like, so it
seems a good idea to move these instead of relying on that to
always be there.
While I had to re-do all the priorities anyway I tried to clean
them up a bit. The idea is roughly this:
10 - 19: most-critical sanity tests (i.e. default_install)
20 - 29: Alpha tests
30 - 39: Beta tests
40 - 49: Final tests
50+ : Optional tests
within each group I ordered 64-bit first, UEFI second, and
32-bit last (usually just as x0 / x1 / x2).
Test Plan:
Check that the file is valid and loads correctly,
and that everything works more or less the same except the
order of tests run is a bit different.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: jskladan, garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D692
2015-12-16 21:03:41 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 50,
|
2015-12-08 10:49:38 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_package_set_kde" },
|
2015-12-08 10:49:38 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
2015-09-15 09:04:01 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "uefi" },
|
templates: drop 'variables', move 'prio' to JobTemplates
Summary:
this is following a couple of upstream changes I noticeed while
playing with dump_templates. Upstream has completely got rid of
the 'variables' keys from all dicts, and when you run dump_
templates the output does not contain any 'variables' keys, so
it seems reasonable to ditch these entirely (I think it was some
old thing that got subsumed into 'settings'). Also, when you
run dump_templates the 'prio' values come out in JobTemplates,
not in TestSuites; if you look at load_templates there's a bit
marked "we have to migrate the prio from the TestSuite to the
JobTemplate" which does exactly what it sounds like, so it
seems a good idea to move these instead of relying on that to
always be there.
While I had to re-do all the priorities anyway I tried to clean
them up a bit. The idea is roughly this:
10 - 19: most-critical sanity tests (i.e. default_install)
20 - 29: Alpha tests
30 - 39: Beta tests
40 - 49: Final tests
50+ : Optional tests
within each group I ordered 64-bit first, UEFI second, and
32-bit last (usually just as x0 / x1 / x2).
Test Plan:
Check that the file is valid and loads correctly,
and that everything works more or less the same except the
order of tests run is a bit different.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: jskladan, garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D692
2015-12-16 21:03:41 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 31,
|
2015-09-15 09:04:01 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_simple_encrypted" },
|
2015-09-15 09:04:01 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "uefi" },
|
templates: drop 'variables', move 'prio' to JobTemplates
Summary:
this is following a couple of upstream changes I noticeed while
playing with dump_templates. Upstream has completely got rid of
the 'variables' keys from all dicts, and when you run dump_
templates the output does not contain any 'variables' keys, so
it seems reasonable to ditch these entirely (I think it was some
old thing that got subsumed into 'settings'). Also, when you
run dump_templates the 'prio' values come out in JobTemplates,
not in TestSuites; if you look at load_templates there's a bit
marked "we have to migrate the prio from the TestSuite to the
JobTemplate" which does exactly what it sounds like, so it
seems a good idea to move these instead of relying on that to
always be there.
While I had to re-do all the priorities anyway I tried to clean
them up a bit. The idea is roughly this:
10 - 19: most-critical sanity tests (i.e. default_install)
20 - 29: Alpha tests
30 - 39: Beta tests
40 - 49: Final tests
50+ : Optional tests
within each group I ordered 64-bit first, UEFI second, and
32-bit last (usually just as x0 / x1 / x2).
Test Plan:
Check that the file is valid and loads correctly,
and that everything works more or less the same except the
order of tests run is a bit different.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: jskladan, garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D692
2015-12-16 21:03:41 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 31,
|
2015-09-15 09:04:01 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_simple_free_space" },
|
2015-09-15 09:04:01 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "uefi" },
|
templates: drop 'variables', move 'prio' to JobTemplates
Summary:
this is following a couple of upstream changes I noticeed while
playing with dump_templates. Upstream has completely got rid of
the 'variables' keys from all dicts, and when you run dump_
templates the output does not contain any 'variables' keys, so
it seems reasonable to ditch these entirely (I think it was some
old thing that got subsumed into 'settings'). Also, when you
run dump_templates the 'prio' values come out in JobTemplates,
not in TestSuites; if you look at load_templates there's a bit
marked "we have to migrate the prio from the TestSuite to the
JobTemplate" which does exactly what it sounds like, so it
seems a good idea to move these instead of relying on that to
always be there.
While I had to re-do all the priorities anyway I tried to clean
them up a bit. The idea is roughly this:
10 - 19: most-critical sanity tests (i.e. default_install)
20 - 29: Alpha tests
30 - 39: Beta tests
40 - 49: Final tests
50+ : Optional tests
within each group I ordered 64-bit first, UEFI second, and
32-bit last (usually just as x0 / x1 / x2).
Test Plan:
Check that the file is valid and loads correctly,
and that everything works more or less the same except the
order of tests run is a bit different.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: jskladan, garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D692
2015-12-16 21:03:41 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 31,
|
2015-09-15 09:04:01 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_multi_empty" },
|
2015-09-15 09:04:01 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "uefi" },
|
templates: drop 'variables', move 'prio' to JobTemplates
Summary:
this is following a couple of upstream changes I noticeed while
playing with dump_templates. Upstream has completely got rid of
the 'variables' keys from all dicts, and when you run dump_
templates the output does not contain any 'variables' keys, so
it seems reasonable to ditch these entirely (I think it was some
old thing that got subsumed into 'settings'). Also, when you
run dump_templates the 'prio' values come out in JobTemplates,
not in TestSuites; if you look at load_templates there's a bit
marked "we have to migrate the prio from the TestSuite to the
JobTemplate" which does exactly what it sounds like, so it
seems a good idea to move these instead of relying on that to
always be there.
While I had to re-do all the priorities anyway I tried to clean
them up a bit. The idea is roughly this:
10 - 19: most-critical sanity tests (i.e. default_install)
20 - 29: Alpha tests
30 - 39: Beta tests
40 - 49: Final tests
50+ : Optional tests
within each group I ordered 64-bit first, UEFI second, and
32-bit last (usually just as x0 / x1 / x2).
Test Plan:
Check that the file is valid and loads correctly,
and that everything works more or less the same except the
order of tests run is a bit different.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: jskladan, garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D692
2015-12-16 21:03:41 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 31,
|
2015-09-15 09:04:01 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_software_raid" },
|
2015-09-15 09:04:01 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "uefi" },
|
templates: drop 'variables', move 'prio' to JobTemplates
Summary:
this is following a couple of upstream changes I noticeed while
playing with dump_templates. Upstream has completely got rid of
the 'variables' keys from all dicts, and when you run dump_
templates the output does not contain any 'variables' keys, so
it seems reasonable to ditch these entirely (I think it was some
old thing that got subsumed into 'settings'). Also, when you
run dump_templates the 'prio' values come out in JobTemplates,
not in TestSuites; if you look at load_templates there's a bit
marked "we have to migrate the prio from the TestSuite to the
JobTemplate" which does exactly what it sounds like, so it
seems a good idea to move these instead of relying on that to
always be there.
While I had to re-do all the priorities anyway I tried to clean
them up a bit. The idea is roughly this:
10 - 19: most-critical sanity tests (i.e. default_install)
20 - 29: Alpha tests
30 - 39: Beta tests
40 - 49: Final tests
50+ : Optional tests
within each group I ordered 64-bit first, UEFI second, and
32-bit last (usually just as x0 / x1 / x2).
Test Plan:
Check that the file is valid and loads correctly,
and that everything works more or less the same except the
order of tests run is a bit different.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: jskladan, garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D692
2015-12-16 21:03:41 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 31,
|
2015-09-15 09:04:01 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_delete_partial" },
|
2015-09-15 09:04:01 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "uefi" },
|
templates: drop 'variables', move 'prio' to JobTemplates
Summary:
this is following a couple of upstream changes I noticeed while
playing with dump_templates. Upstream has completely got rid of
the 'variables' keys from all dicts, and when you run dump_
templates the output does not contain any 'variables' keys, so
it seems reasonable to ditch these entirely (I think it was some
old thing that got subsumed into 'settings'). Also, when you
run dump_templates the 'prio' values come out in JobTemplates,
not in TestSuites; if you look at load_templates there's a bit
marked "we have to migrate the prio from the TestSuite to the
JobTemplate" which does exactly what it sounds like, so it
seems a good idea to move these instead of relying on that to
always be there.
While I had to re-do all the priorities anyway I tried to clean
them up a bit. The idea is roughly this:
10 - 19: most-critical sanity tests (i.e. default_install)
20 - 29: Alpha tests
30 - 39: Beta tests
40 - 49: Final tests
50+ : Optional tests
within each group I ordered 64-bit first, UEFI second, and
32-bit last (usually just as x0 / x1 / x2).
Test Plan:
Check that the file is valid and loads correctly,
and that everything works more or less the same except the
order of tests run is a bit different.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: jskladan, garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D692
2015-12-16 21:03:41 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 41,
|
2015-09-15 09:04:01 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_btrfs" },
|
2015-09-15 09:04:01 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "uefi" },
|
templates: drop 'variables', move 'prio' to JobTemplates
Summary:
this is following a couple of upstream changes I noticeed while
playing with dump_templates. Upstream has completely got rid of
the 'variables' keys from all dicts, and when you run dump_
templates the output does not contain any 'variables' keys, so
it seems reasonable to ditch these entirely (I think it was some
old thing that got subsumed into 'settings'). Also, when you
run dump_templates the 'prio' values come out in JobTemplates,
not in TestSuites; if you look at load_templates there's a bit
marked "we have to migrate the prio from the TestSuite to the
JobTemplate" which does exactly what it sounds like, so it
seems a good idea to move these instead of relying on that to
always be there.
While I had to re-do all the priorities anyway I tried to clean
them up a bit. The idea is roughly this:
10 - 19: most-critical sanity tests (i.e. default_install)
20 - 29: Alpha tests
30 - 39: Beta tests
40 - 49: Final tests
50+ : Optional tests
within each group I ordered 64-bit first, UEFI second, and
32-bit last (usually just as x0 / x1 / x2).
Test Plan:
Check that the file is valid and loads correctly,
and that everything works more or less the same except the
order of tests run is a bit different.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: jskladan, garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D692
2015-12-16 21:03:41 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 41,
|
2015-09-15 09:04:01 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_ext3" },
|
2015-09-15 09:04:01 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
2015-11-26 12:50:45 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "uefi" },
|
templates: drop 'variables', move 'prio' to JobTemplates
Summary:
this is following a couple of upstream changes I noticeed while
playing with dump_templates. Upstream has completely got rid of
the 'variables' keys from all dicts, and when you run dump_
templates the output does not contain any 'variables' keys, so
it seems reasonable to ditch these entirely (I think it was some
old thing that got subsumed into 'settings'). Also, when you
run dump_templates the 'prio' values come out in JobTemplates,
not in TestSuites; if you look at load_templates there's a bit
marked "we have to migrate the prio from the TestSuite to the
JobTemplate" which does exactly what it sounds like, so it
seems a good idea to move these instead of relying on that to
always be there.
While I had to re-do all the priorities anyway I tried to clean
them up a bit. The idea is roughly this:
10 - 19: most-critical sanity tests (i.e. default_install)
20 - 29: Alpha tests
30 - 39: Beta tests
40 - 49: Final tests
50+ : Optional tests
within each group I ordered 64-bit first, UEFI second, and
32-bit last (usually just as x0 / x1 / x2).
Test Plan:
Check that the file is valid and loads correctly,
and that everything works more or less the same except the
order of tests run is a bit different.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: jskladan, garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D692
2015-12-16 21:03:41 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 41,
|
2015-11-26 12:50:45 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_xfs" },
|
2015-11-26 12:50:45 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
2015-09-15 09:04:01 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "uefi" },
|
templates: drop 'variables', move 'prio' to JobTemplates
Summary:
this is following a couple of upstream changes I noticeed while
playing with dump_templates. Upstream has completely got rid of
the 'variables' keys from all dicts, and when you run dump_
templates the output does not contain any 'variables' keys, so
it seems reasonable to ditch these entirely (I think it was some
old thing that got subsumed into 'settings'). Also, when you
run dump_templates the 'prio' values come out in JobTemplates,
not in TestSuites; if you look at load_templates there's a bit
marked "we have to migrate the prio from the TestSuite to the
JobTemplate" which does exactly what it sounds like, so it
seems a good idea to move these instead of relying on that to
always be there.
While I had to re-do all the priorities anyway I tried to clean
them up a bit. The idea is roughly this:
10 - 19: most-critical sanity tests (i.e. default_install)
20 - 29: Alpha tests
30 - 39: Beta tests
40 - 49: Final tests
50+ : Optional tests
within each group I ordered 64-bit first, UEFI second, and
32-bit last (usually just as x0 / x1 / x2).
Test Plan:
Check that the file is valid and loads correctly,
and that everything works more or less the same except the
order of tests run is a bit different.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: jskladan, garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D692
2015-12-16 21:03:41 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 41,
|
2015-09-15 09:04:01 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_lvmthin" },
|
2015-09-15 09:04:01 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "uefi" },
|
templates: drop 'variables', move 'prio' to JobTemplates
Summary:
this is following a couple of upstream changes I noticeed while
playing with dump_templates. Upstream has completely got rid of
the 'variables' keys from all dicts, and when you run dump_
templates the output does not contain any 'variables' keys, so
it seems reasonable to ditch these entirely (I think it was some
old thing that got subsumed into 'settings'). Also, when you
run dump_templates the 'prio' values come out in JobTemplates,
not in TestSuites; if you look at load_templates there's a bit
marked "we have to migrate the prio from the TestSuite to the
JobTemplate" which does exactly what it sounds like, so it
seems a good idea to move these instead of relying on that to
always be there.
While I had to re-do all the priorities anyway I tried to clean
them up a bit. The idea is roughly this:
10 - 19: most-critical sanity tests (i.e. default_install)
20 - 29: Alpha tests
30 - 39: Beta tests
40 - 49: Final tests
50+ : Optional tests
within each group I ordered 64-bit first, UEFI second, and
32-bit last (usually just as x0 / x1 / x2).
Test Plan:
Check that the file is valid and loads correctly,
and that everything works more or less the same except the
order of tests run is a bit different.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: jskladan, garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D692
2015-12-16 21:03:41 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 51,
|
2015-09-15 09:04:01 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_no_swap" },
|
2015-09-15 09:04:01 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
2015-03-12 09:58:04 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
templates: drop 'variables', move 'prio' to JobTemplates
Summary:
this is following a couple of upstream changes I noticeed while
playing with dump_templates. Upstream has completely got rid of
the 'variables' keys from all dicts, and when you run dump_
templates the output does not contain any 'variables' keys, so
it seems reasonable to ditch these entirely (I think it was some
old thing that got subsumed into 'settings'). Also, when you
run dump_templates the 'prio' values come out in JobTemplates,
not in TestSuites; if you look at load_templates there's a bit
marked "we have to migrate the prio from the TestSuite to the
JobTemplate" which does exactly what it sounds like, so it
seems a good idea to move these instead of relying on that to
always be there.
While I had to re-do all the priorities anyway I tried to clean
them up a bit. The idea is roughly this:
10 - 19: most-critical sanity tests (i.e. default_install)
20 - 29: Alpha tests
30 - 39: Beta tests
40 - 49: Final tests
50+ : Optional tests
within each group I ordered 64-bit first, UEFI second, and
32-bit last (usually just as x0 / x1 / x2).
Test Plan:
Check that the file is valid and loads correctly,
and that everything works more or less the same except the
order of tests run is a bit different.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: jskladan, garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D692
2015-12-16 21:03:41 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 30,
|
2015-03-12 09:58:04 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
2015-03-19 21:11:17 +00:00
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
2015-03-12 09:58:04 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_kickstart_hdd" },
|
2015-03-12 09:58:04 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
2015-05-13 11:00:46 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
templates: drop 'variables', move 'prio' to JobTemplates
Summary:
this is following a couple of upstream changes I noticeed while
playing with dump_templates. Upstream has completely got rid of
the 'variables' keys from all dicts, and when you run dump_
templates the output does not contain any 'variables' keys, so
it seems reasonable to ditch these entirely (I think it was some
old thing that got subsumed into 'settings'). Also, when you
run dump_templates the 'prio' values come out in JobTemplates,
not in TestSuites; if you look at load_templates there's a bit
marked "we have to migrate the prio from the TestSuite to the
JobTemplate" which does exactly what it sounds like, so it
seems a good idea to move these instead of relying on that to
always be there.
While I had to re-do all the priorities anyway I tried to clean
them up a bit. The idea is roughly this:
10 - 19: most-critical sanity tests (i.e. default_install)
20 - 29: Alpha tests
30 - 39: Beta tests
40 - 49: Final tests
50+ : Optional tests
within each group I ordered 64-bit first, UEFI second, and
32-bit last (usually just as x0 / x1 / x2).
Test Plan:
Check that the file is valid and loads correctly,
and that everything works more or less the same except the
order of tests run is a bit different.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: jskladan, garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D692
2015-12-16 21:03:41 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 30,
|
2015-05-13 11:00:46 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
convert upgrade tests to dnf-plugin-system-upgrade
Summary:
This is a first cut which more or less works for now. Issues:
1) We're not really testing the BUILD, here. All the test does
is try and upgrade to the specified VERSION - so it'll be using
the latest 'stable' for the given VERSION at the time the test
runs. This isn't really that terrible, but especially for TC/RC
validation, we might want to make things a bit more elaborate
and set up the repo for the actual BUILD (and disable the main
repos).
2) We'd actually need --nogpgcheck for non-Rawhide, at one
specific point in the release cycle - after Branching but
before Bodhi activation (which is when we can be sure all
packages are signed). This won't matter until 24 branches, and
maybe releng will have it fixed by then...if not, I'll tweak
it.
3) We don't really test that the upgrade actually *happened*
for desktop, at the moment - the only thing in the old test
that really checked that was where we checked for the fedup
boot menu entry, but that has no analog in dnf. What we should
probably do is check that GUI login works, then switch to a
console and check /etc/fedora-release just as the minimal test
does.
Test Plan:
Run the tests. Note that creating the desktop disk
image doesn't work ATM, so I can't verify the desktop test
works, but the minimal one seems to (with D565). There'll be
a matching diff for openqa_fedora_tools to update the test
case names there.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: jskladan, garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D567
2015-09-10 21:49:13 +00:00
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "upgrade_minimal_64bit" },
|
2015-05-13 11:00:46 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
2015-07-17 10:52:56 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
templates: drop 'variables', move 'prio' to JobTemplates
Summary:
this is following a couple of upstream changes I noticeed while
playing with dump_templates. Upstream has completely got rid of
the 'variables' keys from all dicts, and when you run dump_
templates the output does not contain any 'variables' keys, so
it seems reasonable to ditch these entirely (I think it was some
old thing that got subsumed into 'settings'). Also, when you
run dump_templates the 'prio' values come out in JobTemplates,
not in TestSuites; if you look at load_templates there's a bit
marked "we have to migrate the prio from the TestSuite to the
JobTemplate" which does exactly what it sounds like, so it
seems a good idea to move these instead of relying on that to
always be there.
While I had to re-do all the priorities anyway I tried to clean
them up a bit. The idea is roughly this:
10 - 19: most-critical sanity tests (i.e. default_install)
20 - 29: Alpha tests
30 - 39: Beta tests
40 - 49: Final tests
50+ : Optional tests
within each group I ordered 64-bit first, UEFI second, and
32-bit last (usually just as x0 / x1 / x2).
Test Plan:
Check that the file is valid and loads correctly,
and that everything works more or less the same except the
order of tests run is a bit different.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: jskladan, garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D692
2015-12-16 21:03:41 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 30,
|
2015-07-17 10:52:56 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
convert upgrade tests to dnf-plugin-system-upgrade
Summary:
This is a first cut which more or less works for now. Issues:
1) We're not really testing the BUILD, here. All the test does
is try and upgrade to the specified VERSION - so it'll be using
the latest 'stable' for the given VERSION at the time the test
runs. This isn't really that terrible, but especially for TC/RC
validation, we might want to make things a bit more elaborate
and set up the repo for the actual BUILD (and disable the main
repos).
2) We'd actually need --nogpgcheck for non-Rawhide, at one
specific point in the release cycle - after Branching but
before Bodhi activation (which is when we can be sure all
packages are signed). This won't matter until 24 branches, and
maybe releng will have it fixed by then...if not, I'll tweak
it.
3) We don't really test that the upgrade actually *happened*
for desktop, at the moment - the only thing in the old test
that really checked that was where we checked for the fedup
boot menu entry, but that has no analog in dnf. What we should
probably do is check that GUI login works, then switch to a
console and check /etc/fedora-release just as the minimal test
does.
Test Plan:
Run the tests. Note that creating the desktop disk
image doesn't work ATM, so I can't verify the desktop test
works, but the minimal one seems to (with D565). There'll be
a matching diff for openqa_fedora_tools to update the test
case names there.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: jskladan, garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D567
2015-09-10 21:49:13 +00:00
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "upgrade_desktop_64bit" },
|
2015-07-17 10:52:56 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
2016-04-25 08:00:34 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
|
|
|
|
prio => 30,
|
|
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "upgrade_server_64bit" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
Test upgrade of FreeIPA server and client deployment
Summary:
This adds an upgrade variant of the FreeIPA tests, with only
the simplest client enrolment (sssd) for now. The server test
starts from the N-1 release and deploys the domain controller
role. The client test similarly starts from the N-1 release
and, when the server is deployed, enrols as a domain client.
Then the server upgrades itself, while the client waits (as the
server is its name server). Then the client upgrades itself,
while the server does some self-checks. The server then waits
for the client to do its checks before decommissioning itself,
as usual. So, summary: *deployment* of both server and client
occurs on N-1, then both are upgraded, then the actual *checks*
occur on N.
