34 lines
1.3 KiB
Diff
34 lines
1.3 KiB
Diff
From e92c85b68932845c908cb3f38b2130c57065e263 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
|
|
From: Lennart Poettering <lennart@poettering.net>
|
|
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2023 11:27:17 +0100
|
|
Subject: [PATCH] sd-event: don't mistake USEC_INFINITY passed in for overflow
|
|
|
|
Let's pass USEC_INFINITY from sd_event_source_set_time_relative() to
|
|
sd_event_source_set_time() instead of raising EOVERFLOW.
|
|
|
|
We should raise EOVERFLOW only if your addition fails, but not if the
|
|
input already is USEC_INFINITY, since it's an entirely valid operation
|
|
to have an infinite time-out, and we should support that.
|
|
|
|
(cherry picked from commit ef8591951aefccb668201f24aa481aa6cda834da)
|
|
|
|
Related: RHEL-6090
|
|
---
|
|
src/libsystemd/sd-event/sd-event.c | 3 +++
|
|
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
|
|
|
|
diff --git a/src/libsystemd/sd-event/sd-event.c b/src/libsystemd/sd-event/sd-event.c
|
|
index 778070a5fb..cd73cd8bfd 100644
|
|
--- a/src/libsystemd/sd-event/sd-event.c
|
|
+++ b/src/libsystemd/sd-event/sd-event.c
|
|
@@ -2723,6 +2723,9 @@ _public_ int sd_event_source_set_time_relative(sd_event_source *s, uint64_t usec
|
|
assert_return(s, -EINVAL);
|
|
assert_return(EVENT_SOURCE_IS_TIME(s->type), -EDOM);
|
|
|
|
+ if (usec == USEC_INFINITY)
|
|
+ return sd_event_source_set_time(s, USEC_INFINITY);
|
|
+
|
|
r = sd_event_now(s->event, event_source_type_to_clock(s->type), &t);
|
|
if (r < 0)
|
|
return r;
|