640e44ca24
- Resolves: rhbz#1375552 - krb5_map_user doesn't seem effective anymore
- Resolves: rhbz#1349286 - authconfig fails with SSSDConfig.NoDomainError:
default if nonexistent domain is mentioned
82 lines
3.1 KiB
Diff
82 lines
3.1 KiB
Diff
From 3b5dc99956715bb0251c48f18c05b3e0317b661f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
|
|
From: =?UTF-8?q?Pavel=20B=C5=99ezina?= <pbrezina@redhat.com>
|
|
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 14:21:12 +0200
|
|
Subject: [PATCH 74/79] failover: proceed normally when no new server is found
|
|
MIME-Version: 1.0
|
|
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
|
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
|
|
|
|
Multiple failover requests come in same time, the first one will
|
|
result in collapsing the meta server but multiple resolution of
|
|
SRV records are triggered. The first one finishes normally but the
|
|
others won't find any new server thus ends with an error.
|
|
|
|
This patch makes failover to proceed normally even in such case.
|
|
|
|
Resolves:
|
|
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/3131
|
|
|
|
Reviewed-by: Jakub Hrozek <jhrozek@redhat.com>
|
|
Reviewed-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fidencio@redhat.com>
|
|
(cherry picked from commit 03cb5ac6aa4c60d2c64c6fdc2daae656bf5493f4)
|
|
---
|
|
src/providers/fail_over.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++----
|
|
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
|
|
|
|
diff --git a/src/providers/fail_over.c b/src/providers/fail_over.c
|
|
index 8ab39f27f77e19e601855632196006a8dbbdf136..77084098831a312bc8629513ccfc2a91165241ba 100644
|
|
--- a/src/providers/fail_over.c
|
|
+++ b/src/providers/fail_over.c
|
|
@@ -1112,7 +1112,9 @@ fo_resolve_service_cont(struct tevent_req *subreq)
|
|
ret = resolve_srv_recv(subreq, &state->server);
|
|
talloc_zfree(subreq);
|
|
|
|
- if (ret) {
|
|
+ /* We will proceed normally on ERR_SRV_DUPLICATES and if the server
|
|
+ * is already being resolved, we hook to that request. */
|
|
+ if (ret != EOK && ret != ERR_SRV_DUPLICATES) {
|
|
tevent_req_error(req, ret);
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
@@ -1398,11 +1400,23 @@ resolve_srv_done(struct tevent_req *subreq)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (last_server == state->meta) {
|
|
- /* SRV lookup returned only those servers
|
|
- * that are already present. */
|
|
+ /* SRV lookup returned only those servers that are already present.
|
|
+ * This may happen only when an ongoing SRV resolution already
|
|
+ * exist. We will return server, but won't set any state. */
|
|
DEBUG(SSSDBG_TRACE_FUNC, "SRV lookup did not return "
|
|
"any new server.\n");
|
|
ret = ERR_SRV_DUPLICATES;
|
|
+
|
|
+ /* Since no new server is returned, state->meta->next is NULL.
|
|
+ * We return last tried server if possible which is server
|
|
+ * from previous resolution of SRV record, and first server
|
|
+ * otherwise. */
|
|
+ if (state->service->last_tried_server != NULL) {
|
|
+ state->out = state->service->last_tried_server;
|
|
+ goto done;
|
|
+ }
|
|
+
|
|
+ state->out = state->service->server_list;
|
|
goto done;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
@@ -1438,7 +1452,10 @@ resolve_srv_done(struct tevent_req *subreq)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
done:
|
|
- if (ret != EOK) {
|
|
+ if (ret == ERR_SRV_DUPLICATES) {
|
|
+ tevent_req_error(req, ret);
|
|
+ return;
|
|
+ } else if (ret != EOK) {
|
|
state->out = state->meta;
|
|
set_srv_data_status(state->meta->srv_data, SRV_RESOLVE_ERROR);
|
|
tevent_req_error(req, ret);
|
|
--
|
|
2.9.3
|
|
|