In my testing, this all more or less works, except the role
decommission step fails. This failure seems to be a genuine one
so far as I can tell; I intend to file a bug for it soon.
Test Plan:
Run the new tests, check they work. Run the existing
FreeIPA tests (both the compose and the update variants), check
they both behave the same.
Reviewers: jsedlak, jskladan
Reviewed By: jsedlak
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qa.fedoraproject.org/D1204
2017-05-17 19:39:45 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
|
|
|
|
prio => 30,
|
|
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "upgrade_server_domain_controller" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
|
|
|
|
prio => 30,
|
|
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2017-06-21 23:18:37 +00:00
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "upgrade_realmd_client" },
|
Test upgrade of FreeIPA server and client deployment
Summary:
This adds an upgrade variant of the FreeIPA tests, with only
the simplest client enrolment (sssd) for now. The server test
starts from the N-1 release and deploys the domain controller
role. The client test similarly starts from the N-1 release
and, when the server is deployed, enrols as a domain client.
Then the server upgrades itself, while the client waits (as the
server is its name server). Then the client upgrades itself,
while the server does some self-checks. The server then waits
for the client to do its checks before decommissioning itself,
as usual. So, summary: *deployment* of both server and client
occurs on N-1, then both are upgraded, then the actual *checks*
occur on N.
In my testing, this all more or less works, except the role
decommission step fails. This failure seems to be a genuine one
so far as I can tell; I intend to file a bug for it soon.
Test Plan:
Run the new tests, check they work. Run the existing
FreeIPA tests (both the compose and the update variants), check
they both behave the same.
Reviewers: jsedlak, jskladan
Reviewed By: jsedlak
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qa.fedoraproject.org/D1204
2017-05-17 19:39:45 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
2016-04-25 08:00:34 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
|
|
|
|
prio => 30,
|
|
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "upgrade_kde_64bit" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-07-08 15:56:57 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
|
|
|
|
prio => 30,
|
|
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "upgrade_desktop_encrypted_64bit" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2015-12-07 17:42:55 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
2017-02-21 01:33:14 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 40,
|
2015-12-07 17:42:55 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "upgrade_2_minimal_64bit" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
2017-02-21 01:33:14 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 40,
|
2015-12-07 17:42:55 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "upgrade_2_desktop_64bit" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-04-25 08:00:34 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
2017-02-21 01:33:14 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 40,
|
2016-04-25 08:00:34 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "upgrade_2_server_64bit" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
2017-02-21 01:33:14 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 40,
|
2016-04-25 08:00:34 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "upgrade_2_kde_64bit" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-07-08 15:56:57 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
2017-02-21 01:33:14 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 40,
|
2016-07-08 15:56:57 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "upgrade_2_desktop_encrypted_64bit" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2015-08-17 15:36:40 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
templates: drop 'variables', move 'prio' to JobTemplates
Summary:
this is following a couple of upstream changes I noticeed while
playing with dump_templates. Upstream has completely got rid of
the 'variables' keys from all dicts, and when you run dump_
templates the output does not contain any 'variables' keys, so
it seems reasonable to ditch these entirely (I think it was some
old thing that got subsumed into 'settings'). Also, when you
run dump_templates the 'prio' values come out in JobTemplates,
not in TestSuites; if you look at load_templates there's a bit
marked "we have to migrate the prio from the TestSuite to the
JobTemplate" which does exactly what it sounds like, so it
seems a good idea to move these instead of relying on that to
always be there.
While I had to re-do all the priorities anyway I tried to clean
them up a bit. The idea is roughly this:
10 - 19: most-critical sanity tests (i.e. default_install)
20 - 29: Alpha tests
30 - 39: Beta tests
40 - 49: Final tests
50+ : Optional tests
within each group I ordered 64-bit first, UEFI second, and
32-bit last (usually just as x0 / x1 / x2).
Test Plan:
Check that the file is valid and loads correctly,
and that everything works more or less the same except the
order of tests run is a bit different.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: jskladan, garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D692
2015-12-16 21:03:41 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 40,
|
2015-08-17 15:36:40 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_updates_img_local" },
|
2015-08-17 15:36:40 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
2015-09-08 13:54:22 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
templates: drop 'variables', move 'prio' to JobTemplates
Summary:
this is following a couple of upstream changes I noticeed while
playing with dump_templates. Upstream has completely got rid of
the 'variables' keys from all dicts, and when you run dump_
templates the output does not contain any 'variables' keys, so
it seems reasonable to ditch these entirely (I think it was some
old thing that got subsumed into 'settings'). Also, when you
run dump_templates the 'prio' values come out in JobTemplates,
not in TestSuites; if you look at load_templates there's a bit
marked "we have to migrate the prio from the TestSuite to the
JobTemplate" which does exactly what it sounds like, so it
seems a good idea to move these instead of relying on that to
always be there.
While I had to re-do all the priorities anyway I tried to clean
them up a bit. The idea is roughly this:
10 - 19: most-critical sanity tests (i.e. default_install)
20 - 29: Alpha tests
30 - 39: Beta tests
40 - 49: Final tests
50+ : Optional tests
within each group I ordered 64-bit first, UEFI second, and
32-bit last (usually just as x0 / x1 / x2).
Test Plan:
Check that the file is valid and loads correctly,
and that everything works more or less the same except the
order of tests run is a bit different.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: jskladan, garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D692
2015-12-16 21:03:41 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 40,
|
2015-09-08 13:54:22 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_shrink_ext4" },
|
2015-09-08 13:54:22 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
templates: drop 'variables', move 'prio' to JobTemplates
Summary:
this is following a couple of upstream changes I noticeed while
playing with dump_templates. Upstream has completely got rid of
the 'variables' keys from all dicts, and when you run dump_
templates the output does not contain any 'variables' keys, so
it seems reasonable to ditch these entirely (I think it was some
old thing that got subsumed into 'settings'). Also, when you
run dump_templates the 'prio' values come out in JobTemplates,
not in TestSuites; if you look at load_templates there's a bit
marked "we have to migrate the prio from the TestSuite to the
JobTemplate" which does exactly what it sounds like, so it
seems a good idea to move these instead of relying on that to
always be there.
While I had to re-do all the priorities anyway I tried to clean
them up a bit. The idea is roughly this:
10 - 19: most-critical sanity tests (i.e. default_install)
20 - 29: Alpha tests
30 - 39: Beta tests
40 - 49: Final tests
50+ : Optional tests
within each group I ordered 64-bit first, UEFI second, and
32-bit last (usually just as x0 / x1 / x2).
Test Plan:
Check that the file is valid and loads correctly,
and that everything works more or less the same except the
order of tests run is a bit different.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: jskladan, garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D692
2015-12-16 21:03:41 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 40,
|
2015-09-08 13:54:22 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_shrink_ntfs" },
|
2015-09-08 13:54:22 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
2015-09-15 01:08:58 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
templates: drop 'variables', move 'prio' to JobTemplates
Summary:
this is following a couple of upstream changes I noticeed while
playing with dump_templates. Upstream has completely got rid of
the 'variables' keys from all dicts, and when you run dump_
templates the output does not contain any 'variables' keys, so
it seems reasonable to ditch these entirely (I think it was some
old thing that got subsumed into 'settings'). Also, when you
run dump_templates the 'prio' values come out in JobTemplates,
not in TestSuites; if you look at load_templates there's a bit
marked "we have to migrate the prio from the TestSuite to the
JobTemplate" which does exactly what it sounds like, so it
seems a good idea to move these instead of relying on that to
always be there.
While I had to re-do all the priorities anyway I tried to clean
them up a bit. The idea is roughly this:
10 - 19: most-critical sanity tests (i.e. default_install)
20 - 29: Alpha tests
30 - 39: Beta tests
40 - 49: Final tests
50+ : Optional tests
within each group I ordered 64-bit first, UEFI second, and
32-bit last (usually just as x0 / x1 / x2).
Test Plan:
Check that the file is valid and loads correctly,
and that everything works more or less the same except the
order of tests run is a bit different.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: jskladan, garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D692
2015-12-16 21:03:41 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 40,
|
2015-09-15 01:08:58 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_european_language" },
|
2015-09-15 01:08:58 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
2016-05-20 14:52:55 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
|
|
|
|
prio => 40,
|
|
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_cyrillic_language" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-12-21 16:41:00 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
|
|
|
|
prio => 40,
|
|
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_asian_language" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-03-23 20:52:00 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
2017-02-21 01:33:14 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 20,
|
2016-03-23 20:52:00 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_kickstart_firewall_disabled" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-05-18 12:04:45 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2016-03-23 20:52:00 +00:00
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
2017-02-21 01:33:14 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 20,
|
2016-03-23 20:52:00 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_kickstart_firewall_configured" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
add NFS tests (and DHCP/DNS in the support server)
Summary:
Set up the support server to provide DHCP/DNS functionality and
an NFS server, providing a kickstart. Add a kickstart test just
like the other root-user-crypted-net kickstart tests except it
gets the kickstart from the support server via NFS. Also add NFS
repository tests and a second support server for Server-dvd-iso
flavor: this test must run on that flavor to ensure that packages
are actually available. The support server just mounts the
attached 'DVD' and exports it via NFS.
Note we don't need to do anything clever to avoid IP conflicts
between the two support servers, because os-autoinst-openvswitch
ensures each worker group is on its own VLAN.
As part of adding the NFS repo tests, I did a bit of cleanup,
moving little things we were repeating a lot into anacondatest,
and sharing the 'check if the repo was used' logic between all
the tests (by making it into a test step that's loaded for all
of them). I also simplified the 'was repo used' checks a bit,
it seems silly to run a 'grep' command inside the VM then have
os-autoinst do a grep on the output (which is effectively what
we were doing before), instead we'll just use a single grep
within the VM, and clean up the messy quoting/escaping a bit.
Test Plan:
Run all tests - at least all repository tests - and
check they work (make sure the tests are actually still sane,
not just that they pass). I've done runs of all the repo tests
and they look good to me, but please double-check. I'm currently
re-running the whole 24-20160609.n.0 test on staging with these
changes.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D888
2016-06-13 15:42:30 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
2017-02-21 01:33:14 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 30,
|
add NFS tests (and DHCP/DNS in the support server)
Summary:
Set up the support server to provide DHCP/DNS functionality and
an NFS server, providing a kickstart. Add a kickstart test just
like the other root-user-crypted-net kickstart tests except it
gets the kickstart from the support server via NFS. Also add NFS
repository tests and a second support server for Server-dvd-iso
flavor: this test must run on that flavor to ensure that packages
are actually available. The support server just mounts the
attached 'DVD' and exports it via NFS.
Note we don't need to do anything clever to avoid IP conflicts
between the two support servers, because os-autoinst-openvswitch
ensures each worker group is on its own VLAN.
As part of adding the NFS repo tests, I did a bit of cleanup,
moving little things we were repeating a lot into anacondatest,
and sharing the 'check if the repo was used' logic between all
the tests (by making it into a test step that's loaded for all
of them). I also simplified the 'was repo used' checks a bit,
it seems silly to run a 'grep' command inside the VM then have
os-autoinst do a grep on the output (which is effectively what
we were doing before), instead we'll just use a single grep
within the VM, and clean up the messy quoting/escaping a bit.
Test Plan:
Run all tests - at least all repository tests - and
check they work (make sure the tests are actually still sane,
not just that they pass). I've done runs of all the repo tests
and they look good to me, but please double-check. I'm currently
re-running the whole 24-20160609.n.0 test on staging with these
changes.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D888
2016-06-13 15:42:30 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_kickstart_nfs" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-05-31 21:24:34 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
2017-02-21 01:33:14 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 20,
|
2016-05-31 21:24:34 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "Server-dvd-iso",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "server_firewall_default" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2015-08-16 01:10:14 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2015-11-25 11:37:55 +00:00
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
2017-02-21 01:33:14 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 61,
|
2015-08-16 01:10:14 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "i386",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
Pungi 4 conversion: handle Pungi-derived BUILD and FLAVOR
With the arrival of Pungi 4, the scheduler is no longer using
fedfind-provided BUILD and FLAVOR values, but ones derived from
Pungi properties. BUILD is now simply the Pungi compose_id.
FLAVOR is produced by joining the Pungi variant, type, and
format with '-' characters as the separators.
Pungi, unfortunately, does not treat 'Rawhide' as a release, it
synthesizes a release number for Rawhide composes and places
that in the compose ID. To cope with that, for now, the
scheduler will set RAWHIDE to '1' if the compose is a Rawhide
one. As we have to adapt all places where we parse the release
in any case, this commit consolidates them into a fedorabase
subroutine.
For the one place where we also used to parse the 'milestone'
from fedfind, there is a placeholder get_milestone subroutine
which currently returns an empty string, as I don't yet have a
good handle on how to draw the kinds of distinctions fedfind
mapped to 'milestone' from Pungi metadata.
2016-01-28 04:48:04 +00:00
|
|
|
flavor => "Workstation-live-iso",
|
2015-08-16 01:10:14 +00:00
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_default" },
|
2015-08-16 01:10:14 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
2015-11-25 11:37:55 +00:00
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
2017-02-21 01:33:14 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 62,
|
2015-08-16 01:10:14 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "i386",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
Pungi 4 conversion: handle Pungi-derived BUILD and FLAVOR
With the arrival of Pungi 4, the scheduler is no longer using
fedfind-provided BUILD and FLAVOR values, but ones derived from
Pungi properties. BUILD is now simply the Pungi compose_id.
FLAVOR is produced by joining the Pungi variant, type, and
format with '-' characters as the separators.
Pungi, unfortunately, does not treat 'Rawhide' as a release, it
synthesizes a release number for Rawhide composes and places
that in the compose ID. To cope with that, for now, the
scheduler will set RAWHIDE to '1' if the compose is a Rawhide
one. As we have to adapt all places where we parse the release
in any case, this commit consolidates them into a fedorabase
subroutine.
For the one place where we also used to parse the 'milestone'
from fedfind, there is a placeholder get_milestone subroutine
which currently returns an empty string, as I don't yet have a
good handle on how to draw the kinds of distinctions fedfind
mapped to 'milestone' from Pungi metadata.
2016-01-28 04:48:04 +00:00
|
|
|
flavor => "Server-boot-iso",
|
2015-08-16 01:10:14 +00:00
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_default" },
|
2015-08-16 01:10:14 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
2015-10-06 22:27:27 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2015-11-25 11:37:55 +00:00
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
2017-02-21 01:33:14 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 62,
|
2015-10-06 22:27:27 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "i386",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
Pungi 4 conversion: handle Pungi-derived BUILD and FLAVOR
With the arrival of Pungi 4, the scheduler is no longer using
fedfind-provided BUILD and FLAVOR values, but ones derived from
Pungi properties. BUILD is now simply the Pungi compose_id.
FLAVOR is produced by joining the Pungi variant, type, and
format with '-' characters as the separators.
Pungi, unfortunately, does not treat 'Rawhide' as a release, it
synthesizes a release number for Rawhide composes and places
that in the compose ID. To cope with that, for now, the
scheduler will set RAWHIDE to '1' if the compose is a Rawhide
one. As we have to adapt all places where we parse the release
in any case, this commit consolidates them into a fedorabase
subroutine.
For the one place where we also used to parse the 'milestone'
from fedfind, there is a placeholder get_milestone subroutine
which currently returns an empty string, as I don't yet have a
good handle on how to draw the kinds of distinctions fedfind
mapped to 'milestone' from Pungi metadata.
2016-01-28 04:48:04 +00:00
|
|
|
flavor => "Server-dvd-iso",
|
2015-10-06 22:27:27 +00:00
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_default" },
|
2015-10-06 22:27:27 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
2015-08-16 01:10:14 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2015-11-25 11:37:55 +00:00
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
2017-02-21 01:33:14 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 62,
|
2015-08-16 01:10:14 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "i386",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
Pungi 4 conversion: handle Pungi-derived BUILD and FLAVOR
With the arrival of Pungi 4, the scheduler is no longer using
fedfind-provided BUILD and FLAVOR values, but ones derived from
Pungi properties. BUILD is now simply the Pungi compose_id.
FLAVOR is produced by joining the Pungi variant, type, and
format with '-' characters as the separators.
Pungi, unfortunately, does not treat 'Rawhide' as a release, it
synthesizes a release number for Rawhide composes and places
that in the compose ID. To cope with that, for now, the
scheduler will set RAWHIDE to '1' if the compose is a Rawhide
one. As we have to adapt all places where we parse the release
in any case, this commit consolidates them into a fedorabase
subroutine.
For the one place where we also used to parse the 'milestone'
from fedfind, there is a placeholder get_milestone subroutine
which currently returns an empty string, as I don't yet have a
good handle on how to draw the kinds of distinctions fedfind
mapped to 'milestone' from Pungi metadata.
2016-01-28 04:48:04 +00:00
|
|
|
flavor => "Everything-boot-iso",
|
2015-08-16 01:10:14 +00:00
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_default" },
|
2015-08-16 01:10:14 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
2017-01-16 17:30:14 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
|
|
|
|
prio => 100,
|
|
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "i386",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "Workstation-boot-iso",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "memory_check" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2015-12-22 08:23:25 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
2017-02-21 01:33:14 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 67,
|
2015-12-22 08:23:25 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "i386",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
Pungi 4 conversion: handle Pungi-derived BUILD and FLAVOR
With the arrival of Pungi 4, the scheduler is no longer using
fedfind-provided BUILD and FLAVOR values, but ones derived from
Pungi properties. BUILD is now simply the Pungi compose_id.
FLAVOR is produced by joining the Pungi variant, type, and
format with '-' characters as the separators.
Pungi, unfortunately, does not treat 'Rawhide' as a release, it
synthesizes a release number for Rawhide composes and places
that in the compose ID. To cope with that, for now, the
scheduler will set RAWHIDE to '1' if the compose is a Rawhide
one. As we have to adapt all places where we parse the release
in any case, this commit consolidates them into a fedorabase
subroutine.
For the one place where we also used to parse the 'milestone'
from fedfind, there is a placeholder get_milestone subroutine
which currently returns an empty string, as I don't yet have a
good handle on how to draw the kinds of distinctions fedfind
mapped to 'milestone' from Pungi metadata.
2016-01-28 04:48:04 +00:00
|
|
|
flavor => "Workstation-boot-iso",
|
2015-12-22 08:23:25 +00:00
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_default" },
|
2015-12-22 08:23:25 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
2015-09-14 06:52:37 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2015-11-25 11:37:55 +00:00
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
2017-02-21 01:33:14 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 67,
|
2015-09-14 06:52:37 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "i386",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
Pungi 4 conversion: handle Pungi-derived BUILD and FLAVOR
With the arrival of Pungi 4, the scheduler is no longer using
fedfind-provided BUILD and FLAVOR values, but ones derived from
Pungi properties. BUILD is now simply the Pungi compose_id.
FLAVOR is produced by joining the Pungi variant, type, and
format with '-' characters as the separators.
Pungi, unfortunately, does not treat 'Rawhide' as a release, it
synthesizes a release number for Rawhide composes and places
that in the compose ID. To cope with that, for now, the
scheduler will set RAWHIDE to '1' if the compose is a Rawhide
one. As we have to adapt all places where we parse the release
in any case, this commit consolidates them into a fedorabase
subroutine.
For the one place where we also used to parse the 'milestone'
from fedfind, there is a placeholder get_milestone subroutine
which currently returns an empty string, as I don't yet have a
good handle on how to draw the kinds of distinctions fedfind
mapped to 'milestone' from Pungi metadata.
2016-01-28 04:48:04 +00:00
|
|
|
flavor => "KDE-live-iso",
|
2015-09-14 06:52:37 +00:00
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_default" },
|
2015-09-14 06:52:37 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
2015-08-16 01:10:14 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2015-11-25 11:37:55 +00:00
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
2017-02-21 01:33:14 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 82,
|
2015-08-16 01:10:14 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "i386",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_package_set_minimal" },
|
2015-08-16 01:10:14 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
2015-11-25 11:37:55 +00:00
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
2017-02-21 01:33:14 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 72,
|
2015-08-16 01:10:14 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "i386",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_repository_http_graphical" },
|
2015-08-16 01:10:14 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
2015-11-25 11:37:55 +00:00
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
2017-02-21 01:33:14 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 72,
|
2015-08-16 01:10:14 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "i386",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_scsi_updates_img" },
|
2015-08-16 01:10:14 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
2015-11-25 11:37:55 +00:00
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
2017-02-21 01:33:14 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 82,
|
2015-08-16 01:10:14 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "i386",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_simple_encrypted" },
|
2015-08-16 01:10:14 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
2015-11-25 11:37:55 +00:00
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
2017-02-21 01:33:14 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 82,
|
2015-08-16 01:10:14 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "i386",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_software_raid" },
|
2015-08-16 01:10:14 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
2015-11-25 11:37:55 +00:00
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
2017-02-21 01:33:14 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 92,
|
2015-08-16 01:10:14 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "i386",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_btrfs" },
|
2015-08-16 01:10:14 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
2015-11-25 11:37:55 +00:00
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
2017-02-21 01:33:14 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 92,
|
2015-08-16 01:10:14 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "i386",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_ext3" },
|
2015-08-16 01:10:14 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
2015-11-25 11:37:55 +00:00
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
2017-02-21 01:33:14 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 92,
|
2015-08-16 01:10:14 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "i386",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_lvmthin" },
|
2015-08-16 01:10:14 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
2017-04-24 12:23:35 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
|
|
|
|
prio => 93,
|
|
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "i386",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_blivet_ext3" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2017-05-19 11:58:16 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
|
|
|
|
prio => 93,
|
|
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "i386",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_blivet_btrfs" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2017-04-24 12:23:35 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
|
|
|
|
prio => 93,
|
|
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "i386",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_blivet_no_swap" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
|
|
|
|
prio => 93,
|
|
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "i386",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_blivet_xfs" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
|
|
|
|
prio => 93,
|
|
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "i386",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_blivet_software_raid" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
|
|
|
|
prio => 93,
|
|
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "i386",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_blivet_lvmthin" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2015-08-16 01:10:14 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2015-11-25 11:37:55 +00:00
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
2017-02-21 01:33:14 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 82,
|
2015-08-16 01:10:14 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "i386",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
convert upgrade tests to dnf-plugin-system-upgrade
Summary:
This is a first cut which more or less works for now. Issues:
1) We're not really testing the BUILD, here. All the test does
is try and upgrade to the specified VERSION - so it'll be using
the latest 'stable' for the given VERSION at the time the test
runs. This isn't really that terrible, but especially for TC/RC
validation, we might want to make things a bit more elaborate
and set up the repo for the actual BUILD (and disable the main
repos).
