rpms
/
sssd
7
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Activity
sssd/0004-pam-fix-SC-auth-with-m...

234 lines
9.9 KiB
Diff
Raw Blame History

From 50077c3255177fe1b01837fbe31a7f8fd47dee74 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sumit Bose <sbose@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 13:08:17 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] pam: fix SC auth with multiple certs and missing login name
While introducing the local_auth_policy option a quite specific use-case
was not covered correctly. If there are multiple matching certificates
on the Smartcard, 'local_auth_policy = only' is set and GDM's Smartcard
mode was used for login, i.e. there is no user name given and the user
has to be derived from the certificate used for login, authentication
failed. The main reason for the failure is that in this case the
Smartcard interaction and the user mapping has to be done first to
determine the user before local_auth_policy is evaluated. As a result
when checking if the authentication can be finished the request was in
an unexpected state because the indicator for local Smartcard
authentication was not enabled.
Resolves: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/issues/7109
Reviewed-by: Justin Stephenson <jstephen@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Scott Poore <spoore@redhat.com>
(cherry picked from commit 44ec3e4638b0c6f7f45a3390a28c2e8745d52bc3)
---
src/responder/pam/pamsrv.h | 10 ++++
src/responder/pam/pamsrv_cmd.c | 17 +++++--
src/tests/intg/Makefile.am | 2 +
src/tests/intg/test_pam_responder.py | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
4 files changed, 96 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/responder/pam/pamsrv.h b/src/responder/pam/pamsrv.h
index 7013a8edd..618836189 100644
--- a/src/responder/pam/pamsrv.h
+++ b/src/responder/pam/pamsrv.h
@@ -93,7 +93,17 @@ struct pam_auth_req {
struct ldb_message *user_obj;
struct cert_auth_info *cert_list;
struct cert_auth_info *current_cert;
+ /* Switched to 'true' if the backend indicates that it cannot handle
+ * Smartcard authentication, but Smartcard authentication is
+ * possible and local Smartcard authentication is allowed. */
bool cert_auth_local;
+ /* Switched to 'true' if authentication (not pre-authentication) was
+ * started without a login name and the name had to be lookup up with the
+ * certificate used for authentication. Since reading the certificate from
+ * the Smartcard already involves the PIN validation in this case there
+ * would be no need for an additional Smartcard interaction if only local
+ * Smartcard authentication is possible. */
+ bool initial_cert_auth_successful;
bool passkey_data_exists;
uint32_t client_id_num;
diff --git a/src/responder/pam/pamsrv_cmd.c b/src/responder/pam/pamsrv_cmd.c
index c23ea7ba4..a7c181733 100644
--- a/src/responder/pam/pamsrv_cmd.c
+++ b/src/responder/pam/pamsrv_cmd.c
@@ -2200,8 +2200,8 @@ static void pam_forwarder_lookup_by_cert_done(struct tevent_req *req)
ret = ENOENT;
goto done;
}
-
- if (cert_count > 1) {
+ /* Multiple certificates are only expected during pre-auth */
+ if (cert_count > 1 && preq->pd->cmd == SSS_PAM_PREAUTH) {
for (preq->current_cert = preq->cert_list;
preq->current_cert != NULL;
preq->current_cert = sss_cai_get_next(preq->current_cert)) {
@@ -2285,7 +2285,9 @@ static void pam_forwarder_lookup_by_cert_done(struct tevent_req *req)
}
/* If logon_name was not given during authentication add a
- * SSS_PAM_CERT_INFO message to send the name to the caller. */
+ * SSS_PAM_CERT_INFO message to send the name to the caller.
+ * Additionally initial_cert_auth_successful is set to
+ * indicate that the user is already authenticated. */
if (preq->pd->cmd == SSS_PAM_AUTHENTICATE
&& preq->pd->logon_name == NULL) {
ret = add_pam_cert_response(preq->pd,
@@ -2297,6 +2299,8 @@ static void pam_forwarder_lookup_by_cert_done(struct tevent_req *req)
preq->pd->pam_status = PAM_AUTHINFO_UNAVAIL;
goto done;
}
+
+ preq->initial_cert_auth_successful = true;
}
/* cert_user will be returned to the PAM client as user name, so
@@ -2851,12 +2855,15 @@ static void pam_dom_forwarder(struct pam_auth_req *preq)
if (found) {
if (local_policy != NULL && strcasecmp(local_policy, "only") == 0) {
talloc_free(tmp_ctx);
- DEBUG(SSSDBG_IMPORTANT_INFO, "Local auth only set, skipping online auth\n");
+ DEBUG(SSSDBG_IMPORTANT_INFO,
+ "Local auth only set and matching certificate was found, "
+ "skipping online auth\n");
if (preq->pd->cmd == SSS_PAM_PREAUTH) {
preq->pd->pam_status = PAM_SUCCESS;
} else if (preq->pd->cmd == SSS_PAM_AUTHENTICATE
&& IS_SC_AUTHTOK(preq->pd->authtok)
