systemd/0219-network-routing-policy-rule-fix-compare-func.patch
Jan Macku e0b00a8ea2 systemd-257-7
Resolves: RHEL-71409
2025-02-10 08:20:10 +01:00

38 lines
1.7 KiB
Diff

From 6e7eddecaae58147806b3e04472fd4d90d8efcc0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yu Watanabe <watanabe.yu+github@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2025 09:14:51 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] network/routing-policy-rule: fix compare func
Previously, when comparing an existing and requested routing policy
rules, `all` flag was unset, thus the from and to addresses in the two
rules were not compared. Hence, a new request with from and/or to
addresses might be considered as it already exists even the addresses of
existing one were different from the newly requested one.
All existing rules have valid family, i.e. AF_INET or AF_INET6. And,
all requesting rules with from and/or to addresses also have a valid
family. Hence, even `all` flag is unset, the addresses can be and must
be compared in that case.
Fixes a regression caused by fc58350aa464cd2414b6fe9fec089412120c7d52 (v257).
Fixes #35874.
(cherry picked from commit bc45d9c9592d3fcd24894199be1902704f48d62c)
---
src/network/networkd-routing-policy-rule.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/network/networkd-routing-policy-rule.c b/src/network/networkd-routing-policy-rule.c
index 1a04af6359..1075f68e7d 100644
--- a/src/network/networkd-routing-policy-rule.c
+++ b/src/network/networkd-routing-policy-rule.c
@@ -318,7 +318,7 @@ static int routing_policy_rule_compare_func_full(const RoutingPolicyRule *a, con
if (r != 0)
return r;
- if (all) {
+ if (a->family == b->family && a->family != AF_UNSPEC) {
r = memcmp(&a->from.address, &b->from.address, FAMILY_ADDRESS_SIZE(a->family));
if (r != 0)
return r;