2) We'd actually need --nogpgcheck for non-Rawhide, at one
specific point in the release cycle - after Branching but
before Bodhi activation (which is when we can be sure all
packages are signed). This won't matter until 24 branches, and
maybe releng will have it fixed by then...if not, I'll tweak
it.
3) We don't really test that the upgrade actually *happened*
for desktop, at the moment - the only thing in the old test
that really checked that was where we checked for the fedup
boot menu entry, but that has no analog in dnf. What we should
probably do is check that GUI login works, then switch to a
console and check /etc/fedora-release just as the minimal test
does.
Test Plan:
Run the tests. Note that creating the desktop disk
image doesn't work ATM, so I can't verify the desktop test
works, but the minimal one seems to (with D565). There'll be
a matching diff for openqa_fedora_tools to update the test
case names there.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: jskladan, garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D567
2015-09-10 21:49:13 +00:00
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "upgrade_desktop_32bit" },
|
2015-12-07 18:12:06 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
2015-12-07 18:10:08 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
2017-02-21 01:33:14 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 92,
|
2015-12-07 18:10:08 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "i386",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "upgrade_2_desktop_32bit" },
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2015-12-08 10:49:38 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
machine => { name => "64bit" },
|
2017-02-21 01:33:14 +00:00
|
|
|
prio => 92,
|
2015-12-08 10:49:38 +00:00
|
|
|
product => {
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "i386",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
test_suite => { name => "install_package_set_kde" },
|
2015-12-08 10:49:38 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
2015-01-26 10:33:26 +00:00
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
Machines => [
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
backend => "qemu",
|
|
|
|
|
name => "64bit",
|
2015-02-19 13:15:29 +00:00
|
|
|
settings => [
|
2016-12-21 02:42:23 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "QEMUCPU", value => "Nehalem" },
|
2015-08-16 01:10:14 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "QEMUCPUS", value => "2"},
|
2017-03-20 18:36:20 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "QEMUVGA", value => "std"},
|
2015-10-15 14:07:00 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "QEMURAM", value => "2048"},
|
2017-07-26 23:12:49 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "PART_TABLE_TYPE", value => "mbr"},
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "WORKER_CLASS", value => "qemu_x86_64" }
|
2015-08-16 01:10:14 +00:00
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2015-09-15 09:04:01 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
backend => "qemu",
|
|
|
|
|
name => "uefi",
|
|
|
|
|
settings => [
|
2016-12-21 02:42:23 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "QEMUCPU", value => "Nehalem" },
|
2015-09-15 09:04:01 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "QEMUCPUS", value => "2"},
|
2017-03-20 18:36:20 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "QEMUVGA", value => "std"},
|
2015-09-15 09:04:01 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "QEMURAM", value => "2048"},
|
2015-10-15 14:07:00 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "UEFI", value => "1"},
|
2017-07-26 23:12:49 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "PART_TABLE_TYPE", value => "gpt"},
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "WORKER_CLASS", value => "qemu_x86_64" }
|
2015-09-15 09:04:01 +00:00
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-05-18 12:04:45 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
backend => "qemu",
|
|
|
|
|
name => "ARM",
|
|
|
|
|
settings => [
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "QEMU", value => "arm" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "QEMUCPUS", value => "2"},
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "QEMUMACHINE", value => "virt"},
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "QEMURAM", value => "1024"},
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "QEMU_NO_KVM", value => "1"},
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "TIMEOUT_SCALE", value => "5" },
|
2017-07-26 23:12:49 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "SERIALDEV", value => "ttyAMA0" },
|
|
|
|
|
# we're running ARM tests on x86_64 for now as we have
|
|
|
|
|
# no ARM workers
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "WORKER_CLASS", value => "qemu_x86_64" }
|
2016-05-18 12:04:45 +00:00
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2015-01-26 10:33:26 +00:00
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
Products => [
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
2015-03-18 21:28:03 +00:00
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
name => "",
|
|
|
|
|
settings => [
|
2017-02-02 15:13:10 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "TEST_TARGET", value => "ISO" }
|
2015-03-18 21:28:03 +00:00
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
Pungi 4 conversion: handle Pungi-derived BUILD and FLAVOR
With the arrival of Pungi 4, the scheduler is no longer using
fedfind-provided BUILD and FLAVOR values, but ones derived from
Pungi properties. BUILD is now simply the Pungi compose_id.
FLAVOR is produced by joining the Pungi variant, type, and
format with '-' characters as the separators.
Pungi, unfortunately, does not treat 'Rawhide' as a release, it
synthesizes a release number for Rawhide composes and places
that in the compose ID. To cope with that, for now, the
scheduler will set RAWHIDE to '1' if the compose is a Rawhide
one. As we have to adapt all places where we parse the release
in any case, this commit consolidates them into a fedorabase
subroutine.
For the one place where we also used to parse the 'milestone'
from fedfind, there is a placeholder get_milestone subroutine
which currently returns an empty string, as I don't yet have a
good handle on how to draw the kinds of distinctions fedfind
mapped to 'milestone' from Pungi metadata.
2016-01-28 04:48:04 +00:00
|
|
|
flavor => "Everything-boot-iso",
|
2015-03-18 21:28:03 +00:00
|
|
|
name => "",
|
|
|
|
|
settings => [
|
2017-02-02 15:13:10 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "TEST_TARGET", value => "ISO" }
|
2015-03-18 21:28:03 +00:00
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
Pungi 4 conversion: handle Pungi-derived BUILD and FLAVOR
With the arrival of Pungi 4, the scheduler is no longer using
fedfind-provided BUILD and FLAVOR values, but ones derived from
Pungi properties. BUILD is now simply the Pungi compose_id.
FLAVOR is produced by joining the Pungi variant, type, and
format with '-' characters as the separators.
Pungi, unfortunately, does not treat 'Rawhide' as a release, it
synthesizes a release number for Rawhide composes and places
that in the compose ID. To cope with that, for now, the
scheduler will set RAWHIDE to '1' if the compose is a Rawhide
one. As we have to adapt all places where we parse the release
in any case, this commit consolidates them into a fedorabase
subroutine.
For the one place where we also used to parse the 'milestone'
from fedfind, there is a placeholder get_milestone subroutine
which currently returns an empty string, as I don't yet have a
good handle on how to draw the kinds of distinctions fedfind
mapped to 'milestone' from Pungi metadata.
2016-01-28 04:48:04 +00:00
|
|
|
flavor => "Server-boot-iso",
|
2015-01-26 10:33:26 +00:00
|
|
|
name => "",
|
|
|
|
|
settings => [
|
2017-02-02 15:13:10 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "TEST_TARGET", value => "ISO" }
|
2015-01-26 10:33:26 +00:00
|
|
|
],
|
2015-03-18 21:28:03 +00:00
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
2015-01-26 10:33:26 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
2015-10-06 22:27:27 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
Pungi 4 conversion: handle Pungi-derived BUILD and FLAVOR
With the arrival of Pungi 4, the scheduler is no longer using
fedfind-provided BUILD and FLAVOR values, but ones derived from
Pungi properties. BUILD is now simply the Pungi compose_id.
FLAVOR is produced by joining the Pungi variant, type, and
format with '-' characters as the separators.
Pungi, unfortunately, does not treat 'Rawhide' as a release, it
synthesizes a release number for Rawhide composes and places
that in the compose ID. To cope with that, for now, the
scheduler will set RAWHIDE to '1' if the compose is a Rawhide
one. As we have to adapt all places where we parse the release
in any case, this commit consolidates them into a fedorabase
subroutine.
For the one place where we also used to parse the 'milestone'
from fedfind, there is a placeholder get_milestone subroutine
which currently returns an empty string, as I don't yet have a
good handle on how to draw the kinds of distinctions fedfind
mapped to 'milestone' from Pungi metadata.
2016-01-28 04:48:04 +00:00
|
|
|
flavor => "Server-dvd-iso",
|
2015-10-06 22:27:27 +00:00
|
|
|
name => "",
|
|
|
|
|
settings => [
|
2017-02-02 15:13:10 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "TEST_TARGET", value => "ISO" }
|
2015-10-06 22:27:27 +00:00
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
add a default_install test for cloud atomic installer image
Summary:
We have these 'atomic installer' images (so far just Cloud),
and maxamillion wanted to get them tested. Turns out it's
pretty trivial - they look much like other installs. Only
little wrinkle is they have a reduced hub (no repository
needles) like live images, but are not like live images in
any other way, so I rejigged the 'small hub needle filtering'
handling a bit.
There will be an accompanying diff for tools, and also some
changes in fedfind (these images are getting built nightly
for *current stable*, and it'd be good to test those).
Because we'd like to test the 22 nightlies, I had to add some
needles for 'olddpi' versions of a few screens. See 2e4c1c2 -
the 22 Atomic installer images still have the old GTK+ code
meaning they run at 96.09dpi. I only retook the necessary
needles for the default-install test, if we add any others we
made need to retake a few more needles.
Test Plan:
Schedule jobs for a compose with the atomic installer
image. You will need the matching openqa_fedora_tools diff and
the very latest git fedfind. Check the test for that image runs,
all other tests run as usual, excessive images are not
downloaded, and the atomic installer is not used for running
universal tests.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D595
2015-09-29 18:36:11 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
2016-10-05 23:43:07 +00:00
|
|
|
flavor => "Atomic-dvd_ostree-iso",
|
add a default_install test for cloud atomic installer image
Summary:
We have these 'atomic installer' images (so far just Cloud),
and maxamillion wanted to get them tested. Turns out it's
pretty trivial - they look much like other installs. Only
little wrinkle is they have a reduced hub (no repository
needles) like live images, but are not like live images in
any other way, so I rejigged the 'small hub needle filtering'
handling a bit.
There will be an accompanying diff for tools, and also some
changes in fedfind (these images are getting built nightly
for *current stable*, and it'd be good to test those).
Because we'd like to test the 22 nightlies, I had to add some
needles for 'olddpi' versions of a few screens. See 2e4c1c2 -
the 22 Atomic installer images still have the old GTK+ code
meaning they run at 96.09dpi. I only retook the necessary
needles for the default-install test, if we add any others we
made need to retake a few more needles.
Test Plan:
Schedule jobs for a compose with the atomic installer
image. You will need the matching openqa_fedora_tools diff and
the very latest git fedfind. Check the test for that image runs,
all other tests run as usual, excessive images are not
downloaded, and the atomic installer is not used for running
universal tests.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D595
2015-09-29 18:36:11 +00:00
|
|
|
name => "",
|
|
|
|
|
settings => [
|
2017-02-02 15:13:10 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "CANNED", value => "1" },
|
2017-06-15 21:11:17 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "PACKAGE_SET", value => "default" },
|
2017-02-02 15:13:10 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "TEST_TARGET", value => "ISO" }
|
add a default_install test for cloud atomic installer image
Summary:
We have these 'atomic installer' images (so far just Cloud),
and maxamillion wanted to get them tested. Turns out it's
pretty trivial - they look much like other installs. Only
little wrinkle is they have a reduced hub (no repository
needles) like live images, but are not like live images in
any other way, so I rejigged the 'small hub needle filtering'
handling a bit.
There will be an accompanying diff for tools, and also some
changes in fedfind (these images are getting built nightly
for *current stable*, and it'd be good to test those).
Because we'd like to test the 22 nightlies, I had to add some
needles for 'olddpi' versions of a few screens. See 2e4c1c2 -
the 22 Atomic installer images still have the old GTK+ code
meaning they run at 96.09dpi. I only retook the necessary
needles for the default-install test, if we add any others we
made need to retake a few more needles.
Test Plan:
Schedule jobs for a compose with the atomic installer
image. You will need the matching openqa_fedora_tools diff and
the very latest git fedfind. Check the test for that image runs,
all other tests run as usual, excessive images are not
downloaded, and the atomic installer is not used for running
universal tests.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D595
2015-09-29 18:36:11 +00:00
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2015-12-22 08:23:25 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
Pungi 4 conversion: handle Pungi-derived BUILD and FLAVOR
With the arrival of Pungi 4, the scheduler is no longer using
fedfind-provided BUILD and FLAVOR values, but ones derived from
Pungi properties. BUILD is now simply the Pungi compose_id.
FLAVOR is produced by joining the Pungi variant, type, and
format with '-' characters as the separators.
Pungi, unfortunately, does not treat 'Rawhide' as a release, it
synthesizes a release number for Rawhide composes and places
that in the compose ID. To cope with that, for now, the
scheduler will set RAWHIDE to '1' if the compose is a Rawhide
one. As we have to adapt all places where we parse the release
in any case, this commit consolidates them into a fedorabase
subroutine.
For the one place where we also used to parse the 'milestone'
from fedfind, there is a placeholder get_milestone subroutine
which currently returns an empty string, as I don't yet have a
good handle on how to draw the kinds of distinctions fedfind
mapped to 'milestone' from Pungi metadata.
2016-01-28 04:48:04 +00:00
|
|
|
flavor => "Workstation-boot-iso",
|
2015-12-22 08:23:25 +00:00
|
|
|
name => "",
|
|
|
|
|
settings => [
|
2017-02-02 15:13:10 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "DESKTOP", value => "gnome" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "TEST_TARGET", value => "ISO" }
|
2015-12-22 08:23:25 +00:00
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2015-03-18 21:28:03 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
Pungi 4 conversion: handle Pungi-derived BUILD and FLAVOR
With the arrival of Pungi 4, the scheduler is no longer using
fedfind-provided BUILD and FLAVOR values, but ones derived from
Pungi properties. BUILD is now simply the Pungi compose_id.
FLAVOR is produced by joining the Pungi variant, type, and
format with '-' characters as the separators.
Pungi, unfortunately, does not treat 'Rawhide' as a release, it
synthesizes a release number for Rawhide composes and places
that in the compose ID. To cope with that, for now, the
scheduler will set RAWHIDE to '1' if the compose is a Rawhide
one. As we have to adapt all places where we parse the release
in any case, this commit consolidates them into a fedorabase
subroutine.
For the one place where we also used to parse the 'milestone'
from fedfind, there is a placeholder get_milestone subroutine
which currently returns an empty string, as I don't yet have a
good handle on how to draw the kinds of distinctions fedfind
mapped to 'milestone' from Pungi metadata.
2016-01-28 04:48:04 +00:00
|
|
|
flavor => "Workstation-live-iso",
|
2015-03-18 21:28:03 +00:00
|
|
|
name => "",
|
|
|
|
|
settings => [
|
2015-08-16 01:10:14 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "LIVE", value => "1" },
|
2017-06-15 21:11:17 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "PACKAGE_SET", value => "default" },
|
2017-02-02 15:13:10 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "DESKTOP", value => "gnome" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "TEST_TARGET", value => "ISO" }
|
2015-08-16 01:10:14 +00:00
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2015-09-14 06:52:37 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
Pungi 4 conversion: handle Pungi-derived BUILD and FLAVOR
With the arrival of Pungi 4, the scheduler is no longer using
fedfind-provided BUILD and FLAVOR values, but ones derived from
Pungi properties. BUILD is now simply the Pungi compose_id.
FLAVOR is produced by joining the Pungi variant, type, and
format with '-' characters as the separators.
Pungi, unfortunately, does not treat 'Rawhide' as a release, it
synthesizes a release number for Rawhide composes and places
that in the compose ID. To cope with that, for now, the
scheduler will set RAWHIDE to '1' if the compose is a Rawhide
one. As we have to adapt all places where we parse the release
in any case, this commit consolidates them into a fedorabase
subroutine.
For the one place where we also used to parse the 'milestone'
from fedfind, there is a placeholder get_milestone subroutine
which currently returns an empty string, as I don't yet have a
good handle on how to draw the kinds of distinctions fedfind
mapped to 'milestone' from Pungi metadata.
2016-01-28 04:48:04 +00:00
|
|
|
flavor => "KDE-live-iso",
|
2015-09-14 06:52:37 +00:00
|
|
|
name => "",
|
|
|
|
|
settings => [
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "LIVE", value => "1" },
|
2017-06-15 21:11:17 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "PACKAGE_SET", value => "default" },
|
2017-02-02 15:13:10 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "DESKTOP", value => "kde" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "TEST_TARGET", value => "ISO" }
|
2015-09-14 06:52:37 +00:00
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2015-08-16 01:10:14 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "i386",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "universal",
|
|
|
|
|
name => "",
|
|
|
|
|
settings => [
|
2017-02-02 15:13:10 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "TEST_TARGET", value => "ISO" }
|
2015-08-16 01:10:14 +00:00
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "i386",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
Pungi 4 conversion: handle Pungi-derived BUILD and FLAVOR
With the arrival of Pungi 4, the scheduler is no longer using
fedfind-provided BUILD and FLAVOR values, but ones derived from
Pungi properties. BUILD is now simply the Pungi compose_id.
FLAVOR is produced by joining the Pungi variant, type, and
format with '-' characters as the separators.
Pungi, unfortunately, does not treat 'Rawhide' as a release, it
synthesizes a release number for Rawhide composes and places
that in the compose ID. To cope with that, for now, the
scheduler will set RAWHIDE to '1' if the compose is a Rawhide
one. As we have to adapt all places where we parse the release
in any case, this commit consolidates them into a fedorabase
subroutine.
For the one place where we also used to parse the 'milestone'
from fedfind, there is a placeholder get_milestone subroutine
which currently returns an empty string, as I don't yet have a
good handle on how to draw the kinds of distinctions fedfind
mapped to 'milestone' from Pungi metadata.
2016-01-28 04:48:04 +00:00
|
|
|
flavor => "Everything-boot-iso",
|
2015-08-16 01:10:14 +00:00
|
|
|
name => "",
|
|
|
|
|
settings => [
|
2017-02-02 15:13:10 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "TEST_TARGET", value => "ISO" }
|
2015-08-16 01:10:14 +00:00
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "i386",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
Pungi 4 conversion: handle Pungi-derived BUILD and FLAVOR
With the arrival of Pungi 4, the scheduler is no longer using
fedfind-provided BUILD and FLAVOR values, but ones derived from
Pungi properties. BUILD is now simply the Pungi compose_id.
FLAVOR is produced by joining the Pungi variant, type, and
format with '-' characters as the separators.
Pungi, unfortunately, does not treat 'Rawhide' as a release, it
synthesizes a release number for Rawhide composes and places
that in the compose ID. To cope with that, for now, the
scheduler will set RAWHIDE to '1' if the compose is a Rawhide
one. As we have to adapt all places where we parse the release
in any case, this commit consolidates them into a fedorabase
subroutine.
For the one place where we also used to parse the 'milestone'
from fedfind, there is a placeholder get_milestone subroutine
which currently returns an empty string, as I don't yet have a
good handle on how to draw the kinds of distinctions fedfind
mapped to 'milestone' from Pungi metadata.
2016-01-28 04:48:04 +00:00
|
|
|
flavor => "Server-boot-iso",
|
2015-08-16 01:10:14 +00:00
|
|
|
name => "",
|
|
|
|
|
settings => [
|
2017-02-02 15:13:10 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "TEST_TARGET", value => "ISO" }
|
2015-08-16 01:10:14 +00:00
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "i386",
|
2015-10-06 22:27:27 +00:00
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
Pungi 4 conversion: handle Pungi-derived BUILD and FLAVOR
With the arrival of Pungi 4, the scheduler is no longer using
fedfind-provided BUILD and FLAVOR values, but ones derived from
Pungi properties. BUILD is now simply the Pungi compose_id.
FLAVOR is produced by joining the Pungi variant, type, and
format with '-' characters as the separators.
Pungi, unfortunately, does not treat 'Rawhide' as a release, it
synthesizes a release number for Rawhide composes and places
that in the compose ID. To cope with that, for now, the
scheduler will set RAWHIDE to '1' if the compose is a Rawhide
one. As we have to adapt all places where we parse the release
in any case, this commit consolidates them into a fedorabase
subroutine.
For the one place where we also used to parse the 'milestone'
from fedfind, there is a placeholder get_milestone subroutine
which currently returns an empty string, as I don't yet have a
good handle on how to draw the kinds of distinctions fedfind
mapped to 'milestone' from Pungi metadata.
2016-01-28 04:48:04 +00:00
|
|
|
flavor => "Server-dvd-iso",
|
2015-10-06 22:27:27 +00:00
|
|
|
name => "",
|
|
|
|
|
settings => [
|
2017-02-02 15:13:10 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "TEST_TARGET", value => "ISO" }
|
2015-10-06 22:27:27 +00:00
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2015-12-22 08:23:25 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "i386",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
Pungi 4 conversion: handle Pungi-derived BUILD and FLAVOR
With the arrival of Pungi 4, the scheduler is no longer using
fedfind-provided BUILD and FLAVOR values, but ones derived from
Pungi properties. BUILD is now simply the Pungi compose_id.
FLAVOR is produced by joining the Pungi variant, type, and
format with '-' characters as the separators.