- && preq->cert_auth_local) {
+ && (preq->cert_auth_local
+ || preq->initial_cert_auth_successful)) {
preq->pd->pam_status = PAM_SUCCESS;
preq->callback = pam_reply;
}
diff --git a/src/tests/intg/Makefile.am b/src/tests/intg/Makefile.am
index 3866d3ca6..0cfd268dc 100644
--- a/src/tests/intg/Makefile.am
+++ b/src/tests/intg/Makefile.am
@@ -199,6 +199,7 @@ clean-local:
PAM_CERT_DB_PATH="$(abs_builddir)/../test_CA/SSSD_test_CA.pem"
SOFTHSM2_CONF="$(abs_builddir)/../test_CA/softhsm2_one.conf"
+SOFTHSM2_TWO_CONF="$(abs_builddir)/../test_CA/softhsm2_two.conf"
intgcheck-installed: config.py passwd group pam_sss_service pam_sss_alt_service pam_sss_sc_required pam_sss_try_sc pam_sss_allow_missing_name pam_sss_domains sss_netgroup_thread_test
pipepath="$(DESTDIR)$(pipepath)"; \
@@ -233,6 +234,7 @@ intgcheck-installed: config.py passwd group pam_sss_service pam_sss_alt_service
PAM_CERT_DB_PATH=$(PAM_CERT_DB_PATH) \
ABS_SRCDIR=$(abs_srcdir) \
SOFTHSM2_CONF=$(SOFTHSM2_CONF) \
+ SOFTHSM2_TWO_CONF=$(SOFTHSM2_TWO_CONF) \
KCM_RENEW=$(KCM_RENEW) \
FILES_PROVIDER=$(FILES_PROVIDER) \
DBUS_SOCK_DIR="$(DESTDIR)$(runstatedir)/dbus/" \
diff --git a/src/tests/intg/test_pam_responder.py b/src/tests/intg/test_pam_responder.py
index 1fc3937e6..0fbf8065e 100644
--- a/src/tests/intg/test_pam_responder.py
+++ b/src/tests/intg/test_pam_responder.py
@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ def format_pam_cert_auth_conf(config, provider):
{provider.p}
[certmap/auth_only/user1]
- matchrule = <SUBJECT>.*CN=SSSD test cert 0001.*
+ matchrule = <SUBJECT>.*CN=SSSD test cert 000[12].*
""").format(**locals())
@@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ def format_pam_cert_auth_conf_name_format(config, provider):
{provider.p}
[certmap/auth_only/user1]
- matchrule = <SUBJECT>.*CN=SSSD test cert 0001.*
+ matchrule = <SUBJECT>.*CN=SSSD test cert 000[12].*
""").format(**locals())
@@ -380,6 +380,28 @@ def simple_pam_cert_auth_no_cert(request, passwd_ops_setup):
return None
+@pytest.fixture
+def simple_pam_cert_auth_two_certs(request, passwd_ops_setup):
+ """Setup SSSD with pam_cert_auth=True"""
+ config.PAM_CERT_DB_PATH = os.environ['PAM_CERT_DB_PATH']
+
+ old_softhsm2_conf = os.environ['SOFTHSM2_CONF']
+ softhsm2_two_conf = os.environ['SOFTHSM2_TWO_CONF']
+ os.environ['SOFTHSM2_CONF'] = softhsm2_two_conf
+
+ conf = format_pam_cert_auth_conf(config, provider_switch(request.param))
+ create_conf_fixture(request, conf)
+ create_sssd_fixture(request)
+
+ os.environ['SOFTHSM2_CONF'] = old_softhsm2_conf
+
+ passwd_ops_setup.useradd(**USER1)
+ passwd_ops_setup.useradd(**USER2)
+ sync_files_provider(USER2['name'])
+
+ return None
+
+
@pytest.fixture
def simple_pam_cert_auth_name_format(request, passwd_ops_setup):
"""Setup SSSD with pam_cert_auth=True and full_name_format"""
@@ -522,6 +544,54 @@ def test_sc_auth(simple_pam_cert_auth, env_for_sssctl):
assert err.find("pam_authenticate for user [user1]: Success") != -1
+@pytest.mark.parametrize('simple_pam_cert_auth_two_certs', provider_list(), indirect=True)
+def test_sc_auth_two(simple_pam_cert_auth_two_certs, env_for_sssctl):
+
+ sssctl = subprocess.Popen(["sssctl", "user-checks", "user1",
+ "--action=auth", "--service=pam_sss_service"],
+ universal_newlines=True,
+ env=env_for_sssctl, stdin=subprocess.PIPE,
+ stdout=subprocess.PIPE, stderr=subprocess.PIPE)
+
+ try:
+ out, err = sssctl.communicate(input="2\n123456")
+ except Exception:
+ sssctl.kill()
+ out, err = sssctl.communicate()
+
+ sssctl.stdin.close()
+ sssctl.stdout.close()
+
+ if sssctl.wait() != 0:
+ raise Exception("sssctl failed")
+
+ assert err.find("pam_authenticate for user [user1]: Success") != -1
+
+
+@pytest.mark.parametrize('simple_pam_cert_auth_two_certs', provider_list(), indirect=True)
+def test_sc_auth_two_missing_name(simple_pam_cert_auth_two_certs, env_for_sssctl):
+
+ sssctl = subprocess.Popen(["sssctl", "user-checks", "",
+ "--action=auth", "--service=pam_sss_allow_missing_name"],
+ universal_newlines=True,
+ env=env_for_sssctl, stdin=subprocess.PIPE,
+ stdout=subprocess.PIPE, stderr=subprocess.PIPE)
+
+ try:
+ out, err = sssctl.communicate(input="2\n123456")
+ except Exception:
+ sssctl.kill()
+ out, err = sssctl.communicate()
+
+ sssctl.stdin.close()
+ sssctl.stdout.close()
+
+ if sssctl.wait() != 0:
+ raise Exception("sssctl failed")
+
+ assert err.find("pam_authenticate for user [user1]: Success") != -1
+
+
@pytest.mark.parametrize('simple_pam_cert_auth', ['proxy_password'], indirect=True)
def test_sc_proxy_password_fallback(simple_pam_cert_auth, env_for_sssctl):
"""
--
2.41.0
Reference in New Issue View Git Blame Copy Permalink