rubygem-rspec-mocks/rubygem-rspec-mocks-3.12.0-display_keyword_hashes.patch

110 lines
4.6 KiB
Diff
Raw Permalink Normal View History

From e931e818b577172b89fb4583fc336fbcd25df36b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jean Boussier <jean.boussier@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2022 11:19:47 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Display keyword hashes in in expectation error messages
Ref: https://github.com/vcr/vcr/pull/925
Ref: https://github.com/rspec/rspec-mocks/pull/1394
I spent quite a lot of time figuring this error:
```
2) VCR.turned_on passes options through to .turn_off!
Failure/Error: turn_off!(options)
VCR received :turn_off! with unexpected arguments
expected: ({:ignore_cassettes=>true})
got: ({:ignore_cassettes=>true})
# ./lib/vcr.rb:317:in `turned_on'
# ./spec/lib/vcr_spec.rb:367:in `block (3 levels) in <top (required)>'
```
I quickly suspected it was a keyword argument issue, but it's far from
obvious to everyone, and even when you are familair with the issue
it doesn't tell you what was expected and what was received.
I doubt the way I implemented this is ok, but I think it's worth
opening the discussion
```
2) VCR.turned_on passes options through to .turn_off!
Failure/Error: turn_off!(options)
VCR received :turn_off! with unexpected arguments
expected: ({:ignore_cassettes=>true}) (keyword arguments)
got: ({:ignore_cassettes=>true}) (options hash)
# ./lib/vcr.rb:317:in `turned_on'
# ./spec/lib/vcr_spec.rb:367:in `block (3 levels) in <top (required)>'
```
---
lib/rspec/mocks/error_generator.rb | 11 ++++++++++
spec/rspec/mocks/diffing_spec.rb | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 44 insertions(+)
diff --git a/lib/rspec/mocks/error_generator.rb b/lib/rspec/mocks/error_generator.rb
index 9bf0984f3..42ff35283 100644
--- a/lib/rspec/mocks/error_generator.rb
+++ b/lib/rspec/mocks/error_generator.rb
@@ -268,6 +268,17 @@ def unexpected_arguments_message(expected_args_string, actual_args_string)
def error_message(expectation, args_for_multiple_calls)
expected_args = format_args(expectation.expected_args)
actual_args = format_received_args(args_for_multiple_calls)
+
+ if RSpec::Support::RubyFeatures.distincts_kw_args_from_positional_hash? && expected_args == actual_args
+ expected_hash = expectation.expected_args.last
+ actual_hash = args_for_multiple_calls.last.last
+ if Hash === expected_hash && Hash === actual_hash &&
+ (Hash.ruby2_keywords_hash?(expected_hash) != Hash.ruby2_keywords_hash?(actual_hash))
+ actual_args += Hash.ruby2_keywords_hash?(actual_hash) ? " (keyword arguments)" : " (options hash)"
+ expected_args += Hash.ruby2_keywords_hash?(expected_hash) ? " (keyword arguments)" : " (options hash)"
+ end
+ end
+
message = default_error_message(expectation, expected_args, actual_args)
if args_for_multiple_calls.one?
diff --git a/spec/rspec/mocks/diffing_spec.rb b/spec/rspec/mocks/diffing_spec.rb
index 3b1f91edf..e17aabcd3 100644
--- a/spec/rspec/mocks/diffing_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/rspec/mocks/diffing_spec.rb
@@ -83,6 +83,39 @@
end
end
+ if RSpec::Support::RubyFeatures.distincts_kw_args_from_positional_hash?
+ eval <<-'RUBY', nil, __FILE__, __LINE__ + 1
+ it "print a diff when keyword argument were expected but got an option hash (using splat)" do
+ with_unfulfilled_double do |d|
+ expect(d).to receive(:foo).with(**expected_hash)
+ expect {
+ d.foo(expected_hash)
+ }.to fail_with(
+ "#<Double \"double\"> received :foo with unexpected arguments\n" \
+ " expected: ({:baz=>:quz, :foo=>:bar}) (keyword arguments)\n" \
+ " got: ({:baz=>:quz, :foo=>:bar}) (options hash)"
+ )
+ end
+ end
+ RUBY
+
+ eval <<-'RUBY', nil, __FILE__, __LINE__ + 1
+ it "print a diff when keyword argument were expected but got an option hash (literal)" do
+ with_unfulfilled_double do |d|
+ expect(d).to receive(:foo).with(:positional, keyword: 1)
+ expect {
+ options = { keyword: 1 }
+ d.foo(:positional, options)
+ }.to fail_with(
+ "#<Double \"double\"> received :foo with unexpected arguments\n" \
+ " expected: (:positional, {:keyword=>1}) (keyword arguments)\n" \
+ " got: (:positional, {:keyword=>1}) (options hash)"
+ )
+ end
+ end
+ RUBY
+ end
+
if RUBY_VERSION.to_f < 1.9
# Ruby 1.8 hashes are not ordered, but `#inspect` on a particular unchanged
# hash instance should return consistent output. However, on Travis that does