xorg-x11-server/SOURCES/0005-record-Check-for-overflow-in-RecordSanityCheckRegist.patch
2025-06-23 10:22:32 +00:00

65 lines
2.2 KiB
Diff

From d943eaa6b8584e7ceebd73ee59bd84e99b09be5d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Olivier Fourdan <ofourdan@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2025 11:47:15 +0200
Subject: [PATCH xserver 5/7] record: Check for overflow in
RecordSanityCheckRegisterClients()
The RecordSanityCheckRegisterClients() checks for the request length,
but does not check for integer overflow.
A client might send a very large value for either the number of clients
or the number of protocol ranges that will cause an integer overflow in
the request length computation, defeating the check for request length.
To avoid the issue, explicitly check the number of clients against the
limit of clients (which is much lower than an maximum integer value) and
the number of protocol ranges (multiplied by the record length) do not
exceed the maximum integer value.
This way, we ensure that the final computation for the request length
will not overflow the maximum integer limit.
CVE-2025-49179
This issue was discovered by Nils Emmerich <nemmerich@ernw.de> and
reported by Julian Suleder via ERNW Vulnerability Disclosure.
Signed-off-by: Olivier Fourdan <ofourdan@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
(cherry picked from commit 2bde9ca49a8fd9a1e6697d5e7ef837870d66f5d4)
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/-/merge_requests/2025>
---
record/record.c | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/record/record.c b/record/record.c
index a8aec23bd..afaceb55c 100644
--- a/record/record.c
+++ b/record/record.c
@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ and Jim Haggerty of Metheus.
#include "inputstr.h"
#include "eventconvert.h"
#include "scrnintstr.h"
+#include "opaque.h"
#include <stdio.h>
#include <assert.h>
@@ -1298,6 +1299,13 @@ RecordSanityCheckRegisterClients(RecordContextPtr pContext, ClientPtr client,
int i;
XID recordingClient;
+ /* LimitClients is 2048 at max, way less that MAXINT */
+ if (stuff->nClients > LimitClients)
+ return BadValue;
+
+ if (stuff->nRanges > (MAXINT - 4 * stuff->nClients) / SIZEOF(xRecordRange))
+ return BadValue;
+
if (((client->req_len << 2) - SIZEOF(xRecordRegisterClientsReq)) !=
4 * stuff->nClients + SIZEOF(xRecordRange) * stuff->nRanges)
return BadLength;
--
2.49.0