add cockpit_default and cockpit_basic tests
Summary:
This adds tests for the Server_cockpit_default and cockpit_basic
test cases. Some notes: I was initially thinking of combining
these into a single test with multiple test modules and coming
up with a system for doing wiki reporting based on individual
test module status, but because we'll also want to do a cockpit
FreeIPA enrol test, I decided against it. We don't really want
to combine all three because then we would skip the cockpit
tests whenever FreeIPA server deployment failed, which isn't
ideal. So since we'll need a separate FreeIPA enrolment test
anyway it doesn't really make sense to go to the trouble of
designing a system for loading multiple postinstall tests (though
I have an idea for that!) and a per-module wiki reporting system.
This was the most minimal and hopefully reliable method for
running Cockpit from a stock Server install that I could think
of. An alternative approach would be to have, say, the most
recent stable Workstation live as a 'stock' asset and have two
tests, one which runs a stock Server install and just waits and
another which boots the live image and accesses the cockpit
running on the other box, but that seems a bit over-complex. It
is not possible to have dependencies between tests for different
ISOs, in case you were wondering about having a Workstation live
test which runs parallel with a Server DVD test, we can't do
that. One funny thing is the font that winds up getting used for
the desktop, but I don't *think* that should be a problem.
Picking needles was a bit tricky; any improvement suggestions
are welcome. I'm hoping it turns out to be safe to rely on some
dbus log messages being present; I think logging into Cockpit
triggers activation of the realmd dbus interface, so there
*should* always be some messages related to that. An alternative
would just be to match on a sliver of the dark grey table header
and the light grey row beneath it and assume that'll always be
the first message (whatever the message is), but then we have to
find some area of the message details screen which is always
present for any message, and it just seems a tad more likely to
result in false passes. Similary I'm making an assumption that
auditd is always going to show up on the first page of the
Services screen and the details screen will always show that
'loaded...enabled' text.
Test Plan:
Run the tests and see if they work! See
https://openqa.stg.fedoraproject.org/tests/21373 and
https://openqa.stg.fedoraproject.org/tests/21371 for my tests.
Reviewers: garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D874
2016-06-01 16:05:33 +00:00
|
|
|
use base "installedtest";
|
|
|
|
|
use strict;
|
|
|
|
|
use testapi;
|
2017-01-18 07:15:44 +00:00
|
|
|
use utils;
|
add cockpit_default and cockpit_basic tests
Summary:
This adds tests for the Server_cockpit_default and cockpit_basic
test cases. Some notes: I was initially thinking of combining
these into a single test with multiple test modules and coming
up with a system for doing wiki reporting based on individual
test module status, but because we'll also want to do a cockpit
FreeIPA enrol test, I decided against it. We don't really want
to combine all three because then we would skip the cockpit
tests whenever FreeIPA server deployment failed, which isn't
ideal. So since we'll need a separate FreeIPA enrolment test
anyway it doesn't really make sense to go to the trouble of
designing a system for loading multiple postinstall tests (though
I have an idea for that!) and a per-module wiki reporting system.
This was the most minimal and hopefully reliable method for
running Cockpit from a stock Server install that I could think
of. An alternative approach would be to have, say, the most
recent stable Workstation live as a 'stock' asset and have two
tests, one which runs a stock Server install and just waits and
another which boots the live image and accesses the cockpit
running on the other box, but that seems a bit over-complex. It
is not possible to have dependencies between tests for different
ISOs, in case you were wondering about having a Workstation live
test which runs parallel with a Server DVD test, we can't do
that. One funny thing is the font that winds up getting used for
the desktop, but I don't *think* that should be a problem.