Pungi, unfortunately, does not treat 'Rawhide' as a release, it
synthesizes a release number for Rawhide composes and places
that in the compose ID. To cope with that, for now, the
scheduler will set RAWHIDE to '1' if the compose is a Rawhide
one. As we have to adapt all places where we parse the release
in any case, this commit consolidates them into a fedorabase
subroutine.
For the one place where we also used to parse the 'milestone'
from fedfind, there is a placeholder get_milestone subroutine
which currently returns an empty string, as I don't yet have a
good handle on how to draw the kinds of distinctions fedfind
mapped to 'milestone' from Pungi metadata.
2016-01-28 04:48:04 +00:00
|
|
|
flavor => "Workstation-boot-iso",
|
2015-12-22 08:23:25 +00:00
|
|
|
name => "",
|
|
|
|
|
settings => [
|
2017-02-02 15:13:10 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "DESKTOP", value => "gnome" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "TEST_TARGET", value => "ISO" }
|
2015-12-22 08:23:25 +00:00
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2015-10-06 22:27:27 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "i386",
|
2015-08-16 01:10:14 +00:00
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
Pungi 4 conversion: handle Pungi-derived BUILD and FLAVOR
With the arrival of Pungi 4, the scheduler is no longer using
fedfind-provided BUILD and FLAVOR values, but ones derived from
Pungi properties. BUILD is now simply the Pungi compose_id.
FLAVOR is produced by joining the Pungi variant, type, and
format with '-' characters as the separators.
Pungi, unfortunately, does not treat 'Rawhide' as a release, it
synthesizes a release number for Rawhide composes and places
that in the compose ID. To cope with that, for now, the
scheduler will set RAWHIDE to '1' if the compose is a Rawhide
one. As we have to adapt all places where we parse the release
in any case, this commit consolidates them into a fedorabase
subroutine.
For the one place where we also used to parse the 'milestone'
from fedfind, there is a placeholder get_milestone subroutine
which currently returns an empty string, as I don't yet have a
good handle on how to draw the kinds of distinctions fedfind
mapped to 'milestone' from Pungi metadata.
2016-01-28 04:48:04 +00:00
|
|
|
flavor => "Workstation-live-iso",
|
2015-08-16 01:10:14 +00:00
|
|
|
name => "",
|
|
|
|
|
settings => [
|
2015-03-18 21:28:03 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "LIVE", value => "1" },
|
2017-06-15 21:11:17 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "PACKAGE_SET", value => "default" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "DESKTOP", value => "gnome" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "TEST_TARGET", value => "ISO" }
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "i386",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "KDE-live-iso",
|
|
|
|
|
name => "",
|
|
|
|
|
settings => [
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "LIVE", value => "1" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "PACKAGE_SET", value => "default" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "DESKTOP", value => "kde" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "TEST_TARGET", value => "ISO" }
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "arm",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz",
|
|
|
|
|
name => "",
|
|
|
|
|
settings => [
|
|
|
|
|
# HDD_2 gets posted by trigger and is always set to target disk image
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "TEST_TARGET", value => "HDD_2" }
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
arch => "x86_64",
|
|
|
|
|
distri => "fedora",
|
|
|
|
|
flavor => "Workstation-dvd_ostree-iso",
|
|
|
|
|
name => "",
|
|
|
|
|
settings => [
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "CANNED", value => "1" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "PACKAGE_SET", value => "default" },
|
2017-02-02 15:13:10 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "DESKTOP", value => "gnome" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "TEST_TARGET", value => "ISO" }
|
2015-03-18 21:28:03 +00:00
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
version => "*",
|
2017-06-15 21:11:17 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
2015-01-26 10:33:26 +00:00
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
TestSuites => [
|
2016-06-09 15:43:46 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
name => "support_server",
|
|
|
|
|
settings => [
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "NUMDISKS", value => "2" },
|
2016-07-04 16:32:27 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "HDD_1", value => "disk_f%CURRREL%_support_3_x86_64.img" },
|
2016-06-09 15:43:46 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "POSTINSTALL", value => "_support_server" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "USER_LOGIN", value => "false" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "ROOT_PASSWORD", value => "weakpassword" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "BOOTFROM", value => "c" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "NICTYPE", value => "tap" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "WORKER_CLASS", value => "tap" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "GRUB_POSTINSTALL", value => "net.ifnames=0 biosdevname=0" },
|
Add support for testing updates
Summary:
This adds an entirely new workflow for testing distribution
updates. The `ADVISORY` variable is introduced: when set,
`main.pm` will load an early post-install test that sets up
a repository containing the packages from the specified update,
runs `dnf -y update`, and reboots. A new templates file is
added, `templates-updates`, which adds two new flavors called
`updates-server` and `updates-workstation`, each containing
job templates for appropriate post-install tests. Scheduler is
expected to post `ADVISORY=(update ID) HDD_1=(base image)
FLAVOR=updates-(server|workstation)`, where (base image) is one
of the stable release base disk images produced by `createhdds`
and usually used for upgrade testing. This will result in the
appropriate job templates being loaded.
We rejig postinstall test loading and static network config a
bit so that this works for both the 'compose' and 'updates' test
flows: we have to ensure we bring up networking for the tap
tests before we try and install the updates, but still allow
later adjustment of the configuration. We take advantage of the
openQA feature that was added a few months back to run the same
module multiple times, so the `_advisory_update` module can
reboot after installing the updates and the modules that take
care of bootloader, encryption and login get run again. This
looks slightly wacky in the web UI, though - it doesn't show the
later runs of each module.
We also use the recently added feature to specify `+HDD_1` in
the test suites which use a disk image uploaded by an earlier
post-install test, so the test suite value will take priority
over the value POSTed by the scheduler for those tests, and we
will use the uploaded disk image (and not the clean base image
POSTed by the scheduler) for those tests.
My intent here is to enhance the scheduler, adding a consumer
which listens out for critpath updates, and runs this test flow
for each one, then reports the results to ResultsDB where Bodhi
could query and display them. We could also add a list of other
packages to have one or both sets of update tests run on it, I
guess.
Test Plan:
Try a post something like:
HDD_1=disk_f25_server_3_x86_64.img DISTRI=fedora VERSION=25
FLAVOR=updates-server ARCH=x86_64 BUILD=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c
ADVISORY=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c CURRREL=25 PREVREL=24
Pick an appropriate `ADVISORY` (ideally, one containing some
packages which might actually be involved in the tests), and
matching `FLAVOR` and `HDD_1`. The appropriate tests should run,
a repo with the update packages should be created and enabled
(and dnf update run), and the tests should work properly. Also
test a regular compose run to make sure I didn't break anything.
Reviewers: jskladan, jsedlak
Reviewed By: jsedlak
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qa.fedoraproject.org/D1143
2017-01-25 16:16:12 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "POST_STATIC", value => "10.0.2.110 support.domain.local" },
|
2017-02-02 15:13:10 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "TEST_TARGET", value => "NONE" },
|
2016-06-09 15:43:46 +00:00
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2015-01-26 10:33:26 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
name => "install_default",
|
2016-03-24 20:38:32 +00:00
|
|
|
settings => [
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "PACKAGE_SET", value => "default" },
|
2016-11-09 15:20:17 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "POSTINSTALL", value => "_collect_data" },
|
2016-03-24 20:38:32 +00:00
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
name => "install_default_upload",
|
2015-03-18 21:28:03 +00:00
|
|
|
settings => [
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "PACKAGE_SET", value => "default" },
|
2016-11-09 15:20:17 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "POSTINSTALL", value => "_collect_data" },
|
add a base_selinux test (follow-on from default_install)
Summary:
so here's our first attempt to use the 'carry on from a previous
test' stuff! This adds a base_selinux test that uses a disk
image from a previous default_install run, and adds jobtemplates
to run base_selinux for appropriate products: generic_boot
(for nightly tests), server_dvd, and workstation_live. Note that
you'll want to either update to the newest openQA package I just
built in COPR or create /var/lib/openqa/share/factory/tmp owned
by geekotest; openQA tries to use that directory as MOJO_TMPDIR
but in 4.2, if the directory doesn't exist, it doesn't create it,
and we wind up with the default MOJO_TMPDIR which is /tmp; when
the disk image is uploaded it creates a huge temp file in /tmp
and may well exhaust the available space as it's a tmpfs. I've
backported a recent upstream commit that tries to create the
directory if it doesn't exist, in 4.2-10.
It seems like openQA is smart enough to figure out the
dependencies correctly, so the 'base_selinux' test for each
product depends on the 'default_install' test for the same
product (not any of the other default_install runs) and will
use the hard disk image it produces.
Test Plan:
Do a full test run and make sure base_selinux tests
appear for appropriate products, depend on the correct default_
install test, the default_install test uploads the hard disk
image correctly, and the base_selinux test runs correctly. And
of course that nothing else broke in the process...
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: jskladan
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D699
2015-12-17 20:46:14 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "STORE_HDD_1", value => "disk_%FLAVOR%_%MACHINE%.qcow2" },
|
2015-03-18 21:28:03 +00:00
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-05-18 12:04:45 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
name => "install_arm_image_deployment_upload",
|
|
|
|
|
settings => [
|
2016-08-16 07:33:10 +00:00
|
|
|
# run ARM entrypoint and also make sure that VM shuts down correctly
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "ENTRYPOINT", value => "install_arm_image_deployment _console_shutdown" },
|
2016-05-27 10:36:15 +00:00
|
|
|
# we don't want HDD_2 to be really connected, but we need to use it to download
|
|
|
|
|
# HDD ISO, see https://github.com/os-autoinst/openQA/issues/684
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "NUMDISKS", value => "1" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "HDD_1", value => "%HDD_2%" },
|
2016-05-18 12:04:45 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "STORE_HDD_1", value => "disk_%FLAVOR%_%MACHINE%.qcow2" },
|
2016-10-17 10:23:06 +00:00
|
|
|
# set kernel arguments for DKB
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "APPEND", value => "rw root=LABEL=_/ rootwait console=ttyAMA0 console=tty0 consoleblank=0" },
|
2016-05-18 12:04:45 +00:00
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-09-07 08:34:54 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
name => "install_anaconda_text",
|
|
|
|
|
settings => [
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "ANACONDA_TEXT", value => "1" },
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-09-16 12:44:03 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
name => "install_rescue_encrypted",
|
|
|
|
|
settings => [
|
2016-12-13 08:18:34 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "BOOTFROM", value => "d" },
|
2016-09-16 12:44:03 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "ENTRYPOINT", value => "rescue_mode_encrypted" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "HDD_1", value => "disk_%MACHINE%_encrypted.qcow2" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "START_AFTER_TEST", value => "install_simple_encrypted" },
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2015-03-18 21:28:03 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
name => "install_package_set_minimal",
|
2015-03-18 21:28:03 +00:00
|
|
|
settings => [
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "PACKAGE_SET", value => "minimal" },
|
2016-11-09 15:20:17 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "POSTINSTALL", value => "_collect_data" },
|
2015-03-18 21:28:03 +00:00
|
|
|
],
|
2015-01-26 10:33:26 +00:00
|
|
|
},
|
2015-01-26 16:21:32 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
name => "install_multi",
|
2015-01-26 16:21:32 +00:00
|
|
|
settings => [
|
2015-08-06 09:02:18 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "PARTITIONING", value => "guided_multi" },
|
2015-01-27 15:35:10 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "NUMDISKS", value => "2" },
|
2015-10-15 14:07:00 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "HDD_2", value => "disk_full_mbr.img" },
|
2015-02-13 09:01:38 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "ROOT_PASSWORD", value => "weakpassword" },
|
2015-01-27 12:35:27 +00:00
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
name => "install_scsi_updates_img",
|
2015-01-27 12:35:27 +00:00
|
|
|
settings => [
|
rename BOOT_UPDATES_IMG_URL to TEST_UPDATES, add GRUBADD
Summary:
BOOT_UPDATES_IMG_URL is a pretty misleading name - it used to
be the actual URL, but now it's simply a boolean that decides
whether we look for the effect of the openQA updates image or
not. TEST_UPDATES seems clearer.
GRUBADD does the same thing as GRUB, on top of it. The point of
this is so we can add an option to the scheduler CLI that lets
you say 'run the normal tests, but with this updates image' -
so we can easily (albeit manually triggered) check the impact
of some anaconda change that needs testing. It should never be
set in the templates or the tests, it's there strictly for the
scheduler (whether that's fedora_openqa_schedule or literally a
person calling `client isos post`) to use as a kind of override.
The tests that test updates image loading will probably fail
when doing this, but all other tests should work as intended,
including ones that specify GRUB, becase the extra params will
just get added on top. That's why I invented a new var instead
of just letting the scheduler override GRUB's value when POST
ing.
Test Plan:
Check the rename didn't break anything (updates tests
still work). Run tests with GRUBADD param, make sure value is
correctly appended to cmdline both when GRUB is also specified
and when it is not.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D801
2016-04-08 20:21:29 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "TEST_UPDATES", value => "1" },
|
2016-04-01 15:00:47 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "GRUB", value => "inst.updates=https://fedorapeople.org/groups/qa/updates/updates-openqa.img" },
|
2015-01-27 12:35:27 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "HDDMODEL", value => "virtio-scsi-pci" },
|
2015-11-09 08:50:24 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "CDMODEL", value => "scsi-cd" },
|
2015-01-27 12:35:27 +00:00
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
name => "install_kickstart_user_creation",
|
2015-01-27 12:35:27 +00:00
|
|
|
settings => [
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "KICKSTART", value => "1" },
|
2015-02-04 13:05:20 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "GRUB", value => "inst.ks=http://jskladan.fedorapeople.org/kickstarts/root-user-crypted-net.ks" },
|
2015-01-27 12:35:27 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "USER_LOGIN", value => "test" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "USER_PASSWORD", value => "test" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "ROOT_PASSWORD", value => "111111" },
|
2015-01-26 16:21:32 +00:00
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2015-01-27 13:22:35 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
name => "install_delete_pata",
|
2015-01-27 13:22:35 +00:00
|
|
|
settings => [
|
2015-08-06 09:02:18 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "PARTITIONING", value => "guided_delete_all" },
|
2015-01-27 13:22:35 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "HDDMODEL", value => "ide-hd" },
|
2015-10-15 14:07:00 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "HDD_1", value => "disk_full_mbr.img" },
|
2015-01-27 13:22:35 +00:00
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2017-01-16 12:07:47 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
name => "install_sata",
|
|
|
|
|
settings => [
|
2017-03-09 21:40:29 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "HDDMODEL", value => "ide-drive,bus=ahci0.0" },
|
2017-01-16 12:07:47 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "ATACONTROLLER", value => "ich9-ahci" },
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2015-02-04 13:05:20 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
name => "install_mirrorlist_graphical",
|
2015-02-04 13:05:20 +00:00
|
|
|
settings => [
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "MIRRORLIST_GRAPHICAL", value => "1" },
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
name => "install_repository_http_graphical",
|
2015-02-04 13:05:20 +00:00
|
|
|
settings => [
|
use compose repository (not master repo) for most tests
Summary:
we have a long-standing problem with all the tests that hit
the repositories. The tests are triggered as soon as a compose
completes. At this point in time, the compose is not synced to
the mirrors, where the default 'fedora' repo definition looks;
the sync happens after the compose completes, and there is also
a metadata sync step that must happen after *that* before any
operation that uses the 'fedora' repository definition will
actually use the packages from the new compose. Thus all net
install tests and tests that installed packages have been
effectively testing the previous compose, not the current one.
We have some thoughts about how to fix this 'properly' (such
that the openQA tests wouldn't have to do anything special,
but their 'fedora' repository would somehow reflect the compose
under test), but none of them is in place right now or likely
to happen in the short term, so in the mean time this should
deal with most of the issues. With this change, everything but
the default_install tests for the netinst images should use
the compose-under-test's Everything tree instead of the 'fedora'
repository, and thus should install and test the correct
packages.
This relies on a corresponding change to openqa_fedora_tools
to set the LOCATION openQA setting (which is simply the base
location of the compose under test).
Test Plan:
Do a full test run, check (as far as you can) tests run sensibly
and use appropriate repositories.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D989
2016-09-01 15:22:59 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "REPOSITORY_GRAPHICAL", value => "%LOCATION%" },
|
2015-02-04 13:05:20 +00:00
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
add NFS tests (and DHCP/DNS in the support server)
Summary:
Set up the support server to provide DHCP/DNS functionality and
an NFS server, providing a kickstart. Add a kickstart test just
like the other root-user-crypted-net kickstart tests except it
gets the kickstart from the support server via NFS. Also add NFS
repository tests and a second support server for Server-dvd-iso
flavor: this test must run on that flavor to ensure that packages
are actually available. The support server just mounts the
attached 'DVD' and exports it via NFS.
Note we don't need to do anything clever to avoid IP conflicts
between the two support servers, because os-autoinst-openvswitch
ensures each worker group is on its own VLAN.
As part of adding the NFS repo tests, I did a bit of cleanup,
moving little things we were repeating a lot into anacondatest,
and sharing the 'check if the repo was used' logic between all
the tests (by making it into a test step that's loaded for all
of them). I also simplified the 'was repo used' checks a bit,
it seems silly to run a 'grep' command inside the VM then have
os-autoinst do a grep on the output (which is effectively what
we were doing before), instead we'll just use a single grep
within the VM, and clean up the messy quoting/escaping a bit.
Test Plan:
Run all tests - at least all repository tests - and
check they work (make sure the tests are actually still sane,
not just that they pass). I've done runs of all the repo tests
and they look good to me, but please double-check. I'm currently
re-running the whole 24-20160609.n.0 test on staging with these
changes.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D888
2016-06-13 15:42:30 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
name => "install_repository_nfs_graphical",
|
|
|
|
|
settings => [
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "REPOSITORY_GRAPHICAL", value => "nfs:10.0.2.110:/repo" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "PARALLEL_WITH", value => "support_server" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "INSTALL_UNLOCK", value => "support_ready" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "NICTYPE", value => "tap" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "WORKER_CLASS", value => "tap" },
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2015-02-04 13:45:37 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
name => "install_repository_http_variation",
|
2015-02-04 13:45:37 +00:00
|
|
|
settings => [
|
use compose repository (not master repo) for most tests
Summary:
we have a long-standing problem with all the tests that hit
the repositories. The tests are triggered as soon as a compose
completes. At this point in time, the compose is not synced to
the mirrors, where the default 'fedora' repo definition looks;
the sync happens after the compose completes, and there is also
a metadata sync step that must happen after *that* before any
operation that uses the 'fedora' repository definition will
actually use the packages from the new compose. Thus all net
install tests and tests that installed packages have been
effectively testing the previous compose, not the current one.
We have some thoughts about how to fix this 'properly' (such
that the openQA tests wouldn't have to do anything special,
but their 'fedora' repository would somehow reflect the compose
under test), but none of them is in place right now or likely
to happen in the short term, so in the mean time this should
deal with most of the issues. With this change, everything but
the default_install tests for the netinst images should use
the compose-under-test's Everything tree instead of the 'fedora'
repository, and thus should install and test the correct
packages.
This relies on a corresponding change to openqa_fedora_tools
to set the LOCATION openQA setting (which is simply the base
location of the compose under test).
Test Plan:
Do a full test run, check (as far as you can) tests run sensibly
and use appropriate repositories.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D989
2016-09-01 15:22:59 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "REPOSITORY_VARIATION", value => "%LOCATION%" },
|
2015-02-04 13:45:37 +00:00
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
add NFS tests (and DHCP/DNS in the support server)
Summary:
Set up the support server to provide DHCP/DNS functionality and
an NFS server, providing a kickstart. Add a kickstart test just
like the other root-user-crypted-net kickstart tests except it
gets the kickstart from the support server via NFS. Also add NFS
repository tests and a second support server for Server-dvd-iso
flavor: this test must run on that flavor to ensure that packages
are actually available. The support server just mounts the
attached 'DVD' and exports it via NFS.
Note we don't need to do anything clever to avoid IP conflicts
between the two support servers, because os-autoinst-openvswitch
ensures each worker group is on its own VLAN.
As part of adding the NFS repo tests, I did a bit of cleanup,
moving little things we were repeating a lot into anacondatest,
and sharing the 'check if the repo was used' logic between all
the tests (by making it into a test step that's loaded for all
of them). I also simplified the 'was repo used' checks a bit,
it seems silly to run a 'grep' command inside the VM then have
os-autoinst do a grep on the output (which is effectively what
we were doing before), instead we'll just use a single grep
within the VM, and clean up the messy quoting/escaping a bit.
