xorg-x11-server/0006-Xi-do-not-keep-linked-list-pointer-during-recursion.patch

71 lines
2.2 KiB
Diff

From bc1fdbe46559dd947674375946bbef54dd0ce36b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Jos=C3=A9=20Exp=C3=B3sito?= <jexposit@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2023 18:28:31 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 6/9] Xi: do not keep linked list pointer during recursion
The `DisableDevice()` function is called whenever an enabled device
is disabled and it moves the device from the `inputInfo.devices` linked
list to the `inputInfo.off_devices` linked list.
However, its link/unlink operation has an issue during the recursive
call to `DisableDevice()` due to the `prev` pointer pointing to a
removed device.
This issue leads to a length mismatch between the total number of
devices and the number of device in the list, leading to a heap
overflow and, possibly, to local privilege escalation.
Simplify the code that checked whether the device passed to
`DisableDevice()` was in `inputInfo.devices` or not and find the
previous device after the recursion.
CVE-2024-21886, ZDI-CAN-22840
This vulnerability was discovered by:
Jan-Niklas Sohn working with Trend Micro Zero Day Initiative
---
dix/devices.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dix/devices.c b/dix/devices.c
index dca98c8d1..389d28a23 100644
--- a/dix/devices.c
+++ b/dix/devices.c
@@ -453,14 +453,20 @@ DisableDevice(DeviceIntPtr dev, BOOL sendevent)
{
DeviceIntPtr *prev, other;
BOOL enabled;
+ BOOL dev_in_devices_list = FALSE;
int flags[MAXDEVICES] = { 0 };
if (!dev->enabled)
return TRUE;
- for (prev = &inputInfo.devices;
- *prev && (*prev != dev); prev = &(*prev)->next);
- if (*prev != dev)
+ for (other = inputInfo.devices; other; other = other->next) {
+ if (other == dev) {
+ dev_in_devices_list = TRUE;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (!dev_in_devices_list)
return FALSE;
TouchEndPhysicallyActiveTouches(dev);
@@ -511,6 +517,9 @@ DisableDevice(DeviceIntPtr dev, BOOL sendevent)
LeaveWindow(dev);
SetFocusOut(dev);
+ for (prev = &inputInfo.devices;
+ *prev && (*prev != dev); prev = &(*prev)->next);
+
*prev = dev->next;
dev->next = inputInfo.off_devices;
inputInfo.off_devices = dev;
--
2.43.0