rpms/valgrind
7
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Activity

Update valgrind-3.11.0-pthread_barrier.patch

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Mark Wielaard 2016-01-21 15:57:58 +01:00
parent 120af06c15
commit e420d8e4a7
1 changed files with 36 additions and 36 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

72
valgrind-3.11.0-pthread_barrier.patch
View File

@ -1,38 +1,41 @@
From b6a0f7b1c175a0159909ede7b41fae09c247784e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 commit f4d91a5df8b749c6cdfec25e38a44c02c90ad4be
From: Mark Wielaard <mjw@redhat.com> Author: Mark Wielaard <mjw@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 15:13:47 +0100 Date: Tue Jan 19 15:13:47 2016 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] pthread_barrier vs newer glibc implementation
glibc 2.23 will have a new pthread_barrier implementation. Bug #358213 helgrind/drd pthread_barrier tests vs new glibc implementation
This implementation reacts differently on bad usage of barriers.
Because of this the bar_bad testcase will hang indefinitely. glibc 2.23 will have a new pthread_barrier implementation.
In particular pthread_barrier_destroy will hang when there are This implementation reacts differently on bad usage of barriers.
still other threads waiting on a barrier. To solve this we add Because of this the bar_bad testcase will hang indefinitely.
extra threads to will "unblock" the hanging destroy by sleeping In particular pthread_barrier_destroy will hang when there are
for a while and then also waiting on the barrier, which will unblock still other threads waiting on a barrier. To solve this we add
the destroy operation. Or if this is the last test, just exit extra threads to will "unblock" the hanging destroy by sleeping
the whole program since we are done anyway. Also newer glibc is for a while and then also waiting on the barrier, which will unblock
more picky about destroying uninitialized barriers, we would crash the destroy operation. Or if this is the last test, just exit
when zero filling, so we now one fill. Which doesn't crash, but the whole program since we are done anyway. Also newer glibc is
depending on glibc version might return an error or hang. Since more picky about destroying uninitialized barriers, we would crash
depending on version we now get slightly different error reports when zero filling, so we now one fill. Which doesn't crash, but
there are now alternative exp files. depending on glibc version might return an error or hang. Since
depending on version we now get slightly different error reports
Tested against glibc 2.17, glibc 2.22 and glibc 2.23-prerelease. there are now alternative exp files.
---
drd/tests/bar_bad.stderr.exp | 13 +--- Tested against glibc 2.17, glibc 2.22 and glibc 2.23-prerelease.
...ar_bad.stderr.exp => bar_bad.stderr.exp-nohang} | 9 +--
drd/tests/bar_bad_xml.stderr.exp | 80 ----------------------
...ml.stderr.exp => bar_bad_xml.stderr.exp-nohang} | 51 --------------
helgrind/tests/Makefile.am | 1 +
helgrind/tests/bar_bad.c | 51 +++++++++-----
helgrind/tests/bar_bad.stderr.exp | 16 ++---
....stderr.exp => bar_bad.stderr.exp-destroy-hang} | 30 +++++---
8 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 187 deletions(-)
copy drd/tests/{bar_bad.stderr.exp => bar_bad.stderr.exp-nohang} (79%)
copy drd/tests/{bar_bad_xml.stderr.exp => bar_bad_xml.stderr.exp-nohang} (82%)
copy helgrind/tests/{bar_bad.stderr.exp => bar_bad.stderr.exp-destroy-hang} (72%)
diff --git a/drd/tests/Makefile.am b/drd/tests/Makefile.am
index 2885391..cfd74d0 100644
--- a/drd/tests/Makefile.am
+++ b/drd/tests/Makefile.am
@@ -81,8 +81,10 @@ EXTRA_DIST = \
atomic_var.stderr.exp \
atomic_var.vgtest \
bar_bad.stderr.exp \
+ bar_bad.stderr.exp-nohang \
bar_bad.vgtest \
bar_bad_xml.stderr.exp \
+ bar_bad_xml.stderr.exp-nohang \
bar_bad_xml.vgtest \
bar_trivial.stderr.exp \
bar_trivial.stdout.exp \
diff --git a/drd/tests/bar_bad.stderr.exp b/drd/tests/bar_bad.stderr.exp diff --git a/drd/tests/bar_bad.stderr.exp b/drd/tests/bar_bad.stderr.exp
index 75f121f..3581b08 100644 index 75f121f..3581b08 100644
--- a/drd/tests/bar_bad.stderr.exp --- a/drd/tests/bar_bad.stderr.exp
@ -508,6 +511,3 @@ index 74af4fa..ddf5624 100644
- by 0x........: main (bar_bad.c:80) - by 0x........: main (bar_bad.c:80)
+ by 0x........: main (bar_bad.c:96) + by 0x........: main (bar_bad.c:96)
--
1.8.3.1