Picking needles was a bit tricky; any improvement suggestions
are welcome. I'm hoping it turns out to be safe to rely on some
dbus log messages being present; I think logging into Cockpit
triggers activation of the realmd dbus interface, so there
*should* always be some messages related to that. An alternative
would just be to match on a sliver of the dark grey table header
and the light grey row beneath it and assume that'll always be
the first message (whatever the message is), but then we have to
find some area of the message details screen which is always
present for any message, and it just seems a tad more likely to
result in false passes. Similary I'm making an assumption that
auditd is always going to show up on the first page of the
Services screen and the details screen will always show that
'loaded...enabled' text.
Test Plan:
Run the tests and see if they work! See
https://openqa.stg.fedoraproject.org/tests/21373 and
https://openqa.stg.fedoraproject.org/tests/21371 for my tests.
Reviewers: garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D874
2016-06-01 16:05:33 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sub run {
|
use compose repository (not master repo) for most tests
Summary:
we have a long-standing problem with all the tests that hit
the repositories. The tests are triggered as soon as a compose
completes. At this point in time, the compose is not synced to
the mirrors, where the default 'fedora' repo definition looks;
the sync happens after the compose completes, and there is also
a metadata sync step that must happen after *that* before any
operation that uses the 'fedora' repository definition will
actually use the packages from the new compose. Thus all net
install tests and tests that installed packages have been
effectively testing the previous compose, not the current one.
We have some thoughts about how to fix this 'properly' (such
that the openQA tests wouldn't have to do anything special,
but their 'fedora' repository would somehow reflect the compose
under test), but none of them is in place right now or likely
to happen in the short term, so in the mean time this should
deal with most of the issues. With this change, everything but
the default_install tests for the netinst images should use
the compose-under-test's Everything tree instead of the 'fedora'
repository, and thus should install and test the correct
packages.
This relies on a corresponding change to openqa_fedora_tools
to set the LOCATION openQA setting (which is simply the base
location of the compose under test).
Test Plan:
Do a full test run, check (as far as you can) tests run sensibly
and use appropriate repositories.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D989
2016-09-01 15:22:59 +00:00
|
|
|
my $self = shift;
|
add cockpit_default and cockpit_basic tests
Summary:
This adds tests for the Server_cockpit_default and cockpit_basic
test cases. Some notes: I was initially thinking of combining
these into a single test with multiple test modules and coming
up with a system for doing wiki reporting based on individual
test module status, but because we'll also want to do a cockpit
FreeIPA enrol test, I decided against it. We don't really want
to combine all three because then we would skip the cockpit
tests whenever FreeIPA server deployment failed, which isn't
ideal. So since we'll need a separate FreeIPA enrolment test
anyway it doesn't really make sense to go to the trouble of
designing a system for loading multiple postinstall tests (though
I have an idea for that!) and a per-module wiki reporting system.
This was the most minimal and hopefully reliable method for
running Cockpit from a stock Server install that I could think
of. An alternative approach would be to have, say, the most
recent stable Workstation live as a 'stock' asset and have two
tests, one which runs a stock Server install and just waits and
another which boots the live image and accesses the cockpit
running on the other box, but that seems a bit over-complex. It
is not possible to have dependencies between tests for different
ISOs, in case you were wondering about having a Workstation live
test which runs parallel with a Server DVD test, we can't do
that. One funny thing is the font that winds up getting used for
the desktop, but I don't *think* that should be a problem.
Picking needles was a bit tricky; any improvement suggestions
are welcome. I'm hoping it turns out to be safe to rely on some
dbus log messages being present; I think logging into Cockpit
triggers activation of the realmd dbus interface, so there
*should* always be some messages related to that. An alternative
would just be to match on a sliver of the dark grey table header
and the light grey row beneath it and assume that'll always be
the first message (whatever the message is), but then we have to
find some area of the message details screen which is always
present for any message, and it just seems a tad more likely to
result in false passes. Similary I'm making an assumption that
auditd is always going to show up on the first page of the
Services screen and the details screen will always show that
'loaded...enabled' text.
Test Plan:
Run the tests and see if they work! See
https://openqa.stg.fedoraproject.org/tests/21373 and
https://openqa.stg.fedoraproject.org/tests/21371 for my tests.
