systemd/0052-logind-Fix-user_elect_display-to-be-more-stable.patch
2015-06-10 15:08:55 -04:00

151 lines
5.7 KiB
Diff
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

From 75aad3b101548151905d528269ffd2a388955193 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Philip Withnall <philip.withnall@collabora.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 10:49:21 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] logind: Fix user_elect_display() to be more stable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
The previous implementation of user_elect_display() could easily end up
overwriting the users valid graphical session with a new TTY session.
For example, consider the situation where there is one session:
c1, type = SESSION_X11, !stopping, class = SESSION_USER
it is initially elected as the users display (i.e. u->display = c1).
If another session is started, on a different VT, the sessions_by_user
list becomes:
c1, type = SESSION_X11, !stopping, class = SESSION_USER
c2, type = SESSION_TTY, !stopping, class = SESSION_USER
In the previous code, graphical = c1 and text = c2, as expected.
However, neither graphical nor text fulfil the conditions for setting
u->display = graphical (because neither is better than u->display), so
the code falls through to check the text variable. The conditions for
this match, as u->display->type != SESSION_TTY (its actually
SESSION_X11). Hence u->display is set to c2, which is incorrect, because
session c1 is still valid.
Refactor user_elect_display() to use a more explicit filter and
pre-order comparison over the sessions. This can be demonstrated to be
stable and only ever upgrade the session to a more graphical one.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90769
(cherry picked from commit 7ffeb45cc63e1326690fd9461b7a4719a3d4f85c)
---
src/login/logind-user.c | 90 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/login/logind-user.c b/src/login/logind-user.c
index 71bff96728..2f62e34f63 100644
--- a/src/login/logind-user.c
+++ b/src/login/logind-user.c
@@ -738,54 +738,72 @@ int user_kill(User *u, int signo) {
return manager_kill_unit(u->manager, u->slice, KILL_ALL, signo, NULL);
}
+static bool
+elect_display_filter(Session *s) {
+ /* Return true if the session is a candidate for the users primary
+ * session or display. */
+ assert(s);
+
+ return (s->class == SESSION_USER && !s->stopping);
+}
+
+static int
+elect_display_compare(Session *s1, Session *s2) {
+ /* Indexed by SessionType. Lower numbers mean more preferred. */
+ const int type_ranks[_SESSION_TYPE_MAX] = {
+ [SESSION_UNSPECIFIED] = 0,
+ [SESSION_TTY] = -2,
+ [SESSION_X11] = -3,
+ [SESSION_WAYLAND] = -3,
+ [SESSION_MIR] = -3,
+ [SESSION_WEB] = -1,
+ };
+
+ /* Calculate the partial order relationship between s1 and s2,
+ * returning < 0 if s1 is preferred as the users primary session,
+ * 0 if s1 and s2 are equally preferred or incomparable, or > 0 if s2
+ * is preferred.
+ *
+ * s1 or s2 may be NULL. */
+ if ((s1 == NULL) != (s2 == NULL))
+ return (s1 == NULL) - (s2 == NULL);
+
+ if (s1->stopping != s2->stopping)
+ return s1->stopping - s2->stopping;
+
+ if ((s1->class != SESSION_USER) != (s2->class != SESSION_USER))
+ return (s1->class != SESSION_USER) - (s2->class != SESSION_USER);
+
+ if ((s1->type == _SESSION_TYPE_INVALID) != (s2->type == _SESSION_TYPE_INVALID))
+ return (s1->type == _SESSION_TYPE_INVALID) - (s2->type == _SESSION_TYPE_INVALID);
+
+ if (s1->type != s2->type)
+ return type_ranks[s1->type] - type_ranks[s2->type];
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
void user_elect_display(User *u) {
- Session *graphical = NULL, *text = NULL, *other = NULL, *s;
+ Session *s;
assert(u);
/* This elects a primary session for each user, which we call
* the "display". We try to keep the assignment stable, but we
* "upgrade" to better choices. */
+ log_debug("Electing new display for user %s", u->name);
LIST_FOREACH(sessions_by_user, s, u->sessions) {
-
- if (s->class != SESSION_USER)
- continue;
-
- if (s->stopping)
+ if (!elect_display_filter(s)) {
+ log_debug("Ignoring session %s", s->id);
continue;
+ }
- if (SESSION_TYPE_IS_GRAPHICAL(s->type))
- graphical = s;
- else if (s->type == SESSION_TTY)
- text = s;
- else
- other = s;
- }
-
- if (graphical &&
- (!u->display ||
- u->display->class != SESSION_USER ||
- u->display->stopping ||
- !SESSION_TYPE_IS_GRAPHICAL(u->display->type))) {
- u->display = graphical;
- return;
- }
-
- if (text &&
- (!u->display ||
- u->display->class != SESSION_USER ||
- u->display->stopping ||
- u->display->type != SESSION_TTY)) {
- u->display = text;
- return;
+ if (elect_display_compare(s, u->display) < 0) {
+ log_debug("Choosing session %s in preference to %s", s->id, u->display ? u->display->id : "-");
+ u->display = s;
+ }
}
-
- if (other &&
- (!u->display ||
- u->display->class != SESSION_USER ||
- u->display->stopping))
- u->display = other;
}
static const char* const user_state_table[_USER_STATE_MAX] = {