Test Plan:
Run all tests - at least all repository tests - and
check they work (make sure the tests are actually still sane,
not just that they pass). I've done runs of all the repo tests
and they look good to me, but please double-check. I'm currently
re-running the whole 24-20160609.n.0 test on staging with these
changes.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D888
2016-06-13 15:42:30 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
name => "install_repository_nfs_variation",
|
|
|
|
|
settings => [
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "REPOSITORY_VARIATION", value => "nfs:10.0.2.110:/repo" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "PARALLEL_WITH", value => "support_server" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "INSTALL_UNLOCK", value => "support_ready" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "NICTYPE", value => "tap" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "WORKER_CLASS", value => "tap" },
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2015-02-13 08:51:24 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
name => "install_delete_partial",
|
2015-02-13 08:51:24 +00:00
|
|
|
settings => [
|
2015-08-06 09:02:18 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "PARTITIONING", value => "guided_delete_partial" },
|
2015-10-15 14:07:00 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "HDD_1", value => "disk_full_%PART_TABLE_TYPE%.img" },
|
2015-02-13 08:51:24 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "ROOT_PASSWORD", value => "weakpassword" },
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2015-02-13 09:58:24 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
name => "install_simple_encrypted",
|
2015-02-13 09:58:24 +00:00
|
|
|
settings => [
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "ENCRYPT_PASSWORD", value => "weakpassword" },
|
2016-09-16 12:44:03 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "STORE_HDD_1", value => "disk_%MACHINE%_encrypted.qcow2" },
|
2015-02-13 09:58:24 +00:00
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2015-03-05 10:44:02 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
name => "install_simple_free_space",
|
2015-03-05 10:44:02 +00:00
|
|
|
settings => [
|
2015-08-06 09:02:18 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "PARTITIONING", value => "guided_free_space" },
|
2015-10-15 14:07:00 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "HDD_1", value => "disk_freespace_%PART_TABLE_TYPE%.img" },
|
2015-03-05 10:44:02 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "ROOT_PASSWORD", value => "weakpassword" },
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2015-03-05 12:57:47 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
name => "install_multi_empty",
|
2015-03-05 12:57:47 +00:00
|
|
|
settings => [
|
2015-08-06 09:02:18 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "PARTITIONING", value => "guided_multi_empty_all" },
|
2015-03-05 12:57:47 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "NUMDISKS", value => "2" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "ROOT_PASSWORD", value => "weakpassword" },
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2015-03-06 09:36:25 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
name => "install_software_raid",
|
2015-03-06 09:36:25 +00:00
|
|
|
settings => [
|
2015-08-06 09:02:18 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "PARTITIONING", value => "custom_software_raid" },
|
2015-03-06 09:36:25 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "NUMDISKS", value => "2" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "ROOT_PASSWORD", value => "weakpassword" },
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2015-03-12 09:58:04 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
name => "install_btrfs",
|
2015-08-10 18:01:12 +00:00
|
|
|
settings => [
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "PARTITIONING", value => "custom_btrfs" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "ROOT_PASSWORD", value => "weakpassword" },
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
name => "install_ext3",
|
2015-08-10 18:01:12 +00:00
|
|
|
settings => [
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "PARTITIONING", value => "custom_ext3" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "ROOT_PASSWORD", value => "weakpassword" },
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
name => "install_lvmthin",
|
2015-08-10 18:01:12 +00:00
|
|
|
settings => [
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "PARTITIONING", value => "custom_lvmthin" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "ROOT_PASSWORD", value => "weakpassword" },
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
name => "install_no_swap",
|
2015-08-19 21:41:41 +00:00
|
|
|
settings => [
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "PARTITIONING", value => "custom_no_swap" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "ROOT_PASSWORD", value => "weakpassword" },
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2017-04-24 12:23:35 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
name => "install_blivet_ext3",
|
|
|
|
|
settings => [
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "PARTITIONING", value => "custom_blivet_ext3" },
|
2017-05-09 07:11:34 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "POSTINSTALL", value => "disk_custom_ext3_postinstall" },
|
2017-04-24 12:23:35 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "ROOT_PASSWORD", value => "weakpassword" },
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2017-05-19 11:58:16 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
name => "install_blivet_btrfs",
|
|
|
|
|
settings => [
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "PARTITIONING", value => "custom_blivet_btrfs" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "POSTINSTALL", value => "disk_custom_btrfs_postinstall" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "ROOT_PASSWORD", value => "weakpassword" },
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2017-04-24 12:23:35 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
name => "install_blivet_no_swap",
|
|
|
|
|
settings => [
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "PARTITIONING", value => "custom_blivet_no_swap" },
|
2017-05-09 07:11:34 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "POSTINSTALL", value => "disk_custom_no_swap_postinstall" },
|
2017-04-24 12:23:35 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "ROOT_PASSWORD", value => "weakpassword" },
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
name => "install_blivet_xfs",
|
|
|
|
|
settings => [
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "PARTITIONING", value => "custom_blivet_xfs" },
|
2017-05-09 07:11:34 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "POSTINSTALL", value => "disk_custom_xfs_postinstall" },
|
2017-04-24 12:23:35 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "ROOT_PASSWORD", value => "weakpassword" },
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
name => "install_blivet_software_raid",
|
|
|
|
|
settings => [
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "PARTITIONING", value => "custom_blivet_software_raid" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "POSTINSTALL", value => "disk_custom_software_raid_postinstall" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "NUMDISKS", value => "2" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "ROOT_PASSWORD", value => "weakpassword" },
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
name => "install_blivet_lvmthin",
|
|
|
|
|
settings => [
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "PARTITIONING", value => "custom_blivet_lvmthin" },
|
2017-05-09 07:11:34 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "POSTINSTALL", value => "disk_custom_lvmthin_postinstall" },
|
2017-04-24 12:23:35 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "ROOT_PASSWORD", value => "weakpassword" },
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2015-08-19 21:41:41 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
name => "install_kickstart_hdd",
|
2015-03-12 09:58:04 +00:00
|
|
|
settings => [
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "KICKSTART", value => "1" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "GRUB", value => "inst.ks=hd:vdb1:/root-user-crypted-net.ks" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "NUMDISKS", value => "2" },
|
2016-08-16 00:01:18 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "HDD_2", value => "disk_ks_3.img" },
|
2015-03-12 09:58:04 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "ROOT_PASSWORD", value => "111111" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "USER_LOGIN", value => "test" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "USER_PASSWORD", value => "test" },
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2015-05-13 11:00:46 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
convert upgrade tests to dnf-plugin-system-upgrade
Summary:
This is a first cut which more or less works for now. Issues:
1) We're not really testing the BUILD, here. All the test does
is try and upgrade to the specified VERSION - so it'll be using
the latest 'stable' for the given VERSION at the time the test
runs. This isn't really that terrible, but especially for TC/RC
validation, we might want to make things a bit more elaborate
and set up the repo for the actual BUILD (and disable the main
repos).
2) We'd actually need --nogpgcheck for non-Rawhide, at one
specific point in the release cycle - after Branching but
before Bodhi activation (which is when we can be sure all
packages are signed). This won't matter until 24 branches, and
maybe releng will have it fixed by then...if not, I'll tweak
it.
3) We don't really test that the upgrade actually *happened*
for desktop, at the moment - the only thing in the old test
that really checked that was where we checked for the fedup
boot menu entry, but that has no analog in dnf. What we should
probably do is check that GUI login works, then switch to a
console and check /etc/fedora-release just as the minimal test
does.
Test Plan:
Run the tests. Note that creating the desktop disk
image doesn't work ATM, so I can't verify the desktop test
works, but the minimal one seems to (with D565). There'll be
a matching diff for openqa_fedora_tools to update the test
case names there.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: jskladan, garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D567
2015-09-10 21:49:13 +00:00
|
|
|
name => "upgrade_minimal_64bit",
|
2015-05-13 11:00:46 +00:00
|
|
|
settings => [
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "ROOT_PASSWORD", value => "weakpassword" },
|
2016-05-05 23:39:47 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "USER_LOGIN", value => "false" },
|
2015-05-13 11:00:46 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "BOOTFROM", value => "c" },
|
2016-07-04 16:32:27 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "HDD_1", value => "disk_f%CURRREL%_minimal_2_x86_64.img" },
|
2016-05-05 23:39:47 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "UPGRADE", value => "1" },
|
2017-02-02 15:13:10 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "TEST_TARGET", value => "COMPOSE" },
|
2015-05-13 11:00:46 +00:00
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2015-07-17 10:52:56 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
convert upgrade tests to dnf-plugin-system-upgrade
Summary:
This is a first cut which more or less works for now. Issues:
1) We're not really testing the BUILD, here. All the test does
is try and upgrade to the specified VERSION - so it'll be using
the latest 'stable' for the given VERSION at the time the test
runs. This isn't really that terrible, but especially for TC/RC
validation, we might want to make things a bit more elaborate
and set up the repo for the actual BUILD (and disable the main
repos).
2) We'd actually need --nogpgcheck for non-Rawhide, at one
specific point in the release cycle - after Branching but
before Bodhi activation (which is when we can be sure all
packages are signed). This won't matter until 24 branches, and
maybe releng will have it fixed by then...if not, I'll tweak
it.
3) We don't really test that the upgrade actually *happened*
for desktop, at the moment - the only thing in the old test
that really checked that was where we checked for the fedup
boot menu entry, but that has no analog in dnf. What we should
probably do is check that GUI login works, then switch to a
console and check /etc/fedora-release just as the minimal test
does.
Test Plan:
Run the tests. Note that creating the desktop disk
image doesn't work ATM, so I can't verify the desktop test
works, but the minimal one seems to (with D565). There'll be
a matching diff for openqa_fedora_tools to update the test
case names there.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: jskladan, garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D567
2015-09-10 21:49:13 +00:00
|
|
|
name => "upgrade_desktop_64bit",
|
2015-12-07 17:42:55 +00:00
|
|
|
settings => [
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "ROOT_PASSWORD", value => "weakpassword" },
|
2016-05-05 23:39:47 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "USER_LOGIN", value => "test" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "USER_PASSWORD", value => "weakpassword" },
|
2015-12-07 17:42:55 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "BOOTFROM", value => "c" },
|
2016-07-04 16:32:27 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "HDD_1", value => "disk_f%CURRREL%_desktop_3_x86_64.img" },
|
2016-05-05 23:39:47 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "UPGRADE", value => "1" },
|
2015-12-08 10:49:38 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "DESKTOP", value => "gnome" },
|
2017-02-02 15:13:10 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "TEST_TARGET", value => "COMPOSE" },
|
2015-12-07 17:42:55 +00:00
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-04-25 08:00:34 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
name => "upgrade_server_64bit",
|
|
|
|
|
settings => [
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "ROOT_PASSWORD", value => "weakpassword" },
|
2016-05-05 23:39:47 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "USER_LOGIN", value => "test" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "USER_PASSWORD", value => "weakpassword" },
|
2016-04-25 08:00:34 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "BOOTFROM", value => "c" },
|
2016-07-04 16:32:27 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "HDD_1", value => "disk_f%CURRREL%_server_3_x86_64.img" },
|
2016-05-05 23:39:47 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "UPGRADE", value => "1" },
|
2017-02-02 15:13:10 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "TEST_TARGET", value => "COMPOSE" },
|
2016-04-25 08:00:34 +00:00
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
Test upgrade of FreeIPA server and client deployment
Summary:
This adds an upgrade variant of the FreeIPA tests, with only
the simplest client enrolment (sssd) for now. The server test
starts from the N-1 release and deploys the domain controller
role. The client test similarly starts from the N-1 release
and, when the server is deployed, enrols as a domain client.
Then the server upgrades itself, while the client waits (as the
server is its name server). Then the client upgrades itself,
while the server does some self-checks. The server then waits
for the client to do its checks before decommissioning itself,
as usual. So, summary: *deployment* of both server and client
occurs on N-1, then both are upgraded, then the actual *checks*
occur on N.
In my testing, this all more or less works, except the role
decommission step fails. This failure seems to be a genuine one
so far as I can tell; I intend to file a bug for it soon.
Test Plan:
Run the new tests, check they work. Run the existing
FreeIPA tests (both the compose and the update variants), check
they both behave the same.
Reviewers: jsedlak, jskladan
Reviewed By: jsedlak
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qa.fedoraproject.org/D1204
2017-05-17 19:39:45 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
name => "upgrade_server_domain_controller",
|
|
|
|
|
settings => [
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "ROOT_PASSWORD", value => "weakpassword" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "HDD_1", value => "disk_f%CURRREL%_server_3_x86_64.img" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "UPGRADE", value => "1" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "TEST_TARGET", value => "COMPOSE" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "PREUPGRADE", value => "role_deploy_domain_controller" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "POSTINSTALL", value => "role_deploy_domain_controller_check" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "USER_LOGIN", value => "false" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "GRUB_POSTINSTALL", value => "net.ifnames=0 biosdevname=0" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "BOOTFROM", value => "c" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "GRUB", value => "net.ifnames=0 biosdevname=0" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "POST_STATIC", value => "10.0.2.100 ipa001.domain.local" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "NICTYPE", value => "tap" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "WORKER_CLASS", value => "tap" },
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
2017-06-09 19:16:28 +00:00
|
|
|
name => "upgrade_realmd_client",
|
Test upgrade of FreeIPA server and client deployment
Summary:
This adds an upgrade variant of the FreeIPA tests, with only
the simplest client enrolment (sssd) for now. The server test
starts from the N-1 release and deploys the domain controller
role. The client test similarly starts from the N-1 release
and, when the server is deployed, enrols as a domain client.
Then the server upgrades itself, while the client waits (as the
server is its name server). Then the client upgrades itself,
while the server does some self-checks. The server then waits
for the client to do its checks before decommissioning itself,
as usual. So, summary: *deployment* of both server and client
occurs on N-1, then both are upgraded, then the actual *checks*
occur on N.
In my testing, this all more or less works, except the role
decommission step fails. This failure seems to be a genuine one
so far as I can tell; I intend to file a bug for it soon.
Test Plan:
Run the new tests, check they work. Run the existing
FreeIPA tests (both the compose and the update variants), check
they both behave the same.
Reviewers: jsedlak, jskladan
Reviewed By: jsedlak
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qa.fedoraproject.org/D1204
2017-05-17 19:39:45 +00:00
|
|
|
settings => [
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "ROOT_PASSWORD", value => "weakpassword" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "HDD_1", value => "disk_f%CURRREL%_server_3_x86_64.img" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "UPGRADE", value => "1" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "TEST_TARGET", value => "COMPOSE" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "PREUPGRADE", value => "realmd_join_sssd" },
|
2017-06-09 19:16:28 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "POSTINSTALL", value => "freeipa_webui freeipa_password_change freeipa_client" },
|
Test upgrade of FreeIPA server and client deployment
Summary:
This adds an upgrade variant of the FreeIPA tests, with only
the simplest client enrolment (sssd) for now. The server test
starts from the N-1 release and deploys the domain controller
role. The client test similarly starts from the N-1 release
and, when the server is deployed, enrols as a domain client.
Then the server upgrades itself, while the client waits (as the
server is its name server). Then the client upgrades itself,
while the server does some self-checks. The server then waits
for the client to do its checks before decommissioning itself,
as usual. So, summary: *deployment* of both server and client
occurs on N-1, then both are upgraded, then the actual *checks*
occur on N.
In my testing, this all more or less works, except the role
decommission step fails. This failure seems to be a genuine one
so far as I can tell; I intend to file a bug for it soon.
Test Plan:
Run the new tests, check they work. Run the existing
FreeIPA tests (both the compose and the update variants), check
they both behave the same.
Reviewers: jsedlak, jskladan
Reviewed By: jsedlak
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qa.fedoraproject.org/D1204
2017-05-17 19:39:45 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "PARALLEL_WITH", value => "upgrade_server_domain_controller" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "USER_LOGIN", value => "false" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "GRUB_POSTINSTALL", value => "net.ifnames=0 biosdevname=0" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "BOOTFROM", value => "c" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "GRUB", value => "net.ifnames=0 biosdevname=0" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "POST_STATIC", value => "10.0.2.103 client003.domain.local" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "NICTYPE", value => "tap" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "WORKER_CLASS", value => "tap" },
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-04-25 08:00:34 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
name => "upgrade_kde_64bit",
|
|
|
|
|
settings => [
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "ROOT_PASSWORD", value => "weakpassword" },
|
2016-05-05 23:39:47 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "USER_LOGIN", value => "test" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "USER_PASSWORD", value => "weakpassword" },
|
2016-04-25 08:00:34 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "BOOTFROM", value => "c" },
|
2016-07-04 16:32:27 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "HDD_1", value => "disk_f%CURRREL%_kde_3_x86_64.img" },
|
2016-05-05 23:39:47 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "UPGRADE", value => "1" },
|
2016-04-25 08:00:34 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "DESKTOP", value => "kde" },
|
2017-02-02 15:13:10 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "TEST_TARGET", value => "COMPOSE" },
|
2016-04-25 08:00:34 +00:00
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-07-08 15:56:57 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
name => "upgrade_desktop_encrypted_64bit",
|
|
|
|
|
settings => [
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "ROOT_PASSWORD", value => "weakpassword" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "USER_LOGIN", value => "test" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "USER_PASSWORD", value => "weakpassword" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "BOOTFROM", value => "c" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "HDD_1", value => "disk_f%CURRREL%_desktopencrypt_x86_64.img" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "UPGRADE", value => "1" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "DESKTOP", value => "gnome" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "ENCRYPT_PASSWORD", value => "weakpassword" },
|
2017-02-02 15:13:10 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "TEST_TARGET", value => "COMPOSE" },
|
2016-07-08 15:56:57 +00:00
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2015-12-07 17:42:55 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
name => "upgrade_2_minimal_64bit",
|
|
|
|
|
settings => [
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "ROOT_PASSWORD", value => "weakpassword" },
|
2016-05-05 23:39:47 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "USER_LOGIN", value => "false" },
|
2015-12-07 17:42:55 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "BOOTFROM", value => "c" },
|
2016-07-04 16:32:27 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "HDD_1", value => "disk_f%PREVREL%_minimal_2_x86_64.img" },
|
2016-05-05 23:39:47 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "UPGRADE", value => "1" },
|
2017-02-02 15:13:10 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "TEST_TARGET", value => "COMPOSE" },
|
2015-12-07 17:42:55 +00:00
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
name => "upgrade_2_desktop_64bit",
|
2015-07-17 10:52:56 +00:00
|
|
|
settings => [
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "ROOT_PASSWORD", value => "weakpassword" },
|
2016-05-05 23:39:47 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "USER_LOGIN", value => "test" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "USER_PASSWORD", value => "weakpassword" },
|
2015-07-17 10:52:56 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "BOOTFROM", value => "c" },
|
2016-07-04 16:32:27 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "HDD_1", value => "disk_f%PREVREL%_desktop_3_x86_64.img" },
|
2016-05-05 23:39:47 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "UPGRADE", value => "1" },
|
2015-12-08 10:32:48 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "DESKTOP", value => "gnome" },
|
2017-02-02 15:13:10 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "TEST_TARGET", value => "COMPOSE" },
|
2015-08-27 11:49:09 +00:00
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-04-25 08:00:34 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
name => "upgrade_2_server_64bit",
|
|
|
|
|
settings => [
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "ROOT_PASSWORD", value => "weakpassword" },
|
2016-05-05 23:39:47 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "USER_LOGIN", value => "test" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "USER_PASSWORD", value => "weakpassword" },
|
2016-04-25 08:00:34 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "BOOTFROM", value => "c" },
|
2016-07-04 16:32:27 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "HDD_1", value => "disk_f%PREVREL%_server_3_x86_64.img" },
|
2016-05-05 23:39:47 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "UPGRADE", value => "1" },
|
2017-02-02 15:13:10 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "TEST_TARGET", value => "COMPOSE" },
|
2016-04-25 08:00:34 +00:00
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
name => "upgrade_2_kde_64bit",
|
|
|
|
|
settings => [
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "ROOT_PASSWORD", value => "weakpassword" },
|
2016-05-05 23:39:47 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "USER_LOGIN", value => "test" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "USER_PASSWORD", value => "weakpassword" },
|
2016-04-25 08:00:34 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "BOOTFROM", value => "c" },
|
2016-07-04 16:32:27 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "HDD_1", value => "disk_f%PREVREL%_kde_3_x86_64.img" },
|
2016-05-05 23:39:47 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "UPGRADE", value => "1" },
|
2016-04-25 08:00:34 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "DESKTOP", value => "kde" },
|
2017-02-02 15:13:10 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "TEST_TARGET", value => "COMPOSE" },
|
2016-04-25 08:00:34 +00:00
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-07-08 15:56:57 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
name => "upgrade_2_desktop_encrypted_64bit",
|
|
|
|
|
settings => [
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "ROOT_PASSWORD", value => "weakpassword" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "USER_LOGIN", value => "test" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "USER_PASSWORD", value => "weakpassword" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "BOOTFROM", value => "c" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "HDD_1", value => "disk_f%PREVREL%_desktopencrypt_x86_64.img" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "UPGRADE", value => "1" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "DESKTOP", value => "gnome" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "ENCRYPT_PASSWORD", value => "weakpassword" },
|
2017-02-02 15:13:10 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "TEST_TARGET", value => "COMPOSE" },
|
2016-07-08 15:56:57 +00:00
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2015-12-07 18:10:08 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
name => "upgrade_desktop_32bit",
|
|
|
|
|
settings => [
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "ROOT_PASSWORD", value => "weakpassword" },
|
2016-05-05 23:39:47 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "USER_LOGIN", value => "test" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "USER_PASSWORD", value => "weakpassword" },
|
2015-12-07 18:10:08 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "BOOTFROM", value => "c" },
|
2016-07-04 16:32:27 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "HDD_1", value => "disk_f%CURRREL%_desktop_3_i686.img" },
|
2016-05-05 23:39:47 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "UPGRADE", value => "1" },
|
2015-12-08 10:49:38 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "DESKTOP", value => "gnome" },
|
2017-02-02 15:13:10 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "TEST_TARGET", value => "COMPOSE" },
|
2015-12-07 18:10:08 +00:00
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2015-08-27 11:49:09 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2015-12-07 17:42:55 +00:00
|
|
|
name => "upgrade_2_desktop_32bit",
|
2015-08-27 11:49:09 +00:00
|
|
|
settings => [
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "ROOT_PASSWORD", value => "weakpassword" },
|
2016-05-05 23:39:47 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "USER_LOGIN", value => "test" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "USER_PASSWORD", value => "weakpassword" },
|
2015-08-27 11:49:09 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "BOOTFROM", value => "c" },
|
2016-07-04 16:32:27 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "HDD_1", value => "disk_f%PREVREL%_desktop_3_i686.img" },
|
2016-05-05 23:39:47 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "UPGRADE", value => "1" },
|
2015-12-08 10:32:48 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "DESKTOP", value => "gnome" },
|
2017-02-02 15:13:10 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "TEST_TARGET", value => "COMPOSE" },
|
2015-07-17 10:52:56 +00:00
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2015-08-17 15:36:40 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
name => "install_updates_img_local",
|
2015-08-17 15:36:40 +00:00
|
|
|
settings => [
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "NUMDISKS", value => "2" },
|
2016-04-01 15:00:47 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "HDD_2", value => "disk_updates_img_2.img" },
|
rename BOOT_UPDATES_IMG_URL to TEST_UPDATES, add GRUBADD
Summary:
BOOT_UPDATES_IMG_URL is a pretty misleading name - it used to
be the actual URL, but now it's simply a boolean that decides
whether we look for the effect of the openQA updates image or
not. TEST_UPDATES seems clearer.