Reviewers: garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D874
2016-06-01 16:05:33 +00:00
|
|
|
# check cockpit appears to be enabled and running and firewall is setup
|
|
|
|
|
assert_script_run 'systemctl is-enabled cockpit.socket';
|
|
|
|
|
assert_script_run 'systemctl is-active cockpit.socket';
|
|
|
|
|
assert_script_run 'firewall-cmd --query-service cockpit';
|
use compose repository (not master repo) for most tests
Summary:
we have a long-standing problem with all the tests that hit
the repositories. The tests are triggered as soon as a compose
completes. At this point in time, the compose is not synced to
the mirrors, where the default 'fedora' repo definition looks;
the sync happens after the compose completes, and there is also
a metadata sync step that must happen after *that* before any
operation that uses the 'fedora' repository definition will
actually use the packages from the new compose. Thus all net
install tests and tests that installed packages have been
effectively testing the previous compose, not the current one.
We have some thoughts about how to fix this 'properly' (such
that the openQA tests wouldn't have to do anything special,
but their 'fedora' repository would somehow reflect the compose
under test), but none of them is in place right now or likely
to happen in the short term, so in the mean time this should
deal with most of the issues. With this change, everything but
the default_install tests for the netinst images should use
the compose-under-test's Everything tree instead of the 'fedora'
repository, and thus should install and test the correct
packages.
This relies on a corresponding change to openqa_fedora_tools
to set the LOCATION openQA setting (which is simply the base
location of the compose under test).
Test Plan:
Do a full test run, check (as far as you can) tests run sensibly
and use appropriate repositories.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D989
2016-09-01 15:22:59 +00:00
|
|
|
# use compose repo, disable u-t, etc.
|
2017-01-18 07:15:44 +00:00
|
|
|
repo_setup();
|
add cockpit_default and cockpit_basic tests
Summary:
This adds tests for the Server_cockpit_default and cockpit_basic
test cases. Some notes: I was initially thinking of combining
these into a single test with multiple test modules and coming
up with a system for doing wiki reporting based on individual
test module status, but because we'll also want to do a cockpit
FreeIPA enrol test, I decided against it. We don't really want
to combine all three because then we would skip the cockpit
tests whenever FreeIPA server deployment failed, which isn't
ideal. So since we'll need a separate FreeIPA enrolment test
anyway it doesn't really make sense to go to the trouble of
designing a system for loading multiple postinstall tests (though
I have an idea for that!) and a per-module wiki reporting system.
This was the most minimal and hopefully reliable method for
running Cockpit from a stock Server install that I could think
of. An alternative approach would be to have, say, the most
recent stable Workstation live as a 'stock' asset and have two
tests, one which runs a stock Server install and just waits and
another which boots the live image and accesses the cockpit
running on the other box, but that seems a bit over-complex. It
is not possible to have dependencies between tests for different
ISOs, in case you were wondering about having a Workstation live
test which runs parallel with a Server DVD test, we can't do
that. One funny thing is the font that winds up getting used for
the desktop, but I don't *think* that should be a problem.
Picking needles was a bit tricky; any improvement suggestions
are welcome. I'm hoping it turns out to be safe to rely on some
dbus log messages being present; I think logging into Cockpit
triggers activation of the realmd dbus interface, so there
*should* always be some messages related to that. An alternative
would just be to match on a sliver of the dark grey table header
and the light grey row beneath it and assume that'll always be
the first message (whatever the message is), but then we have to
find some area of the message details screen which is always
present for any message, and it just seems a tad more likely to
result in false passes. Similary I'm making an assumption that
auditd is always going to show up on the first page of the
Services screen and the details screen will always show that
'loaded...enabled' text.
Test Plan:
Run the tests and see if they work! See
https://openqa.stg.fedoraproject.org/tests/21373 and
https://openqa.stg.fedoraproject.org/tests/21371 for my tests.
