systemd/0382-udev-raise-RLIMIT_NOFILE-as-high-as-we-can.patch
Jan Macku 14ddea439d systemd-252-19
Resolves: RHEL-1086,RHEL-11040,RHEL-5070,RHEL-7026
2023-11-13 14:52:30 +01:00

44 lines
1.4 KiB
Diff

From 5221edaee281175e3a8ba3e676ba5622085eb1ef Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lennart Poettering <lennart@poettering.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2023 09:52:05 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] udev: raise RLIMIT_NOFILE as high as we can
We might need a lot of fds on large systems, hence raise RLIMIT_NOFILE
to what the service manager allows us, which is quite a lot these days.
udev already sets FORK_RLIMIT_NOFILE_SAFE when forking of chilren, thus
ensuring that forked off processes get their RLIMIT_NOFILE soft limit
reset to 1K for compat with crappy old select().
Replaces: #29298
Fixes: #28583
(cherry picked from commit 1617424ce76d797d081dd6cb1082b954c4d2bf38)
Resolves: RHEL-11040
---
src/udev/udevd.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/udev/udevd.c b/src/udev/udevd.c
index e3a2742733..ccc3c0eece 100644
--- a/src/udev/udevd.c
+++ b/src/udev/udevd.c
@@ -55,6 +55,7 @@
#include "pretty-print.h"
#include "proc-cmdline.h"
#include "process-util.h"
+#include "rlimit-util.h"
#include "selinux-util.h"
#include "signal-util.h"
#include "socket-util.h"
@@ -2040,6 +2041,9 @@ int run_udevd(int argc, char *argv[]) {
if (r < 0)
return r;
+ /* Make sure we can have plenty fds (for example for pidfds) */
+ (void) rlimit_nofile_bump(-1);
+
r = RET_NERRNO(mkdir("/run/udev", 0755));
if (r < 0 && r != -EEXIST)
return log_error_errno(r, "Failed to create /run/udev: %m");