GRUBADD does the same thing as GRUB, on top of it. The point of
this is so we can add an option to the scheduler CLI that lets
you say 'run the normal tests, but with this updates image' -
so we can easily (albeit manually triggered) check the impact
of some anaconda change that needs testing. It should never be
set in the templates or the tests, it's there strictly for the
scheduler (whether that's fedora_openqa_schedule or literally a
person calling `client isos post`) to use as a kind of override.
The tests that test updates image loading will probably fail
when doing this, but all other tests should work as intended,
including ones that specify GRUB, becase the extra params will
just get added on top. That's why I invented a new var instead
of just letting the scheduler override GRUB's value when POST
ing.
Test Plan:
Check the rename didn't break anything (updates tests
still work). Run tests with GRUBADD param, make sure value is
correctly appended to cmdline both when GRUB is also specified
and when it is not.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D801
2016-04-08 20:21:29 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "TEST_UPDATES", value => "1" },
|
2015-08-17 15:36:40 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "GRUB", value => "inst.updates=hd:LABEL=UPDATES_IMG:/updates.img" },
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2015-09-08 13:54:22 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
name => "install_shrink_ext4",
|
2015-09-08 13:54:22 +00:00
|
|
|
settings => [
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "ROOT_PASSWORD", value => "weakpassword" },
|
2015-10-15 14:07:00 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "HDD_1", value => "disk_shrink_ext4_mbr.img" },
|
2015-09-08 13:54:22 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "PARTITIONING", value => "guided_shrink" },
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
name => "install_shrink_ntfs",
|
2015-09-08 13:54:22 +00:00
|
|
|
settings => [
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "ROOT_PASSWORD", value => "weakpassword" },
|
2015-10-15 14:07:00 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "HDD_1", value => "disk_shrink_ntfs_mbr.img" },
|
2015-09-08 13:54:22 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "PARTITIONING", value => "guided_shrink" },
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2015-09-15 01:08:58 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
name => "install_european_language",
|
2015-09-15 01:08:58 +00:00
|
|
|
settings => [
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "LANGUAGE", value => "french" },
|
2016-12-16 17:40:29 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "DESKTOP", value => "gnome" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "PACKAGE_SET", value => "workstation" },
|
2015-09-15 01:08:58 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "USER_LOGIN", value => "qwerty" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "ROOT_PASSWORD", value => "weakpassword" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "ENCRYPT_PASSWORD", value => "weakpassword" },
|
2016-12-16 17:40:29 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "POSTINSTALL", value => "_console_login" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "REPOSITORY_VARIATION", value => "%LOCATION%" },
|
2015-09-15 01:08:58 +00:00
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-05-20 14:52:55 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
name => "install_cyrillic_language",
|
|
|
|
|
settings => [
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "LANGUAGE", value => "russian" },
|
2016-12-16 17:40:29 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "DESKTOP", value => "gnome" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "PACKAGE_SET", value => "workstation" },
|
2016-05-20 14:52:55 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "SWITCHED_LAYOUT", value => "1" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "USER_LOGIN", value => "qwerty" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "ROOT_PASSWORD", value => "weakpassword" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "ENCRYPT_PASSWORD", value => "weakpassword" },
|
2016-12-21 16:41:00 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "POSTINSTALL", value => "_console_login" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "REPOSITORY_VARIATION", value => "%LOCATION%" },
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
name => "install_asian_language",
|
|
|
|
|
settings => [
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "LANGUAGE", value => "japanese" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "DESKTOP", value => "gnome" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "PACKAGE_SET", value => "workstation" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "INPUT_METHOD", value => "1" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "USER_LOGIN", value => "qwerty" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "ROOT_PASSWORD", value => "weakpassword" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "ENCRYPT_PASSWORD", value => "weakpassword" },
|
2016-12-16 17:40:29 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "POSTINSTALL", value => "_console_login" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "REPOSITORY_VARIATION", value => "%LOCATION%" },
|
2016-05-20 14:52:55 +00:00
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2015-11-26 12:50:45 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
name => "install_xfs",
|
2015-11-26 12:50:45 +00:00
|
|
|
settings => [
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "PARTITIONING", value => "custom_xfs" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "ROOT_PASSWORD", value => "weakpassword" },
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-06-09 15:43:46 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
name => "install_iscsi",
|
|
|
|
|
settings => [
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "PARTITIONING", value => "custom_iscsi" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "ANACONDA_STATIC", value => "10.0.2.111" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "ROOT_PASSWORD", value => "weakpassword" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "PARALLEL_WITH", value => "support_server" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "INSTALL_UNLOCK", value => "support_ready" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "NICTYPE", value => "tap" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "WORKER_CLASS", value => "tap" },
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2015-12-08 10:49:38 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2016-03-23 20:46:48 +00:00
|
|
|
name => "install_package_set_kde",
|
2015-12-08 10:49:38 +00:00
|
|
|
settings => [
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "DESKTOP", value => "kde" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "PACKAGE_SET", value => "kde" },
|
2016-11-09 15:20:17 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "POSTINSTALL", value => "_collect_data" },
|
use compose repository (not master repo) for most tests
Summary:
we have a long-standing problem with all the tests that hit
the repositories. The tests are triggered as soon as a compose
completes. At this point in time, the compose is not synced to
the mirrors, where the default 'fedora' repo definition looks;
the sync happens after the compose completes, and there is also
a metadata sync step that must happen after *that* before any
operation that uses the 'fedora' repository definition will
actually use the packages from the new compose. Thus all net
install tests and tests that installed packages have been
effectively testing the previous compose, not the current one.
We have some thoughts about how to fix this 'properly' (such
that the openQA tests wouldn't have to do anything special,
but their 'fedora' repository would somehow reflect the compose
under test), but none of them is in place right now or likely
to happen in the short term, so in the mean time this should
deal with most of the issues. With this change, everything but
the default_install tests for the netinst images should use
the compose-under-test's Everything tree instead of the 'fedora'
repository, and thus should install and test the correct
packages.
This relies on a corresponding change to openqa_fedora_tools
to set the LOCATION openQA setting (which is simply the base
location of the compose under test).
Test Plan:
Do a full test run, check (as far as you can) tests run sensibly
and use appropriate repositories.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D989
2016-09-01 15:22:59 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "REPOSITORY_VARIATION", value => "%LOCATION%" },
|
2015-12-08 10:49:38 +00:00
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
add a base_selinux test (follow-on from default_install)
Summary:
so here's our first attempt to use the 'carry on from a previous
test' stuff! This adds a base_selinux test that uses a disk
image from a previous default_install run, and adds jobtemplates
to run base_selinux for appropriate products: generic_boot
(for nightly tests), server_dvd, and workstation_live. Note that
you'll want to either update to the newest openQA package I just
built in COPR or create /var/lib/openqa/share/factory/tmp owned
by geekotest; openQA tries to use that directory as MOJO_TMPDIR
but in 4.2, if the directory doesn't exist, it doesn't create it,
and we wind up with the default MOJO_TMPDIR which is /tmp; when
the disk image is uploaded it creates a huge temp file in /tmp
and may well exhaust the available space as it's a tmpfs. I've
backported a recent upstream commit that tries to create the
directory if it doesn't exist, in 4.2-10.
It seems like openQA is smart enough to figure out the
dependencies correctly, so the 'base_selinux' test for each
product depends on the 'default_install' test for the same
product (not any of the other default_install runs) and will
use the hard disk image it produces.
Test Plan:
Do a full test run and make sure base_selinux tests
appear for appropriate products, depend on the correct default_
install test, the default_install test uploads the hard disk
image correctly, and the base_selinux test runs correctly. And
of course that nothing else broke in the process...
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: jskladan
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D699
2015-12-17 20:46:14 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
name => "base_selinux",
|
|
|
|
|
settings => [
|
consolidate login waits, use postinstall not entrypoint for base
Summary:
I started out wanting to fix an issue I noticed today where
graphical upgrade tests were failing because they didn't wait
for the graphical login screen properly; the test was sitting
at the 'full Fedora logo' state of plymouth for a long time,
so the current boot_to_login_screen's wait_still_screen was
triggered by it and the function wound up failing on the
assert_screen, because it was still some time before the real
login screen appeared.
So I tweaked the boot_to_login_screen implementation to work
slightly differently (look for a login screen match, *then* -
if we're dealing with a graphical login - wait_still_screen
to defeat the 'old GPU buffer showing login screen' problem
and assert the login screen again). But while working on it,
I figured we really should consolidate all the various places
that handle the bootloader -> login, we were doing it quite
differently in all sorts of different places. And as part of
that, I converted the base tests to use POSTINSTALL (and thus
go through the shared _wait_login tests) instead of handling
boot themselves. As part of *that*, I tweaked main.pm to not
require all POSTINSTALL tests have the _postinstall suffix on
their names, as it really doesn't make sense, and renamed the
tests.
Test Plan: Run all tests, see if they work.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D1015
2016-09-27 18:48:15 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "POSTINSTALL", value => "base_selinux" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "USER_LOGIN", value => "false" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "ROOT_PASSWORD", value => "weakpassword" },
|
2016-03-24 20:38:32 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "START_AFTER_TEST", value => "install_default_upload" },
|
add a base_selinux test (follow-on from default_install)
Summary:
so here's our first attempt to use the 'carry on from a previous
test' stuff! This adds a base_selinux test that uses a disk
image from a previous default_install run, and adds jobtemplates
to run base_selinux for appropriate products: generic_boot
(for nightly tests), server_dvd, and workstation_live. Note that
you'll want to either update to the newest openQA package I just
built in COPR or create /var/lib/openqa/share/factory/tmp owned
by geekotest; openQA tries to use that directory as MOJO_TMPDIR
but in 4.2, if the directory doesn't exist, it doesn't create it,
and we wind up with the default MOJO_TMPDIR which is /tmp; when
the disk image is uploaded it creates a huge temp file in /tmp
and may well exhaust the available space as it's a tmpfs. I've
backported a recent upstream commit that tries to create the
directory if it doesn't exist, in 4.2-10.
It seems like openQA is smart enough to figure out the
dependencies correctly, so the 'base_selinux' test for each
product depends on the 'default_install' test for the same
product (not any of the other default_install runs) and will
use the hard disk image it produces.
Test Plan:
Do a full test run and make sure base_selinux tests
appear for appropriate products, depend on the correct default_
install test, the default_install test uploads the hard disk
image correctly, and the base_selinux test runs correctly. And
of course that nothing else broke in the process...
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: jskladan
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D699
2015-12-17 20:46:14 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "BOOTFROM", value => "c" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "HDD_1", value => "disk_%FLAVOR%_%MACHINE%.qcow2" },
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-01-08 17:01:33 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
name => "base_services_start",
|
|
|
|
|
settings => [
|
consolidate login waits, use postinstall not entrypoint for base
Summary:
I started out wanting to fix an issue I noticed today where
graphical upgrade tests were failing because they didn't wait
for the graphical login screen properly; the test was sitting
at the 'full Fedora logo' state of plymouth for a long time,
so the current boot_to_login_screen's wait_still_screen was
triggered by it and the function wound up failing on the
assert_screen, because it was still some time before the real
login screen appeared.
So I tweaked the boot_to_login_screen implementation to work
slightly differently (look for a login screen match, *then* -
if we're dealing with a graphical login - wait_still_screen
to defeat the 'old GPU buffer showing login screen' problem
and assert the login screen again). But while working on it,
I figured we really should consolidate all the various places
that handle the bootloader -> login, we were doing it quite
differently in all sorts of different places. And as part of
that, I converted the base tests to use POSTINSTALL (and thus
go through the shared _wait_login tests) instead of handling
boot themselves. As part of *that*, I tweaked main.pm to not
require all POSTINSTALL tests have the _postinstall suffix on
their names, as it really doesn't make sense, and renamed the
tests.
Test Plan: Run all tests, see if they work.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D1015
2016-09-27 18:48:15 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "POSTINSTALL", value => "base_services_start" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "USER_LOGIN", value => "false" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "ROOT_PASSWORD", value => "weakpassword" },
|
2016-03-24 20:38:32 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "START_AFTER_TEST", value => "install_default_upload" },
|
2016-01-08 17:01:33 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "BOOTFROM", value => "c" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "HDD_1", value => "disk_%FLAVOR%_%MACHINE%.qcow2" },
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-05-27 10:36:15 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
name => "base_services_start_arm",
|
|
|
|
|
settings => [
|
consolidate login waits, use postinstall not entrypoint for base
Summary:
I started out wanting to fix an issue I noticed today where
graphical upgrade tests were failing because they didn't wait
for the graphical login screen properly; the test was sitting
at the 'full Fedora logo' state of plymouth for a long time,
so the current boot_to_login_screen's wait_still_screen was
triggered by it and the function wound up failing on the
assert_screen, because it was still some time before the real
login screen appeared.
So I tweaked the boot_to_login_screen implementation to work
slightly differently (look for a login screen match, *then* -
if we're dealing with a graphical login - wait_still_screen
to defeat the 'old GPU buffer showing login screen' problem
and assert the login screen again). But while working on it,
I figured we really should consolidate all the various places
that handle the bootloader -> login, we were doing it quite
differently in all sorts of different places. And as part of
that, I converted the base tests to use POSTINSTALL (and thus
go through the shared _wait_login tests) instead of handling
boot themselves. As part of *that*, I tweaked main.pm to not
require all POSTINSTALL tests have the _postinstall suffix on
their names, as it really doesn't make sense, and renamed the
tests.
Test Plan: Run all tests, see if they work.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D1015
2016-09-27 18:48:15 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "POSTINSTALL", value => "base_services_start" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "USER_LOGIN", value => "false" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "ROOT_PASSWORD", value => "weakpassword" },
|
2016-05-27 10:36:15 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "START_AFTER_TEST", value => "install_arm_image_deployment_upload" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "NUMDISKS", value => "1" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "HDD_1", value => "disk_%FLAVOR%_%MACHINE%.qcow2" },
|
2016-10-17 10:23:06 +00:00
|
|
|
# set kernel arguments for DKB
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "APPEND", value => "rw root=LABEL=_/ rootwait console=ttyAMA0 console=tty0 consoleblank=0" },
|
2016-05-27 10:36:15 +00:00
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-01-11 20:30:24 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
name => "base_service_manipulation",
|
|
|
|
|
settings => [
|
consolidate login waits, use postinstall not entrypoint for base
Summary:
I started out wanting to fix an issue I noticed today where
graphical upgrade tests were failing because they didn't wait
for the graphical login screen properly; the test was sitting
at the 'full Fedora logo' state of plymouth for a long time,
so the current boot_to_login_screen's wait_still_screen was
triggered by it and the function wound up failing on the
assert_screen, because it was still some time before the real
login screen appeared.
So I tweaked the boot_to_login_screen implementation to work
slightly differently (look for a login screen match, *then* -
if we're dealing with a graphical login - wait_still_screen
to defeat the 'old GPU buffer showing login screen' problem
and assert the login screen again). But while working on it,
I figured we really should consolidate all the various places
that handle the bootloader -> login, we were doing it quite
differently in all sorts of different places. And as part of
that, I converted the base tests to use POSTINSTALL (and thus
go through the shared _wait_login tests) instead of handling
boot themselves. As part of *that*, I tweaked main.pm to not
require all POSTINSTALL tests have the _postinstall suffix on
their names, as it really doesn't make sense, and renamed the
tests.
Test Plan: Run all tests, see if they work.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D1015
2016-09-27 18:48:15 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "POSTINSTALL", value => "base_service_manipulation" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "USER_LOGIN", value => "false" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "ROOT_PASSWORD", value => "weakpassword" },
|
2016-03-24 20:38:32 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "START_AFTER_TEST", value => "install_default_upload" },
|
2016-01-11 20:30:24 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "BOOTFROM", value => "c" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "HDD_1", value => "disk_%FLAVOR%_%MACHINE%.qcow2" },
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-09-20 18:41:12 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
name => "base_update_cli",
|
|
|
|
|
settings => [
|
consolidate login waits, use postinstall not entrypoint for base
Summary:
I started out wanting to fix an issue I noticed today where
graphical upgrade tests were failing because they didn't wait
for the graphical login screen properly; the test was sitting
at the 'full Fedora logo' state of plymouth for a long time,
so the current boot_to_login_screen's wait_still_screen was
triggered by it and the function wound up failing on the
assert_screen, because it was still some time before the real
login screen appeared.
So I tweaked the boot_to_login_screen implementation to work
slightly differently (look for a login screen match, *then* -
if we're dealing with a graphical login - wait_still_screen
to defeat the 'old GPU buffer showing login screen' problem
and assert the login screen again). But while working on it,
I figured we really should consolidate all the various places
that handle the bootloader -> login, we were doing it quite
differently in all sorts of different places. And as part of
that, I converted the base tests to use POSTINSTALL (and thus
go through the shared _wait_login tests) instead of handling
boot themselves. As part of *that*, I tweaked main.pm to not
require all POSTINSTALL tests have the _postinstall suffix on
their names, as it really doesn't make sense, and renamed the
tests.
Test Plan: Run all tests, see if they work.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D1015
2016-09-27 18:48:15 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "POSTINSTALL", value => "base_update_cli" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "USER_LOGIN", value => "false" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "ROOT_PASSWORD", value => "weakpassword" },
|
2016-09-20 18:41:12 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "START_AFTER_TEST", value => "install_default_upload" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "BOOTFROM", value => "c" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "HDD_1", value => "disk_%FLAVOR%_%MACHINE%.qcow2" },
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2017-06-01 09:06:04 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
name => "base_system_logging",
|
|
|
|
|
settings => [
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "POSTINSTALL", value => "base_system_logging" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "USER_LOGIN", value => "false" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "ROOT_PASSWORD", value => "weakpassword" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "START_AFTER_TEST", value => "install_default_upload" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "BOOTFROM", value => "c" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "HDD_1", value => "disk_%FLAVOR%_%MACHINE%.qcow2" },
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-03-23 20:52:00 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
name => "install_kickstart_firewall_disabled",
|
|
|
|
|
settings => [
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "KICKSTART", value => "1" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "GRUB", value => "inst.ks=http://fedorapeople.org/groups/qa/kickstarts/firewall-disabled-net.ks" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "POSTINSTALL", value => "firewall_disabled" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "ROOT_PASSWORD", value => "anaconda" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "USER_LOGIN", value => "false" },
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
name => "install_kickstart_firewall_configured",
|
|
|
|
|
settings => [
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "KICKSTART", value => "1" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "GRUB", value => "inst.ks=http://fedorapeople.org/groups/qa/kickstarts/firewall-configured-net.ks" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "POSTINSTALL", value => "firewall_configured" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "ROOT_PASSWORD", value => "anaconda" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "USER_LOGIN", value => "false" },
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-05-31 21:24:34 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
name => "server_firewall_default",
|
|
|
|
|
settings => [
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "POSTINSTALL", value => "server_firewall_default" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "USER_LOGIN", value => "false" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "START_AFTER_TEST", value => "install_default_upload" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "BOOTFROM", value => "c" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "HDD_1", value => "disk_%FLAVOR%_%MACHINE%.qcow2" },
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-05-04 18:53:11 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
name => "server_role_deploy_domain_controller",
|
|
|
|
|
settings => [
|
Test upgrade of FreeIPA server and client deployment
Summary:
This adds an upgrade variant of the FreeIPA tests, with only
the simplest client enrolment (sssd) for now. The server test
starts from the N-1 release and deploys the domain controller
role. The client test similarly starts from the N-1 release
and, when the server is deployed, enrols as a domain client.
Then the server upgrades itself, while the client waits (as the
server is its name server). Then the client upgrades itself,
while the server does some self-checks. The server then waits
for the client to do its checks before decommissioning itself,
as usual. So, summary: *deployment* of both server and client
occurs on N-1, then both are upgraded, then the actual *checks*
occur on N.
In my testing, this all more or less works, except the role
decommission step fails. This failure seems to be a genuine one
so far as I can tell; I intend to file a bug for it soon.
Test Plan:
Run the new tests, check they work. Run the existing
FreeIPA tests (both the compose and the update variants), check
they both behave the same.
Reviewers: jsedlak, jskladan
Reviewed By: jsedlak
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qa.fedoraproject.org/D1204
2017-05-17 19:39:45 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "POSTINSTALL", value => "role_deploy_domain_controller role_deploy_domain_controller_check" },
|
consolidate login waits, use postinstall not entrypoint for base
Summary:
I started out wanting to fix an issue I noticed today where
graphical upgrade tests were failing because they didn't wait
for the graphical login screen properly; the test was sitting
at the 'full Fedora logo' state of plymouth for a long time,
so the current boot_to_login_screen's wait_still_screen was
triggered by it and the function wound up failing on the
assert_screen, because it was still some time before the real
login screen appeared.
So I tweaked the boot_to_login_screen implementation to work
slightly differently (look for a login screen match, *then* -
if we're dealing with a graphical login - wait_still_screen
to defeat the 'old GPU buffer showing login screen' problem
and assert the login screen again). But while working on it,
I figured we really should consolidate all the various places
that handle the bootloader -> login, we were doing it quite
differently in all sorts of different places. And as part of
that, I converted the base tests to use POSTINSTALL (and thus
go through the shared _wait_login tests) instead of handling
boot themselves. As part of *that*, I tweaked main.pm to not
require all POSTINSTALL tests have the _postinstall suffix on
their names, as it really doesn't make sense, and renamed the
tests.