Reviewers: garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D874
2016-06-01 16:05:33 +00:00
|
|
|
# install a desktop and firefox so we can actually try it
|
use compose repository (not master repo) for most tests
Summary:
we have a long-standing problem with all the tests that hit
the repositories. The tests are triggered as soon as a compose
completes. At this point in time, the compose is not synced to
the mirrors, where the default 'fedora' repo definition looks;
the sync happens after the compose completes, and there is also
a metadata sync step that must happen after *that* before any
operation that uses the 'fedora' repository definition will
actually use the packages from the new compose. Thus all net
install tests and tests that installed packages have been
effectively testing the previous compose, not the current one.
We have some thoughts about how to fix this 'properly' (such
that the openQA tests wouldn't have to do anything special,
but their 'fedora' repository would somehow reflect the compose
under test), but none of them is in place right now or likely
to happen in the short term, so in the mean time this should
deal with most of the issues. With this change, everything but
the default_install tests for the netinst images should use
the compose-under-test's Everything tree instead of the 'fedora'
repository, and thus should install and test the correct
packages.
This relies on a corresponding change to openqa_fedora_tools
to set the LOCATION openQA setting (which is simply the base
location of the compose under test).
Test Plan:
Do a full test run, check (as far as you can) tests run sensibly
and use appropriate repositories.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D989
2016-09-01 15:22:59 +00:00
|
|
|
assert_script_run 'dnf -y groupinstall "base-x"', 300;
|
|
|
|
|
assert_script_run 'dnf -y install firefox', 120;
|
2017-01-18 07:15:44 +00:00
|
|
|
start_cockpit(0);
|
add cockpit_default and cockpit_basic tests
Summary:
This adds tests for the Server_cockpit_default and cockpit_basic
test cases. Some notes: I was initially thinking of combining
these into a single test with multiple test modules and coming
up with a system for doing wiki reporting based on individual
test module status, but because we'll also want to do a cockpit
FreeIPA enrol test, I decided against it. We don't really want
to combine all three because then we would skip the cockpit
tests whenever FreeIPA server deployment failed, which isn't
ideal. So since we'll need a separate FreeIPA enrolment test
anyway it doesn't really make sense to go to the trouble of
designing a system for loading multiple postinstall tests (though
I have an idea for that!) and a per-module wiki reporting system.
This was the most minimal and hopefully reliable method for
running Cockpit from a stock Server install that I could think
of. An alternative approach would be to have, say, the most
recent stable Workstation live as a 'stock' asset and have two
tests, one which runs a stock Server install and just waits and
another which boots the live image and accesses the cockpit
running on the other box, but that seems a bit over-complex. It
is not possible to have dependencies between tests for different
ISOs, in case you were wondering about having a Workstation live
test which runs parallel with a Server DVD test, we can't do
that. One funny thing is the font that winds up getting used for
the desktop, but I don't *think* that should be a problem.
Picking needles was a bit tricky; any improvement suggestions
are welcome. I'm hoping it turns out to be safe to rely on some
dbus log messages being present; I think logging into Cockpit
triggers activation of the realmd dbus interface, so there
*should* always be some messages related to that. An alternative
would just be to match on a sliver of the dark grey table header
and the light grey row beneath it and assume that'll always be
the first message (whatever the message is), but then we have to
find some area of the message details screen which is always
present for any message, and it just seems a tad more likely to
result in false passes. Similary I'm making an assumption that
auditd is always going to show up on the first page of the
Services screen and the details screen will always show that
'loaded...enabled' text.
Test Plan:
Run the tests and see if they work! See
https://openqa.stg.fedoraproject.org/tests/21373 and
https://openqa.stg.fedoraproject.org/tests/21371 for my tests.
Reviewers: garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D874
2016-06-01 16:05:33 +00:00
|
|
|
# quit firefox (return to console)
|
|
|
|
|
send_key "ctrl-q";
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sub test_flags {
|
|
|
|
|
return { fatal => 1 };
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# vim: set sw=4 et:
|