sssd/SOURCES/0053-AD-GPO-respect-ad_gpo_implicit_deny-if-no-GPO-is-pre.patch
2021-09-10 04:53:40 +00:00

47 lines
1.4 KiB
Diff

From e865b008aa8947efca0116deb95e29cc2309256f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sumit Bose <sbose@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 15:31:17 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] AD GPO: respect ad_gpo_implicit_deny if no GPO is present
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Currently ad_gpo_implicit_deny=True is not applied if there is no GPO at
all for the given client. With this patch this case is handled as
expected as well.
Resolves: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/issues/5561
:fixes: `ad_gpo_implicit_deny` is now respected even if there are no
applicable GPOs present
Reviewed-by: Pavel Březina <pbrezina@redhat.com>
---
src/providers/ad/ad_gpo.c | 10 +++++++++-
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/providers/ad/ad_gpo.c b/src/providers/ad/ad_gpo.c
index b15e0f345..4ef6a7219 100644
--- a/src/providers/ad/ad_gpo.c
+++ b/src/providers/ad/ad_gpo.c
@@ -2472,7 +2472,15 @@ ad_gpo_process_gpo_done(struct tevent_req *subreq)
}
}
- ret = EOK;
+ if (state->gpo_implicit_deny == true) {
+ DEBUG(SSSDBG_TRACE_FUNC,
+ "No applicable GPOs have been found and ad_gpo_implicit_deny"
+ " is set to 'true'. The user will be denied access.\n");
+ ret = ERR_ACCESS_DENIED;
+ } else {
+ ret = EOK;
+ }
+
goto done;
}
--
2.26.3