Test Plan: Run all tests, see if they work.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D1015
2016-09-27 18:48:15 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "USER_LOGIN", value => "false" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "ROOT_PASSWORD", value => "weakpassword" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "GRUB_POSTINSTALL", value => "net.ifnames=0 biosdevname=0" },
|
2016-05-04 18:53:11 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "START_AFTER_TEST", value => "install_default_upload" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "BOOTFROM", value => "c" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "HDD_1", value => "disk_%FLAVOR%_%MACHINE%.qcow2" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "GRUB", value => "net.ifnames=0 biosdevname=0" },
|
Add support for testing updates
Summary:
This adds an entirely new workflow for testing distribution
updates. The `ADVISORY` variable is introduced: when set,
`main.pm` will load an early post-install test that sets up
a repository containing the packages from the specified update,
runs `dnf -y update`, and reboots. A new templates file is
added, `templates-updates`, which adds two new flavors called
`updates-server` and `updates-workstation`, each containing
job templates for appropriate post-install tests. Scheduler is
expected to post `ADVISORY=(update ID) HDD_1=(base image)
FLAVOR=updates-(server|workstation)`, where (base image) is one
of the stable release base disk images produced by `createhdds`
and usually used for upgrade testing. This will result in the
appropriate job templates being loaded.
We rejig postinstall test loading and static network config a
bit so that this works for both the 'compose' and 'updates' test
flows: we have to ensure we bring up networking for the tap
tests before we try and install the updates, but still allow
later adjustment of the configuration. We take advantage of the
openQA feature that was added a few months back to run the same
module multiple times, so the `_advisory_update` module can
reboot after installing the updates and the modules that take
care of bootloader, encryption and login get run again. This
looks slightly wacky in the web UI, though - it doesn't show the
later runs of each module.
We also use the recently added feature to specify `+HDD_1` in
the test suites which use a disk image uploaded by an earlier
post-install test, so the test suite value will take priority
over the value POSTed by the scheduler for those tests, and we
will use the uploaded disk image (and not the clean base image
POSTed by the scheduler) for those tests.
My intent here is to enhance the scheduler, adding a consumer
which listens out for critpath updates, and runs this test flow
for each one, then reports the results to ResultsDB where Bodhi
could query and display them. We could also add a list of other
packages to have one or both sets of update tests run on it, I
guess.
Test Plan:
Try a post something like:
HDD_1=disk_f25_server_3_x86_64.img DISTRI=fedora VERSION=25
FLAVOR=updates-server ARCH=x86_64 BUILD=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c
ADVISORY=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c CURRREL=25 PREVREL=24
Pick an appropriate `ADVISORY` (ideally, one containing some
packages which might actually be involved in the tests), and
matching `FLAVOR` and `HDD_1`. The appropriate tests should run,
a repo with the update packages should be created and enabled
(and dnf update run), and the tests should work properly. Also
test a regular compose run to make sure I didn't break anything.
Reviewers: jskladan, jsedlak
Reviewed By: jsedlak
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qa.fedoraproject.org/D1143
2017-01-25 16:16:12 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "POST_STATIC", value => "10.0.2.100 ipa001.domain.local" },
|
2016-05-04 18:53:11 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "NICTYPE", value => "tap" },
|
2016-05-05 21:42:16 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "WORKER_CLASS", value => "tap" },
|
2016-05-04 18:53:11 +00:00
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
name => "server_realmd_join_kickstart",
|
|
|
|
|
settings => [
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "KICKSTART", value => "1" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "GRUB", value => "inst.ks=hd:vdb1:/freeipaclient.ks" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "NUMDISKS", value => "2" },
|
2016-08-16 00:01:18 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "HDD_2", value => "disk_ks_3.img" },
|
2016-05-04 18:53:11 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "POSTINSTALL", value => "freeipa_client" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "USER_LOGIN", value => "false" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "ROOT_PASSWORD", value => "anaconda" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "PARALLEL_WITH", value => "server_role_deploy_domain_controller" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "INSTALL_UNLOCK", value => "freeipa_ready" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "NICTYPE", value => "tap" },
|
2016-05-05 21:42:16 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "WORKER_CLASS", value => "tap" },
|
2016-05-04 18:53:11 +00:00
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
add cockpit_default and cockpit_basic tests
Summary:
This adds tests for the Server_cockpit_default and cockpit_basic
test cases. Some notes: I was initially thinking of combining
these into a single test with multiple test modules and coming
up with a system for doing wiki reporting based on individual
test module status, but because we'll also want to do a cockpit
FreeIPA enrol test, I decided against it. We don't really want
to combine all three because then we would skip the cockpit
tests whenever FreeIPA server deployment failed, which isn't
ideal. So since we'll need a separate FreeIPA enrolment test
anyway it doesn't really make sense to go to the trouble of
designing a system for loading multiple postinstall tests (though
I have an idea for that!) and a per-module wiki reporting system.
This was the most minimal and hopefully reliable method for
running Cockpit from a stock Server install that I could think
of. An alternative approach would be to have, say, the most
recent stable Workstation live as a 'stock' asset and have two
tests, one which runs a stock Server install and just waits and
another which boots the live image and accesses the cockpit
running on the other box, but that seems a bit over-complex. It
is not possible to have dependencies between tests for different
ISOs, in case you were wondering about having a Workstation live
test which runs parallel with a Server DVD test, we can't do
that. One funny thing is the font that winds up getting used for
the desktop, but I don't *think* that should be a problem.
Picking needles was a bit tricky; any improvement suggestions
are welcome. I'm hoping it turns out to be safe to rely on some
dbus log messages being present; I think logging into Cockpit
triggers activation of the realmd dbus interface, so there
*should* always be some messages related to that. An alternative
would just be to match on a sliver of the dark grey table header
and the light grey row beneath it and assume that'll always be
the first message (whatever the message is), but then we have to
find some area of the message details screen which is always
present for any message, and it just seems a tad more likely to
result in false passes. Similary I'm making an assumption that
auditd is always going to show up on the first page of the
Services screen and the details screen will always show that
'loaded...enabled' text.
Test Plan:
Run the tests and see if they work! See
https://openqa.stg.fedoraproject.org/tests/21373 and
https://openqa.stg.fedoraproject.org/tests/21371 for my tests.
Reviewers: garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D874
2016-06-01 16:05:33 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
name => "server_cockpit_default",
|
|
|
|
|
settings => [
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "POSTINSTALL", value => "server_cockpit_default" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "USER_LOGIN", value => "false" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "ROOT_PASSWORD", value => "weakpassword" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "START_AFTER_TEST", value => "install_default_upload" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "BOOTFROM", value => "c" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "HDD_1", value => "disk_%FLAVOR%_%MACHINE%.qcow2" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "STORE_HDD_1", value => "disk_%MACHINE%_cockpit.qcow2" },
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
name => "server_cockpit_basic",
|
|
|
|
|
settings => [
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "POSTINSTALL", value => "server_cockpit_basic" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "USER_LOGIN", value => "false" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "ROOT_PASSWORD", value => "weakpassword" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "START_AFTER_TEST", value => "server_cockpit_default" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "BOOTFROM", value => "c" },
|
Add support for testing updates
Summary:
This adds an entirely new workflow for testing distribution
updates. The `ADVISORY` variable is introduced: when set,
`main.pm` will load an early post-install test that sets up
a repository containing the packages from the specified update,
runs `dnf -y update`, and reboots. A new templates file is
added, `templates-updates`, which adds two new flavors called
`updates-server` and `updates-workstation`, each containing
job templates for appropriate post-install tests. Scheduler is
expected to post `ADVISORY=(update ID) HDD_1=(base image)
FLAVOR=updates-(server|workstation)`, where (base image) is one
of the stable release base disk images produced by `createhdds`
and usually used for upgrade testing. This will result in the
appropriate job templates being loaded.
We rejig postinstall test loading and static network config a
bit so that this works for both the 'compose' and 'updates' test
flows: we have to ensure we bring up networking for the tap
tests before we try and install the updates, but still allow
later adjustment of the configuration. We take advantage of the
openQA feature that was added a few months back to run the same
module multiple times, so the `_advisory_update` module can
reboot after installing the updates and the modules that take
care of bootloader, encryption and login get run again. This
looks slightly wacky in the web UI, though - it doesn't show the
later runs of each module.
We also use the recently added feature to specify `+HDD_1` in
the test suites which use a disk image uploaded by an earlier
post-install test, so the test suite value will take priority
over the value POSTed by the scheduler for those tests, and we
will use the uploaded disk image (and not the clean base image
POSTed by the scheduler) for those tests.
My intent here is to enhance the scheduler, adding a consumer
which listens out for critpath updates, and runs this test flow
for each one, then reports the results to ResultsDB where Bodhi
could query and display them. We could also add a list of other
packages to have one or both sets of update tests run on it, I
guess.
Test Plan:
Try a post something like:
HDD_1=disk_f25_server_3_x86_64.img DISTRI=fedora VERSION=25
FLAVOR=updates-server ARCH=x86_64 BUILD=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c
ADVISORY=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c CURRREL=25 PREVREL=24
Pick an appropriate `ADVISORY` (ideally, one containing some
packages which might actually be involved in the tests), and
matching `FLAVOR` and `HDD_1`. The appropriate tests should run,
a repo with the update packages should be created and enabled
(and dnf update run), and the tests should work properly. Also
test a regular compose run to make sure I didn't break anything.
Reviewers: jskladan, jsedlak
Reviewed By: jsedlak
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qa.fedoraproject.org/D1143
2017-01-25 16:16:12 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "+HDD_1", value => "disk_%MACHINE%_cockpit.qcow2" },
|
add cockpit_default and cockpit_basic tests
Summary:
This adds tests for the Server_cockpit_default and cockpit_basic
test cases. Some notes: I was initially thinking of combining
these into a single test with multiple test modules and coming
up with a system for doing wiki reporting based on individual
test module status, but because we'll also want to do a cockpit
FreeIPA enrol test, I decided against it. We don't really want
to combine all three because then we would skip the cockpit
tests whenever FreeIPA server deployment failed, which isn't
ideal. So since we'll need a separate FreeIPA enrolment test
anyway it doesn't really make sense to go to the trouble of
designing a system for loading multiple postinstall tests (though
I have an idea for that!) and a per-module wiki reporting system.
This was the most minimal and hopefully reliable method for
running Cockpit from a stock Server install that I could think
of. An alternative approach would be to have, say, the most
recent stable Workstation live as a 'stock' asset and have two
tests, one which runs a stock Server install and just waits and
another which boots the live image and accesses the cockpit
running on the other box, but that seems a bit over-complex. It
is not possible to have dependencies between tests for different
ISOs, in case you were wondering about having a Workstation live
test which runs parallel with a Server DVD test, we can't do
that. One funny thing is the font that winds up getting used for
the desktop, but I don't *think* that should be a problem.
Picking needles was a bit tricky; any improvement suggestions
are welcome. I'm hoping it turns out to be safe to rely on some
dbus log messages being present; I think logging into Cockpit
triggers activation of the realmd dbus interface, so there
*should* always be some messages related to that. An alternative
would just be to match on a sliver of the dark grey table header
and the light grey row beneath it and assume that'll always be
the first message (whatever the message is), but then we have to
find some area of the message details screen which is always
present for any message, and it just seems a tad more likely to
result in false passes. Similary I'm making an assumption that
auditd is always going to show up on the first page of the
Services screen and the details screen will always show that
'loaded...enabled' text.
Test Plan:
Run the tests and see if they work! See
https://openqa.stg.fedoraproject.org/tests/21373 and
https://openqa.stg.fedoraproject.org/tests/21371 for my tests.
Reviewers: garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D874
2016-06-01 16:05:33 +00:00
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
add a cockpit realmd FreeIPA join test
Summary:
This requires a few other changes:
* turn clone_host_resolv into clone_host_file, letting you clone
any given host file (cloning /etc/hosts seems to make both
server deployment and client enrolment faster/more reliable)
* allow loading of multiple POSTINSTALL tests (so we can share
the freeipa_client_postinstall test). Note this is compatible,
existing uses will work fine
* move initial password change for the IPA test users into the
server deployment test (so the client tests don't conflict over
doing that)
* add GRUB_POSTINSTALL, for specifying boot parameters for boot of
the installed system, and make it work by tweaking _console_wait
_login (doesn't work for _graphical_wait_login yet, as I didn't
need that)
* make the static networking config for tap tests into a library
function so the tests can share it
* handle ABRT problem dirs showing up in /var/spool/abrt as well
as /var/tmp/abrt (because the enrol attempt hits #1330766 and
the crash report shows up in /var/spool/abrt, don't ask me why
the difference, I just work here)
* specify the DNS servers from the worker host's resolv.conf as
the forwarders for the FreeIPA server when deploying it; if we
don't do this, rolekit defaults to using the root servers as
forwarders(!) and thus we get the public, not phx2-appropriate,
results for e.g. mirrors.fedoraproject.org, some of which the
workers can't reach, so PackageKit package install always fails
(boy, was it fun figuring THAT mess out)
Even after all that, the test still doesn't actually pass, but
I'm reasonably confident this is because it's hitting actual bugs,
not because it's broken. It runs into #1330766 nearly every time
(I think I saw *one* time the enrolment actually succeeded), and
seems to run into a subsequent bug I hadn't seen before when
trying to work around that by trying the join again (see
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1330766#c37 ).
Test Plan:
Run the test, see what happens. If you're really lucky,
it'll actually pass. But you'll probably run into #1330766#c37,
I'm mostly posting for comment. You'll need a tap-capable openQA
instance to test this.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D880
2016-06-07 20:00:39 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
name => "realmd_join_cockpit",
|
|
|
|
|
settings => [
|
add QA:Testcase_FreeIPA_password_change test
Summary:
again, added as a non-fatal module for realmd_join_cockpit as
it's convenient to do it here. Also abstract a couple of ipa
bits into a new exporter package in the style of SUSE's
mm_network, rather than using ill-fitting class inheritance as
we have before - we should probably convert our existing class
based stuff to work this way.
Also a few minor tweaks and clean-ups of the other tests:
The path in console_login() where we detect login of a regular
user when we want root or vice versa and log out was actually
broken because it would 'wait' for the result of the 'exit'
command, which obviously doesn't work (as it relies on running
another command afterwards, and we're no longer at a shell).
This commit no longer actually uses that path, but I spotted
the bug with an earlier version of this which did, and we may
as well keep the fix.
/var/log/lastlog is an apparently-extremely-large sparse file.
A couple of times it seemed to cause tar to run very slowly
while creating the /var/log archive for upload on failure. It's
no use for diagnosing bugs, so we may as well exclude it from
the archive.
I caught cockpit webUI login failing one time when testing the
test, so threw in a wait_still_screen before starting to type
the URL, as we have for the FreeIPA webUI.
I also caught a timing issue with the openQA webUI policy add
step; the test flips from the Users screen to the HBAC screen
then clicks the 'add' button, but there's actually an identical
'add' button on *both* screens, so it could wind up trying to
click the one on the Users screen instead, if the web UI took
a few milliseconds to switch. So we throw in a needle match to
make sure we're actually on the HBAC screen before clicking the
button.
We make the freeipa_webui test a 'milestone' so that if the
new test fails, restoring to the last-known-good milestone
doesn't take so long; it actually seems like openQA can get
confused and try to cancel the test if restoring the milestone
takes a *really* long time, and wind up with a zombie qemu
process, which isn't good. This seems to avoid that happening.
Test Plan:
In the simple case, just run all the FreeIPA-related
tests on Fedora 24 (as Rawhide is broken) and make sure they all
work properly. To get a bit more advanced you can throw in an
`assert_script_run 'false'` in either of the non-fatal tests to
break it and make sure things go properly when that happens (the
last milestone should be restored - which should be right after
freeipa_webui, sitting at tty1 - and run properly; things are
set up so each test starts with root logged in on tty1).
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D935
2016-08-03 20:21:12 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "POSTINSTALL", value => "realmd_join_cockpit freeipa_webui freeipa_password_change freeipa_client" },
|
add a cockpit realmd FreeIPA join test
Summary:
This requires a few other changes:
* turn clone_host_resolv into clone_host_file, letting you clone
any given host file (cloning /etc/hosts seems to make both
server deployment and client enrolment faster/more reliable)
* allow loading of multiple POSTINSTALL tests (so we can share
the freeipa_client_postinstall test). Note this is compatible,
existing uses will work fine
* move initial password change for the IPA test users into the
server deployment test (so the client tests don't conflict over
doing that)
* add GRUB_POSTINSTALL, for specifying boot parameters for boot of
the installed system, and make it work by tweaking _console_wait
_login (doesn't work for _graphical_wait_login yet, as I didn't
need that)
* make the static networking config for tap tests into a library
function so the tests can share it
* handle ABRT problem dirs showing up in /var/spool/abrt as well
as /var/tmp/abrt (because the enrol attempt hits #1330766 and
the crash report shows up in /var/spool/abrt, don't ask me why
the difference, I just work here)
* specify the DNS servers from the worker host's resolv.conf as
the forwarders for the FreeIPA server when deploying it; if we
don't do this, rolekit defaults to using the root servers as
forwarders(!) and thus we get the public, not phx2-appropriate,
results for e.g. mirrors.fedoraproject.org, some of which the
workers can't reach, so PackageKit package install always fails
(boy, was it fun figuring THAT mess out)
Even after all that, the test still doesn't actually pass, but
I'm reasonably confident this is because it's hitting actual bugs,
not because it's broken. It runs into #1330766 nearly every time
(I think I saw *one* time the enrolment actually succeeded), and
seems to run into a subsequent bug I hadn't seen before when
trying to work around that by trying the join again (see
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1330766#c37 ).
Test Plan:
Run the test, see what happens. If you're really lucky,
it'll actually pass. But you'll probably run into #1330766#c37,
I'm mostly posting for comment. You'll need a tap-capable openQA
instance to test this.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D880
2016-06-07 20:00:39 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "USER_LOGIN", value => "false" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "ROOT_PASSWORD", value => "weakpassword" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "START_AFTER_TEST", value => "server_cockpit_default" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "PARALLEL_WITH", value => "server_role_deploy_domain_controller" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "BOOTFROM", value => "c" },
|
Add support for testing updates
Summary:
This adds an entirely new workflow for testing distribution
updates. The `ADVISORY` variable is introduced: when set,
`main.pm` will load an early post-install test that sets up
a repository containing the packages from the specified update,
runs `dnf -y update`, and reboots. A new templates file is
added, `templates-updates`, which adds two new flavors called
`updates-server` and `updates-workstation`, each containing
job templates for appropriate post-install tests. Scheduler is
expected to post `ADVISORY=(update ID) HDD_1=(base image)
FLAVOR=updates-(server|workstation)`, where (base image) is one
of the stable release base disk images produced by `createhdds`
and usually used for upgrade testing. This will result in the
appropriate job templates being loaded.
We rejig postinstall test loading and static network config a
bit so that this works for both the 'compose' and 'updates' test
flows: we have to ensure we bring up networking for the tap
tests before we try and install the updates, but still allow
later adjustment of the configuration. We take advantage of the
openQA feature that was added a few months back to run the same
module multiple times, so the `_advisory_update` module can
reboot after installing the updates and the modules that take
care of bootloader, encryption and login get run again. This
looks slightly wacky in the web UI, though - it doesn't show the
later runs of each module.
We also use the recently added feature to specify `+HDD_1` in
the test suites which use a disk image uploaded by an earlier
post-install test, so the test suite value will take priority
over the value POSTed by the scheduler for those tests, and we
will use the uploaded disk image (and not the clean base image
POSTed by the scheduler) for those tests.
My intent here is to enhance the scheduler, adding a consumer
which listens out for critpath updates, and runs this test flow
for each one, then reports the results to ResultsDB where Bodhi
could query and display them. We could also add a list of other
packages to have one or both sets of update tests run on it, I
guess.
Test Plan:
Try a post something like:
HDD_1=disk_f25_server_3_x86_64.img DISTRI=fedora VERSION=25
FLAVOR=updates-server ARCH=x86_64 BUILD=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c
ADVISORY=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c CURRREL=25 PREVREL=24
Pick an appropriate `ADVISORY` (ideally, one containing some
packages which might actually be involved in the tests), and
matching `FLAVOR` and `HDD_1`. The appropriate tests should run,
a repo with the update packages should be created and enabled
(and dnf update run), and the tests should work properly. Also
test a regular compose run to make sure I didn't break anything.
Reviewers: jskladan, jsedlak
Reviewed By: jsedlak
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qa.fedoraproject.org/D1143
2017-01-25 16:16:12 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "+HDD_1", value => "disk_%MACHINE%_cockpit.qcow2" },
|
add a cockpit realmd FreeIPA join test
Summary:
This requires a few other changes:
* turn clone_host_resolv into clone_host_file, letting you clone
any given host file (cloning /etc/hosts seems to make both
server deployment and client enrolment faster/more reliable)
* allow loading of multiple POSTINSTALL tests (so we can share
the freeipa_client_postinstall test). Note this is compatible,
existing uses will work fine
* move initial password change for the IPA test users into the
server deployment test (so the client tests don't conflict over
doing that)
* add GRUB_POSTINSTALL, for specifying boot parameters for boot of
the installed system, and make it work by tweaking _console_wait
_login (doesn't work for _graphical_wait_login yet, as I didn't
need that)
* make the static networking config for tap tests into a library
function so the tests can share it
* handle ABRT problem dirs showing up in /var/spool/abrt as well
as /var/tmp/abrt (because the enrol attempt hits #1330766 and
the crash report shows up in /var/spool/abrt, don't ask me why
the difference, I just work here)
* specify the DNS servers from the worker host's resolv.conf as
the forwarders for the FreeIPA server when deploying it; if we
don't do this, rolekit defaults to using the root servers as
forwarders(!) and thus we get the public, not phx2-appropriate,
results for e.g. mirrors.fedoraproject.org, some of which the
workers can't reach, so PackageKit package install always fails
(boy, was it fun figuring THAT mess out)
Even after all that, the test still doesn't actually pass, but
I'm reasonably confident this is because it's hitting actual bugs,
not because it's broken. It runs into #1330766 nearly every time
(I think I saw *one* time the enrolment actually succeeded), and
seems to run into a subsequent bug I hadn't seen before when
trying to work around that by trying the join again (see
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1330766#c37 ).
