sos/sos-bz2218279-clean-respect-permissions.patch
Jan Jansky 0a59a91eda sos updates to 9.3
Resolves: bz2217943

Signed-off-by: Jan Jansky <jjansky@redhat.com>
2023-07-03 15:07:20 +02:00

94 lines
3.2 KiB
Diff

From cca04c1e1fdc97632cdefdc1d1d7a3dea9cb4aea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pavel Moravec <pmoravec@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2023 11:49:56 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clean] Respect permissions of sanitised files
When copying files we applied a substitution in, we must replace just
original file content (shutil.copyfile) and not also its stat data
(shutil.copy).
Resolves: #3292
Signed-off-by: Pavel Moravec <pmoravec@redhat.com>
---
sos/cleaner/__init__.py | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/sos/cleaner/__init__.py b/sos/cleaner/__init__.py
index feeedf66..fbcaa9c3 100644
--- a/sos/cleaner/__init__.py
+++ b/sos/cleaner/__init__.py
@@ -778,7 +778,7 @@ third party.
% (short_name, err), caller=arc_name)
tfile.seek(0)
if subs:
- shutil.copy(tfile.name, filename)
+ shutil.copyfile(tfile.name, filename)
tfile.close()
_ob_short_name = self.obfuscate_string(short_name.split('/')[-1])
--
2.31.1
From fc1489a621108d3613d3337489a64950e52d77c3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pavel Moravec <pmoravec@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2023 22:57:46 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] [tests] add test for #3292
Add a test that cleaner keeps permissions of a sanitised file
Relevant to: #3292
Signed-off-by: Pavel Moravec <pmoravec@redhat.com>
---
.../basic_function_tests/report_with_mask.py | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tests/cleaner_tests/basic_function_tests/report_with_mask.py b/tests/cleaner_tests/basic_function_tests/report_with_mask.py
index 7c4d3905..baee836a 100644
--- a/tests/cleaner_tests/basic_function_tests/report_with_mask.py
+++ b/tests/cleaner_tests/basic_function_tests/report_with_mask.py
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
from sos_tests import StageOneReportTest, StageTwoReportTest
import re
+from os import stat
class ReportWithMask(StageOneReportTest):
@@ -18,6 +19,17 @@ class ReportWithMask(StageOneReportTest):
"""
sos_cmd = '--mask -o host,networking'
+ hosts_obfuscated = None
+
+ def pre_sos_setup(self):
+ # obfuscate a random word from /etc/hosts and ensure the updated
+ # sanitised file has same permissions (a+r)
+ try:
+ self.hosts_obfuscated = open('/etc/hosts').read().strip('#\n').split()[-1]
+ except (FileNotFoundError, IndexError) as e:
+ self.warning(f"Unable to process /etc/hosts: {e}")
+ if self.hosts_obfuscated:
+ self.sos_cmd += f' --keywords={self.hosts_obfuscated}'
def test_mask_was_run(self):
self.assertOutputContains('Beginning obfuscation')
@@ -53,6 +65,12 @@ class ReportWithMask(StageOneReportTest):
mac = line.strip().split()[1]
assert mac.startswith('53:4f:53'), "Found unobfuscated mac addr %s" % mac
+ def test_perms_unchanged_on_modified_file(self):
+ if self.hosts_obfuscated:
+ imode_orig = stat('/etc/hosts').st_mode
+ imode_obfuscated = stat(self.get_name_in_archive('etc/hosts')).st_mode
+ self.assertEqual(imode_orig, imode_obfuscated)
+
class ReportWithCleanedKeywords(StageOneReportTest):
"""Testing for obfuscated keywords provided by the user
--
2.31.1