Test Plan:
Run the test, see what happens. If you're really lucky,
it'll actually pass. But you'll probably run into #1330766#c37,
I'm mostly posting for comment. You'll need a tap-capable openQA
instance to test this.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D880
2016-06-07 20:00:39 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "GRUB_POSTINSTALL", value => "net.ifnames=0 biosdevname=0" },
|
Add support for testing updates
Summary:
This adds an entirely new workflow for testing distribution
updates. The `ADVISORY` variable is introduced: when set,
`main.pm` will load an early post-install test that sets up
a repository containing the packages from the specified update,
runs `dnf -y update`, and reboots. A new templates file is
added, `templates-updates`, which adds two new flavors called
`updates-server` and `updates-workstation`, each containing
job templates for appropriate post-install tests. Scheduler is
expected to post `ADVISORY=(update ID) HDD_1=(base image)
FLAVOR=updates-(server|workstation)`, where (base image) is one
of the stable release base disk images produced by `createhdds`
and usually used for upgrade testing. This will result in the
appropriate job templates being loaded.
We rejig postinstall test loading and static network config a
bit so that this works for both the 'compose' and 'updates' test
flows: we have to ensure we bring up networking for the tap
tests before we try and install the updates, but still allow
later adjustment of the configuration. We take advantage of the
openQA feature that was added a few months back to run the same
module multiple times, so the `_advisory_update` module can
reboot after installing the updates and the modules that take
care of bootloader, encryption and login get run again. This
looks slightly wacky in the web UI, though - it doesn't show the
later runs of each module.
We also use the recently added feature to specify `+HDD_1` in
the test suites which use a disk image uploaded by an earlier
post-install test, so the test suite value will take priority
over the value POSTed by the scheduler for those tests, and we
will use the uploaded disk image (and not the clean base image
POSTed by the scheduler) for those tests.
My intent here is to enhance the scheduler, adding a consumer
which listens out for critpath updates, and runs this test flow
for each one, then reports the results to ResultsDB where Bodhi
could query and display them. We could also add a list of other
packages to have one or both sets of update tests run on it, I
guess.
Test Plan:
Try a post something like:
HDD_1=disk_f25_server_3_x86_64.img DISTRI=fedora VERSION=25
FLAVOR=updates-server ARCH=x86_64 BUILD=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c
ADVISORY=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c CURRREL=25 PREVREL=24
Pick an appropriate `ADVISORY` (ideally, one containing some
packages which might actually be involved in the tests), and
matching `FLAVOR` and `HDD_1`. The appropriate tests should run,
a repo with the update packages should be created and enabled
(and dnf update run), and the tests should work properly. Also
test a regular compose run to make sure I didn't break anything.
Reviewers: jskladan, jsedlak
Reviewed By: jsedlak
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qa.fedoraproject.org/D1143
2017-01-25 16:16:12 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "POST_STATIC", value => "10.0.2.102 client002.domain.local" },
|
add a cockpit realmd FreeIPA join test
Summary:
This requires a few other changes:
* turn clone_host_resolv into clone_host_file, letting you clone
any given host file (cloning /etc/hosts seems to make both
server deployment and client enrolment faster/more reliable)
* allow loading of multiple POSTINSTALL tests (so we can share
the freeipa_client_postinstall test). Note this is compatible,
existing uses will work fine
* move initial password change for the IPA test users into the
server deployment test (so the client tests don't conflict over
doing that)
* add GRUB_POSTINSTALL, for specifying boot parameters for boot of
the installed system, and make it work by tweaking _console_wait
_login (doesn't work for _graphical_wait_login yet, as I didn't
need that)
* make the static networking config for tap tests into a library
function so the tests can share it
* handle ABRT problem dirs showing up in /var/spool/abrt as well
as /var/tmp/abrt (because the enrol attempt hits #1330766 and
the crash report shows up in /var/spool/abrt, don't ask me why
the difference, I just work here)
* specify the DNS servers from the worker host's resolv.conf as
the forwarders for the FreeIPA server when deploying it; if we
don't do this, rolekit defaults to using the root servers as
forwarders(!) and thus we get the public, not phx2-appropriate,
results for e.g. mirrors.fedoraproject.org, some of which the
workers can't reach, so PackageKit package install always fails
(boy, was it fun figuring THAT mess out)
Even after all that, the test still doesn't actually pass, but
I'm reasonably confident this is because it's hitting actual bugs,
not because it's broken. It runs into #1330766 nearly every time
(I think I saw *one* time the enrolment actually succeeded), and
seems to run into a subsequent bug I hadn't seen before when
trying to work around that by trying the join again (see
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1330766#c37 ).
Test Plan:
Run the test, see what happens. If you're really lucky,
it'll actually pass. But you'll probably run into #1330766#c37,
I'm mostly posting for comment. You'll need a tap-capable openQA
instance to test this.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D880
2016-06-07 20:00:39 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "NICTYPE", value => "tap" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "WORKER_CLASS", value => "tap" },
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-06-28 19:00:13 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
name => "realmd_join_sssd",
|
|
|
|
|
settings => [
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "POSTINSTALL", value => "realmd_join_sssd freeipa_client" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "USER_LOGIN", value => "false" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "ROOT_PASSWORD", value => "weakpassword" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "START_AFTER_TEST", value => "install_default_upload" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "PARALLEL_WITH", value => "server_role_deploy_domain_controller" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "BOOTFROM", value => "c" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "HDD_1", value => "disk_%FLAVOR%_%MACHINE%.qcow2" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "GRUB_POSTINSTALL", value => "net.ifnames=0 biosdevname=0" },
|
Add support for testing updates
Summary:
This adds an entirely new workflow for testing distribution
updates. The `ADVISORY` variable is introduced: when set,
`main.pm` will load an early post-install test that sets up
a repository containing the packages from the specified update,
runs `dnf -y update`, and reboots. A new templates file is
added, `templates-updates`, which adds two new flavors called
`updates-server` and `updates-workstation`, each containing
job templates for appropriate post-install tests. Scheduler is
expected to post `ADVISORY=(update ID) HDD_1=(base image)
FLAVOR=updates-(server|workstation)`, where (base image) is one
of the stable release base disk images produced by `createhdds`
and usually used for upgrade testing. This will result in the
appropriate job templates being loaded.
We rejig postinstall test loading and static network config a
bit so that this works for both the 'compose' and 'updates' test
flows: we have to ensure we bring up networking for the tap
tests before we try and install the updates, but still allow
later adjustment of the configuration. We take advantage of the
openQA feature that was added a few months back to run the same
module multiple times, so the `_advisory_update` module can
reboot after installing the updates and the modules that take
care of bootloader, encryption and login get run again. This
looks slightly wacky in the web UI, though - it doesn't show the
later runs of each module.
We also use the recently added feature to specify `+HDD_1` in
the test suites which use a disk image uploaded by an earlier
post-install test, so the test suite value will take priority
over the value POSTed by the scheduler for those tests, and we
will use the uploaded disk image (and not the clean base image
POSTed by the scheduler) for those tests.
My intent here is to enhance the scheduler, adding a consumer
which listens out for critpath updates, and runs this test flow
for each one, then reports the results to ResultsDB where Bodhi
could query and display them. We could also add a list of other
packages to have one or both sets of update tests run on it, I
guess.
Test Plan:
Try a post something like:
HDD_1=disk_f25_server_3_x86_64.img DISTRI=fedora VERSION=25
FLAVOR=updates-server ARCH=x86_64 BUILD=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c
ADVISORY=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c CURRREL=25 PREVREL=24
Pick an appropriate `ADVISORY` (ideally, one containing some
packages which might actually be involved in the tests), and
matching `FLAVOR` and `HDD_1`. The appropriate tests should run,
a repo with the update packages should be created and enabled
(and dnf update run), and the tests should work properly. Also
test a regular compose run to make sure I didn't break anything.
Reviewers: jskladan, jsedlak
Reviewed By: jsedlak
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qa.fedoraproject.org/D1143
2017-01-25 16:16:12 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "POST_STATIC", value => "10.0.2.103 client003.domain.local" },
|
2016-06-28 19:00:13 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "NICTYPE", value => "tap" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "WORKER_CLASS", value => "tap" },
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-09-08 21:19:09 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
name => "server_role_deploy_database_server",
|
|
|
|
|
settings => [
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "POSTINSTALL", value => "role_deploy_database_server" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "USER_LOGIN", value => "false" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "ROOT_PASSWORD", value => "weakpassword" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "START_AFTER_TEST", value => "install_default_upload" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "BOOTFROM", value => "c" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "HDD_1", value => "disk_%FLAVOR%_%MACHINE%.qcow2" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "GRUB_POSTINSTALL", value => "net.ifnames=0 biosdevname=0" },
|
Add support for testing updates
Summary:
This adds an entirely new workflow for testing distribution
updates. The `ADVISORY` variable is introduced: when set,
`main.pm` will load an early post-install test that sets up
a repository containing the packages from the specified update,
runs `dnf -y update`, and reboots. A new templates file is
added, `templates-updates`, which adds two new flavors called
`updates-server` and `updates-workstation`, each containing
job templates for appropriate post-install tests. Scheduler is
expected to post `ADVISORY=(update ID) HDD_1=(base image)
FLAVOR=updates-(server|workstation)`, where (base image) is one
of the stable release base disk images produced by `createhdds`
and usually used for upgrade testing. This will result in the
appropriate job templates being loaded.
We rejig postinstall test loading and static network config a
bit so that this works for both the 'compose' and 'updates' test
flows: we have to ensure we bring up networking for the tap
tests before we try and install the updates, but still allow
later adjustment of the configuration. We take advantage of the
openQA feature that was added a few months back to run the same
module multiple times, so the `_advisory_update` module can
reboot after installing the updates and the modules that take
care of bootloader, encryption and login get run again. This
looks slightly wacky in the web UI, though - it doesn't show the
later runs of each module.
We also use the recently added feature to specify `+HDD_1` in
the test suites which use a disk image uploaded by an earlier
post-install test, so the test suite value will take priority
over the value POSTed by the scheduler for those tests, and we
will use the uploaded disk image (and not the clean base image
POSTed by the scheduler) for those tests.
My intent here is to enhance the scheduler, adding a consumer
which listens out for critpath updates, and runs this test flow
for each one, then reports the results to ResultsDB where Bodhi
could query and display them. We could also add a list of other
packages to have one or both sets of update tests run on it, I
guess.
Test Plan:
Try a post something like:
HDD_1=disk_f25_server_3_x86_64.img DISTRI=fedora VERSION=25
FLAVOR=updates-server ARCH=x86_64 BUILD=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c
ADVISORY=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c CURRREL=25 PREVREL=24
Pick an appropriate `ADVISORY` (ideally, one containing some
packages which might actually be involved in the tests), and
matching `FLAVOR` and `HDD_1`. The appropriate tests should run,
a repo with the update packages should be created and enabled
(and dnf update run), and the tests should work properly. Also
test a regular compose run to make sure I didn't break anything.
Reviewers: jskladan, jsedlak
Reviewed By: jsedlak
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qa.fedoraproject.org/D1143
2017-01-25 16:16:12 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "POST_STATIC", value => "10.0.2.104 db.domain.local" },
|
2016-09-08 21:19:09 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "NICTYPE", value => "tap" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "WORKER_CLASS", value => "tap" },
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
name => "server_database_client",
|
|
|
|
|
settings => [
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "POSTINSTALL", value => "database_client" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "USER_LOGIN", value => "false" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "ROOT_PASSWORD", value => "weakpassword" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "START_AFTER_TEST", value => "install_default_upload" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "PARALLEL_WITH", value => "server_role_deploy_database_server" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "BOOTFROM", value => "c" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "HDD_1", value => "disk_%FLAVOR%_%MACHINE%.qcow2" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "GRUB_POSTINSTALL", value => "net.ifnames=0 biosdevname=0" },
|
Add support for testing updates
Summary:
This adds an entirely new workflow for testing distribution
updates. The `ADVISORY` variable is introduced: when set,
`main.pm` will load an early post-install test that sets up
a repository containing the packages from the specified update,
runs `dnf -y update`, and reboots. A new templates file is
added, `templates-updates`, which adds two new flavors called
`updates-server` and `updates-workstation`, each containing
job templates for appropriate post-install tests. Scheduler is
expected to post `ADVISORY=(update ID) HDD_1=(base image)
FLAVOR=updates-(server|workstation)`, where (base image) is one
of the stable release base disk images produced by `createhdds`
and usually used for upgrade testing. This will result in the
appropriate job templates being loaded.
We rejig postinstall test loading and static network config a
bit so that this works for both the 'compose' and 'updates' test
flows: we have to ensure we bring up networking for the tap
tests before we try and install the updates, but still allow
later adjustment of the configuration. We take advantage of the
openQA feature that was added a few months back to run the same
module multiple times, so the `_advisory_update` module can
reboot after installing the updates and the modules that take
care of bootloader, encryption and login get run again. This
looks slightly wacky in the web UI, though - it doesn't show the
later runs of each module.
We also use the recently added feature to specify `+HDD_1` in
the test suites which use a disk image uploaded by an earlier
post-install test, so the test suite value will take priority
over the value POSTed by the scheduler for those tests, and we
will use the uploaded disk image (and not the clean base image
POSTed by the scheduler) for those tests.
My intent here is to enhance the scheduler, adding a consumer
which listens out for critpath updates, and runs this test flow
for each one, then reports the results to ResultsDB where Bodhi
could query and display them. We could also add a list of other
packages to have one or both sets of update tests run on it, I
guess.
Test Plan:
Try a post something like:
HDD_1=disk_f25_server_3_x86_64.img DISTRI=fedora VERSION=25
FLAVOR=updates-server ARCH=x86_64 BUILD=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c
ADVISORY=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c CURRREL=25 PREVREL=24
Pick an appropriate `ADVISORY` (ideally, one containing some
packages which might actually be involved in the tests), and
matching `FLAVOR` and `HDD_1`. The appropriate tests should run,
a repo with the update packages should be created and enabled
(and dnf update run), and the tests should work properly. Also
test a regular compose run to make sure I didn't break anything.
Reviewers: jskladan, jsedlak
Reviewed By: jsedlak
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qa.fedoraproject.org/D1143
2017-01-25 16:16:12 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "POST_STATIC", value => "10.0.2.105 dbclient.domain.local" },
|
2016-09-08 21:19:09 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "NICTYPE", value => "tap" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "WORKER_CLASS", value => "tap" },
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-09-20 22:32:44 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
name => "desktop_update_graphical",
|
|
|
|
|
settings => [
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "POSTINSTALL", value => "desktop_update_graphical" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "START_AFTER_TEST", value => "install_default_upload" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "BOOTFROM", value => "c" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "HDD_1", value => "disk_%FLAVOR%_%MACHINE%.qcow2" },
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-05-05 23:39:47 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
name => "desktop_terminal",
|
|
|
|
|
settings => [
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "POSTINSTALL", value => "desktop_terminal" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "START_AFTER_TEST", value => "install_default_upload" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "BOOTFROM", value => "c" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "HDD_1", value => "disk_%FLAVOR%_%MACHINE%.qcow2" },
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-08-03 20:22:29 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
name => "desktop_browser",
|
|
|
|
|
settings => [
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "POSTINSTALL", value => "desktop_browser" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "START_AFTER_TEST", value => "install_default_upload" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "BOOTFROM", value => "c" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "HDD_1", value => "disk_%FLAVOR%_%MACHINE%.qcow2" },
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-09-23 23:03:13 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
name => "desktop_notifications_postinstall",
|
|
|
|
|
settings => [
|
Force GNOME to notify updates, re-enable test on Workstation
Summary:
GNOME's update notification criteria are pretty braindead: it
fires the update check timer once on login then once every hour
thereafter, but only actually checks for and notifies of updates
once a day if it's after 6am(?!?!?!). So we have to do a bunch
of fiddling around to ensure we reliably get a notification.
Move the clock to 6am if it's earlier than that, and reset the
'last update check' timer to 48 hours ago, then log in to GNOME
after that.
Note: I thought this still wasn't fully reliable, but I've looked
into all the recent failures of either test on staging and
there's only one which was really 'no update notification came
up', and the logs clearly indicate PK did run an update check,
so I don't think that was a test bug (I think something went
wrong with the update check). The other failures are all 'GNOME
did something wacky', plus one case where the needle didn't quite
match because I think the match area is slightly too tall; I'll
fix that in a second.
Test Plan:
Run the tests on both KDE and GNOME and check they
work properly now (assuming nothing unrelated breaks, like KDE
crashing...)
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D1039
2016-10-27 23:23:59 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "ENTRYPOINT", value => "desktop_notifications" },
|
2016-09-23 23:03:13 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "START_AFTER_TEST", value => "install_default_upload" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "BOOTFROM", value => "c" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "HDD_1", value => "disk_%FLAVOR%_%MACHINE%.qcow2" },
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
name => "desktop_notifications_live",
|
|
|
|
|
settings => [
|
consolidate login waits, use postinstall not entrypoint for base
Summary:
I started out wanting to fix an issue I noticed today where
graphical upgrade tests were failing because they didn't wait
for the graphical login screen properly; the test was sitting
at the 'full Fedora logo' state of plymouth for a long time,
so the current boot_to_login_screen's wait_still_screen was
triggered by it and the function wound up failing on the
assert_screen, because it was still some time before the real
login screen appeared.
So I tweaked the boot_to_login_screen implementation to work
slightly differently (look for a login screen match, *then* -
if we're dealing with a graphical login - wait_still_screen
to defeat the 'old GPU buffer showing login screen' problem
and assert the login screen again). But while working on it,
I figured we really should consolidate all the various places
that handle the bootloader -> login, we were doing it quite
differently in all sorts of different places. And as part of
that, I converted the base tests to use POSTINSTALL (and thus
go through the shared _wait_login tests) instead of handling
boot themselves. As part of *that*, I tweaked main.pm to not
require all POSTINSTALL tests have the _postinstall suffix on
their names, as it really doesn't make sense, and renamed the
tests.
Test Plan: Run all tests, see if they work.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D1015
2016-09-27 18:48:15 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "ENTRYPOINT", value => "desktop_notifications" },
|
2016-09-23 23:03:13 +00:00
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
add NFS tests (and DHCP/DNS in the support server)
Summary:
Set up the support server to provide DHCP/DNS functionality and
an NFS server, providing a kickstart. Add a kickstart test just
like the other root-user-crypted-net kickstart tests except it
gets the kickstart from the support server via NFS. Also add NFS
repository tests and a second support server for Server-dvd-iso
flavor: this test must run on that flavor to ensure that packages
are actually available. The support server just mounts the
attached 'DVD' and exports it via NFS.
Note we don't need to do anything clever to avoid IP conflicts
between the two support servers, because os-autoinst-openvswitch
ensures each worker group is on its own VLAN.
As part of adding the NFS repo tests, I did a bit of cleanup,
moving little things we were repeating a lot into anacondatest,
and sharing the 'check if the repo was used' logic between all
the tests (by making it into a test step that's loaded for all
of them). I also simplified the 'was repo used' checks a bit,
it seems silly to run a 'grep' command inside the VM then have
os-autoinst do a grep on the output (which is effectively what
we were doing before), instead we'll just use a single grep
within the VM, and clean up the messy quoting/escaping a bit.
Test Plan:
Run all tests - at least all repository tests - and
check they work (make sure the tests are actually still sane,
not just that they pass). I've done runs of all the repo tests
and they look good to me, but please double-check. I'm currently
re-running the whole 24-20160609.n.0 test on staging with these
changes.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D888
2016-06-13 15:42:30 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
name => "install_kickstart_nfs",
|
|
|
|
|
settings => [
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "KICKSTART", value => "1" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "GRUB", value => "inst.ks=nfs:10.0.2.110:/export/root-user-crypted-net.ks" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "USER_LOGIN", value => "false" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "ROOT_PASSWORD", value => "111111" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "PARALLEL_WITH", value => "support_server" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "INSTALL_UNLOCK", value => "support_ready" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "NICTYPE", value => "tap" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "WORKER_CLASS", value => "tap" },
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-08-03 20:19:18 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
name => "install_updates_nfs",
|
|
|
|
|
settings => [
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "GRUB", value => "inst.stage2=nfs:nfsvers=4:10.0.2.110:/repo" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "TEST_UPDATES", value => "1" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "PARALLEL_WITH", value => "support_server" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "INSTALL_UNLOCK", value => "support_ready" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "NICTYPE", value => "tap" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "WORKER_CLASS", value => "tap" },
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2017-01-16 17:30:14 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
name => "memory_check",
|
|
|
|
|
settings => [
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "PACKAGE_SET", value => "default" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "MEMCHECK", value => "1" },
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "REPOSITORY_VARIATION", value => "%LOCATION%" },
|
2017-02-02 15:13:10 +00:00
|
|
|
{ key => "TEST_TARGET", value => "NONE" },
|
2017-01-16 17:30:14 +00:00
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2017-04-03 23:23:45 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
name => "install_no_user",
|
|
|
|
|
settings => [
|
|
|
|
|
{ key => "INSTALL_NO_USER", value => "1" },
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
2015-01-26 10:33:26 +00:00
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
